Hydrology and Earth System Sciences www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net 1027-5606 1607-7938 10 5 2006 10.5194/hess-10-663-2006 http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/10/663/2006/ http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/10/663/2006/hess-10-663-2006.html http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/10/663/2006/hess-10-663-2006.pdf 663 677 2006-09-27 A new method for determination of most likely landslide initiation points and the evaluation of digital terrain model scale in terrain stability mapping P. Tarolli paolo.tarolli@unipd.it D. G. Tarboton Department of Land and Agroforest Environments, AGRIPOLIS, University of Padova, 35020 Legnaro, Padova, Italy Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Utah State University, Logan, Utah, USA This paper introduces a new approach for determining the most likely initiation points for landslides from potential instability mapped using a terrain stability model. This approach identifies the location with critical stability index from a terrain stability model on each downslope path from ridge to valley. Any measure of terrain stability may be used with this approach, which here is illustrated using results from SINMAP, and from simply taking slope as an index of potential instability. The relative density of most likely landslide initiation points within and outside mapped landslide scars provides a way to evaluate the effectiveness of a terrain stability measure, even when mapped landslide scars include run out zones, rather than just initiation locations. This relative density was used to evaluate the utility of high resolution terrain data derived from airborne laser altimetry (LIDAR) for a small basin located in the Northeastern Region of Italy. Digital Terrain Models were derived from the LIDAR data for a range of grid cell sizes (from 2 to 50 m). We found appreciable differences between the density of most likely landslide initiation points within and outside mapped landslides with ratios as large as three or more with the highest ratios for a digital terrain model grid cell size of 10 m. This leads to two conclusions: (1) The relative density from a most likely landslide initiation point approach is useful for quantifying the effectiveness of a terrain stability map when mapped landslides do not or can not differentiate between initiation, runout, and depositional areas; and (2) in this study area, where landslides occurred in complexes that were sometimes more than 100 m wide, a digital terrain model scale of 10 m is optimal. Digital terrain model scales larger than 10 m result in loss of resolution that degrades the results, while for digital terrain model scales smaller than 10 m the physical processes responsible for triggering landslides are obscured by smaller scale terrain variability. Ackermann, F.: Airborne laser scanning – present status and future expectations, IS-PRN Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 54, 64–67, 1999. Barling, R. D., Moore, I. D., and Grayson, R. B.: A Quasi-Dynamic Wetness Index for Characterizing the Spatial Distribution of Zones of Surface Saturation and Soil Water Content, Water Resour. Res., 30(4), 1029–1044, 1994. Begueria, S.: Validation and evaluation of predictive models in hazard assessment and risk management, Natural Hazards, 37, 315–329, 2006. Beven, K. J., Lamb, R., Quinn, P. F., Romanowicz, R., and Freer, J.: TOPMODEL, in: Computer Models of Watershed Hydrology, edited by: Singh, V. P., Water Resour. Publ., 627–668, 1995. Borga, M., Dalla Fontana, G., and Cazorzi, F.: Analysis of topographic and climatic control on rainfall-triggered shallow landsliding using a quasi-dynamic wetness index, J. Hydrol., 268(1–4), 56–71, 2002. Borga, M., Dalla Fontana, G., Gregoretti, C., and Marchi, L.: Assessment of shallow landsliding by using a physically based model of hillslope stability, Hydrol. Processes, 16(14), 2833–2851, 2002. Brenning, A.: Spatial Prediction Models for Landslide Hazards: Review, Comparison and Evaluation, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 5, 853–862, 2005. Briese, C.: Breakline Modelling from Airborne Laser Scanner Data, PHD Thesis, Institute of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Vienna University of Technology, 2004. Chinnayakanahalli, K.: An Objective Method for the Intercomparison of Terrain Stability Models and Incorporation of Parameter Uncertainty, MS Thesis, Civil and Environmental Engineering, Utah State University, 2004. Chung, C. J. and Fabbri, A. G.: Validation of spatial prediction models for landslide hazard mapping", Natural Hazards, 30, 451–472, 2003. Chung, C. J. and Fabbri, A. G.: Systematic procedures of landslide-hazard mapping for risk assessment using spatial prediction models, in: Landslide Hazard and Risk, edited by: Glade, T., Anderson, M. G., and Crozier, M. J., John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Chichester, England, 139–174, 2005. Dietrich, W. E., Bellugi, D., and de Asua, R. R.: Validation of Shallow Landslide Model, Shalstab, for Forest Management, in: Land Use and Watersheds: Human Influence on Hydrology and Geomorphology in Urban and Forest Areas, edited by: Wigmosta, M. S. and Burges, S. J., Water Sci. Appl. 2, Amer. Geoph. Union, 195–227, 2001. Dietrich, W. E., Wilson, C. J., Montgomery, D. R., McKean J., and Bauer, R.: Erosion Thresholds and Land Surface Morphology, Geology, 20, 675–679, 1992. Freer, J., McDonnell, J. J. Beven, K. J., Peters, N. E., Burns, D. A., Hooper, R. P., Aulenbach, B., and Kendall, C.: The Role of Bedrock Topography on Subsurface Storm Flow, Water Resour. Res., 38(12), 1269, doi:10.1029/2001WR000872, 2002. Hammond, C., Hall, D., Miller, S., and Swetik, P.: Level I Stability Analysis (LISA) Documentation for Version 2.0, General Technical Report INT-285, USDA Forest Service Intermountain Research Station, 1992. Hutchinson, M. F.: Calculation of hydrologically sound digital elevation models, Third International Symposium on Spatial Data Handling, Sydney, Columbus, Ohio, International Geographical Union, 1988. Hutchinson, M. F.: A new procedure for gridding elevation and stream line data with automatic removal of spurious pits, J. Hydrol., 106, 211–232, 1989. Iverson, R. M.: Landslide Triggering by Rain Infiltration, Water Resour. Res., 36(7), 1897–1910, 2000. Kraus, K. and Pfeifer, N.: Advanced DTM generation from LIDAR data, International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, XXXIV-3/W4, 23–35, 2001. McKean, J. and Roering, J.: Objective landslide detection and surface morphology mapping using high-resolution airborne laser altimetry, Geomorphology, 57, 331–351, 2004. Montgomery, D. R. and Dietrich, W. E.: A physically based model for the topographic control on shallow landsliding, Water Resour. Res., 30(4), 1153–1171, 1994. Pack, R. T., Tarboton, D. G., and Goodwin, C. N.: The SINMAP Approach to Terrain Stability Mapping, 8th Congress of the International Association of Engineering Geology, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, 1998. Tarboton, D. G.: A new method for the determination of flow directions and upslope areas in grid digital elevation models, Water Resour. Res., 33, 309–319, 1997. Wu, W. and Sidle, R. C.: A Distributed Slope Stability Model for Steep Forested Watersheds, Water Resour. Res., 31(8), 2097–2110, 1995.