<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article SYSTEM "http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/inc/hess/copernicus.dtd">
<article language="en">
	<journal>
		<journal_title>Hydrology and Earth System Sciences</journal_title>
		<journal_url>www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net</journal_url>
		<issn>1027-5606</issn>
		<eissn>1607-7938</eissn>
		<volume_number>10</volume_number>
		<issue_number>6</issue_number>
		<publication_year>2006</publication_year>
	</journal>
	<doi>10.5194/hess-10-925-2006</doi>
	<article_url>http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/10/925/2006/</article_url>
	<abstract_html>http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/10/925/2006/hess-10-925-2006.html</abstract_html>
	<fulltext_pdf>http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/10/925/2006/hess-10-925-2006.pdf</fulltext_pdf>
	<start_page>925</start_page>
	<end_page>936</end_page>
	<publication_date>2006-12-06</publication_date>
	<article_title content_type="html">Curvature distribution within hillslopes and catchments and its effect on the hydrological response</article_title>
	<authors>
		<author numeration="1" affiliations="1">
			<name>P. W. Bogaart</name>
			<email>patrick.bogaart@wur.nl</email>
		</author>
		<author numeration="2" affiliations="1,2">
			<name>P. A. Troch</name>
		</author>
	</authors>
	<affiliations>
		<affiliation numeration="1" content_type="html">Hydrology and Quantitative Water Management Group, Wageningen University, The Netherlands</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="2" content_type="html">now at: Department of Hydrology and Water Resources, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA</affiliation>
	</affiliations>
	<abstract content_type="html">Topographic convergence and divergence are first order controls on
the hillslope and catchment hydrological response, as evidenced by
similarity parameter analyses. Hydrological models often do not
take convergence as measured by contour curvature directly into
account; instead they use comparable measures like the topographic
index, or the hillslope width function. This paper focuses on the
question how hillslope width functions and contour curvature are
related within the Plynlimon catchments, Wales. It is shown that
the total width function of all hillslopes combined suggest that
the catchments are divergent in overall shape, which is in
contrast to the perception that catchments should be overall
convergent. This so-called convergence paradox is explained by the
effect of skewed curvature distributions and extreme curvatures
near the channel network. The hillslope-storage Bossiness (hsB)
model is used to asses the effect of within-hillslope convergence
variability on the hydrological response. It is concluded that
this effect is small, even when the soil saturation threshold is
exceeded. Also described in this paper is a novel algorithm to
compute flow path lengths on hillslopes towards the drainage
network, using the multidirectional flow redistribution method.</abstract>
	<references>
		<reference numeration="1" content_type="text"> Aryal, S K., O’Loughlin, E M., and Mein, R G.: A Similarity approach to predict landscape saturation in catchments, Water Resour. Res., 38, 1208, doi:10.1029/2001WR000864, 2002. </reference>
		<reference numeration="2" content_type="text"> Aryal, S K., O&apos;Loughlin, E M., and Mein, R G.: A similarity approach to determine response times to steady-state saturation in landscapes, Adv.\ Water Resour., 28, 99–&amp;ndash;115, 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="3" content_type="text"> Berne, A., Uijlenhoet, R., and Troch, P A.: Similarity analysis of subsurface flow response of hillslopes with complex geometry, Water Resour. Res., 41, W09410, doi:10.1029/2004WR003629, 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="4" content_type="text"> Beven, K.: TOPMODEL: A critique, Hydrol. Process., 11, 1069&amp;ndash;1085, 1997. </reference>
		<reference numeration="5" content_type="text"> Beven, K J. and Kirkby, M J.: A physically based, variable contributing area model of basin hydrology, Hydrol. Sci. B., 24, 43&amp;ndash;69, 1979. </reference>
		<reference numeration="6" content_type="text"> Brandt, C., Robinson, M., and Finch, J W.: Anatomy of a catchment: the relation of physical attributes of the Plynlimon catchments to variations in hydrology and water status, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 8, 345&amp;ndash;354, 2004. </reference>
		<reference numeration="7" content_type="text"> Canfield, H E. and Goodrich, D C.: The impact of parameter lumping and geometric simplification in modelling runoff and erosion in the shrublands of southeast Arizona, Hydrol. Process., 20, 17&amp;ndash;35, doi:10.1002/hyp.5896, 2006. </reference>
		<reference numeration="8" content_type="text"> Erskine, R. H. T. R G., Ramirez, J A., and MacDonald, L H.: Comparison of grid-based algorithms for computing upslope contributing area, Water Resour. Res., 42, W09416, doi:10.1029/2005WR004648, 2006. </reference>
		<reference numeration="9" content_type="text"> Fan, Y. and Bras, R L.: Analytical solutions to hillslope subsurface storm flow and saturation overland flow, Water Resour. Res., 34, 921&amp;ndash;927, 1998. </reference>
		<reference numeration="10" content_type="text"> GĂĽntner, A., Seibert, J., and Uhlenbrook, S.: Modeling spatial patterns of saturated areas: An evaluation of different terrain indices, Water Resour. Res., 40, W05114, doi:10.1029/2003WR002864, 2004. </reference>
		<reference numeration="11" content_type="text"> IjjĂˇsz-VĂˇsquez, E J. and Bras, R L.: Scaling regimes of local slope versus contributing area in digital elevation models, Geomorphology, 12, 299&amp;ndash;311, 1995. </reference>
		<reference numeration="12" content_type="text"> Kirkby, M J.: TOPMODEL: A personal view, Hydrol. Process., 11, 1087&amp;ndash;1097, 1997. </reference>
		<reference numeration="13" content_type="text"> Martin, Y.: Modelling hillslope evolution: linear and nonlinear transport relations, Geomorphology, 34, 1&amp;ndash;21, 2000. </reference>
		<reference numeration="14" content_type="text"> McGuire, K J., McDonnell, J J., Weiler, M., Kendall, C., McGlynn, B L., Welker, J M., and Seibert, J.: The role of topography on catchment-scale water residence time, Water Resour. Res., 41, W05002, doi:10.1029/2004WR003657, 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="15" content_type="text"> Mitasova, H. and Hoffierka, J.: Interpolation by regularized spline with tension: II. Application to terrain modelling and surface geometry analysis, Math. Geol., 25, 657&amp;ndash;669, 1993. </reference>
		<reference numeration="16" content_type="text"> O&apos;Callaghan, J F. and Mark, D M.: The extractionof drainage networks from digital elevation data, Comput. Vision Graphics Image Process., 28, 328&amp;ndash;344, 1984. </reference>
		<reference numeration="17" content_type="text"> O&apos;Loughlin, E M.: Prediction of Surface Saturation Zones in Natural Catchments by Topographic Analysis, Water Resour. Res., 22, 794&amp;ndash;804, 1986. </reference>
		<reference numeration="18" content_type="text"> Pan, F., Peters-Lidard, C D., Sale, M J., and King, A W.: A comparison of geographical information systems–based algorithms for computing the TOPMODEL topographic index, Water Resour. Res., 40, W06303, doi:10.1029/2004WR003069, 2004. </reference>
		<reference numeration="19" content_type="text"> Quinn, P., Beven, K., Chevallier, P., and Planchon, O.: The prediction of hillslope flow paths for distributed hydrological modelling using digital terrain models, Hydrol. Process., 5, 59&amp;ndash;79, 1991. </reference>
		<reference numeration="20" content_type="text"> Quinn, P F., Beven, K J., and Lamb, R.: The $\ln(a/\tan\beta)$ index: how to calculate it and how to use it within the TOPMODEL framework, Hydrol.\ Process., 9, 161&amp;ndash;182, 1995. </reference>
		<reference numeration="21" content_type="text"> Roering, J J., Kirchner, J W., and Dietrich, W E.: Evidence for nonlinear, diffusive sediment transport on hillslopes and implications for landscape morphology, Water Resour. Res., 35, 853&amp;ndash;870, 1999. </reference>
		<reference numeration="22" content_type="text"> Rosenbloom, N A. and Anderson, R S.: Hillslope and channel evolution in a marine terraced landscape, Santa Cruz, California, J. Geophys. Res., 99B, 14 013&amp;ndash;14 029, 1994. </reference>
		<reference numeration="23" content_type="text"> Schmidt, F. and Persson, A.: Comparison of DEM data capture and topographic wetness indices, Precis. Agric., 4, 179–&amp;ndash;192, 2003. </reference>
		<reference numeration="24" content_type="text"> Schmidt, J., Evans, I S., and Brinkmann, J.: Comparison of polynomial models for land surface curvature calculation, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci., 17, 797&amp;ndash;814, 2003. </reference>
		<reference numeration="25" content_type="text"> Sivapalan, M., Wood, E F., and Beven, K J.: On Hydrologic Similarity 3. A Dimensionless Flood Frequency Model Using a Generalized Geomorphologic Unit Hydrograph and Partial Area Runoff Generation, Water Resour. Res., 26, 43&amp;ndash;58, 1990. </reference>
		<reference numeration="26" content_type="text"> Smith, R E., Goodrich, D C., Woolhiser, D A., and Unkrich, C L.: KINEROS &amp;ndash; a kinematic runoff and erosion model, in: Computer Models of Watershed Hydrology, edited by: Singh, V J., Water Resour. Publ., pp 697&amp;ndash;–732, 1995. </reference>
		<reference numeration="27" content_type="text"> Smith, T R. and Bretherton, F P.: Stability and the Conservation of Mass in Drainage Basin Evolution, Water Resour. Res., 8, 1506&amp;ndash;1529, 1972. </reference>
		<reference numeration="28" content_type="text"> Smith, T R., Birnir, B., and Merchant, G E.: Towards an elementary theory of drainage basin evolution: I. The theoretical basis, Comput. Geosci., 23, 811&amp;ndash;822, doi:10.1016/S0098-3004(97)00068-X, 1997. </reference>
		<reference numeration="29" content_type="text"> Stock, J. and Dietrich, W E.: Valley incision by debris flows: Evidence of a topographic signature, Water Resour. Res., 39, 1089, doi:10.1029/2001WR001057, 2003. </reference>
		<reference numeration="30" content_type="text"> Tarboton, D G.: A new method for the determination of flow directions and upslope areas in grid digital elevation models, Water Resour. Res., 33, 309&amp;ndash;319, 1997. </reference>
		<reference numeration="31" content_type="text"> Tarboton, D G., Bras, R L., and Rodriguez-Iturbe, I.: On the extraction of channel networks from digital elevation data, Hydrol. Process., 5, 81–&amp;ndash;100, 1991. </reference>
		<reference numeration="32" content_type="text"> Tarboton, D G., Bras, R L., and Rodriguez-Iturbe, I.: A physical basis for drainage density, Geomorphology, 5, 59&amp;ndash;76, 1992. </reference>
		<reference numeration="33" content_type="text"> Troch, P., van Loon, E., and Hilberts, A.: Analytical solutions to a hillslope-storage kinematic wave equation for subsurface flow, Adv. Water Resour., 25, 637–&amp;ndash;649, 2002. </reference>
		<reference numeration="34" content_type="text"> Troch, P A., Smith, J A., Wood, E F., and de~Troch, F P.: Hydrologic controls of large floods in a small basin: central Appalachian case study, J. Hydrol., 156, 285&amp;ndash;309, 1994. </reference>
		<reference numeration="35" content_type="text"> Troch, P A., Paniconi, C., and van Loon, E E.: Hillslope-storage Boussinesq model for subsurface flow and variable source areas along complex hillslopes: 1. Formulation and characteristic response, Water Resour. Res., 39, 1316, doi:10.1029/2002WR001728, 2003. </reference>
		<reference numeration="36" content_type="text"> Tucker, G E. and Bras, R L.: Hillslope processes, drainage density, and landscape morphology, Water Resour. Res., 34, 2751&amp;ndash;2764, 1998. </reference>
		<reference numeration="37" content_type="text"> Woolhiser, D., Smith, R., and Goodrich, D C.: A kinematic runoff and erosion model: documentation and user manual, Report~77, Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, 1990. </reference>
	</references>
</article>

