<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article SYSTEM "http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/inc/hess/copernicus.dtd">
<article language="en">
	<journal>
		<journal_title>Hydrology and Earth System Sciences</journal_title>
		<journal_url>www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net</journal_url>
		<issn>1027-5606</issn>
		<eissn>1607-7938</eissn>
		<volume_number>10</volume_number>
		<issue_number>6</issue_number>
		<publication_year>2006</publication_year>
	</journal>
	<doi>10.5194/hess-10-957-2006</doi>
	<article_url>http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/10/957/2006/</article_url>
	<abstract_html>http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/10/957/2006/hess-10-957-2006.html</abstract_html>
	<fulltext_pdf>http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/10/957/2006/hess-10-957-2006.pdf</fulltext_pdf>
	<start_page>957</start_page>
	<end_page>965</end_page>
	<publication_date>2006-12-14</publication_date>
	<article_title content_type="html">Optimal estimator for assessing landslide model performance</article_title>
	<authors>
		<author numeration="1" affiliations="1">
			<name>J. C. Huang</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="2" affiliations="1">
			<name>S. J. Kao</name>
			<email>sjkao@gate.sinica.edu.tw</email>
		</author>
	</authors>
	<affiliations>
		<affiliation numeration="1" content_type="html">Research Center for Environmental Changes, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan</affiliation>
	</affiliations>
	<abstract content_type="html">The commonly used success rate (SR) in evaluating cell-based landslide model
performance is based on the ratio of successfully predicted landslide sites
over total actual landslide sites without considering the performance in
predicting stable cells. We proposed a modified SR (MSR), in which the
performance of stable cell prediction is included. The advantage of MSR is
to avoid over- and under-prediction while upholding the stable sensitivity
throughout all simulated cases. Stochastic analyses are conducted by using
artificial landslide maps and simulations with a full range of performances
(from worst to perfect) in both stable and unstable cell predictions.
Stochastic analyses reveal mathematical responses of estimators to various
model results in calculating performance. The Kappa method, which is
commonly used for satellite image analysis, is improper for landslide
modeling giving inconsistent performance when landslide coverage changes. To
examine differences among SR and MSR in real model application, we applied
the SHALSTAB model onto a mountainous watershed in Taiwan. Case study shows
that stable and unstable cell predictions are inter-exclusive in SHALSTAB
model. The optimal estimator should compromise landslide over- and
under-prediction. According to our 4000 simulations, the best simulation
generated by MSR projects 83 hits over 131 actual landslide sites while the
unstable cells cover only 16% of the studied watershed. By contrast,
despite the fact that the best simulation deduced from SR projects 120 hits
over 131 actual landslide sites, this high performance is only obtained when
unstable cells cover an incredibly high landslide cover (~75%) of
the entire watershed exhibiting a significant landslide over-prediction.</abstract>
	<references>
		<reference numeration="1" content_type="text"> Ayalew, L. and Yamagishi, H.: The application of GIS-based logistic regression for landslide susceptibility mapping in the Kakuda-Yahiko Mountains, Central Japan, Geomorphology, 65, 15&amp;ndash;31, 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="2" content_type="text"> Borga, M., Fontana, G. D., and Marchi, L.: Shallow landslide hazard assessment using a physically based model and digital elevation data, Environ. Geol., 32, 81&amp;ndash;88, 1998. </reference>
		<reference numeration="3" content_type="text"> Borga, M., Dalla Fontana, G., Gregoretti, C., and Marchi, L.: Assessment of shallow landsliding by using a physically based model of hillslope stability, Hydrol. Processes, 16, 2833&amp;ndash;2851, 2002. </reference>
		<reference numeration="4" content_type="text"> Carrara, A., Cardinali, M., Guzzetti, F., and Reichenbach, P.: GIS technology in mapping landslide hazard, in: Geographical Information Systems in Assessing Natural Hazards, edited by: Carrara, A. and Guzetti, F., Kluwer, Dordrecht, Netherlands, pp. 135&amp;ndash;175, 1995. </reference>
		<reference numeration="5" content_type="text"> Cheng, Y. L.: Study on Risk Analysis of Slopes Consideration Spatial Variability &amp;ndash; A Case Study at the Lisan, Master Thesis, National Chunghsing University, 2003. </reference>
		<reference numeration="6" content_type="text"> Casadei, M., Dietrich, W. E., and Miller, N. L.: Testing a model for predicting the timing and location of shallow landslide initiation in soil-mantled landscapes, Earth Surf. Processes Landf., 28, 925&amp;ndash;950, 2003. </reference>
		<reference numeration="7" content_type="text"> Dietrich, W. E., Reiss, R., Hsu, M. L., and Montgomery, D. R.: A process-based model for colluvial soil depth and shallow landsliding using digital elevation data, Hydrol. Processes, 9, 383&amp;ndash;400, 1995. </reference>
		<reference numeration="8" content_type="text"> Dietrich, W. E. and Montgomery, D. R.: SHALSTAB: A digital terrain model for mapping shallow landslide potential, http://socrates.berkeley.edu/~geomorph/shalstab, 1998. </reference>
		<reference numeration="9" content_type="text"> Duan, J. and Grant, G. E.: Shallow landslide delineation for steep forest watersheds based on topographic attributes and probability analysis, in: Terrain Analysis &amp;ndash; Principles and Applications, edited by: Wilson, J. P. and Gallant, J. C., John Wiley &amp; Sons, New York, pp. 311&amp;ndash;329, 2000. </reference>
		<reference numeration="10" content_type="text"> Hsu, M. L.: A Grid-Based Model for Predicting Shallow Landslides: A Case Study in Linkou, Taipei. Eos, Transaction, American Geophysical Union, 79(24), W25, 1998. </reference>
		<reference numeration="11" content_type="text"> Huang, J. C., Kao S. J., Hsu, M. L., and Lin, J. C.: Stochastic procedure to extract and to integrate landslide susceptibility maps: An example of mountainous watershed in Taiwan, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 6, 803&amp;ndash;815, 2006. </reference>
		<reference numeration="12" content_type="text"> Industrial Technology Research Institute: The management of Dai-Jia Reservoir Watershed-the 4th technique report, The management committee of Dai-Jia Reservoir (in Chinese), 1998. </reference>
		<reference numeration="13" content_type="text"> Lee, S.: Application and cross-validation of spatial logistic multiple regression for landslide susceptibility analysis, Geosciences, 9(1), 63&amp;ndash;71, 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="14" content_type="text"> Longley, P. A., Goodchild, M. F., and Rhind, D. W.: Geographic Information Systems and Sciences, New York, Wiley, 2001. </reference>
		<reference numeration="15" content_type="text"> Montgomery, D. R. and Dietrich, W. E.: A physically based model for the topographic control on the shallow landsliding, Water Resour. Res., 30, 1153&amp;ndash;1171, 1994. </reference>
		<reference numeration="16" content_type="text"> Pack, R. T., Tarboton, D. G., and Goodwin, C. N.: The SINMAP Approach to Terrain Stability Mapping, Congress of the International Association of Engineering Geology, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, 21&amp;ndash;25 September 1998. </reference>
		<reference numeration="17" content_type="text"> Pack, R. T., Tarboton, D. G., and Goodwin, C. N.: Assessing terrain stability in a GIS using SINMAP, in 15th annual GIS conference, Vancouver, British Columbia, 19&amp;ndash;22 February 2001. </reference>
		<reference numeration="18" content_type="text"> Schuster, R. L. and Krizek, R. J.: Landslide: analysis and control, Transportation Research Board Special Report, 176, 1&amp;ndash;10, 1978. </reference>
		<reference numeration="19" content_type="text"> Sidle, R. C., Pearce, A. J., and O&apos;Loughlin, C. L.: Hillslope stability and landuse, Washington, DC, American Geophysical Union, Water Resour. Monogr., 11, 140 pp, 1985. </reference>
		<reference numeration="20" content_type="text"> Viera, A. J. and Garrett, J. M.: Understanding interobserver agreement: the Kappa statistics, Fam. Med., 37(5), 360&amp;ndash;363, 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="21" content_type="text"> Zhou, Q. and Liu, X.: Error assessment of grid-based flow routing algorithms used in hydrological models, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci., 16(8), 819&amp;ndash;842, 2002. </reference>
		<reference numeration="22" content_type="text"> Zhou, G., Esaki, T., Mitani, Y., Xie, M., and Mori, J.: Spatial probabilistic modeling of slope failure using an integrated GIS Monte Carlo simulation approach, Eng. Geol., 68, 373&amp;ndash;386, 2003. </reference>
	</references>
</article>

