Hydrology and Earth System Sciences www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net 1027-5606 1607-7938 11 4 2007 10.5194/hess-11-1417-2007 http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/11/1417/2007/ http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/11/1417/2007/hess-11-1417-2007.html http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/11/1417/2007/hess-11-1417-2007.pdf 1417 1434 2007-07-09 A multimodel ensemble approach to assessment of climate change impacts on the hydrology and water resources of the Colorado River Basin N. S. Christensen D. P. Lettenmaier dennisl@u.washington.edu Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Box 352700, University of Washington, Seattle WA 98195, USA Implications of 21st century climate change on the hydrology and water resources of the Colorado River Basin were assessed using a multimodel ensemble approach in which downscaled and bias corrected output from 11 General Circulation Models (GCMs) was used to drive macroscale hydrology and water resources models. Downscaled climate scenarios (ensembles) were used as forcings to the Variable Infiltration Capacity (VIC) macroscale hydrology model, which in turn forced the Colorado River Reservoir Model (CRMM). Ensembles of downscaled precipitation and temperature, and derived streamflows and reservoir system performance were assessed through comparison with current climate simulations for the 1950–1999 historical period. For each of the 11 GCMs, two emissions scenarios (IPCC SRES A2 and B1, corresponding to relatively unconstrained growth in emissions, and elimination of global emissions increases by 2100) were represented. Results for the A2 and B1 climate scenarios were divided into three periods: 2010–2039, 2040–2069, and 2070–2099. The mean temperature change averaged over the 11 ensembles for the Colorado basin for the A2 emission scenario ranged from 1.2 to 4.4°C for periods 1–3, and for the B1 scenario from 1.3 to 2.7°C. Precipitation changes were modest, with ensemble mean changes ranging from −1 to −2% for the A2 scenario, and from +1 to −1% for the B1 scenario. An analysis of seasonal precipitation patterns showed that most GCMs had modest reductions in summer precipitation and increases in winter precipitation. Derived April 1 snow water equivalent declined for all ensemble members and time periods, with maximum (ensemble mean) reductions of 38% for the A2 scenario in period 3. Runoff changes were mostly the result of a dominance of increased evapotranspiration over the seasonal precipitation shifts, with ensemble mean runoff changes of −1, −6, and −11% for the A2 ensembles, and 0, −7, and −8% for the B1 ensembles. These hydrological changes were reflected in reservoir system performance. Average total basin reservoir storage and average hydropower production generally declined, however there was a large range across the ensembles. Releases from Glen Canyon Dam to the Lower Basin were reduced for all periods and both emissions scenarios in the ensemble mean. The fraction of years in which shortages occurred increased by approximately 20% by period 3 for both emissions scenarios. Brown, R. D.: Northern hemisphere snow cover variability and change, 1915–97, J. Climate, 13, 2339–2355, 2000. Christensen, N. S., Wood, A. W., Voisin, N., Lettenmaier, D. P., and Palmer, R. N.: Effects of climate change on the hydrology and water resources of the Colorado River Basin, Climatic Change, 62, 337–363, 2004. Delworth, T. L., Broccoli, A. J., Rosati, A., Stouffer, R. J., Balaji, V., Beesley, J. A., Cooke, W. F., Dixon, K. W., Dunne, J., Dunne, K. A., Durachta, J. W., Findell, K. L., Ginoux, P., Gnanadesikan, A., Gordon, C. T., Griffies, S. M., Gudgel, R., Harrison, M. J., Held, I. M., Hemler, R. S., Horowitz, L. W., Klein, S. A., Knutson, T. R., Kushner, P. J., Langenhorst, A. R., Lee, H. C., Lin, S. J., Lu, J., Malyshev, S. L., Milly, P. C. D., Ramaswamy, V., Russell, J., Schwarzkopf, M. D., Shevliakova, E., Sirutis, J. J., Spelman, M. J., Stern, W. F., Winton, M., Wittenberg, A. T., Wyman, B., Zeng, F., and Zhang, R.: GFDL's CM2 global coupled climate models. Part I: Formulation and simulation characteristics, J. Climate, 19, 643–674, 2006. Diansky, N. A. and Volodin, E. M.: Simulation of present-day climate with a coupled Atmosphere-ocean general circulation model, Izv. Atmos. Ocean. Phys. (Engl. Transl.), 38, 732–747, 2002. Gleick, P. H.: Regional hydrologic consequences of increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide and other trace gases, Climatic Change, 10, 10 137–10 161, 1987. Gordon, C., Cooper, C., Senior, C. A., Banks, H. T., Gregory, J. M., Johns, T. C., Mitchell, J. F. B., and Wood, R. A.: The simulation of SST, sea ice extents and ocean heat transports in a version of the Hadley Centre coupled model without flux adjustments, Clim. Dynam., 16, 147–168, 2000. Gordon, H. B., Rotstayn, L. D., McGregor, J. L., Dix, M. R., Kowalczyk, E.A., O'Farrell, S. P., Waterman, L. J., Hirst, A. C., Wilson, S. G., Collier, M. A., Watterson, I. G., and Elliott, T. I.: The CSIRO Mk3 Climate System Model, CSIRO Atmospheric Research Technical Paper No 60, CSIRO. Division of Atmospheric Research, Victoria, Australia, 130~pp., 2002. Hamlet, A. F. and Lettenmaier, D. P.: Effects of climate change on hydrology and water resources of the Columbia River Basin, J. Amer. W. Resourc. Assn., 35, 1597–1623, 1999. Hundley Jr., N.: Water in the West, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA, 1975. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC): Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Bias, edited by: Houghton, J. T. and Ding, Y., Cambridge, Cambridge UP, 2001. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC): Special report on emission scenarios, Cambridge University Press, New York, 2000. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC): Climate change 2007: Impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability: Working Group II contribution to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Fourth Assessment Report, Summary for Policymakers, IPCC Secretariat, Geneva, 22 p., 2007. IPSL: The new IPSL climate system model: IPSL-CM4', Institut Pierre Simon Laplace des Sciences de l'Environnement Global, Paris, France, 73 pp., 2005. Jungclaus, J. H., Botzet, M., Haak, H., Keenlyside, N., Luo, J.-J., Latif, M., Marotzke, J., Mikolajewicz, U., and Roeckner, E.: Ocean circulation and tropical variability in the AOGCM ECHAM5/MPI-OM, J. Climate 19, 3952–3972, 2006. K-1 model developers: K-1 coupled model (MIROC) description, K-1 technical report, 1, edited by: Hasumi, H. and Emori, S., Center for Climate System Research, University of Tokyo, 34~pp., 2004. Lettenmaier, D. P., Brettman, K. L., Vail, L. W., Yabusaki, S. B., and Scott, M. J.: Sensitivity of Pacific Northwest water resources to global warming" Northwest Environ. J., 8, 265–283, 1992. Liang, X., Lettenmaier, D. P., Wood, E. F., and Burges, S. J.: A simple hydrologically based model of land surface water and energy fluxes for general circulation models, J. Geophys. Res., 99(D7), 14 415–14 428, 1994. Loaiciga, H. A., Valdes, J. B., Vogel, R., Garvey, J., and Schwarz, H.: Global warming and the hydrologic cycle, J. Hydrol., 174, 83–127, 1996. Maurer, E. P., Lettenmaier, D. P., and Roads, J. O.: Water balance of the Mississippi River Basin from a macroscale hydrology model and NCEP/NCAR reanalysis, EOS, Transactions of the American Geophysical Union, 80(46), F409–410, 1999. Maurer, E. P., Wood, A. W., Adam, J. C., Lettenmaier, D. P., and Nijssen, B.: A long-term hydrologically-based data set of land surface fluxes and states for the conterminous United States, J. Climate, 15, 3237–3251, 2002. Maurer, E. P.: Uncertainty in hydrologic impacts of climate change in the Sierra Nevada, California under two emissions scenarios, Climatic Change, 82, 309–325, 2007. McCabe, G. J. and Wolock, D. M.: General circulation model simulations of future snowpack in the western United States, J. Amer. Water. Resourc. Assn., 35, 1473–1484, 1999. McCabe, G. J. and Hay, L. E.: Hydrological effects of hypothetical climate change in the East River Basin, Colorado, USA, Hydrol. Sci., 40, 303–317, 1995. Milly, P. C. D., Dunne, K. A., and Vecchia, A. V.: Global patterns of trends in streamflow and water availability in a changing climate, Nature, 438, 347–350, 2005. Nash, L. L. and Gleick, P.: The sensitivity of streamflow in the Colorado basin to climatic changes, J. Hydrol., 125, 221–241, 1991. Nash, L. L. and Gleick, P.: The Colorado River Basin and climate change: The sensitivity of streamflow and water supply to variations in temperature and precipitation, EPA, Policy, Planning and Evaluation, EPA 230-R-93-009, December 1993. Nijssen, B., Lettenmaier, D. P., Liang, X., Wetzel, S. W., and Wood, E. F.: Streamflow simulation for continental-scale river basins, Water Resour. Res., 33, 711–724, 1997. Russell, G. L., Miller, J. R., and Rind, D.: A coupled atmosphere-ocean model for transient climate change studies, Atmos. Ocean, 33, 683–730, 1995. Russell, G. L., Miller, J. R., Rind, D., Ruedy, R. A., Schmidt, G. A., and Sheth, S.: Comparison of model and observed regional temperature changes during the past 40 years, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 14 891–14 898, 2000. Salas-Mélia, D., Chauvin, F., Déqué, M., Douville, H., Gueremy, J. F., Marquet, P., Planton, S., Royer J. F., and Tyteca, S.: Description and validation of the CNRM-CM3 global coupled model, CNRM working note 103, available at: http://www.cnrm.meteo.fr/scenario2004/paper_cm3.pdf, 2005. Schuster, R. J.: Colorado River System: System overview, U.S Bureau of Reclamation, Denver, Colo, 1987. Seager, R., Ting, M., Held, I., Kushnir, Y., Lu, J., Vecchi, G., Huang, H.-P., Harnik, N., Leetmaa, A., Lau, N.-C., Li, C., Velez, J., and Naik, N.: Model projections of an imminent transition to a more arid climate in southwestern North America, Science Express, 316, 1181–1184, doi:10.1126/science.1139601, 2007. Snover, A. K., Hamlet, A. F., and Lettenmaier, D. P.: Climate change scenarios for water planning studies, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 84, 1513–1518, 2003. U.S. Department of Interior (USDOI), Bureau of Reclamation: Colorado River Simulation System: System Overview. USDOI Publication, 1985. U.S. Department of Interior (USDOI), Bureau of Reclamation: Colorado River Interim Surplus Criteria; Final Environmental Impact Statement, Volume 1. USDOI Publication, 2000. Washington, W. M., Weatherly, J. W., Meehl, G. A., Semtner, A. J., Bettge, T. W., Craig, A. P., Strand, W. G., Arblaster, J., Wayland, V. B., James, R., and Zhang, Y.: Parallel climate model (PCM) control and transient simulations, Clim. Dynam., 16, 755–774, 2000. Wilby, R. L, Hay, L. E., and Leavesley, G. H.: A comparison of downscaled and raw GCM output: implications for climate change scenarios in the San Juan River basin, Colorado, J. Hydrol., 225, 67–91, 1999. Wolock, D. M. and McCabe, G. J.: Estimates of runoff using water-balance and atmospheric General Circulation Models, J. Am. Water Resour. As., 35, 1341–1350, 1999. Wood, A. W., Leung, L. R., Sridhar, V., and Lettenmaier, D. P.: Hydrologic implications of dynamical and statistical approaches to downscaling climate model outputs, Climatic Change, 62, 189–216, 2004. Woodhouse, C. A., Gray, S. T., and Meko, D. M.: Updated streamflow reconstructions for the Upper Colorado River Basin, Water Resour. Res., 42, W05415, doi:10.1029/2005WR004455, 2006. Yukimoto, S., Noda, A., Kitoh A., Sugi, M., Kitamura, Y., Hosaka, M., Shibata, K., Maeda, S., and Uchiyama, T.: The New Meteorological Research Institute Coupled GCM (MRI-CGCM2), Model climate and variability, Pap. Meteorol. Geophys., 51, 47–88, 2001.