<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article SYSTEM "http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/inc/hess/copernicus.dtd">
<article language="en">
	<journal>
		<journal_title>Hydrology and Earth System Sciences</journal_title>
		<journal_url>www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net</journal_url>
		<issn>1027-5606</issn>
		<eissn>1607-7938</eissn>
		<volume_number>11</volume_number>
		<issue_number>5</issue_number>
		<publication_year>2007</publication_year>
	</journal>
	<doi>10.5194/hess-11-1645-2007</doi>
	<article_url>http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/11/1645/2007/</article_url>
	<abstract_html>http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/11/1645/2007/hess-11-1645-2007.html</abstract_html>
	<fulltext_pdf>http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/11/1645/2007/hess-11-1645-2007.pdf</fulltext_pdf>
	<start_page>1645</start_page>
	<end_page>1659</end_page>
	<publication_date>2007-10-15</publication_date>
	<article_title content_type="html">A mass conservative and water storage consistent variable parameter  Muskingum-Cunge approach</article_title>
	<authors>
		<author numeration="1" affiliations="1">
			<name>E. Todini</name>
			<email>ezio.todini@unibo.it</email>
		</author>
	</authors>
	<affiliations>
		<affiliation numeration="1" content_type="html">Department of Earth and Geo-Environmental Sciences, University of  Bologna, Italy</affiliation>
	</affiliations>
	<abstract content_type="html">The variable parameter Muskingum-Cunge (MC) flood routing approach, together
with several variants proposed in the literature, does not fully preserve
the mass balance, particularly when dealing with very mild slopes (&amp;lt;10&lt;sup&gt;&amp;minus;3&lt;/sup&gt;). This paper revisits the derivation of the
MC and demonstrates (i) that the loss of mass balance in MC is caused by the
use of time variant parameters which violate the implicit assumption
embedded in the original derivation of the Muskingum scheme, which implies
constant parameters and at the same time (ii) that the parameters estimated
by means of the Cunge approach violate the two basic equations of the
Muskingum formulation. The paper also derives the modifications needed to
allow the MC to fully preserve the mass balance and, at the same time, to
comply with the original Muskingum formulation in terms of water storage.
The properties of the proposed algorithm have been assessed by varying the
cross section, the slope, the roughness, the space and the time integration
steps. The results of all the tests also show that the new algorithm is
always mass conservative. Finally, it is also shown that the proposed
approach closely approaches the full de Saint Venant equation solution, both
in terms of water levels and discharge, when the parabolic approximation
holds.</abstract>
	<references>
		<reference numeration="1" content_type="text"> Bocquillon, C. and Moussa, R.: CMOD: Logiciel de choix de modèles d&apos;ondes diffusantes et leur caractéristique, La Houille Blanche, 5(6), 433&amp;ndash;437 (in French), 1988. </reference>
		<reference numeration="2" content_type="text"> Cappelaere, B.: Accurate Diffusive Wave Routing, J. Hydraulic Eng., ASCE, 123(3),174&amp;ndash;181, 1997. </reference>
		<reference numeration="3" content_type="text"> Chow, V. T.: Handbook of Applied Hydrology, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, 1964. </reference>
		<reference numeration="4" content_type="text"> Chow, V. T., Maidment, D. R., and Mays, L. W.: Applied Hydrology, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, 1988 </reference>
		<reference numeration="5" content_type="text"> Cunge, J. A.: On the subject of a flood propagation computation method (Muskingum method), Delft, The Netherlands, J. Hydr. Res., 7(2), 205&amp;ndash;230, 1969. </reference>
		<reference numeration="6" content_type="text"> Cunge, J.: Volume conservation in variable parameter Muskingum-Cunge method &amp;ndash; Discussion, J. Hydraul. Eng., ASCE, 127(3), 239&amp;ndash;239, 2001. </reference>
		<reference numeration="7" content_type="text"> DHI Water and Environment: MIKE 11, User Guide and Reference Manual, DHI Water &amp; Environment, Horsholm, Denmark, 2000. </reference>
		<reference numeration="8" content_type="text"> Dooge, J. C. I.: Linear Theory of Hydrologic Systems, USDA Tech. Bull. 1468. US Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C., 1973. </reference>
		<reference numeration="9" content_type="text"> Hayami S.: On the propagation of flood waves, Bulletin n. 1, Disaster Prevention Research Institute, Kyoto University, Japa, 1951n. </reference>
		<reference numeration="10" content_type="text"> Kalinin, G. P. and Miljukov, P. I.: Approximate methods for computing unsteady flow movement of water masses. Transactions, Central Forecasting Institute. Issue 66 (in Russian, 1958). </reference>
		<reference numeration="11" content_type="text"> Koussis, A. D.: Comparison of Muskingum method difference scheme Journal of Hydraulic Division, ASCE, 106(5), 925&amp;ndash;929, 1980. </reference>
		<reference numeration="12" content_type="text"> Koussis, A. D.: Accuracy criteria in diffusion routing: a discussion. Journal of Hydraulic Division, ASCE, 109(5), 803&amp;ndash;806, 1983. </reference>
		<reference numeration="13" content_type="text"> Liu Z. and Todini E.: Towards a comprehensive physically based rainfall-runoff model, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 6(5), 859&amp;ndash;881, 2002. </reference>
		<reference numeration="14" content_type="text"> Liu, Z. and Todini, E.: Assessing the TOPKAPI non-linear reservoir cascade approximation by means of a characteristic lines solution, Hydrol. Processes, 19(10), 1983&amp;ndash;2006, 2004. </reference>
		<reference numeration="15" content_type="text"> McCarthy, G. T.: The Unit Hydrograph and Flood Routing. Unpublished manuscript presented at a conference of the North Atlantic Division, U.S. Army, Corps of Engineers, June 24, 1938. </reference>
		<reference numeration="16" content_type="text"> McCarthy, G. T.: Flood Routing, Chap. V of &quot;Flood Control&quot;, The Engineer School, Fort Belvoir, Virginia, pp. 127&amp;ndash;177, 1940. </reference>
		<reference numeration="17" content_type="text"> Nash, J. E.: The form of the instantaneous unit hydrograph. IUGG General Assembly of Toronto, Vol. III &amp;ndash; IAHS Publ., 45, 114&amp;ndash;121, 1958. </reference>
		<reference numeration="18" content_type="text"> Patankar, S. V.: Numerical heat transfer and fluid flow. Hemisphere Publishing Corporation, New York, pp. 197, 1980. </reference>
		<reference numeration="19" content_type="text"> Perumal, M. and Ranga Raju, K. G.: Variable Parameter Stage-Hydrograph Routing Method. I: Theory. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, ASCE, 3(2), 109&amp;ndash;114, 1998a. </reference>
		<reference numeration="20" content_type="text"> Perumal, M. and Ranga Raju, K. G.: Variable Parameter Stage-Hydrograph Routing Method. I: Theory, J. Hydrol. Eng., ASCE, 3(2), 115&amp;ndash;121, 1998b. </reference>
		<reference numeration="21" content_type="text"> Perumal, M., O&apos;Connell, P. E., and Ranga Raju, K. G.: Field Applications of a Variable-Parameter Muskingum Method, J. Hydrol. Eng., ASCE, 6(3), 196&amp;ndash;207, 2001 </reference>
		<reference numeration="22" content_type="text"> Ponce, V. M. and Chaganti, P. V.: Variable-parameter Muskingum-Cunge revisited, J. Hydrol., 162(3&amp;ndash;4), 433&amp;ndash;439, 1994. </reference>
		<reference numeration="23" content_type="text"> Ponce, V. M. and Lugo, A.: Modeling looped ratings in Muskingum-Cunge routing, J. Hydrol. Eng., ASCE, 6(2), 119&amp;ndash;124, 2001. </reference>
		<reference numeration="24" content_type="text"> Ponce, V. M. and Yevjevich, V.: Muskingum-Cunge method with variable parameters, J. Hydraulic Division, ASCE, 104(12), 1663&amp;ndash;1667, 1978. </reference>
		<reference numeration="25" content_type="text"> Price, R. K.: Variable parameter diffusion method for flood routing. Rep. N.INT. 115, Hydr. Res. Station, Wallingford. UK, 1973. </reference>
		<reference numeration="26" content_type="text"> Stelling, G. S. and Duinmeijer, S. P. A.: A staggered conservative scheme for every Froude number in rapidly varied shallow water flows, Int. J. Numer. Meth. Fluids, 43, 1329&amp;ndash;1354, 2003. </reference>
		<reference numeration="27" content_type="text"> Stelling, G. S and Verwey, A.: Numerical Flood Simulation, in Encyclopedia of Hydrological Sciences, John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd, 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="28" content_type="text"> Szél S. and Gáspár C.: On the negative weighting factors in Muskingum-Cunge scheme, J. Hydraulic Res., 38(4), 299&amp;ndash;306, 2000. </reference>
		<reference numeration="29" content_type="text"> Tang, X., Knight, D. W. and Samuels, P. G.: Volume conservation in Variable Parameter Muskingum-Cunge Method, J. Hydraulic Eng. (ASCE), 125(6), 610&amp;ndash;620, 1999. </reference>
		<reference numeration="30" content_type="text"> Tang, X. and Samuels, P. G.: Variable Parameter Muskingum-Cunge Method for flood routing in a compound channel, J. Hydraulic Res., 37, 591&amp;ndash;614, 1999. </reference>
		<reference numeration="31" content_type="text"> Todini E. and Bossi A.: PAB (Parabolic and Backwater) an unconditionally stable flood routing scheme particularly suited for real time forecasting and control, J. Hydraulic Res., 24(5), 405&amp;ndash;424, 1986. </reference>
		<reference numeration="32" content_type="text"> U.S. Army Corps of Engineers: HEC-RAS Users Manual. http://www.hec.usace. army.mil/software/hec-ras/documents/userman/index.html, 2005 </reference>
		<reference numeration="33" content_type="text"> Wang, G. T., Yao Ch., Okoren C., and Chen S.: 4-Point FDF of Muskingum method based on the complete St Venant equations, J. Hydrol., 324, 339-349, 2006. </reference>
	</references>
</article>

