Hydrology and Earth System Sciences www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net 1027-5606 1607-7938 11 2 2007 10.5194/hess-11-863-2007 http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/11/863/2007/ http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/11/863/2007/hess-11-863-2007.html http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/11/863/2007/hess-11-863-2007.pdf 863 874 2007-02-13 Uncertainties in selected river water quality data M. Rode michael.rode@ufz.de U. Suhr UFZ – Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, Department of Hydrological Modelling, Brueckstrasse 3a, 39114 Magdeburg, Germany Monitoring of surface waters is primarily done to detect the status and trends in water quality and to identify whether observed trends arise from natural or anthropogenic causes. Empirical quality of river water quality data is rarely certain and knowledge of their uncertainties is essential to assess the reliability of water quality models and their predictions. The objective of this paper is to assess the uncertainties in selected river water quality data, i.e. suspended sediment, nitrogen fraction, phosphorus fraction, heavy metals and biological compounds. The methodology used to structure the uncertainty is based on the empirical quality of data and the sources of uncertainty in data (van Loon et al., 2005). A literature review was carried out including additional experimental data of the Elbe river. All data of compounds associated with suspended particulate matter have considerable higher sampling uncertainties than soluble concentrations. This is due to high variability within the cross section of a given river. This variability is positively correlated with total suspended particulate matter concentrations. Sampling location has also considerable effect on the representativeness of a water sample. These sampling uncertainties are highly site specific. The estimation of uncertainty in sampling can only be achieved by taking at least a proportion of samples in duplicates. Compared to sampling uncertainties, measurement and analytical uncertainties are much lower. Instrument quality can be stated well suited for field and laboratory situations for all considered constituents. Analytical errors can contribute considerably to the overall uncertainty of river water quality data. Temporal autocorrelation of river water quality data is present but literature on general behaviour of water quality compounds is rare. For meso scale river catchments (500–3000 km²) reasonable yearly dissolved load calculations can be achieved using biweekly sample frequencies. For suspended sediments none of the methods investigated produced very reliable load estimates when weekly concentrations data were used. Uncertainties associated with loads estimates based on infrequent samples will decrease with increasing size of rivers. Alexander, R. B., Smith, R. A., and Schwarz, G. E.: Correction of stream quality trends for the effects of laboratory measurements bias, Water Resources Research, 29(11) 3821–3833, 1993. Arheimer, B. and Olsson, J.: Integration and coupling of hydrological models with water quality models, Applications in Europe, Report of the Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute, Norrköping Sweden, p. 49, 2003. Asselmann, N. E. M.: Fitting and interpretation of sediment rating curve, J. Hydrol., 234, 228–248, 2000. Brown, J. D., Heuvelink, G. B. M., and Refsgaard, J. C.: An integrated framework for assessing and recording uncertainties about environmental data, Water Sci. Technol., 52(6), 153–160, 2005. Creitz, G. I. and Richards, F. A.: The estimation and characterisation of phytoplankton population by pigment analysis, J. Mar. Res., 14, 211–216, 1955. Cohn, T. A.: Recent advances in statistical methods for the estimation of sediment and nutrient transport in rivers, Rev. Geophys., 1117–1123, 1955. Deutsches Einheitsverfahren (DEV): Selected methods of water analysis, 9th Delivery, Wiley-VCH, Verlag GmbH and Co. KGaA, Weinheim, 1981. Deutsches Einheitsverfahren (DEV): Selected methods of water analysis, 35th Delivery, Wiley-VCH, Verlag GmbH and Co. KGaA, Weinheim, 1996. Deutsches Einheitsverfahren (DEV): Selected methods of water analysis, 38th Delivery, Wiley-VCH, Verlag GmbH and Co. KGaA, Weinheim, 1997. Deutsches Einheitsverfahren (DEV): Selected methods of water analysis, 43th Delivery, Wiley-VCH, Verlag GmbH and Co. KGaA, Weinheim, 1999. Deutsches Einheitsverfahren (DEV): Selected methods of water analysis, 48th Delivery, Wiley-VCH, Verlag GmbH and Co. KGaA, Weinheim, 2000. Desertova, B.: Relationship between chlorophyll-a concentration and phytoplankton biomass in several reservoirs in Czechoslovakia, Int. Revues. Hydrobiol., 66(2), 153–169, 1981. Ferguson, R. I.: River loads underestimation by rating curves, Water Resources Research, 22(1), 74–76, 1986. Gilbert, R. O.: Statistical Methods for Environmental Pollution Monitoring, Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, 1987. Guo, Y., Markus, M., and Demissie, M.: Uncertainty of nitrate-n load computations for agricultural watersheds, Water Resources Research, 38(10), 1185–1197, 2002. Guhr, H., Karrasch, B., and Spott, D.: Shifts in the processes of oxygen and nutrient balances in the river Elbe since the transformation of the economic structure, Acta hydrochim. hydrobiol., 28 (3), 1–7, 2000. Hakanson, L.: On the principles and factors determining the predictive success of ecosystem models, with a focus on lake eutrophication models, Ecological Modelling, 121, 139–160, 1999. Hakanson, L., Malmaeus, J. M., Bodemer, U., and Gerhardt, V.: Coefficients of variation for chlorophyll, green algae, diatoms, cryptophytes and blue-greens in rivers as a basis for predictive modelling and aquatic management, Ecological Modelling, 169, 179–196, 2003. Harmel, R. D., Cooper, R. J., Slade, R. M., Haney, R. L., and Arnold, J. G.: Cumulative uncertainty in measured streamflow and water quality data for small watersheds, Transaction of the ASABE, 49(3), 689–701, 2006a. Harmel, R. D., King, K. W., Haggard, B. E., Wren, D. G., and Sheridan J. M.: Practical guidance for discharge and water quality data collection on small watersheds, Transaction of the ASABE, 49(4), 937–948, 2006b. Horowitz, A. J.: The use of suspended sediment and associated trace elements in water quality studies, IAHS Special Publication No. 4, IAHS Press, Wallingford, UK, 58 pp., 1995. Horowitz, A. J.: Some thoughts on problems associated with various sampling media used for environmental monitoring, Analyst, 122, 1193–1200, 1997. Horowitz, A. J.: An evaluation of sediment rating curves for estimating suspended sediment concentrations for subsequent flux calculations, Hydrological Processes, 17, 3387–3409, 2003. Horowitz, A. J., Elrick, K. A., and Hooper, R. P.: The prediction of aquatic sediment-associated trace element concentrations using selected geochemical factors, Hydrological Processes, 3, 347–364, 1989. Horowitz, A. J., Rinella, F. A., Lamothe, P., Miller, T. L., Edwards, T. K., Roche, R. L., and Rickert, D. A.: Variation in suspended sediment and associated trace element concentrations in selected riverine cross sections, Environ. Sci. Technol., 24, 1313–1320, 1990. James, A. (Ed.): An introduction to water quality modelling, John Wiley, Chichester, 1993. Koch, R. W. and Smillie, G. M.: Bias in hydrologic prediction using log-transformed regression models, Water Resources Bull., 22(5), 717–723, 1986. Lehmann, A. and Rode, M.: Long-term behaviour and cross-correlations analysis of water quality parameters of the Elbe river at Magdeburg, Germany, Water Research, 35, 2153–2160, 2001. Littlewood, I. G.: Hydrological regimes, sampling strategies, and assessment of errors in mass load estimates for United Kingdom rivers, Environmental International, 21(2), 211–220, 1995. Markus, M., Tsai, C. W.-S., and Demissie, M.: Uncertainty of weekly nitrate-nitrogen forecasts using artificial neural networks, Journal of Environmental Engineering, 129(3), 267–274, 2003. McBride, G. B. and Smith, D. G.: Sampling and analytical tolerance requirements for detecting trends in water quality, J. of the American Water Resources Association, 33(2), 367–373, 1997. Moatar, F. and Meybeck, M.: Compared performances of different algorithms for estimating annual nutrient loads discharged by the eutrophic River Loire, Hydrological Processes, 19(2), 429–444, 2005. Moatar, F. and Meybeck, M.: The influence of contrasting suspended particulate matter transport regimes on the bias and precision of flux estimates, Science of the Total Environment, 370, 515–531, 2006. Moosmann, L., Müller, B., Gächter, R., Wüest, A., Butscher, E., and Herzog, P.: Trend-oriented sampling strategy and estimation of soluble reactive phosphorus loads in streams, Water Resources Research, 41, W01020, doi:10.1029/2004WR003539, 2005. Preston, S., Bierman, V. J., and Sillimann, S. E.: An evaluation of methods for the estimation of tributary mass loads, Water Resources Research, 25(6), 1379–1389, 1989. Ramsey, M. H.: Sampling as a source of measurement uncertainty: techniques for quantification and comparison with analytical sources, Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry, 13, 97–104, 1998. Reinelt, L. E. and Grimvall, A.: Estimation of nonpoint source loadings with data obtained from limited sampling programs, Enviromental Monitoring and Assessment, 21(3), 173–192, 1991. Rekolainen, S., Posch, M., Kämäri, J., and Ekholm, P.: Evaluation of the accuracy and precision of annual phosphorus load estimates from two agricultural basins in Finland, Journal of Hydrology, 128, 237–255, 1991. Robertson, D. M. and Roerisch, E. D.: Influence of various water quality sampling strategies on load estimates for small streams, Water Resources Research, 35, 3747–3759, 1999. Ryding, S. O. and Rast, W. (Eds.): The control of eutrophication of lakes and reservoirs, Man and the Biosphere Series Vol 1, UNESCO and the Parathenon Publishing Group, 1989. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association and Water Environment Federation (Eds.), 20th Edition, 1998. Tonderski, A., Grimvall, A., Dojlido, J. R., and Van Dijk, G.: Monitoring nutrient transport in large rivers, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 34(3), 245–269, 1995. Trudgill, S. T. (Ed.): Solute modelling in catchment systems, John Wiley, Chichester, 1995. van Loon, E., Brown, J., and Heuvelink, G.: Methodological considerations, in: Guidelines for assessing data uncertainty in river basin management studies, edited by: van Loon, E. and Refsgaard, J. C., HarmoniRiB Report http://www.harmonirib.com/, 2005. Vanoni, V. A.: Sedimentation engineering, American society of Civil Engineers, Manuals and Reports on Engineering practice No. 54, American Society of Civil Engineers, New York, pp. 154–190 and 317–349, 1977. Vörös, L. and Padisak, J.: Phytoplankton biomass and chlorophyll-a in some shallow lakes in central Europe, Hydrobiologia, 215, 111–119, 1991. Walling, D. E. and Webb, W. B.: The reliability of suspended sediment load data, Erosion and Sediment Transport Measurement, IAHS Publication No 133, IAHS Press: Wallingford, 177–194, 1981. Walling, D. E. and Webb, W. B.: The reliability of rating curve estimates of suspended sediment yield: some further comments, Sediment budgets, in: IAHS Publication No 174, edited by: Boardas, M. P. and Walling, D. E., IAHS Press, Wallingford, 337–350, 1988. Walling, D. E., Webb, W. B., and Woodward, J. C.: Some sampling conciderations in the design of effective strategies for monitoring sediment associated transport, Erosion and Sediment Transport Monitoring Programms in River Basins, in: IAHS Publication No. 210, edited by: Bogen, J., Walling, D. E., and Day, T. J., IAHS Press, Wallingford, UK, 279–288, 1992. Wass, P. D. and Leeks, G. J. L.: Suspended sediment fluxes in the Humber catchment, UK, Hydrol. Process., 13, 935–953, 1999. Webb, B. W., Phillips, J. M., Walling, D. E., Littlewood, I. G., Watts, C. D., and Leeks, G. J. L.: Load estimation methodologies for British rivers and their relevance to the LOIS RACS(R) programme, The Science of the Total Environment, 194–195, 379–389, 1997. WMO: Manual on operational methods of the measurements of sediment transport, Operational Hydrological Report No 29, Genf, 1989. Worrall, F. and Burt, T. P.: A univariate model of river water nitrate times series, J. Hydrol., 214, 74–90, 1999.