<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article SYSTEM "http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/inc/hess/copernicus.dtd">
<article language="en">
	<journal>
		<journal_title>Hydrology and Earth System Sciences</journal_title>
		<journal_url>www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net</journal_url>
		<issn>1027-5606</issn>
		<eissn>1607-7938</eissn>
		<volume_number>12</volume_number>
		<issue_number>2</issue_number>
		<publication_year>2008</publication_year>
	</journal>
	<doi>10.5194/hess-12-657-2008</doi>
	<article_url>http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/12/657/2008/</article_url>
	<abstract_html>http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/12/657/2008/hess-12-657-2008.html</abstract_html>
	<fulltext_pdf>http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/12/657/2008/hess-12-657-2008.pdf</fulltext_pdf>
	<start_page>657</start_page>
	<end_page>667</end_page>
	<publication_date>2008-04-09</publication_date>
	<article_title content_type="html">Towards model evaluation and identification using Self-Organizing Maps</article_title>
	<authors>
		<author numeration="1" affiliations="1">
			<name>M. Herbst</name>
			<email>herbstm@uni-trier.de</email>
		</author>
		<author numeration="2" affiliations="1">
			<name>M. C. Casper</name>
		</author>
	</authors>
	<affiliations>
		<affiliation numeration="1" content_type="html">Department of Physical Geography, University of Trier, Germany</affiliation>
	</affiliations>
	<abstract content_type="html">The reduction of information contained in model time series through the use
of aggregating statistical performance measures is very high compared to the
amount of information that one would like to draw from it for model
identification and calibration purposes. It has been readily shown that this
loss imposes important limitations on model identification and -diagnostics
and thus constitutes an element of the overall model uncertainty. In this
contribution we present an approach using a Self-Organizing Map (SOM) to
circumvent the identifiability problem induced by the low discriminatory
power of aggregating performance measures. Instead, a Self-Organizing Map is
used to differentiate the spectrum of model realizations, obtained from
Monte-Carlo simulations with a distributed conceptual watershed model, based
on the recognition of different patterns in time series. Further, the SOM is
used instead of a classical optimization algorithm to identify those model
realizations among the Monte-Carlo simulation results that most closely
approximate the pattern of the measured discharge time series. The results
are analyzed and compared with the manually calibrated model as well as with
the results of the Shuffled Complex Evolution algorithm (SCE-UA). In our
study the latter slightly outperformed the SOM results. The SOM method,
however, yields a set of equivalent model parameterizations and therefore
also allows for confining the parameter space to a region that closely
represents a measured data set. This particular feature renders the SOM
potentially useful for future model identification applications.</abstract>
	<references>
		<reference numeration="1" content_type="text"> Alhoniemi, E., Hollmén, J., Simula, O., and Vesanto, J.: Process Monitoring and Modeling using the Self-Organizing Map, Integr. Comput.-Aid. E., 6, 3&amp;ndash;14, 1999. </reference>
		<reference numeration="2" content_type="text"> Allinson, N. M. and Yin, H.: Self-Organising Maps for Pattern Recognition, in: Kohonen Maps, edited by: Oja, E. and Kaski, S., Elsevier, Amsterdam, 111&amp;ndash;120, 1999. </reference>
		<reference numeration="3" content_type="text"> Ambroise, B., Perrin, J. L., and Reutenauer, D.: Multicriterion validation of a semidistributed conceptual model of the water cycle in the Fecht Catchment (Vosges Massif, France), Water Resour. Res., 31, 1467&amp;ndash;1482, 1995. </reference>
		<reference numeration="4" content_type="text"> Beven, K. J. and Binley, A.: The future of distributed models: model calibration and uncertainty prediction, Hydrol. Process., 6, 279-298, 1992. </reference>
		<reference numeration="5" content_type="text"> Boyle, D. P., Gupta, H. V., and Sorooshian, S.: Toward improved calibration of hydrologic models: Combining the strengths of manual and automatic methods, Water Resour. Res., 36, 3663-3674, 2000. </reference>
		<reference numeration="6" content_type="text"> Cho, J.: Multiple Modelling and Control of Nonlinear Systems with Self-Organizing Maps, PhD Thesis, University of Florida, 130 pp., 2004. </reference>
		<reference numeration="7" content_type="text"> Clemen, T.: Zur Wavelet-gestützten Validierung von Simulationsmodellen in der Ökologie, Dissertation, Institut für Informatik und Praktische Mathematik, Christian-Albrechts-Universität, Kiel, 111 pp., 1999. </reference>
		<reference numeration="8" content_type="text"> Duan, Q., Gupta, V. K., and Sorooshian, S.: Shuffled complex evolution approach for effective and efficient global minimization, J. Optimiz. Theory App., 76, 501&amp;ndash;521, 1993. </reference>
		<reference numeration="9" content_type="text"> Franks, S. W., Gineste, P., Beven, K. J., and Merot, P.: On constraining the predictions of a distributed model: the incorporation of fuzzy estimates of saturated areas into the calibration process, Water Resour. Res., 34, 787&amp;ndash;797, 1998. </reference>
		<reference numeration="10" content_type="text"> Gupta, H. V., Sorooshian, S., and Yapo, P. O.: Toward improved calibration of hydrologic models: Multiple and noncommensurable measures of information, Water Resour. Res., 34, 751&amp;ndash;764, 1998. </reference>
		<reference numeration="11" content_type="text"> Gupta, H. V., Sorooshian, S., Hogue, T. S., and Boyle, D. P.: Advances in Automatic Calibration of Watershed Models, in: Calibration of Watershed Models, edited by: Duan, Q., Gupta, H. V., Sorooshian, S., Rousseau, A. N., and Turcotte, R., Water Science and Application, AGU, Washington D.C., 9&amp;ndash;28, 2003. </reference>
		<reference numeration="12" content_type="text"> Haykin, S.: Neural networks &amp;ndash; a comprehensive foundation, 2nd ed., New Jersey, 842 pp., 1999. </reference>
		<reference numeration="13" content_type="text"> Hsu, K.-l., Gupta, H. V., Gao, X., Sorooshian, S., and Imam, B.: Self-organizing linear output map (SOLO): An artificial neural network suitable for hydrologic modeling and analysis, Water Resour. Res., 38, 1302, doi:10.1029/2001WR000795, 2002. </reference>
		<reference numeration="14" content_type="text"> Hydrotec: Rainfall-Runoff-Model NASIM &amp;ndash; program documentation (in German), Hydrotec Ltd., Aachen, 579 pp., 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="15" content_type="text"> Kalteh, A. M. and Berndtsson, R.: Interpolating monthly precipitation by self-organizing map (SOM) and multilayer perceptron (MLP), Hydrolog. Sci. J., 52, 305&amp;ndash;317, 2007. </reference>
		<reference numeration="16" content_type="text"> Kohonen, T.: Self-Organizing Maps, 3rd ed., Information Sciences, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 501 pp., 2001. </reference>
		<reference numeration="17" content_type="text"> Lamb, R., Beven, K., and Myrabø, S.: Use of spatially distributed water table observations to constrain uncertainty in a rainfall-runoff model, Adv. Water Resour., 22(4), 305&amp;ndash;317, 1998. </reference>
		<reference numeration="18" content_type="text"> Lane, S. N.: Assessment of rainfall-runoff models based upon wavelet analysis, Hydrol. Process., 21, 586&amp;ndash;607, 2007. </reference>
		<reference numeration="19" content_type="text"> Legates, D. R. and McCabe Jr., G. J.: Evaluating the use of &quot;goodness-of-fit&quot; measures in hydrologic and hydroclimatic model validation, Water Resour. Res., 35, 233&amp;ndash;241, 1999. </reference>
		<reference numeration="20" content_type="text"> Lischeid, G.: A decision support system for mountain basin management using sparse data, EGU General Assembly 2006, Vienna, Geophys. Res. Abstr., 8, EGU06-A-04223, 2006. </reference>
		<reference numeration="21" content_type="text"> Montanari, A. and Toth, E.: Calibration of hydrological models in the spectral domain: An opportunity for scarcely gauged basins?, Water Resour. Res., 43, W05434, doi:10.1029/2006WR005184, 2007. </reference>
		<reference numeration="22" content_type="text"> Peeters, L., Ba&amp;#x00E7;ão, F., Lobo, V., and Dassargues, A.: Exploratory data analysis and clustering of multivariate spatial hydrogeological data by means of GEO3DSOM, a variant of Kohonen&apos;s Self-Organizing Map, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 11, 1309&amp;ndash;1321, 2007. </reference>
		<reference numeration="23" content_type="text"> Principe, J. C., Wang, L., and Motter, M. A.: Local dynamic modeling with self-organizing maps and applications to nonlinear system identification and control, P. IEEE, 86, 2240&amp;ndash;2258, 1998. </reference>
		<reference numeration="24" content_type="text"> Schütze, N., Schmitz, G. H., and Petersohn, U.: Self-organizing maps with multiple input-output option for modeling the Richards equation and its inverse solution, Water Resour. Res., 41, W03022, doi:10.1029/2004WR003630, 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="25" content_type="text"> Seibert, J.: Multi-criteria calibration of a conceptual runoff model using a genetic algorithm, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 4, 215&amp;ndash;224, 2000. </reference>
		<reference numeration="26" content_type="text"> Simula, O., Vesanto, J., Alhoniemi, E., and Hollmén, J.: Analysis and Modeling of Complex Systems Using the Self-Organizing Map, in: Neuro-Fuzzy Techniques for Intelligent Information Systems, edited by: Kasabov, N., and Kozma, R., Physica Verlag (Springer Verlag), 3&amp;ndash;22, 1999. </reference>
		<reference numeration="27" content_type="text"> Vesanto, J.: Using the SOM and Local Models in Time-Series Prediction, Workshop on Self-Organizing Maps (WSOM&apos;97), Espoo, Finland, 1997, 209&amp;ndash;214, 1997. </reference>
		<reference numeration="28" content_type="text"> Vesanto, J., Himberg, J., Alhoniemi, E., and Parhankangas, J.: SOM Toolbox for Matlab 5, Helsinki University of Technology, Espoo, 60 pp., 2000. </reference>
		<reference numeration="29" content_type="text"> Vrugt, J. A., Gupta, H. V., Bastidas, L. A., Bouten, W., and Sorooshian, S.: Effective and efficient algorithm for multiobjective optimization of hydrologic models, Water Resour. Res., 39(4), 1214, doi:10.1029/2002WR001746, 2003. </reference>
		<reference numeration="30" content_type="text"> Wagener, T., Wheater, H. S., and Gupta, H. V.: Identification and Evaluation of Watershed Models, in: Calibration of Watershed Models, edited by: Duan, Q., Gupta, H. V., Sorooshian, S., Rousseau, A. N., and Turcotte, R., Water Science and Application, AGU, Washington D.C., 29&amp;ndash;47, 2003. </reference>
		<reference numeration="31" content_type="text"> Wagener, T., Wheater, H. S., and Gupta, H. V.: Rainfall-Runoff Modelling in Gauged and Ungauged Basins, Imperial College Press, London, 306 pp., 2004. </reference>
		<reference numeration="32" content_type="text"> Willmott, C. J.: On the validation of models, Phys. Geogr., 2, 184&amp;ndash;194, 1981. </reference>
		<reference numeration="33" content_type="text"> Willmott, C. J.: Some Comments on the Evaluation of Model Performance, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 63, 1309&amp;ndash;1313, 1982. </reference>
		<reference numeration="34" content_type="text"> Yapo, P. O., Gupta, H. V., and Sorooshian, S.: Multi-objective global optimization for hydrologic models, J. Hydrol., 204, 83&amp;ndash;97, 1998. </reference>
	</references>
</article>

