<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article SYSTEM "http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/inc/hess/copernicus.dtd">
<article language="en">
	<journal>
		<journal_title>Hydrology and Earth System Sciences</journal_title>
		<journal_url>www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net</journal_url>
		<issn>1027-5606</issn>
		<eissn>1607-7938</eissn>
		<volume_number>12</volume_number>
		<issue_number>3</issue_number>
		<publication_year>2008</publication_year>
	</journal>
	<doi>10.5194/hess-12-739-2008</doi>
	<article_url>http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/12/739/2008/</article_url>
	<abstract_html>http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/12/739/2008/hess-12-739-2008.html</abstract_html>
	<fulltext_pdf>http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/12/739/2008/hess-12-739-2008.pdf</fulltext_pdf>
	<start_page>739</start_page>
	<end_page>749</end_page>
	<publication_date>2008-05-15</publication_date>
	<article_title content_type="html">Systems Analysis &amp;ndash; a new paradigm and decision support tools for the water framework directive</article_title>
	<authors>
		<author numeration="1" affiliations="1">
			<name>M. Bruen</name>
			<email>michael.bruen@ucd.ie</email>
		</author>
	</authors>
	<affiliations>
		<affiliation numeration="1" content_type="html">Centre for Water Resources Research, University College Dublin, Newstead, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland</affiliation>
	</affiliations>
	<abstract content_type="html">In the early days of Systems Analysis the focus was on providing tools for
optimisation, modelling and simulation for use by experts. Now there is a
recognition of the need to develop and disseminate tools to assist in making
decisions, negotiating compromises and communicating preferences that can
easily be used by stakeholders without the need for specialist training. The
Water Framework Directive (WFD) requires public participation and thus
provides a strong incentive for progress in this direction. This paper
places the new paradigm in the context of the classical one and discusses
some of the new approaches which can be used in the implementation of the
WFD. These include multi-criteria decision support methods suitable for
environmental problems, adaptive management, cognitive mapping, social
learning and cooperative design and group decision-making. Concordance
methods (such as ELECTRE) and the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) are
identified as multi-criteria methods that can be readily integrated into
Decision Support Systems (DSS) that deal with complex environmental issues
with very many criteria, some of which are qualitative. The expanding use of
the new paradigm provides an opportunity to observe and learn from the
interaction of stakeholders with the new technology and to assess its
effectiveness.</abstract>
	<references>
		<reference numeration="1" content_type="text"> Benayoun, R., Roy, B., and Sussman, N.: Manual de Referance du Programme ELECTRE, Note de Synthèse et Formation, No. 25, Direction Scientifique SEMA, Paris, 1966. </reference>
		<reference numeration="2" content_type="text"> Bertalanffy, L. von: General System Theory: Foundations, Development, Applications, George Braziller, New York, 1968. </reference>
		<reference numeration="3" content_type="text"> Bruce, C.: Modelling the environmental collaboration process: A deductive approach, Ecological Economics, 59, 275&amp;ndash;286, 2006. </reference>
		<reference numeration="4" content_type="text"> Bruen, M.: End-User level of service requirements, Carpe Diem Project report 11.2, available at: http://carpediem.am.ub.es/results/deliverables/Del_11.2_EndUSERREPORT2.pdf, (accessed Feb 2008), 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="5" content_type="text"> Bruen, M.: Introduction to decision support systems, in: River basin modelling for flood risk mitigation, Taylor &amp; Francis, London, 235&amp;ndash;248, 2006. </reference>
		<reference numeration="6" content_type="text"> Burus, N.: Scientific allocation of water resources, American Elsevier Publishing Co, New York, 209 pp., 1972. </reference>
		<reference numeration="7" content_type="text"> Checkland, P.: Soft systems methodology: a thirty year retrospective, Systems Research and Behavioural Science, 17(S1), S11&amp;ndash;S58, 2000. </reference>
		<reference numeration="8" content_type="text"> Damart, S., Dias, L. C., and Mousseau, V.: Supporting groups in sorting decisions: Methodology and use of a multi-criteria aggregation/disaggregation DSS, Decis. Support Syst., 43(4), 1464&amp;ndash;1475, 2007. </reference>
		<reference numeration="9" content_type="text"> De Bono, E.: The Use of Lateral Thinking, Jonathan Cape, London, 1967. </reference>
		<reference numeration="10" content_type="text"> De Neufville, R.: Applied systems analysis, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1990. </reference>
		<reference numeration="11" content_type="text"> de Steiguer, J. E., Duberstein, J., and Lopes, V.: The Analytic Hierarchy Process as a Means for Integrated Watershed Management, in Proceedings of the First Interagency Conference on Research in the Watersheds, USDA, 736&amp;ndash;740, 2003. </reference>
		<reference numeration="12" content_type="text"> Dinka, D. and Lundberg, J.: Identity and role-A qualitative case study of cooperative scenario building, Int. J. Human-Computer Studies 64, 1049&amp;ndash;1060, 2006 </reference>
		<reference numeration="13" content_type="text"> Eden, C.: Using Cognitive Mapping for Strategic Alternatives Development and Analysis (SODA), in Rational Analysis for a Problematic World, Wiley, Chichester, 1990. </reference>
		<reference numeration="14" content_type="text"> Efstratiadis, A. and Koutsoyiannis, D.: An evolutionary annealing-simplex algorithm for global optimisation of water resource systems, in: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Hydroinformatics, IWA Publishing, UK, 1423&amp;ndash;1428, 2002. </reference>
		<reference numeration="15" content_type="text"> Galbraith, J. K.: A History of Economics: The Past as the Present, Penguin, UK, 1991. </reference>
		<reference numeration="16" content_type="text"> Gill, P. E., Murray, W., and Wright, M. H.: Practical Optimization, Academic Press, London, 1981. </reference>
		<reference numeration="17" content_type="text"> Giordano, R., Passarella, G., Uricchio, V. F., and Vurro, M.: Fuzzy cognitive maps for issue identification in a water resources conflict resolution system, Phys. Chem. Earth, 30, 463&amp;ndash;469, 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="18" content_type="text"> Giupponi, C., Mysiak, J., Fassio, A., and Cogan V.: MULINO-DSS: a computer tool for sustainable use of water resources at the catchment scale, Math. Comput. Simulat., 64, 13&amp;ndash;24, 2004. </reference>
		<reference numeration="19" content_type="text"> Haemaelaeinen, R. P., Kettunen, E., Ehtamo, H., and Marttunen, M.: Evaluating a Framework for Multi-Stakeholder Decision Support in Water Resources Management, Group Decis. Negot., 10(4), 331&amp;ndash;353, 2001. </reference>
		<reference numeration="20" content_type="text"> Hajkowicz, S. and Collins, K.: A Review of Multiple Criteria Analysis for Water Resource Planning and Management, J. Water Resources Management, 21(9), 1553&amp;ndash;1566, 2007. </reference>
		<reference numeration="21" content_type="text"> Hämäläinen, R. P.: Decisionarium &amp;ndash; Aiding Decisions, Negotiating and Collecting Opinions on the Web, Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 12(2&amp;ndash;3), 101&amp;ndash;110, 2003. </reference>
		<reference numeration="22" content_type="text"> Hannon, B. and Ruth, M.: Dynamic Modeling (Mac Version), Springer-Verlag, New York, 248 pp., 1994 </reference>
		<reference numeration="23" content_type="text"> Haseman, W. D., Nazareth, D. L. and Paul, S.: Implementation of a group decision support system utilising collective memory, Information and Management, 42, 591&amp;ndash;605, 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="24" content_type="text"> Heathcote, I. W.: Integrated Watershed Management: Principles and Practices, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1998. </reference>
		<reference numeration="25" content_type="text"> Jamieson, D.: An integrated, multi-functional approach to water resources management, Hydrolog. Sci. J., 31(4), 501&amp;ndash;514, 1986. </reference>
		<reference numeration="26" content_type="text"> Innes, J. E. and Booher, D. E.: Consensus building and Complex Adaptive Systems: A Framework for Evaluating Collaborative Planning, Journal of Planning Association, 65(4), 412&amp;ndash;423, 1999. </reference>
		<reference numeration="27" content_type="text"> Ison, R. and Watson, D.: Illuminating the possibilities for social learning in the management of Scotland&apos;s water, Ecology and Society, 12(1), 21, available at: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss1/art21/ (accessed Feb 2008), 2007. </reference>
		<reference numeration="28" content_type="text"> Janssen, M. A. and Goosen, H., and Omtzigt, N.: A simple mediation and negotiation support tool for water management in the Netherlands, Landscape Urban Plan., 78, 71&amp;ndash;84, 2006. </reference>
		<reference numeration="29" content_type="text"> Kalman, R. E.: A new approach to linear filtering and prediction problems, Transactions of the A.S.M.E., J. Basic-Eng-D, 82, 35&amp;ndash;45, 1960. </reference>
		<reference numeration="30" content_type="text"> Kearney, A. and Kaplan, S.: Toward a methodology for the measurement of knowledge structures of ordinary people - The conceptual concept cognitive map (3CM), Environ. Behav., 29, 385&amp;ndash;415, 1997. </reference>
		<reference numeration="31" content_type="text"> Keeney, R. L. and Raiffa, H.: Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1993. </reference>
		<reference numeration="32" content_type="text"> Kelly, G. A.: The psychology of personal constructs, Norton, New York, 1955. </reference>
		<reference numeration="33" content_type="text"> Kemp, R. V., Bennett, D. G., and White, M. J.: Recent trends and developments in dialogue on radioactive waste management: Experience from the UK., Environment International, 2006. </reference>
		<reference numeration="34" content_type="text"> Kolkman, M. J., Kok, M., and van der Veen, A.: Mental model mapping as a new tool to analyse the use of information in decision-making in integrated water management, Phys. Chem. Earth, 30, 317&amp;ndash;332, 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="35" content_type="text"> Limayem, M., Banerjee, P., and Ma, L.: Impact of GDSS: Opening the black box, Decis. Support Syst., 42(2), 945&amp;ndash;957, 2006. </reference>
		<reference numeration="36" content_type="text"> Lourenco, R. P. and Costa, J. P.: Incorporating citizens&apos; views in local policy decision making processes, Decis. Support Syst., 43(4), 1499&amp;ndash;1511, 2007. </reference>
		<reference numeration="37" content_type="text"> Makowski, M., Somlyody, L. and Watkins, D.: Multiple Criteria Analysis for Regional Water Quality Management &amp;ndash; the Nitra River case, Working paper 95-022, IIASA, Austria, 1997. </reference>
		<reference numeration="38" content_type="text"> Massam, B.: Spatial Search, Pergamon Press, 1988. </reference>
		<reference numeration="39" content_type="text"> May, R. M.: Will a Large Complex System be Stable?, Nature, 238, 413&amp;ndash;414, 1974. </reference>
		<reference numeration="40" content_type="text"> Miller, G. A.: The Magical Number Seven, Plus or Minus Two: Some Limits On Our Capacity For Processing Information, The Psychological Review, 63, 81&amp;ndash;97, 1956. </reference>
		<reference numeration="41" content_type="text"> Moreno-Jimenez, J. M. and Polasek, W.: e-Democracy and knowledge. A multicriteria framework for the new democratic era, Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 12(2&amp;ndash;3), 163&amp;ndash;176, 2003. </reference>
		<reference numeration="42" content_type="text"> Odum, H.: Ecological and General Systems: An introduction to systems ecology, Colorado University Press, Colorado, 1994. </reference>
		<reference numeration="43" content_type="text"> Odum, H. and Odum, E.: Modelling for all scales &amp;ndash; An introduction to systems simulation, Academic Press, New York, 2000. </reference>
		<reference numeration="44" content_type="text"> Osborn, A. F.: Applied imagination: Principles and procedures of creative problem solving, New York, Charles Scribner&apos;s Sons, 1963. </reference>
		<reference numeration="45" content_type="text"> Ossenbrugger, P. J.: Systems Analysis for Civil Engineers, Wiley, New York, 1984. </reference>
		<reference numeration="46" content_type="text"> Pahl-Wostl, C.: Transitions towards adaptive management of water facing climate and global change, Water Resources Management, 21, 49&amp;ndash;62, 2007a. </reference>
		<reference numeration="47" content_type="text"> Pahl-Wostl, C.: The implications of complexity for integrated resources management, Environ. Modell. Softw., 22, 561&amp;ndash;569, 2007b. </reference>
		<reference numeration="48" content_type="text"> Regan, H. M., Colyvan, M., and Markovchich-Nicholls, L.: A formal model for consensus and negotiation in environmental management, J. Environ. Manage., 80, 167&amp;ndash;176, 2006. </reference>
		<reference numeration="49" content_type="text"> Rios-Insua, D., Holgado, J., and Morena, R.: Multicriteria e-Negotiation Systems for e-Democracy, Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 12, 213&amp;ndash;218, 2003. </reference>
		<reference numeration="50" content_type="text"> Rogers, M. G., Bruen, M., and Maystre, L.-Y.: ELECTRE and Decision Support: Methods and Applications in Engineering and Infrastructure Investment, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, 208 pp., 1999. </reference>
		<reference numeration="51" content_type="text"> Rogers, M. G. and Bruen, M. P.: Non-monetary Decision-Aid techniques in EIA &amp;ndash; An Overview, Paper 10746, Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, Municipal Engineer, 109, June, 88&amp;ndash;103, 1995. </reference>
		<reference numeration="52" content_type="text"> Rogers, M. G. and Bruen, M. P.: A New System for Weighting Criteria within Electre, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 107(3), 552&amp;ndash;563, 1998. </reference>
		<reference numeration="53" content_type="text"> Roy, B.: Classement et choix en présence de points de vue multiples (la méthode ELECTRE), La Revue d&apos;Informatique et de Recherche Opérationelle (RIRO), 8, 57&amp;ndash;75, 1968. </reference>
		<reference numeration="54" content_type="text"> Roy, B., Slowinski, R., and Treichel, W.: Multicriteria programming of water supply systems for rural areas, Water Resour. Bull., 28, 13&amp;ndash;31, 1992. </reference>
		<reference numeration="55" content_type="text"> Rubio, J. A., Rios-Insua, D., Rios, J., and Fernandez, E.: Quixote: Supporting Group Decisions Through the Web, in: E-Government Towards Electronic Democracy, Proceedings of an International Conference, Bolzano, Springer, Berlin, 225&amp;ndash;234, 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="56" content_type="text"> Saaty, T. L.: The Analytic Hierarchy Process, McGraw-Hill, 1980. </reference>
		<reference numeration="57" content_type="text"> Saaty, T. L.: A Scaling for Priorities in Hierarchical Structures, J. Math. Psychol., 15, 207&amp;ndash;218, 1977. </reference>
		<reference numeration="58" content_type="text"> Sharma, M. and Norton, B. G.: A policy decision tool for integrated environmental assessment, Environ. Sci. Policy, 8(4), 356&amp;ndash;366, 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="59" content_type="text"> Shirani, A. I.: Sampling and pooling of decision-relevant information: Comparing the efficiency of face-to-face and GSS supported groups, Information and Management, 43, 521&amp;ndash;529, 2006. </reference>
		<reference numeration="60" content_type="text"> Srdjevic, B.: Linking analytic hierarchy process and social choice methods to support group decision-making in water management, Decis. Support Syst., 42(4), 2261&amp;ndash;2273, 2007. </reference>
		<reference numeration="61" content_type="text"> Tan, C. O. and Ozesmi, U.: A generic shallow lake ecosystem model based on collective expert knowledge, Hydrobiologia, 563, 125&amp;ndash;142, 2006. </reference>
		<reference numeration="62" content_type="text"> Tang, S. L. and Ellis, K. V.: Wastewater Treatment Optimisation Model for Developing World. Part I: Model Development, ASCE Journal of Environmental Engineering, 117(4), 501&amp;ndash;518, 1991. </reference>
		<reference numeration="63" content_type="text"> Tippett, J.: Policies and Tools for Sustainable Water Management in the European Union, Environ. Modell. Softw., 20(2), 119&amp;ndash;139, 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="64" content_type="text"> Tippett, J.: A participatory protocol for ecologically informed design within river catchments, Ph.D. thesis, School of Planning and Landscape, University of Manchester, UK, 2004. </reference>
		<reference numeration="65" content_type="text"> Tippett, J., Searle, B., Pahl-Wostl, C., and Rees, Y.: Social learning in public participation in river basin management &amp;ndash; early findings from HarmoniCOP European case studies, Environ. Sci. Policy, 8(3), 287&amp;ndash;299, 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="66" content_type="text"> Triantaphyllou, E.: Two New Cases of Ranking Reversals When the AHP and Some of Its Additive Variants Are Used that do not Occur with the Multiplicative AHP, Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 10, 11&amp;ndash;25, 2001 </reference>
		<reference numeration="67" content_type="text"> Turoff, M., Hiltz, S. R., Cho, H. K., Li, Z., and Wang, Y.: Social Decision Support Systems (SDSS), in: Proc. 35th Hawaii International Conference on Systems Science, Vol 1, paper no 11, 2002. </reference>
		<reference numeration="68" content_type="text"> Wang, X. and Triantaphyllou, E.: Ranking irregularities when evaluating alternatives by using some ELECTRE methods, Omega, 36, 45&amp;ndash;63, 2008 </reference>
		<reference numeration="69" content_type="text"> Wilson, D. and Droste, R.: Design consideration for watershed management decision support systems, Water Quality Res. J. Canada, 35(2), 163&amp;ndash;188, 2000. </reference>
		<reference numeration="70" content_type="text"> Vatn, A.: Resource regimes and cooperation, Land Use Policy, 24(4), 624&amp;ndash;632. 2007. </reference>
		<reference numeration="71" content_type="text"> Vincke, P.: Multicriteria Decision Aid, John Wiley, Van Delft and Nijkamp, 1992. </reference>
	</references>
</article>

