Hydrology and Earth System Sciences www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net 1027-5606 1607-7938 12 3 2008 10.5194/hess-12-943-2008 http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/12/943/2008/ http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/12/943/2008/hess-12-943-2008.html http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/12/943/2008/hess-12-943-2008.pdf 943 957 2008-06-25 Comparing model performance of two rainfall-runoff models in the Rhine basin using different atmospheric forcing data sets A. H. te Linde aline.te.linde@ivm.vu.nl J. C. J. H. Aerts R. T. W. L. Hurkmans M. Eberle Institute for Environmental Studies (IVM), Faculty of Earth and Life Sciences, Vrije Universiteit, De Boelelaan 1087, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands Deltares, Rotterdamseweg 185, 2629 HD Delft, The Netherlands Hydrology and Quantitative Water Management, Wageningen University, Droevendaalsesteeg 4, 6708 PB Wageningen, The Netherlands Federal Institute of Hydrology (BfG), Am Mainzer Tor 1, D-56068 Koblenz, Germany Due to the growing wish and necessity to simulate the possible effects of climate change on the discharge regime on large rivers such as the Rhine in Europe, there is a need for well performing hydrological models that can be applied in climate change scenario studies. There exists large variety in available models and there is an ongoing debate in research on rainfall-runoff modelling on whether or not physically based distributed models better represent observed discharges than conceptual lumped model approaches do. In addition, it is argued that Land Surface Models (LSMs) carry the potential to accurately estimate hydrological partitioning, because they solve the coupled water and energy balance. In this paper, the hydrological models HBV and VIC were compared for the Rhine basin by testing their performance in simulating discharge. Overall, the semi-distributed conceptual HBV model performed much better than the distributed land surface model VIC (<i>E</i>=0.62, <i>r</i>²=0.65 vs. <i>E</i>=0.31, <i>r</i>²=0.54 at Lobith). It is argued here that even for a well-documented river basin such as the Rhine, more complex modelling does not automatically lead to better results. Moreover, it is concluded that meteorological forcing data has a considerable influence on model performance, irrespectively to the type of model structure and the need for ground-based meteorological measurements is emphasized. Abbott, M. B., Bathurs, J. C., Cunge, J. A., O'Connel, P. E., and Rasmussen, J.: An introduction to the european hydrological system – systeme hydrologique "She", 1: History and philosophy of a physically based distributed modelling system, J. Hydrol., 87, 45–59, 1986. Bergström, S.: Development and application of a conceptual runoff model for scandinavian catchments, ph.D. Thesis, Department of water resources engineering, University of Lund, Lund, Sweden, 1976. Bergström, S., Lindström, G., and Pettersson, A.: Multi-variable parameter estimation to increase confidence in hydrological modelling, Hydrol. Process., 16, 413–421, 2002. Beven, K.: How far can we go in distributed hydrological modelling?, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 5, 1–12, 2001. Beven, K.: Towards an alternative blueprint for a physically based digitally simulated hydrologic response modelling system, Hydrol. Process., 16, 189–206, 2002a. Beven, K.: Towards a coherent philosophy for modelling the environment, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A, 458, 1–20, 2002b. Bogaard, T. A., Luxemburg, W. M. J., De Wit, M., Douben, N., and Savenije, H. H. G.: Some hydrological challenges in understanding discharge generation processes in the Rhine and Meuse basins, Phys. Chem. Earth, 30, 262–266, 2005. Booij, M. J.: Determination and integration of appropriate spatial scales for river basin modelling, Hydrol. Process., 17, 2581–2598, 2003. Buishand, T. A. and Lenderink, G.: Estimation of future discharges of the river Rhine in the SWURVE project, KNMI, De Bilt, The Netherlands TR-273, 1–36, 2004. De Roo, A. P. J., Wesseling, C. G. and Van Deursen, W. P. A. Physically based river basin modelling within a GIS. The LISFLOOD model. Proc. 3rd Int. Conf. on Geo-Computation. In: Geo-Computation CF-ROM produced by R. J. Abrahart, 1998. De Roo, A. P. J., Wesseling, C. G. and Van Deursen, W. P. A. Physically based river basin modelling within a GIS. The LISFLOOD model. Hydrol. Process., 14, 1981–1992, 2000. Disse, M. and Engel, H.: Flood events in the Rhine basin: Genesis, influendes and mitigation, Nat. Hazards, 23, 271–290, 2001. The water page – the Rhine river: http://www.thewaterpage.com/rhine_main.htm, access: 2 April 2007, 2001. Eberle, M., Buiteveld, H., Wilke, K., and Krahe, P.: Hydrological modelling in the river Rhine basin part III - daily HBV model for the Rhine basin, Institute for Inland Water Management and Wase Water Treatment (RIZA) and Bundesanstalt für Gewässerkunde (BfG), Koblenz, Germany BfG-1451, 2005. Hurkmans, R. T. W., De Moel, H., Aerts, J. C. J. H., and Troch, P. A.: Water balance versus land surface model in the simulation of Rhine river discharges, Water Resour. Res., 44, W01418, doi:10.1029/2007WR006168, 2008. Jacob, D.: A note to the simulation of the annual and inter-annual variability of the water budget over the baltic sea drainage basin, Meteorol. Athos. Phys., 77, 61–73, 2001. Jothityangkoon, M., Sivalapan, M., and Farmer, D. L.: Process controls of water balance variability in a large semi-arid catchment: Downward approach to hydrological model development, J. Hydrol., 254, 174–198, 2001. Krause, P., Boyle, D. P. and Bäse, F.: Comparison of different efficiency criteria for hydrological model assessment, Adv. Geosci., 5, 89–97, 2005. Kundzewicz, Z. W., Mata, L. J., Arnell, N. W., Döll, P., Kabat, P., Jiménez, B., Miller, K. A., Oke, T., Sen, Z., and Shiklomanov, I. A.: Freshwater resources and their management, in: Climate change 2007: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability, Contribution of working group ii tot the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change, edited by: Parry, M. L., Conziani, O. F., Palutikof, J. P., Van der Linden, P. J., and Hanson, C. E., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 173–210, 2007. Kwadijk, J. C. J.: The impact of climate change on the discharge of the river Rhine, PhD Thesis, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands, 1993. Liang, X., Lettenmaier, D. P., Wood, E. F., and Burges, S. J.: A simple hydrologically based model of land surface water and energy fluxes for general circulation models, J. Geophys. Res., 99, 415–428, 1994. Liang, X., and Zhenghui, X.: A new surface runoff parameterization with subgrid-scale soil heterogeneity for land surface models, Adv Water Resour, 24, 1173-1193, 2001. Lindström, G., Johansson, B., Persson, M., Gardelin, M., and Bergström, S.: Development and test of the distributed HBV-96 hydrological model, J. Hydrol., 201, 272–288, 1997. Liu, Z. and Todini, E. Towards a comprehensive physically-bassed rainfall-runoff model. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 6, 859–881, 2002. Lohmann, D., Nolte-Holube, R., and Raschke, E.: A large-scale horizontal routing model to be coupled to land surface parametrization schemes, Tellus, 48A, 708–721, 1996. Middelkoop, H., Daamen, K., Gellens, D., Grabs, W., Kwadijk, J. C. J., Lang, H., Parmet, B. W. A. H., Schädler, B., Schulla, J., and Wilke, K.: Impact of climate change on hydrological regimes and water resources management in the Rhine basin., Climatic Change, 49, 105–128, 2001. Mitchell, T. D. and Jones, P. D.: An improved method of constructing a database of monthly climate observations and associated high-resolution grids, Int. J. Climatol., 25, 693–712, 2005. Mülders, R., Parmet, B., and Wilke, K.: Hydrological modelling in the river Rhine basin. Final report, Federal Institute of Hydrology (BfG), KoblenzBfG – 125, 1999. Nash, J. E. and Sutcliffe, J. V.: River flow forecasting through conceptual models. Part i – a discussion of principles, J. Hydrol., 10, 282–290, 1970. Passchier, R. and Stone, K.: Analysis of the instrumentation for computing design discharges, WL $\vert $ Delft Hydraulics, Delft, The Netherlands, Q2705, 1–78, 2003. Perrin, C., Michel, C., and Andréassian, V.: Does a large number of parameters enhance model performance? Comparative assessments of common catchment model structures on 429 catchments, J. Hydrol., 242, 275–301, 2000. Pitman, A. J. and Perkins, S. E.: Reducing uncertainty in selecting climate models for hydrological impact assessments, in: Quantification and Reduction of Predictive Uncertainty for Sustainable Water Resource Management, Symposium HS2004 at IUGG2007, Perugia, 3–15, 2007. Refsgaard, J. C.: Terminology, modelling protocol and classification of hydrological model codes, in: Distributed hydrological modelling, edited by: Abbott, M. B. and Refsgaard, J. C., Kluwer Academic Publishers, 17–39, 1996. Reggiani, P., Hassanizadeh, S. M., Sivapalan, M., and Gray, W. G.: A unifying framework for watershed thermodynamics: Balance equations for mass, momentum, energy and entropy, and the second law of thermodynamics, Adv. Water Resour., 22, 367–398, 1998. Reggiani, P., Hassanizadeh, S. M., Sivapalan, M., and Gray, W. G.: A unifying framework for watershed thermodynamics: Constitutive relationships, Adv. Water Resour., 23, 15–39, 1999. Reggiani, P. and Schellekens, J.: Modelling of hydrological responses: The respresentative elementary watershed approach as an alternative blueprint for watershed modelling, Hydrol. Process., 17, 3785–3789, 2003. Rientjes, T. and Zaadnoordijk, W. J.: Hoogwatervoorspelling: Fysisch gebaseerde regen-afvoermodellering. Dilemma of déjà vu?, Stromingen, 6, 33–44, 2000 (in Dutch). Savenije, H. G.: Equifinality, a blessing in disguise?, Hydrol. Process., 15, 2835–2838, 2001. Schär, C., Lüthi, D., Beyerly, U., and Heise, E.: The soil-precipitation feedback: A process study with a regional climate model, J. Climate, 12, 722–741, 1998. Schulla, J. and Kaspar, K.: Model description WaSIM-ETH, Internal report, IAC, ETH, Zürich, 1–174, 2006. Seibert, J.: Conceptual runoff models - fiction or representation of reality, MSc Thesis, Acta University, Uppsala, Sweden, 52 pp., 1999. Shaw, E. M.: Hydrology in practice, Nelson Thornes Ltd, Cheltenham, England, 1–569, 2002. Sprokkereef, E.: Eine hydrologische datenbank für das Rheingebiet, International Commission for the Hydrology of the Rhine Basin (CHR), 2001. Te Linde, A. H.: Effect of climate change on the discharge of the rivers Rhine and Meuse. Applying the KNMI 2006 scenarios using the HBV model, WL $\vert $ Delft Hydraulics, Delft, The Netherlands Q4286, 1–30, 2007. Troy, T., Sheffield, J., and Wood, E.: Temporal and spatial scales in hydrological model calibration, in: Geophysical Research Abstracts, European Geosciences Union General Assembly 2007, Vienna, Austria, 2007, Uhlenbrook, S., Seibert, J., Leibundgut, C., and Rodhe, A.: Prediction uncertainty of conceptual rainfall-runoff models caused by problems to identify model parameters and structure, Hydrol. Sci., 44, 779–798, 1999. Uhlenbrook, S.: An emperical approach for delineating spatial units with the same dominating runoff generation processes, Phys. Chem. Earth, 28, 297–303, 2003. Van Deursen, W. P. A. and Kwadijk, J. C. J.: Rhineflow: An integrated GIS water balance model for the river Rhine, HydroGIS 93: Application of Geographic Information Systems in Hydrology and Water Resources, 507–518, 1993. Van Deursen, W. P. A.: Rapportage Rhineflow/Meuseflow. Nieuwe KNMI scenario's mei 2006,, Carthago Consultancy, Rotterdam, the Netherlands, 2006 (in Dutch). Vivoni, E. R. Hydrologic modeling using triangulated irregular networks: terrain representation, flood forecasing and catchment response, PhD Thesis, Cambridge – Massaschusetts Institute of Technology, USA, 2003. Wagener, T., McIntyre, N., Lees, M. J., Wheater, H. S., and Gupta, H. V.: Towards reduced uncertainty in conceptual rainfall-runoff modelling: Dynamic identifiability analysis, Hydrol. Process., 17, 455–476, 2003. Ward, R. C. and Robinson, M.: Principles of hydrology, 4 ed., McGraw-Hill Publishing Company, London, 2000. Weerts, A. H.: Assessing and quantifying the combined effect of model parameter and boundary uncertainties in model based flood forecasting., Geophys. Res. Abstr., 5, 14564, 2003. Weerts, A. H. and Van der Klis, H.: FEWS-Rhine version 1.02. Improvements and adjustments., WL $\vert $ Delft Hydraulics, Delft, Q3618, 2004. Wessel, J.: Flood management of the transnational Rhine river. Proc. United States-Italy Research Workshop on Hydrometeorology, Impacts and Management of Extreme Floods, at Perugia, Italy, 13–17~November, 1995.