<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article SYSTEM "http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/inc/hess/copernicus.dtd">
<article language="en">
	<journal>
		<journal_title>Hydrology and Earth System Sciences</journal_title>
		<journal_url>www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net</journal_url>
		<issn>1027-5606</issn>
		<eissn>1607-7938</eissn>
		<volume_number>13</volume_number>
		<issue_number>1</issue_number>
		<publication_year>2009</publication_year>
	</journal>
	<doi>10.5194/hess-13-1-2009</doi>
	<article_url>http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/13/1/2009/</article_url>
	<abstract_html>http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/13/1/2009/hess-13-1-2009.html</abstract_html>
	<fulltext_pdf>http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/13/1/2009/hess-13-1-2009.pdf</fulltext_pdf>
	<start_page>1</start_page>
	<end_page>16</end_page>
	<publication_date>2009-01-07</publication_date>
	<article_title content_type="html">A new data assimilation approach for improving runoff prediction using remotely-sensed soil moisture retrievals</article_title>
	<authors>
		<author numeration="1" affiliations="1">
			<name>W. T. Crow</name>
			<email>wade.crow@ars.usda.gov</email>
		</author>
		<author numeration="2" affiliations="2">
			<name>D. Ryu</name>
		</author>
	</authors>
	<affiliations>
		<affiliation numeration="1" content_type="html">USDA ARS Hydrology and Remote Sensing Laboratory, Beltsville, MD, USA</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="2" content_type="html">Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia</affiliation>
	</affiliations>
	<abstract content_type="html">A number of recent studies have focused on enhancing runoff prediction via
the assimilation of remotely-sensed surface soil moisture retrievals into a
hydrologic model. The majority of these approaches have viewed the problem
from purely a state or parameter estimation perspective in which
remotely-sensed soil moisture estimates are assimilated to improve the
characterization of pre-storm soil moisture conditions in a hydrologic
model, and consequently, its simulation of runoff response to subsequent
rainfall. However, recent work has demonstrated that soil moisture
retrievals can also be used to filter errors present in satellite-based
rainfall accumulation products. This result implies that soil moisture
retrievals have potential benefit for characterizing both antecedent
moisture conditions (required to estimate sub-surface flow intensities and
subsequent surface runoff efficiencies) and storm-scale rainfall totals
(required to estimate the total surface runoff volume). In response, this
work presents a new sequential data assimilation system that exploits
remotely-sensed surface soil moisture retrievals to simultaneously improve
estimates of both pre-storm soil moisture conditions and storm-scale rainfall
accumulations. Preliminary testing of the system, via a synthetic twin data
assimilation experiment based on the Sacramento hydrologic model and data
collected from the Model Parameterization Experiment, suggests that the new
approach is more efficient at improving stream flow predictions than data
assimilation techniques focusing solely on the constraint of antecedent soil
moisture conditions.</abstract>
	<references>
		<reference numeration="1" content_type="text"> Aubert, D., Loumagne, C., and Oudin, L.: Sequential assimilation of soil moisture and streamflow data in a conceptual rainfall-runoff model, J. Hydrol., 280, 145–161, 2003. </reference>
		<reference numeration="2" content_type="text"> Burnash, R. J. C., Ferral, R. L., and McGuire, R. A.: A generalized streamflow simulation system: Conceptual modeling for digital computers, US National Weather Service and California Department of Water Resources, Joint Federal-State River Forecast Center, Sacramento, California, USA, 204 pp., 1973. </reference>
		<reference numeration="3" content_type="text"> Crow, W. T., Bindlish, R., and Jackson, T. J.: The added value of spaceborne passive microwave soil moisture retrievals for forecasting rainfall-runoff ratio partitioning, Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L18401, doi:10.1029/2005GL023543, 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="4" content_type="text"> Crow, W. T. and Van Loon, E.: The impact of incorrect model error assumptions on the sequential assimilation of remotely sensed surface soil moisture, J. Hydrometeorol., 8(3), 421–431, 2006. </reference>
		<reference numeration="5" content_type="text"> Crow, W. T. and Bolten, J. D.: Estimating precipitation errors using spaceborne surface soil moisture retrievals, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L08403, doi:10.1029/2007GL029450, 2007. </reference>
		<reference numeration="6" content_type="text"> Crow, W. T., Huffman, G. H., Bindlish, R., and Jackson, T. J.: Improving satellite-based rainfall accumulation estimates using spaceborne surface soil moisture retrievals, J. Hydrometeorol., doi:10.1175/2008JHM986.1, in press, 2009. </reference>
		<reference numeration="7" content_type="text"> Dunne, S. and Entekhabi, D.: An ensemble-based reanalysis approach to land data assimilation, Wat. Resour. Res., 41, W02013, doi:10.1029/2004WR003449, 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="8" content_type="text"> Entekhabi, D., Njoku, E. G., and Houser, P., et al.: The Hydrosphere State (HYDROS) mission concept: An earth system pathfinder for global mapping of soil moisture and land freeze/thaw, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Rem. Sens., 42(10), 218–2195, 2004. </reference>
		<reference numeration="9" content_type="text"> Francois, C., Quesney, A., and Ottle, C.: Sequential assimilation of ERS-1 SAR data into a coupled land surface-hydrological model using an extended Kalman filter, J. Hydrometeorol., 4(2), 473–487, 2003. </reference>
		<reference numeration="10" content_type="text"> Georgakakos, K. P.: Analytical results for operational flash flood guidance, J. Hydrol., 317(1–2), 81–103, 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="11" content_type="text"> Goodrich, D. C., Schmugge, T. J., Jackson, T. J., Unkrich, C. L., Keefer, T. O., Parry, R., Bach, L. B., and Amer, S. A.: Runoff simulation sensitivity to remotely-sensed initial soil water content, Water Resour. Res., 30(5), 1393–1405, 1994. </reference>
		<reference numeration="12" content_type="text"> Jacobs, J. M., Meyers, D. A., and Whitfield, B. M.: Improved rainfall/runoff estimates using remotely-sensed soil moisture, J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 39(2), 313–324, 2003.  </reference>
		<reference numeration="13" content_type="text"> Kantamneni, V., Simon, D., and Schwartz, S.: Optimal filtering techniques for analytical streamflow forecasting, Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Systems Engineering, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA, 130–135, 16–18 August 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="14" content_type="text"> Kerr, Y. H., Waldteufel, P., Wigneron, J.-P., Martinuzzi, J.-M., Font, J., and Berger, M.: Soil moisture retrieval from space: the soil moisture and ocean salinity mission (SMOS), IEEE Trans. Geosci. Rem. Sens., 39(8), 1729–1735, 2001. </reference>
		<reference numeration="15" content_type="text"> Lakskmi, V.: Use of satellite remote sensing in hydrological predictions in ungauged basins, Hydrol. Processes, 18(5), 1029–1034, 2004. </reference>
		<reference numeration="16" content_type="text"> National Research Council: Earth Science and Applications from Space: National Imperatives for the Next Decade and Beyond, National Academy Press, Washington DC, USA, 400 pp., 2007. </reference>
		<reference numeration="17" content_type="text"> Oki, T., Nishimura, T., and Dirmeyer, P.: Assessment of annual runoff from land surface models using Total Runoff Integrating Pathways (TRIP), J. Meteor. Soc. Jpn., 78, 235–255, 1999. </reference>
		<reference numeration="18" content_type="text"> Parajka, J., V. Naemi, G. Blöschl, W. Wagner, R. Merz, and K. Scipal, Assimilating scatterometer soil moisture data into conceptual hydrologic models at coarse scales, Hydrology and Earth System Science, 10, 353-368, 2006. </reference>
		<reference numeration="19" content_type="text"> Pauwels, R. N., Hoeben, R., Verhoest, N. E. C., De Troch, F. P., and Troch, P. A.: Improvements of TOPLATS-based discharge predictions through assimilation of ERS-based remotely-sensed soil moisture values, Hydrol. Proc., 16, 995–1013, 2002. </reference>
		<reference numeration="20" content_type="text"> Reichle, R. H. and Koster, R. D.: Global assimilation of satellite surface soil moisture retrievals into the NASA Catchment land surface model, Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L02404, doi:10.1029/2004GL021700, 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="21" content_type="text"> Ryu, D., Crow, W. T., Zhan, X., and Jackson, T. J.: Correcting unintended perturbation biases in hydrologic data assimilation using Ensemble Kalman filter, J. Hydrometeorol., in press, 2009. </reference>
		<reference numeration="22" content_type="text"> Schaake, J., Duan, Q., Koren, V., and Hall, A.: Toward improved parameter estimation of land surface hydrology models through the Model Parameter Estimation Experiment (MOPEX), IAHS Publ., 270, 91–97, 2001. </reference>
		<reference numeration="23" content_type="text"> Weissling, B. P., Xie, H., Murray, K. E.: A multitemporal remote sensing approach to parsimonious streamflow modeling in a southcentral Texas watershed, USA, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 4, 1–33, 2007. </reference>
		<reference numeration="24" content_type="text"> Wood, E. F., Sivapalan, M., and Beven, K.: Similarity and scale in catchment storm response, Rev. Geophys., 28(1), 1–18, 1990. </reference>
	</references>
</article>

