<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article SYSTEM "http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/inc/hess/copernicus.dtd">
<article language="en">
	<journal>
		<journal_title>Hydrology and Earth System Sciences</journal_title>
		<journal_url>www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net</journal_url>
		<issn>1027-5606</issn>
		<eissn>1607-7938</eissn>
		<volume_number>13</volume_number>
		<issue_number>7</issue_number>
		<publication_year>2009</publication_year>
	</journal>
	<doi>10.5194/hess-13-1235-2009</doi>
	<article_url>http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/13/1235/2009/</article_url>
	<abstract_html>http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/13/1235/2009/hess-13-1235-2009.html</abstract_html>
	<fulltext_pdf>http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/13/1235/2009/hess-13-1235-2009.pdf</fulltext_pdf>
	<start_page>1235</start_page>
	<end_page>1248</end_page>
	<publication_date>2009-07-21</publication_date>
	<article_title content_type="html">A novel approach to parameter uncertainty analysis of hydrological models using neural networks</article_title>
	<authors>
		<author numeration="1" affiliations="1">
			<name>D. L. Shrestha</name>
			<email>d.shrestha@unesco-ihe.org</email>
		</author>
		<author numeration="2" affiliations="2">
			<name>N. Kayastha</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="3" affiliations="1,3">
			<name>D. P. Solomatine</name>
		</author>
	</authors>
	<affiliations>
		<affiliation numeration="1" content_type="html">UNESCO-IHE Institute for Water Education, Delft, The Netherlands</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="2" content_type="html">MULTI Disciplinary Consultants Ltd, Kathmandu, Nepal</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="3" content_type="html">Water Resources Section, Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands</affiliation>
	</affiliations>
	<abstract content_type="html">In this study, a methodology has been developed to emulate a time consuming
Monte Carlo (MC) simulation by using an Artificial Neural Network (ANN) for
the assessment of model parametric uncertainty. First, MC simulation of a
given process model is run. Then an ANN is trained to approximate the
functional relationships between the input variables of the process model and
the synthetic uncertainty descriptors estimated from the MC realizations. The
trained ANN model encapsulates the underlying characteristics of the
parameter uncertainty and can be used to predict uncertainty descriptors for
the new data vectors. This approach was validated by comparing the
uncertainty descriptors in the verification data set with those obtained by
the MC simulation. The method is applied to estimate the parameter
uncertainty of a lumped conceptual hydrological model, HBV, for the Brue
catchment in the United Kingdom. The results are quite promising as the
prediction intervals estimated by the ANN are reasonably accurate. The
proposed techniques could be useful in real time applications when it is not
practicable to run a large number of simulations for complex hydrological
models and when the forecast lead time is very short.</abstract>
	<references>
		<reference numeration="1" content_type="text"> Abebe, A. J. and Price, R. K.: Managing uncertainty in hydrological models using complementary models, Hydrol. Sci. J., 48, 679â€“692, 2003. </reference>
		<reference numeration="2" content_type="text"> Abebe, A. J. and Price, R. K.: Forecasting surge prediction accuracy on the Dutch coast using neural networks, in: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Hydroinformatics: Singapore, 21â€“24 June 2004, World Scientific, 2004. </reference>
		<reference numeration="3" content_type="text"> Abrahart, R. J. and See, L.: Comparing neural network and autoregressive moving average techniques for the provision of continuous river flow forecasts in two contrasting catchments, Hydrol. Proc., 14, 2157-2172, 2000. </reference>
		<reference numeration="4" content_type="text"> Ajami, N. K., Duan, Q., and Sorooshian, S.: An integrated hydrologic Bayesian multimodel combination framework: Confronting input, parameter, and model structural uncertainty in hydrologic prediction, Water Resour. Res., 43, W01403, doi:10.1029/2005WR004745, 2007. </reference>
		<reference numeration="5" content_type="text"> Allen, R. G., Pereisa, L. S., Raes, D., and Smith, M.: Crop evapotranspiration, guideline for computing crop water requirements, FAO, Irrigation and drainage paper, 56, 300~pp., 1998. </reference>
		<reference numeration="6" content_type="text"> Ballio, F. and Guadagnini, A.: Convergence assessment of numerical Monte Carlo simulations in groundwater hydrology, Water Resour. Res., 40, W04603, doi:10.1029/2003WR002876, 2004. </reference>
		<reference numeration="7" content_type="text"> Beven, K. and Binley, A.: The future of distributed models: Model calibration and uncertainty prediction, Hydrol. Proc., 6, 279â€“298, doi:10.1002/hyp.3360060305, 1992. </reference>
		<reference numeration="8" content_type="text"> Beven, K. and Freer, J.: Equifinality, data assimilation, and uncertainty estimation in mechanistic modelling of complex environmental systems using the GLUE methodology, J. Hydrol., 249, 11â€“29, 2001. </reference>
		<reference numeration="9" content_type="text"> Bishop, C. M.: Neural networks for pattern recognition, Clarendon-Press, Oxford, 504~pp., 1995. </reference>
		<reference numeration="10" content_type="text"> Blasone, R. S., Vrugt, J. A., Madsen, H., Rosbjerg, D., Robinson, B. A., and Zyvoloski, G. A.: Generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation (GLUE) using adaptive Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling, Adv. Water Resour., 31, 630â€“648, doi:10.1016/j.advwatres.2007.12.003, 2008. </reference>
		<reference numeration="11" content_type="text"> Bowden, G. J., Dandy, G. C., and Maier, H. R.: Input determination for neural network models in water resources applications, Part 1 -— background and methodology, J. Hydrol., 301, 93-107, doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.06.020, 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="12" content_type="text"> Braun, L. N. and Renner, C. B.: Application of a conceptual runoff model in different physiographic regions of Switzerland, Hydrol. Sci. J., 37, 217â€“232, 1992. </reference>
		<reference numeration="13" content_type="text"> Dawson, C. W. and Wilby, R. L.: Hydrological modelling using artificial neural networks, Prog. Phys. Geogr., 25, 80â€“108, doi:10.1177/030913330102500104, 2001. </reference>
		<reference numeration="14" content_type="text"> Dibike, Y. B., Velickov, S., Solomatine, D. P., and Abbott, M. B.: Model induction with support vector machines: Introduction and applications, J. Comput. Civil Eng., 15, 208â€“216, 2001. </reference>
		<reference numeration="15" content_type="text"> Fraser, A. M. and Swinney, H. L.: Independent coordinates for strange attractors from mutual information, Phys. Rev. A, 33(2), 1134â€“1140, 1986.  </reference>
		<reference numeration="16" content_type="text"> Freer, J., Beven, K., and Ambroise, B.: Bayesian estimation of uncertainty in runoff prediction and the value of data: An application of the GLUE approach, Water Resour. Res., 32, 2161â€“2173, 1996. </reference>
		<reference numeration="17" content_type="text"> Georgakakos, K., Seo, D.-J., Gupta, H. V, Schaake, J., and Butts, M. M.: Towards the characterization of streamflow simulation uncertainty through multimodel ensembles, J. Hydrol., 298, 222â€“241, doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.03.037, 2004. </reference>
		<reference numeration="18" content_type="text"> Govindaraju, R. S. and Rao, A. R.: Artificial neural networks in hydrology, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Amsterdam, 348~pp., 2000. </reference>
		<reference numeration="19" content_type="text"> Guyon, I. and Elisseeff, A.: An introduction to variable and feature selection, J. Mach. Learn. Res., 3, 1157â€“1182, 2003. </reference>
		<reference numeration="20" content_type="text"> Haario, H., Laine, M., Mira, A., and Saksman, E.: DRAM: efficient adaptive MCMC, Stat. Comput., 16, 339â€“354, doi:10.1007/s11222-006-9438-0, 2006. </reference>
		<reference numeration="21" content_type="text"> Harr, M.: Probabilistic estimates for multivariate analyses, Appl. Math. Model., 13, 313â€“318, doi:10.1016/0307-904X(89)90075-9, 1989. </reference>
		<reference numeration="22" content_type="text"> Haykin, S.: Neural networks: A comprehensive foundation. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 1999. </reference>
		<reference numeration="23" content_type="text"> Jacquin, A. P. and Shamseldin, A. Y.: Development of rainfall-runoff models using Takagi-Sugeno fuzzy inference systems, J. Hydrol., 329(1â€“2), 154â€“173, 2006. </reference>
		<reference numeration="24" content_type="text"> Kavetski, D., Kuczera, G., and Franks, S. W.: Bayesian analysis of input uncertainty in hydrological modeling: 1. Theory, Water Resour. Res., 42, W03407, doi:10.1029/2005WR004368, 2006. </reference>
		<reference numeration="25" content_type="text"> Klir, G. J. and Yuan, B.: Fuzzy sets, fuzzy logic, and fuzzy systems: selected papers by: Zadeh, L. A., World Scientific Publishing Co. Inc., River Edge, NJ, USA, 840~pp., 1996.  \bibitem[Khan and Coulibaly (2006)] khan2006bnn Khan, M. S. and Coulibaly, P.: Bayesian neural network for rainfall-runoff modeling, Water Resour. Res., 42, W07409, doi:10.1029/2005WR003971, 2006. </reference>
		<reference numeration="26" content_type="text"> Khu, S.-T. and Werner, M. G. F.: Reduction of Monte-Carlo simulation runs for uncertainty estimation in hydrological modelling, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 7, 680â€“692, 2003. </reference>
		<reference numeration="27" content_type="text"> Kuczera, G. and Parent, E.: Monte Carlo assessment of parameter uncertainty in conceptual catchment models: the Metropolis algorithm, J. Hydrol., 211, 69â€“85, 1998. </reference>
		<reference numeration="28" content_type="text"> Kuczera, G., Kavetski, D., Franks, S. W., and Thyer, M.: Towards a Bayesian total error analysis of conceptual rainfall-runoff models: Characterising model error using storm-dependent parameters, J. Hydrol., 331, 161â€“177, doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.05.010, 2006. </reference>
		<reference numeration="29" content_type="text"> Kunstmann, H., Kinzelbach, W., and Siegfried, T.: Conditional first-order second-moment method and its application to the quantification of uncertainty in groundwater modeling, Water Resour. Res., 38, 1035, doi:10.1029/2000WR000022, 2002.  </reference>
		<reference numeration="30" content_type="text"> Li, G., Azarm, S., Farhang-Mehr, A., and Diaz, A.: Approximation of multiresponse deterministic engineering simulations: a dependent metamodeling approach, Struct. Multidiscip. O., 31, 260â€“269, doi:10.1007/s00158-005-0574-5, 2006.  </reference>
		<reference numeration="31" content_type="text"> LindstrÃ¶m, G., Johansson, B., Persson, M., Gardelin, M., and BergstrÃ¶m, S.: Development and test of the distributed HBV-96 hydrological model, J. Hydrol., 201, 272â€“288, 1997. </reference>
		<reference numeration="32" content_type="text"> Maier, H. R. and Dandy, G. C.: Neural networks for the prediction and forecasting of water resources variables: a review of modelling issues and applications, Environ. Modell. Softw., 15, 101â€“124, 2000. </reference>
		<reference numeration="33" content_type="text"> Mantovan, P. and Todini, E.: Hydrological forecasting uncertainty assessment: Incoherence of the GLUE methodology, J. Hydrol., 330, 368â€“381, doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.04.046, 2006. </reference>
		<reference numeration="34" content_type="text"> Maskey, S., Guinot, V., and Price, R. K.: Treatment of precipitation uncertainty in rainfall-runoff modelling: a fuzzy set approach, Adv. Water Resour., 27, 889â€“898, 2004. </reference>
		<reference numeration="35" content_type="text"> McKay, M. D., Conover, W. J., and Beckman, R. J.: A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code, Technometrics, 21, 239â€“245, 1979. </reference>
		<reference numeration="36" content_type="text"> Melching, C. S.: An improved-first-order reliability approach for assessing uncertainties in hydrologic modeling, J. Hydrol., 132, 157â€“177, 1992. </reference>
		<reference numeration="37" content_type="text"> Melching, C. S.: Reliability estimation in computer models of watershed hydrology, Water Res. Publ., 69â€“118, 1995. </reference>
		<reference numeration="38" content_type="text"> Minns, A. W. and Hall, M. J.: Artificial neural networks as rainfall-runoff models, Hydrol. Sci. J., 41, 399â€“417, 1996. </reference>
		<reference numeration="39" content_type="text"> Montanari, A. and Brath, A.: A stochastic approach for assessing the uncertainty of rainfall-runoff simulations, Water Resour. Res., 40, W01106, doi:10.1029/2003WR002540, 2004. </reference>
		<reference numeration="40" content_type="text"> Montanari, A.: Large sample behaviors of the generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation (GLUE) in assessing the uncertainty of rainfall-runoff simulations, Water Resour. Res., 41, W08406, doi:10.1029/2004WR003826, 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="41" content_type="text"> Moradkhani, H., Hsu, K.-L., Gupta, H. V., and Sorooshian, S.: Uncertainty assessment of hydrologic model states and parameters: Sequential data assimilation using the particle filter, Water Resour. Res., 41, W05012, doi:10.1029/2004WR003604, 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="42" content_type="text"> Nash, J. and Sutcliffe, J.: River flow forecasting through conceptual models â€“ Part I â€“ A discussion of principles, J. Hydrol., 10, 282â€“290, 1970.  </reference>
		<reference numeration="43" content_type="text"> O&apos;Hagan, A.: Bayesian analysis of computer code outputs: A tutorial, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Safe., 91, 1290â€“1300, doi:10.1016/j.ress.2005.11.025, 2006. </reference>
		<reference numeration="44" content_type="text"> Protopapas, A. and Bras, R.: Uncertainty propagation with numerical models for flow and transport in the unsaturated zone, Water Resour. Res., 26, 2463â€“2474, 1990. </reference>
		<reference numeration="45" content_type="text"> Rosenblueth, E.: Two-point estimates in probability, Appl. Math. Model., 5, 329â€“335, doi:10.1016/S0307-904X(81)80054-6, 1981. </reference>
		<reference numeration="46" content_type="text"> Shrestha, D. L. and Solomatine, D. P.: Machine learning approaches for estimation of prediction interval for the model output, Neural Networks, 19, 225â€“235, doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2006.01.012, 2006. </reference>
		<reference numeration="47" content_type="text"> Shrestha, D. L. and Solomatine, D. P.: Data-driven approaches for estimating uncertainty in rainfall-runoff modelling, Int. J. River Basin Management, 6, 109â€“122, 2008. </reference>
		<reference numeration="48" content_type="text"> Solomatine, D. P., Dibike, Y. B., and Kukuric, N.: Automatic calibration of groundwater models using global optimization techniques, Hydrol. Sci. J., 44, 879â€“894, 1999. </reference>
		<reference numeration="49" content_type="text"> Solomatine, D. P. and Dulal, K. N.: Model trees as an alternative to neural networks in rainfallâ€“runoff modelling, Hydrol. Sci. J., 48, 399â€“411, 2003. </reference>
		<reference numeration="50" content_type="text"> Solomatine, D. P. and Shrestha, D. L.: A novel method to estimate model uncertainty using machine learning techniques, Water Resour. Res., 45, W00B11, doi:10.1029/2008WR006839, 2009. </reference>
		<reference numeration="51" content_type="text"> Thiemann, M., Trosset, M., Gupta, H. V., and Sorooshian, S.: Bayesian recursive parameter estimation for hydrologic models, Water Resour. Res., 37, 2521â€“2535, 2001.  </reference>
		<reference numeration="52" content_type="text"> Tung, Y.-K.: Uncertainty and reliability analysis, in: Water Resources Handbook, edited by: Mays, L. W., McGraw-Hill Book Company, 7.1â€“7.64, 1996.  </reference>
		<reference numeration="53" content_type="text"> Vernieuwe, H., Georgieva, O., De Baets, B., Pauwels, V. R. N., Verhoest, N. E. C., and De Troch, F. P.: Comparison of data-driven Takagi-Sugeno models of rainfall–discharge dynamics, J. Hydrol., 302(1â€“4), 173â€“186, 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="54" content_type="text"> Vrugt, J. A., Diks, C., Gupta, H. V., Bouten, W., and Verstraten, J. M.: Improved treatment of uncertainty in hydrologic modeling: Combining the strengths of global optimization and data assimilation, Water Resour. Res., 41, W01017, doi:10.1029/2004WR003059, 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="55" content_type="text"> Vrugt, J. A., Gupta, H. V., Bouten, W., and Sorooshian, S.: A Shuffled complex evolution Metropolis algorithm for optimization and uncertainty assessment of hydrologic model parameters, Water Resour. Res., 39, 1201, doi:10.1029/2002WR001642, 2003. </reference>
		<reference numeration="56" content_type="text"> Vrugt, J. A. and Robinson, B. A.: Treatment of uncertainty using ensemble methods: Comparison of sequential data assimilation and Bayesian model averaging, Water Resour. Res., 43, W01411, doi:10.1029/2005WR004838, 2007.  </reference>
		<reference numeration="57" content_type="text"> Vrugt, J. A., ter Braak, C. J. F., Clark, M. P., Hyman, J. M, and Robinson, B. A.: Treatment of input uncertainty in hydrologic modeling: doing hydrology backwards with Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation, Water Resour. Res., 44, W00B09, doi:10.1029/2007WR006720, 2008. </reference>
		<reference numeration="58" content_type="text"> Xiong, L. and O&apos;Connor, K.: An empirical method to improve the prediction limits of the GLUE methodology in rainfall-runoff modeling, J. Hydrol., 349, 115â€“124, doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.10.029, 2008. </reference>
		<reference numeration="59" content_type="text"> Young, P. C.: Data-based mechanistic modelling of environmental, ecological, economic and engineering systems, Environ. Modell. Softw., 13, 105â€“122, doi:10.1016/S1364-8152(98)00011-5, 1998. </reference>
		<reference numeration="60" content_type="text"> Young, P. C. and Ratto, M.: A unified approach to environmental systems modeling, Stoch. Env. Res. Risk A., 10, 008â€“0271, doi:10.1007/s00477-008-0271-1, 2008. </reference>
	</references>
</article>

