<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article SYSTEM "http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/inc/hess/copernicus.dtd">
<article language="en">
	<journal>
		<journal_title>Hydrology and Earth System Sciences</journal_title>
		<journal_url>www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net</journal_url>
		<issn>1027-5606</issn>
		<eissn>1607-7938</eissn>
		<volume_number>13</volume_number>
		<issue_number>9</issue_number>
		<publication_year>2009</publication_year>
	</journal>
	<doi>10.5194/hess-13-1649-2009</doi>
	<article_url>http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/13/1649/2009/</article_url>
	<abstract_html>http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/13/1649/2009/hess-13-1649-2009.html</abstract_html>
	<fulltext_pdf>http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/13/1649/2009/hess-13-1649-2009.pdf</fulltext_pdf>
	<start_page>1649</start_page>
	<end_page>1658</end_page>
	<publication_date>2009-09-16</publication_date>
	<article_title content_type="html">Dynamically vs. empirically downscaled medium-range precipitation forecasts</article_title>
	<authors>
		<author numeration="1" affiliations="1,2">
			<name>G. Bürger</name>
			<email>gbuerger@uni-potsdam.de</email>
		</author>
	</authors>
	<affiliations>
		<affiliation numeration="1" content_type="html">Universität Potsdam, Institut für Geoökologie, Potsdam, Germany</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="2" content_type="html">currently at: Pacific Climate Impacts Consortium, Victoria, Canada</affiliation>
	</affiliations>
	<abstract content_type="html">For three small, mountainous catchments in Germany two medium-range
      forecast systems are compared that predict precipitation for up to 5
      days in advance. One system is composed of the global German weather
      service (DWD) model, GME, which is dynamically downscaled using the
      COSMO-EU regional model. The other system is an empirical (expanded)
      downscaling of the ECMWF model IFS. Forecasts are verified against
      multi-year daily observations, by applying standard skill scores to
      events of specified intensity. All event classes are skillfully
      predicted by the empirical system for up to five days lead time. For
      the available prediction range of one to two days it is superior to
      the dynamical system.</abstract>
	<references>
		<reference numeration="1" content_type="text"> Bürger,~G.: Expanded downscaling for generating local weather scenarios, Clim. Res., 7, 111–128, 1996. </reference>
		<reference numeration="2" content_type="text"> Bürger,~G.: Selected precipitation scenarios across Europe, J. Hydrol., 262(1–4), 99–110, 2002. </reference>
		<reference numeration="3" content_type="text"> Bürger,~G., Fast,~I., and Cubasch,~U.: Climate reconstruction by regression-32 variations on a~theme, Tellus A, 58(1), 227–235, 2006. </reference>
		<reference numeration="4" content_type="text"> Bürger,~G., Reusser,~D., and Kneis,~D.: Early flood warnings from empirical (expanded) downscaling of the full Ensemble Prediction System, Water Resour. Res., doi:10.1029/2009WR007779, in press, 2009. </reference>
		<reference numeration="5" content_type="text"> Baldauf,~M. and Schulz,~J P.: Prognostic precipitation in the Lokal-Modell (LM) of DWD, COSMO Newsletter, 4, 177–180, 2004. </reference>
		<reference numeration="6" content_type="text"> Bartholmes,~J C., Thielen,~J., Ramos,~M H., and Gentilini,~S.: The european flood alert system EFAS – Part 2: Statistical skill assessment of probabilistic and deterministic operational forecasts, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 13, 141–153, 2009. </reference>
		<reference numeration="7" content_type="text"> Charba,~J P., Reynolds,~D W., McDonald,~B E., and Carter,~G M.: Comparative verification of recent quantitative precipitation forecasts in the National Weather Service: A~simple approach for scoring forecast accuracy, Weather Forecast., 18(2), 161–183, 2003. </reference>
		<reference numeration="8" content_type="text"> Clark,~M P. and Hay,~L E.: Use of medium-range numerical weather prediction model output to produce forecasts of streamflow, J. Hydrometeorol., 5(1), 15–32, 2004. </reference>
		<reference numeration="9" content_type="text"> Damrath,~U., Doms,~G., Frühwald,~D., Heise,~E., Richter,~B., and Steppeler,~J.: Operational quantitative precipitation forecasting at the German Weather Service, J. Hydrol., 239(1–4), 260–285, 2000. </reference>
		<reference numeration="10" content_type="text"> Ebert,~E E., Damrath,~U., Wergen,~W., and Baldwin,~M E.: The WGNE assessment of short-term quantitative precipitation forecasts, Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 84(4), 481–492, 2003. </reference>
		<reference numeration="11" content_type="text"> Elementi, M., Marsigli, C., and Paccagnella, T.: High resolution forecast of heavy precipitation with Lokal Modell: analysis of two case studies in the Alpine area, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 5, 593–602, 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="12" content_type="text"> Hamill,~T M., Whitaker,~J S., and Mullen,~S L.: Reforecasts: An Important Dataset for Improving Weather Predictions, Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 87(1), 33–46, 2006. </reference>
		<reference numeration="13" content_type="text"> Ledermann,~W., Churchhouse,~R F., and Vajda,~S.: Handbook of Applicable Mathematics: Statistics, John Wiley &amp; Sons, 1984. </reference>
		<reference numeration="14" content_type="text"> Liu,~X., Coulibaly,~P., and Evora,~N.: Comparison of data-driven methods for downscaling ensemble weather forecasts, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 12, 615–624, 2008. </reference>
		<reference numeration="15" content_type="text"> Majewski,~D., Liermann,~D., Prohl,~P., Ritter,~B., Buchhold,~M., Hanisch,~T., Paul,~G., Wergen,~W., and Baumgardner,~J.: The operational global icosahedral–hexagonal gridpoint model GME: Description and high-resolution tests, Month. Weath. Rev., 130(2), 319–338, 2002. </reference>
		<reference numeration="16" content_type="text"> McBride,~J L. and Ebert,~E E.: Verification of quantitative precipitation forecasts from operational numerical weather prediction models over Australia, Weather Forecast., 15(1), 103–121, 2000. </reference>
		<reference numeration="17" content_type="text"> Menzel,~L., Thieken,~A H., Schwandt,~D., and Bürger,~G.: Impact of climate change on the regional hydrology – scenario-based modelling studies in the German Rhine catchment, Nat. Haz., 38(1), 45–61, 2006. </reference>
		<reference numeration="18" content_type="text"> Richard,~E., Buzzi,~A., and Zangl,~G.: Quantitative precipitation forecasting in the Alps: The advances achieved by the Mesoscale Alpine Programme, Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 133(625), 831–846, 2007.  </reference>
		<reference numeration="19" content_type="text"> Thompson,~J C.: On the operational deficiencies in categorical weather forecasts, Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc, 33, 223–226, 1952. </reference>
		<reference numeration="20" content_type="text"> White,~B G., Paegle,~J., Steenburgh,~W J., Horel,~J D., Swanson,~R T., Cook,~L K., Onton,~D J., and Miles,~J G.: Short-term forecast validation of six models, Weather Forecast., 14(1), 84–108, 1999. </reference>
		<reference numeration="21" content_type="text"> White,~P W.: IFS Documentation, ECMWF, Reading, 2002. </reference>
		<reference numeration="22" content_type="text"> Wilks,~D S.: Statistical methods in the atmospheric sciences, Academic Press, San Diego, 1995. </reference>
	</references>
</article>

