<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article SYSTEM "http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/inc/hess/copernicus.dtd">
<article language="en">
	<journal>
		<journal_title>Hydrology and Earth System Sciences</journal_title>
		<journal_url>www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net</journal_url>
		<issn>1027-5606</issn>
		<eissn>1607-7938</eissn>
		<volume_number>13</volume_number>
		<issue_number>11</issue_number>
		<publication_year>2009</publication_year>
	</journal>
	<doi>10.5194/hess-13-2137-2009</doi>
	<article_url>http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/13/2137/2009/</article_url>
	<abstract_html>http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/13/2137/2009/hess-13-2137-2009.html</abstract_html>
	<fulltext_pdf>http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/13/2137/2009/hess-13-2137-2009.pdf</fulltext_pdf>
	<start_page>2137</start_page>
	<end_page>2149</end_page>
	<publication_date>2009-11-12</publication_date>
	<article_title content_type="html">Multi-objective calibration of a distributed hydrological model (WetSpa) using a genetic algorithm</article_title>
	<authors>
		<author numeration="1" affiliations="1">
			<name>M. Shafii</name>
			<email>mshafiih@vub.ac.be</email>
		</author>
		<author numeration="2" affiliations="1">
			<name>F. De Smedt</name>
		</author>
	</authors>
	<affiliations>
		<affiliation numeration="1" content_type="html">Department of Hydrology and Hydraulic Engineering, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium</affiliation>
	</affiliations>
	<abstract content_type="html">A multi-objective genetic algorithm, NSGA-II, is applied
to calibrate a distributed hydrological model (WetSpa) for prediction of
river discharges. The goals of this study include (i) analysis of the
applicability of multi-objective approach for WetSpa calibration instead of
the traditional approach, i.e. the Parameter ESTimator software (PEST), and
(ii) identifiability assessment of model parameters. The objective functions
considered are model efficiency (Nash-Sutcliffe criterion) known to be
biased for high flows, and model efficiency for logarithmic transformed
discharges to emphasize low-flow values. For the multi-objective approach,
Pareto-optimal parameter sets are derived, whereas for the single-objective
formulation, PEST is applied to give optimal parameter sets. The two
approaches are evaluated by applying the WetSpa model to predict daily
discharges in the Hornad River (Slovakia) for a 10 year period (1991–2000).
The results reveal that NSGA-II performs favourably well to locate Pareto
optimal solutions in the parameters search space. Furthermore,
identifiability analysis of the WetSpa model parameters shows that most
parameters are well-identifiable. However, in order to perform an
appropriate model evaluation, more efforts should be focused on improving
calibration concepts and to define robust methods to quantify different
sources of uncertainties involved in the calibration procedure.</abstract>
	<references>
		<reference numeration="1" content_type="text"> Ajami, N. K., Gupta, H. V., Wagener, T., and Sorooshian, S.: Calibration of a semi-distributed hydrologic model for streamflow estimation along a river system, J. Hydrol., 298, 112–135, 2004. </reference>
		<reference numeration="2" content_type="text"> Baginska, B., Milne-Home, W., and Cornish, P.: Modelling nutrient transport in Currency Creek, NSW with AnnAGNPS and PEST, Environ. Model Softw., 18, 801–808, 2003. </reference>
		<reference numeration="3" content_type="text"> Bahremand, A., De Smedt, F., Corluy, J., and Liu, Y. B.: WetSpa Model Application for Assessing Reforestation Impacts on Floods in Margecany-Hornad Watershed, Slovakia, Water Resour. Manag., 21, 1373–1391, 2007. </reference>
		<reference numeration="4" content_type="text"> Bekele, E. G. and Nicklow, J. W.: Multi-objective automatic calibration of SWAT using NSGA-II, J. Hydrol., 341(3–4), 165–176, 2007. </reference>
		<reference numeration="5" content_type="text"> Beven, K. J.: Prophesy, reality and uncertainty in distributed hydrological modelling, Adv. Water Resour., 16, 41–51, 1993. </reference>
		<reference numeration="6" content_type="text"> Beven, K. J. and Binley, A. M.: The future of distributed models: model calibration and uncertainty prediction, Hydrol. Processes, 6, 279–298, 1992. </reference>
		<reference numeration="7" content_type="text"> Boyle, D. P., Gupta, H. V., and Sorooshian, S.: Toward improved calibration of hydrologic models: Combining the strengths of manual and automatic methods, Water Resour. Res., 36, 3663–3674, 2000. </reference>
		<reference numeration="8" content_type="text"> Cheng, C. T., Ou, C. P., and Chaw, K. W.: Combining a fuzzy optimal model with a genetic algorithm to solve multi-objective rainfall-runoff model calibration, J. Hydrol., 268(1–4), 72–86, 2002. </reference>
		<reference numeration="9" content_type="text"> Cieniawski, S. E., Eheart, J. W., and Ranjithan, S. R.: Using genetic algorithms to solve a multiobjective groundwater monitoring problem, Water Resour. Res., 31, 399–409, 1995. </reference>
		<reference numeration="10" content_type="text"> Coello, C. C.: An updated survey of GA-based multiobjective optimization techniques, ACM Comput. Surv., 32(2), 109–143, 2000. </reference>
		<reference numeration="11" content_type="text"> Cunha, A. G., Oliviera, P., and Covas, J.: Use of genetic algorithms in multicriteria optimization to solve industrial problems, in: Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Genetic Algorithms, edited by: Bäck, T., San Francisco, California, 682–688, Morgan Kaufmann, 1997. </reference>
		<reference numeration="12" content_type="text"> De Smedt, F., Liu, Y. B., Gebremeskel, S., Hoffmann, L., and Pfister, L.: Application of GIS and remote sensing in flood modeling for complex terrain, in: GIS and Remote Sensing in Hydrology, edited by: Chen, Y. B., Takara, K., Cluckie, I., and De Smedt, F., Water Resources and Environment, IAHS Publ., 289, 23–32, 2004. </reference>
		<reference numeration="13" content_type="text"> De Smedt, F., Liu, Y. B., and Gebremeskel, S.: Hydrologic modeling on a basin scale using GIS and remote sensed land use information, in: Risk Analysis II, edited by: Brebbia, C. A., 295–304, WTI press, Southampton, Boston, 2000. </reference>
		<reference numeration="14" content_type="text"> Deb, K., Pratap, A., Agarwal, S., and Meyarivan, T.: A Fast and Elitist Multiobjective Genetic Algorithm: NSGA-II, IEEE Trans. Evol. Computation, 6(2), 182–197, 2002. </reference>
		<reference numeration="15" content_type="text"> Doherty, J. and Johnston, J. M.: Methodologies for calibration and predictive analysis of a watershed model, J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 39, 251–265, 2003. </reference>
		<reference numeration="16" content_type="text"> Fonseca, C. and Fleming, P. J.: An overview of evolutionary algorithms in multiobjective optimization, Evolutionary Comput., 3(1), 1–16, 1995. </reference>
		<reference numeration="17" content_type="text"> Fourman, M. P.: Compaction of symbolic layout using genetic algorithms, in: Proceedings of an International Conference on Genetic Algorithms and Their Applications, edited by: Grefenstette, J. J., Pittsburgh, PA, 141–153, sponsored by Texas Instruments and US Navy Center for Applied Research in Artificial Intelligence (NCARAI), 1985. </reference>
		<reference numeration="18" content_type="text"> Gen, M. and Cheng, R.: Genetic algorithms and engineering optimization, New York, John Wiley &amp;Sons, 2000. </reference>
		<reference numeration="19" content_type="text"> Goldberg, D. E.: Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization and Machine Learning, Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., Inc., Redwood City, CA, USA, 1989. </reference>
		<reference numeration="20" content_type="text"> Goldberg, D. E. and Deb, K.: A comparative analysis of selection schemes used in genetic algorithms, in: Foundations of Genetic Algorithms, edited by: Rawlins, G. J. E., Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA, 1991. </reference>
		<reference numeration="21" content_type="text"> Gupta, H. V., Beven, K. J., and Wagener, T.: Model Calibration and Uncertainty Estimation, Encyclopedia of Hydrological Sciences, Part 11, Rainfall-Runoff Modeling, John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd, 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="22" content_type="text"> Gupta, H. V., Sorooshian, S., and Yapo, P. O.: Toward improved calibration of hydrological models: multiple and noncommensurable measures of information, Water Resour. Res., 34(4), 751–763, 1998. </reference>
		<reference numeration="23" content_type="text"> Iman, R. L. and Conover, W. J.: Small sample sensitivity analysis techniques for computer models, with an application to risk assessment, Communication in Statistics, A9(17), 1749–1842, 1980. </reference>
		<reference numeration="24" content_type="text"> Ishibuchi, H. and Murata, T.: Multi-objective genetic local search algorithm, in: Proceedings of 1996 IEEE International Conference on Evolutionary Computation (ICEC&apos;96), Piscataway, NJ, 119–124, 1996. </reference>
		<reference numeration="25" content_type="text"> Kavetski, D., Franks, S. W., and Kuczera, G.: Confronting input uncertainty in environmental modeling, in: Calibration of Watershed Models, edited by: Duan, Q., Gupta, H. V., Sorooshian, S., Rousseau, A. N., and Turcotte, R., AGU Water Science and Applications Series, 6, 49–68, 2002. </reference>
		<reference numeration="26" content_type="text"> Khu, S. T., Savic, D., and Liu, Y.: Evolutionary-based multi-objective meta-model approach for rainfall-runoff model calibration, Geophys. Res. Abstr., 7, 09858, 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="27" content_type="text"> Lindstorm, G.: A simple automatic calibration routine for the HBV model, Nordic Hydrology, 28, 153–168, 1997. </reference>
		<reference numeration="28" content_type="text"> Liu, Y. B., Gebremeskel. S., De Smedt, F., Hoffmann, L., and Pfister, L.: A diffusive transport approach for flow routing in GIS-based flood modelling, J. Hydrol., 283, 91–106, 2003. </reference>
		<reference numeration="29" content_type="text"> Liu, Y. B., De Smedt, F., Hoffmann, L., and Pfister, L.: Parameterization using ArcView GIS in medium and large watershed modelling, in: GIS and Remote Sensing in Hydrology, edited by: Chen, Y. B., Takara, K., Cluckie, I., and De Smedt, F., Water Resources and Environment, IAHS Publ., 289, 50–58, 2004. </reference>
		<reference numeration="30" content_type="text"> Liu, Y. B., Batelaan, O., De Smedt, F., Poorova, J., and Velcicka, L.: Automated calibration applied to a GIS-based flood simulation model using PEST, in: Floods, from Defence to Management, edited by: van Alphen, J., van Beek, E., and Taal, M., Taylor &amp; Francis Group, London, 317–326, 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="31" content_type="text"> Liu, Y. B. and De Smedt, F.: WetSpa extension, documentation and user manual, Department of Hydrology and Hydraulic Engineering, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium, 2004. </reference>
		<reference numeration="32" content_type="text"> Liu, Y. B. and De Smedt, F.: Flood modeling for complex terrain using GIS and remote sensed information, Water Resour. Manag., 19(5), 605–624, 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="33" content_type="text"> Madsen, H.: Parameter estimation in distributed hydrological catchment modeling using automatic calibration with multiple objectives, Adv. Water Resour., 26, 205–216, 2003. </reference>
		<reference numeration="34" content_type="text"> Madsen, H.: Automatic calibration of a conceptual rainfall-runoff model using multiple objectives, J. Hydrol., 235, 276–288, 2000. </reference>
		<reference numeration="35" content_type="text"> Michalewicz, Z.: Genetic Algorithms + Data Structures = Evolution Programs, AI Series, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1994. </reference>
		<reference numeration="36" content_type="text"> Muleta, M. and Nicklow, J.: Decision Support for Watershed Management Using Evolutionary Algorithms, J. Water Res. Pl., 131, 35–44, 2005a. </reference>
		<reference numeration="37" content_type="text"> Muleta, M. K. and Nicklow, J. W.: Sensitivity and uncertainty analysis coupled with automatic calibration for a distributed watershed model, J. Hydrol., 306, 127–145, 2005b. </reference>
		<reference numeration="38" content_type="text"> Nash, J. E. and Sutcliffe, J. V.: River flow forecasting through conceptual models. Part 1: A discussion of principles, J. Hydrol., 10, 282–290, 1970. </reference>
		<reference numeration="39" content_type="text"> Osyczka, A.: Multicriteria Optimization for Engineering Design, Academic Press, 1985. </reference>
		<reference numeration="40" content_type="text"> Pareto, V.: The Rise and Fall of the Elites, Totowa, N. J., Bedminster Press, 1968. </reference>
		<reference numeration="41" content_type="text"> Reed, P. and Minsker, B. S.: Striking the Balance: Long-Term Groundwater Monitoring Design for Conflicting Objectives, J. Water Res. Pl., 130, 140–149, 2004. </reference>
		<reference numeration="42" content_type="text"> Reed, P., Minsker, B. S., and Goldberg, D. E.: A multiobjective approach to cost effective long-term groundwater monitoring using an Elitist Nondominated Sorted Genetic Algorithm with historical data, J. Hydroinform., 3, 71–90, 2001. </reference>
		<reference numeration="43" content_type="text"> Ritzel, B. J., Eheart, J. W., and Ranjithan, S. R.: Using genetic algorithms to solve a multiple objective groundwater pollution containment problem, Water Resour. Res., 30, 1589–1603, 1994. </reference>
		<reference numeration="44" content_type="text"> Schaffer, J. D.: Multiple objective optimization with vector evaluated genetic algorithms, in: Proceedings of an International Conference on Genetic Algorithms and Their Applications, edited by: Grefenstette, J. J., Pittsburgh, PA, 93–100, sponsored by Texas Instruments and US Navy Center for Applied Research in Artificial Intelligence (NCARAI), 1984. </reference>
		<reference numeration="45" content_type="text"> Seibert, J.: Multi-criteria calibration of a conceptual runoff model using a genetic algorithm, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 4, 215–224, 2000. </reference>
		<reference numeration="46" content_type="text"> Singh, A. and Minsker, B. S.: Uncertainty-based multiobjective optimization of groundwater remediation design, Water Resour. Res., 44, W02404, doi:10.1029/2005WR004436, 2008. </reference>
		<reference numeration="47" content_type="text"> Srinivas, N. and Deb, K.: Multiobjective optimization using nondominated sorting in genetic algorithms, Tech. Rep., Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi, India, 1993. </reference>
		<reference numeration="48" content_type="text"> Syvoloski, G., Kwicklis, E., Eddebbarh, A. A., Arnold, B., Faunt, C., and Robinson, B.: The site-scale saturated zone flow model for Yucca Mountain: calibration of different conceptual models and their impact on flow paths, J. Contam. Hydrol., 62–63, 731–750, 2003. </reference>
		<reference numeration="49" content_type="text"> Tang, Y., Reed, P., and Wagener, T.: How effective and efficient are multiobjective evolutionary algorithms at hydrologic model calibration?, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 10, 289–307, 2006. </reference>
		<reference numeration="50" content_type="text"> Valenzuela-Rend&apos;on, M. and Uresti-Charre, E.: A nongenerational genetic algorithm for multiobjective optimization, in: Proc. 7th Int. Conf. Genetic Algorithms, edited by: Bäck, T., San Francisco, CA, Morgan Kaufmann, 658–665, 1997. </reference>
		<reference numeration="51" content_type="text"> Vrugt, J., Gupta, H. V., Bastidas, L. A., Bouten, W., and Sorooshian, S.: Effective and efficient algorithm for multiobjective optimization of hydrologic models, Water Resour. Res., 39, 1214, doi:1210.1029/2002WR001746, 2003. </reference>
		<reference numeration="52" content_type="text"> Vrugt, J. A., Schoups, G., Hopmans, J. W., Young, C., Wallender, W. W., and Harter, T.: Inverse modeling of large-scale spatially distributed vadose zone properties using global optimization, Water Resour. Res., 41, W06003, doi:10.1029/2004WR003698, 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="53" content_type="text"> Vrugt, J. A. and Robinson, B. A.: Improved evolutionary optimization from genetically adaptive multimethod search, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 104, 708–711, doi:10.1073/pnas.0610471104, 2007. </reference>
		<reference numeration="54" content_type="text"> Wagener, T., Boyle, D. P., Lees, M. J., Wheater, H. S., Gupta, H. V., and Sorooshian, S.: A framework for development and application of hydrological models, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 5, 13–26, 2001. </reference>
		<reference numeration="55" content_type="text"> Wang, Z., Batelaan, O., and De Smedt, F.: A distributed model for Water and Energy Transfer between Soil, Plants and Atmosphere (WetSpa), Phys. Chem. Earth 21(3), 189–193, 1997. </reference>
		<reference numeration="56" content_type="text"> Wöhling, Th., Barkle, G. F., and Vrugt, J. A.: Comparison of three multiobjective optimization algorithms for inverse modeling of vadose zone hydraulic properties, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 72(2), 305–319, 2008. </reference>
		<reference numeration="57" content_type="text"> Yapo, P. O., Gupta, H. V., and Sorooshian, S.: Multi-objective global optimization of hydrological models, J. Hydrol., 204, 83–97, 1998. </reference>
		<reference numeration="58" content_type="text"> Zitzler, E., Deb, K., and Thiele, L.: Comparison of Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithms: Empirical Results, Evolutionary Comput., 8(2), 173–195, 2000. </reference>
		<reference numeration="59" content_type="text"> Zitzler, E. and Thiele, L.: Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: A comparative case study and the strength pareto approach, IEEE Trans. Evol. Computation, 3(4), 257–271, 1999. </reference>
	</references>
</article>
