<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article SYSTEM "http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/inc/hess/copernicus.dtd">
<article language="en">
	<journal>
		<journal_title>Hydrology and Earth System Sciences</journal_title>
		<journal_url>www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net</journal_url>
		<issn>1027-5606</issn>
		<eissn>1607-7938</eissn>
		<volume_number>13</volume_number>
		<issue_number>2</issue_number>
		<publication_year>2009</publication_year>
	</journal>
	<doi>10.5194/hess-13-259-2009</doi>
	<article_url>http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/13/259/2009/</article_url>
	<abstract_html>http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/13/259/2009/hess-13-259-2009.html</abstract_html>
	<fulltext_pdf>http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/13/259/2009/hess-13-259-2009.pdf</fulltext_pdf>
	<start_page>259</start_page>
	<end_page>271</end_page>
	<publication_date>2009-02-23</publication_date>
	<article_title content_type="html">Matching ERS scatterometer based soil moisture patterns with simulations of a conceptual dual layer hydrologic model over Austria</article_title>
	<authors>
		<author numeration="1" affiliations="1,3">
			<name>J. Parajka</name>
			<email>parajka@hydro.tuwien.ac.at</email>
		</author>
		<author numeration="2" affiliations="2">
			<name>V. Naeimi</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="3" affiliations="1">
			<name>G. Blöschl</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="4" affiliations="1">
			<name>J. Komma</name>
		</author>
	</authors>
	<affiliations>
		<affiliation numeration="1" content_type="html">Institute for Hydraulic and Water Resources Engineering, Vienna University of Technology, Austria</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="2" content_type="html">Institute of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Vienna University of Technology, Austria</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="3" content_type="html">Institute of Hydrology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava, Slovakia</affiliation>
	</affiliations>
	<abstract content_type="html">This study compares ERS scatterometer top soil moisture observations with
simulations of a dual layer conceptual hydrologic model. The comparison is
performed for 148 Austrian catchments in the period 1991–2000. On average,
about 5 to 7 scatterometer images per month with a mean spatial coverage of
about 37% are available. The results indicate that the agreement between
the two top soil moisture estimates changes with the season and the weight
given to the scatterometer in hydrologic model calibration. The hydrologic
model generally simulates larger top soil moisture values than are observed
by the scatterometer. The differences tend to be smaller for lower altitudes
and the winter season. The average correlation between the two estimates is
more than 0.5 in the period from July to October, and about 0.2 in the
winter months, depending on the period and calibration setting. Using both
ERS scatterometer based soil moisture and runoff for model calibration
provides more robust model parameters than using either of these two sources
of information.</abstract>
	<references>
		<reference numeration="1" content_type="text"> Bartalis, Z., Scipal, K., and Wagner, W.: Azimuthal anisotropy of scatterometer measurements over land, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote Sens., 44, 2083–2092, 2006. </reference>
		<reference numeration="2" content_type="text"> Boni, G., Entekhabi, D., and Castelli, F.: Land data assimilation with satellite measurements for the estimation of surface energy balance components and surface control on evaporation, Water Resour. Res., 37(6), 1713–1722, 2001. </reference>
		<reference numeration="3" content_type="text"> Ceballos, A., Scipal, K., Wagner W., and Mart\&apos;inez-Fernandez, J.: Validation of ERS scatterometer-derived soil moisture data in the central part of the Duero Basin, Spain, Hydrol. Process., 19, 1549–1566, 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="4" content_type="text"> Crow, W. T., Bindlish, R., and Jackson, T. J.: The added value of spaceborne passive microwave soil moisture retrievals for forecasting rainfall-runoff partitioning, Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L18401, doi:10.1029/2005GL023543, 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="5" content_type="text"> de Wit, A. J. W. and van Diepen, C. A.: Crop model data assimilation with the ensemble Kalman filter for improving regional crop yield forecasts, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 146, 38–56, 2007. </reference>
		<reference numeration="6" content_type="text"> Dirmeyer, P. A., Guo, Z., and Gao, X.: Comparison, validation, and transferability of eight multiyear global soil wetness products, J. Hydrometeorol., 5, 1011–1033, 2004. </reference>
		<reference numeration="7" content_type="text"> Duan, Q., Sorooshian, S., and Gupta, V. K.: Effective and efficient global optimization for conceptual rainfall-runoff models, Water Res. R., 28, 1015–1031, 1992. </reference>
		<reference numeration="8" content_type="text"> Fontaine, B., Louvet, S., and Roucou, P.: Fluctuations in annual cycles and interseasonal memory in west africa: rainfall, soil moisture and heat fluxes, Theor. Appl. Climatol., 88, 57–70, 2006. </reference>
		<reference numeration="9" content_type="text"> Francois, C., Quesney, A., and Ottlé, C.: Sequential Assimilation of ERS-1 SAR Data into a Coupled Land Surface – Hydrological Model Using an Extended Kalman Filter, J. Hydrometeorol., 4, 473–487, 2003. </reference>
		<reference numeration="10" content_type="text"> Hoeben, R. and Troch, P. A.: Assimilation of active microwave observation data for soil moisture profile estimation, Water Res. R., 36(10), 2805–2819, 2000. </reference>
		<reference numeration="11" content_type="text"> Houser, P., Goodrich, D., and Syed, K.: Runoff, precipitation, and soil moisture at Walnut Gulch, Chapter 6, in: Spatial Patterns in Catchment Hydrology: Observations and Modelling, edited by: Grayson, R. and Blöschl, G.: Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 125–157, 2000. </reference>
		<reference numeration="12" content_type="text"> Klemeš, V.: Operational testing of hydrological simulation models, Hydrol. Sci. J., 31, 13–24, 1986. </reference>
		<reference numeration="13" content_type="text"> Merz, R. and Blöschl, G.: Regionalisation of catchment model parameters, J. Hydrol., 287, 95–123, 2004. </reference>
		<reference numeration="14" content_type="text"> Mészároš, I. and Miklánek, P.: Calculation of potential evapotranspiration based on solar radiation income modeling in mountainous areas. Biologia, 61/Suppl. 19, 284–288, 2006. </reference>
		<reference numeration="15" content_type="text"> Naeimi, V., Scipal, K., Bartalis, Z., Hasenauer, S., and Wagner, W.: An improved soil moisture retrieval algorithm for ERS and METOP scatterometer observations, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote Sens., in press, 2008a. </reference>
		<reference numeration="16" content_type="text"> Naeimi, V., Bartalis, Z., and Wagner, W.: ASCAT soil moisture: An assessment of the data quality and consistency with the ERS scatterometer heritage, J. Hydrometeorol., doi:10.1175/2008JHM1051.1, in press, 2008b. </reference>
		<reference numeration="17" content_type="text"> Parada, L. M. and Liang, X.: Optimal multiscale Kalman filter for assimilation of near-surface soil moisture into land surface models. J. Geophys. Res., 109, D24109, doi:10.1029/2004JD004745, 2004. </reference>
		<reference numeration="18" content_type="text"> Parada, L. M. and Liang, X.: Impacts of spatial resolutions and data quality on soil moisture data assimilation, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D10101, doi:10.1029/2007JD009037, 2008. </reference>
		<reference numeration="19" content_type="text"> Parajka, J., Merz, R., and Blöschl, G.: Estimation of daily potential evapotranspiration for regional water balance modeling in Austria, 11th, International Poster Day and Institute of Hydrology Open Day &quot;Transport of Water, Chemicals and Energy in the Soil – Crop Canopy – Atmosphere System&quot;, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava, 299–306, 2003. </reference>
		<reference numeration="20" content_type="text"> Parajka, J. and Blöschl, G.: The value of MODIS snow cover data in validating and calibrating conceptual hydrologic models, J. Hydrol., 240–258, doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.06.006, 2008. </reference>
		<reference numeration="21" content_type="text"> Parajka, J., Merz, R., and Blöschl, G.: Uncertainty and multiple objective calibration in regional water balance modelling – Case study in 320 Austrian catchments, Hydrol. Proc., 21, 435–446, 2007. </reference>
		<reference numeration="22" content_type="text"> Parajka, J., Naeimi, V., Blöschl, G., Wagner, W., Merz, R., and Scipal, K.: Assimilating scatterometer soil moisture data into conceptual hydrological models at the regional scale, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 10, 353–368, 2006. </reference>
		<reference numeration="23" content_type="text"> Pauwels, R. N., Hoeben, R., Verhoest, N. E. C., De Troch, F. P., and Troch, P. A.: Improvements of TOPLATS-based discharge predictions through assimilation of ERS-based remotely-sensed soil moisture values, Hydrol. Proc., 16, 995–1013, 2002. </reference>
		<reference numeration="24" content_type="text"> Pebesma, E. J.: Gstat user&apos;s manual, Dept. of Physical Geography, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands, 100 pp., 2001. </reference>
		<reference numeration="25" content_type="text"> Pellarin, T., Calvet, J. C., and Wagner W.: Evaluation of ERS scatterometer soil moisture products over a half-degree region in southwestern France; Geophysical Research Letters, 33, L17401, 1–6, 2006. </reference>
		<reference numeration="26" content_type="text"> Reichle, R. H. and Koster, R. D.: Global assimilation of satellite surface soil moisture retrievals into the NASA Catchment land surface model, Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L02404, doi:10.1029/2004GL021700, 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="27" content_type="text"> Schuurmans, J. M., Troch, P. A., Veldhuizen, A. A., Bastiaanssen, W. G. M., and Bierkens, M. F. P.: Assimilation of remotely sensed latent heat flux in a distributed hydrological model, Adv. Water Res., 26, 151–159, 2003. </reference>
		<reference numeration="28" content_type="text"> Scipal, K., Scheffler, C., Wagner, W.: Soil moisture-runoff relation at the catchment scale as observed with coarse resolution microwave remote sensing, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 9(3), 173–83, 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="29" content_type="text"> Skøien, J. and Blöschl, G.: Catchments as space-time filters – a joint spatio-temporal geostatistical analysis of runoff and precipitation. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 10, 645-662, 2006. </reference>
		<reference numeration="30" content_type="text"> Wagner, W., Lemoine, G., and Rott, H.: A method for estimating soil moisture from ERS scatterometer and soil data, Remote Sens. Environ., 70, 191–207, 1999. </reference>
		<reference numeration="31" content_type="text"> Walker, J. P., Willgoose, G. R., and Kalma, J. D.: One-dimensional soil moisture profile retrieval by assimilation of near-surface observations: A comparison of retrieval algorithms, Adv. Water Resour., 24(6), 631–650, 2001. </reference>
		<reference numeration="32" content_type="text"> Western, A., Grayson, R., and Blöschl, G.: Scaling of soil moisture: a hydrologic perspective, Ann. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci., 30, 149–180, 2002. </reference>
		<reference numeration="33" content_type="text"> Western, A. W., Grayson, R., Blöschl, G., and Wilson, D. J.: Spatial variability of soil moisture and its implications for scaling, in: Scaling methods in soil physics, edited by: Pachepsky, Y., Radcliffe, D. E., and Selim, H. M., CRC Press, Boca Raton, 119-142, 2003. </reference>
		<reference numeration="34" content_type="text"> Wigneron, J. P., Olioso, A., Calvet, J. C., and Bertuzzi, P.: Estimating root zone soil moisture from surface soil moisture data and soil-vegetation-atmosphere transfer modelling, Water Res. R., 35(12), 3735–3745, 1999. </reference>
		<reference numeration="35" content_type="text"> Zhao, D., Su, B., and Zhao, M.: Soil moisture retrieval from satellite images and its application to heavy rainfall simulation in eastern China, Adv. Atmos. Sci., 23, 299–316, 2006. </reference>
	</references>
</article>

