<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article SYSTEM "http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/inc/hess/copernicus.dtd">
<article language="en">
	<journal>
		<journal_title>Hydrology and Earth System Sciences</journal_title>
		<journal_url>www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net</journal_url>
		<issn>1027-5606</issn>
		<eissn>1607-7938</eissn>
		<volume_number>13</volume_number>
		<issue_number>5</issue_number>
		<publication_year>2009</publication_year>
	</journal>
	<doi>10.5194/hess-13-567-2009</doi>
	<article_url>http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/13/567/2009/</article_url>
	<abstract_html>http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/13/567/2009/hess-13-567-2009.html</abstract_html>
	<fulltext_pdf>http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/13/567/2009/hess-13-567-2009.pdf</fulltext_pdf>
	<start_page>567</start_page>
	<end_page>576</end_page>
	<publication_date>2009-05-11</publication_date>
	<article_title content_type="html">Improved estimation of flood parameters by combining space based SAR data with very high resolution digital elevation data</article_title>
	<authors>
		<author numeration="1" affiliations="1">
			<name>H. Zwenzner</name>
			<email>hendrik.zwenzner@dlr.de</email>
		</author>
		<author numeration="2" affiliations="1">
			<name>S. Voigt</name>
		</author>
	</authors>
	<affiliations>
		<affiliation numeration="1" content_type="html">German Remote Sensing Data Center, German Aerospace Center, Oberpfaffenhofen, Germany</affiliation>
	</affiliations>
	<abstract content_type="html">Severe flood events turned out to be the most devastating catastrophes for
Europe&apos;s population, economy and environment during the past decades. The
total loss caused by the August 2002 flood is estimated to be 10 billion
Euros for Germany alone. Due to their capability to present a synoptic view
of the spatial extent of floods, remote sensing technology, and especially
synthetic aperture radar (SAR) systems, have been successfully applied for
flood mapping and monitoring applications. However, the quality and accuracy
of the flood masks and derived flood parameters always depends on the scale
and the geometric precision of the original data as well as on the
classification accuracy of the derived data products. The incorporation of
auxiliary information such as elevation data can help to improve the
plausibility and reliability of the derived flood masks as well as higher
level products. This paper presents methods to improve the matching of flood
masks with very high resolution digital elevation models as derived from
LiDAR measurements for example. In the following, a cross section approach
is presented that allows the dynamic fitting of the position of flood mask
profiles according to the underlying terrain information from the DEM. This
approach is tested in two study areas, using different input data sets. The
first test area is part of the Elbe River (Germany) where flood masks
derived from Radarsat-1 and IKONOS during the 2002 flood are used in
combination with a LiDAR DEM of 1 m spatial resolution. The other test data
set is located on the River Severn (UK) and flood masks derived from the
TerraSAR-X satellite and aerial photos acquired during the 2007 flood are
used in combination with a LiDAR DEM of 2 m pixel spacing. By means of these
two examples the performance of the matching technique and the scaling
effects are analysed and discussed. Furthermore, the systematic flood
mapping capability of the different imaging systems are examined. It could
be shown that the combination of high resolution SAR data and LiDAR DEM
allows the derivation of higher level flood parameters such as flood depth
estimates, as presented for the Severn area. Finally, the potential and the
constraints of the approach are evaluated and discussed.</abstract>
	<references>
		<reference numeration="1" content_type="text">Baatz, M. and Schäpe, A.: Multiresolution Segmentation–an optimization approach for high quality multi-scale image segmentation, Angewandte Geographische Informationsverarbeitung XII. Beiträge zum AGIT-Symposium Salzburg, 200, 12–23, 2000. </reference>
		<reference numeration="2" content_type="text">Bates, P. D., Wilson, M. D., Horritt, M. S., Mason, D. C., Holden, N., and Currie, A.: Reach scale floodplain inundation dynamics observed using airborne synthetic aperture radar imagery: Data analysis and modeling, J. Hydrol., 328, 306–318, 2006. </reference>
		<reference numeration="3" content_type="text">Blaschke, T., Lang, S., Lorup, E., Strobl, J., and Zeil, P.: Object-oriented image processing in an integrated GIS/remote sensing environment and perspectives for environmental applications, in: Environmental Information for Planning, Politics and the Public, edited by: Cremers, A. and Greve, K.: Metropolis Verlag, Marburg, Germany, 2, 555–570, 2000. </reference>
		<reference numeration="4" content_type="text">Bonn, F. and Dixon, R.: Monitoring Flood Extent and Forecasting Excess Runoff Risk with RADARSAT-1 Data, Nat. Hazards, 35, 377–393, 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="5" content_type="text">Brivio, P. A., Colombo, R., Maggi, M., and Tomasoni, R.: Integration of remote sensing data and GIS for accurate mapping of flooded areas, Int. J. Remote Sens., 23, 429–441, 2002. </reference>
		<reference numeration="6" content_type="text">Fowler, R. A.: LIDAR for Flood Mapping, Earth Observation Magazine, 9, 2002, http://www.eomonline.com/Common/Archives/July00/robert.htm, access: 25 August, 2008. </reference>
		<reference numeration="7" content_type="text">Horritt, M. S., Mason, D. C., Cobby, D. M., Davenport, I. J., and Bates, P. D.: Waterline mapping in flooded vegetation from airborne SAR imagery, Remote Sens. Environ., 85, 271–281, 2003. </reference>
		<reference numeration="8" content_type="text">Krieger, G., Fiedler, H., Hajnsek, I., Eineder, M., Werner, M., and Moreira, A.: TanDEM-X: mission concept and performance analysis, IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium Proceedings, 2005 (IGARSS &apos;05), 25–29 July 2005, Seoul, South Korea, 4890–4893, 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="9" content_type="text">Ling, F., Xiao, F., Du, Y., 5 Xue, H. P., and Ren, X. Y.: Waterline mapping at the subpixel scale from remote sensing imagery with high-resolution digital elevation models, Int. J. Remote Sens., 29, 1809–1815, 2008. </reference>
		<reference numeration="10" content_type="text">Mason, D. C., Horrit, M. S., Dall&apos;Amico, J. T., Scott, T. R., and Bates, P. D.: Improving River Flood Extent Delineation From Synthetic Aperture Radar Using Airborne Laser Altimetry, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote, 45, 3932–3943, 2007. </reference>
		<reference numeration="11" content_type="text">Matgen, P., Schumann, G., Henry, J. B., Hoffmann, L., and Pfister, L.: Integration of SAR derived river inundation areas, high-precision topographic data and a river flow model toward near real-time flood management, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs., 9, 247–263, 2007. </reference>
		<reference numeration="12" content_type="text">Meinel, G., Schumacher, U., and Hennersdorf, J.: GIS-Technical Evaluation of the Flood Disaster in Summer 2002 with respect to the City of Dresden on the Basis of Remote Sensing, Laser Scanner and Measurement Data, ISPRS International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, XXXIV, 104–111, 2003. </reference>
		<reference numeration="13" content_type="text">Pappenberger, F., Frodsham, K., Beven, K., Romanowicz, R., and Matgen, P.: Fuzzy set approach to calibrating distributed flood inundation models using remote sensing observations, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 11, 739–752, 2007. </reference>
		<reference numeration="14" content_type="text">Sanders, B. F.: Evaluation of on-line DEMs for flood inundation modeling, Adv. Water Resour., 30, 1831–1843, 2007. </reference>
		<reference numeration="15" content_type="text">Sanyal, J. and Lu, X. X.: Application of Remote Sensing in Flood Management with Special Reference to Monsoon Asia: A Review, Nat. Hazards, 33, 283–301, 2004. </reference>
		<reference numeration="16" content_type="text">Schneiderhan, T., Huber, M., Zwenzner, H., and Hoffmann, J.: Use of ENVISAT ASAR and ERS SAR data for flood rapid mapping, ENVISAT Symposium, Montreux, Swiss, 2007. </reference>
		<reference numeration="17" content_type="text">Schumann, G., Black, A., Cutler, M., Henry, J.-B., Hoffmann, L., Matgen, P., and Pfister, L.: Hydraulic and event knowledge to reduce the positional uncertainty in SAR flood images for improved flood model calibration and development, 7th International Symposium on Spatial Accuracy Assessment in Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences., Lisbon, Portugal, 633–642, 2006. </reference>
		<reference numeration="18" content_type="text">Schumann, G., Hostache, R., Puech, C., Hoffmann, L., Matgen, P., Pappenberger, F., and Pfister, L.: High-Resolution 3-D Flood Information From Radar Imagery for Flood Hazard Management, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote, 45, 1715–1725, 2007. </reference>
		<reference numeration="19" content_type="text">Sheng, Y. and Xia, Z.-G.: A comprehensive evaluation of filters for radar speckle suppression, in: Remote Sensing for a Sustainable Future, International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS), Lincoln, Nebraska, USA, 1559–1561, 1996. </reference>
		<reference numeration="20" content_type="text">Thieken, A. H., Müller, M., Kreibich, H., and Merz, B.: Flood damage and influenceing factors: New insights from the August 2002 flood in Germany, Water Resour. Res., 41, 1–16, 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="21" content_type="text">Wang, Y.: Seasonal change in the extent of inundation on floodplains detected by JERS-1 Synthetic Aperture Radar data, Int. J. Remote Sens., 25, 2497–2508, 2004. </reference>
	</references>
</article>

