Hydrology and Earth System Sciences www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net 1027-5606 1607-7938 13 6 2009 10.5194/hess-13-847-2009 http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/13/847/2009/ http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/13/847/2009/hess-13-847-2009.html http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/13/847/2009/hess-13-847-2009.pdf 847 863 2009-06-19 A dynamic rating curve approach to indirect discharge measurement F. Dottori francesco.dottori@unibo.it M. L. V. Martina E. Todini Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra e Geologico-Ambientali, Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy The operational measurement of discharge in medium and large rivers is mostly based on indirect approaches by converting water stages into discharge on the basis of steady-flow rating curves. Unfortunately, under unsteady flow conditions, this approach does not guarantee accurate estimation of the discharge due, on the one hand, to the underlying steady state assumptions and, on the other hand, to the required extrapolation of the rating curve beyond the range of actual measurements used for its derivation. <br><br> Historically, several formulae were proposed to correct the steady-state discharge value and to approximate the unsteady-flow stage-discharge relationship. In the majority of these methods, the correction is made on the basis of water level measurements taken at a single cross section where a steady state rating curve is available, while other methods explicitly account for the water surface slope using stage measurements in two reference sections. However, most of the formulae available in literature are either over-simplified or based on approximations that prevent their generalisation. Moreover they have been rarely tested on cases where their use becomes essential, namely under unsteady-flow conditions characterised by wide loop rating curves. <br><br> In the present work, an original approach, based on simultaneous stage measurements at two adjacent cross sections, is introduced and compared to the approaches described in the literature. The most relevant feature is that the proposed procedure allows for the application of the full dynamic flow equations without restrictive hypotheses. The comparison has been carried out on channels with constant or spatially variable geometry under a wide range of flood wave and river bed slope conditions. The results clearly show the improvement in the discharge estimation and the reduction of estimation errors obtainable using the proposed approach. % vor jede Referenz Aricò, C., Tucciarelli, T., Dottori, F., Martina., M. L. V., and Todini, E.: Peak flow measurement in the Arno River by means of unsteady-state water level data analysis, Proc. International Conference on Fluvial Hydraulics (RiverFlow), Cesme-Izmir, Turkey, 3–5 September 2008. Barbetta, S., Melone, F., Moramarco, T., and Saltalippi, C.: On Discharge Simulation from Observed Stage Hydrographs, Proc. IASTED International Conference, Crete, Greece, 25–28 June 2002. Chow, V.-T.: Open Channel Hydraulics, Mc Graw Hill, Tokio, Japan, 680~pp., 1958. Danish Hydraulic Institute (DHI): MIKE11 user's guide, Copenhagen, Denmark, 142~pp., 2003. Di Baldassarre, G. and Montanari, A.: Uncertainty in river discharge observations: a quantitative analysis, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., 6, 39–61, 2009. Di Silvio, G.: Flood wave modifications along prismatic channels, J. Hydraul. Div. ASCE, 95, 1589–1614, 1969. Dottori, F., Martina., M. L. V., and Todini, E.: Misure indirette di portata in alvei naturali, Atti del 31 Convegno Nazionale di Idraulica e Costruzioni Idrauliche, Perugia, Italy, 9–12 September 2008 (in Italian). Faye, R. E. and Cherry, R. N.: Channel and dynamic flow characteristics of the Chatthoochee River, Buford Dam to Georgia Highway 141, US Geological Survey, Water Supply Paper 2063, 1980. Fenton, J. D.: Calculating hydrographs from stage records, Proc. 28th IAHR Congress, Graz, Austria, 1999. Fenton, J. D.: Rating Curves: Part 1 – Correction for Surface Slope, Proc. Conference on Hydraulics in Civil Engineering, Hobart, 309–317, Australia, 28–30 November 2001. Fenton, J. D. and Keller, R. J.:. The calculation of stream flow from measurements of stage, Technical Report 01/6, Cooperative Research Centre for Catchment Hydrology, Melbourne, Australia, 84~pp., 2001. Franchini, M. and Ravagnani, F.: Costruzione della scala di deflusso in una sezione con sole misure di livello utilizzando le portate registrate a monte ed un modello diffusivo – convettivo, L'Acqua 5, 9–19, 2007 (in Italian). Fread, D. L.: Computation of stage-discharge relationship affected by unsteady flow, Water Resour. Bull., 11(2), 429–442, 1975. Gasiorowski, D. and Szymkiewicz, R.: Mass and momentum conservation in the simplified flood routing models, J. Hydrol., 346, 51–58, 2007. Henderson, F. M.: Open channel flow, Macmilliam Series in Civil Engineering, Macmilliam eds.,New York, USA, 522~pp., 1966. Herschy, R. W.: Streamflow Measurement (2nd edition), E & FN Spon, London, UK, 1995. Hydraulic Engineering Centre (HEC): Hydraulic Reference Manual, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Davis, California, USA, 377~pp., 2001. Jones, B. E.: A method of correcting river discharge for a changing stage, U.S. Geological Survey Water Supply Paper, 375-E, 117–130, 1915. Lamberti, P. and Pilati, S.: Quasi-kinematic flood wave propagation, Meccanica, 25, 107–114, 1990. Lamberti, P. and Pilati, S.: Flood propagation models for real-time forecasting, J. Hydrol., 175, 239–265, 1996. Marchi, E.: La Propagazione delle onde di piena, Atti Accademia Nazionale Lincei, 64, 594–602, 1976 (in Italian). Perumal, M. and Moramarco, T.: A reappraisal of discharge estimation methods using stage hydrographs, Proc. HYPESD International Conference, Roorkee, India, 23–25 February 2005, 105–116, 2005. Perumal, M. and Ranga Raju, K. G.: Approximate convection-diffusion equations, J. Hydrol. Eng.-ASCE, 4(2), 160–164, 1999. Perumal, M., Shrestha, K. B., and Chaube, U. C.: Reproduction of Hysteresis in Rating Curves, J. Hydrol. Eng.-ASCE, 130, 870–878, 2004. Petersen-Øverleir, A.: Modelling stage-discharge relationships affected by hysteresis using the Jones formula and nonlinear regression, Hydrol. Sci. J., 51, 365–388, 2006. Schmidt, A. R. and Garcia, M. H.: Theoretical Examination of Historical Shifts and Adjustments to Stage-Discharge Rating Curves, in Proc. EWRI World Water and Environmental Congress, Philadelphia, PA, USA, 23–26 June 2001. Schmidt, A. R. and Yen, B. C.: Stage-Discharge Ratings Revisited, in Hydraulic Measurements and Experimental Methods, Proc. EWRI and IAHR Joint Conference, Estes Park, CO, USA, 28 July–1 August 2002. Simons, D. B. and Richardson, E. V.: The effect of bed roughness on depth-discharge relations in alluvial channels, US Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 1498-E, 1961. Todini, E. and Bossi, A.: PAB (Parabolic and Backwater) an Unconditionally Stable Flood Routing Scheme Particularly Suited for Real Time Forecasting and Control, J. Hydrol. Eng.-ASCE, 24(5), 405–424, 1986.