Hydrology and Earth System Sciences www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net 1027-5606 1607-7938 14 6 2010 10.5194/hess-14-1093-2010 http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/14/1093/2010/ http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/14/1093/2010/hess-14-1093-2010.html http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/14/1093/2010/hess-14-1093-2010.pdf 1093 1097 2010-06-28 Comment on "A praxis-oriented perspective of streamflow inference from stage observations – the method of Dottori et al. (2009) and the alternative of the Jones Formula, with the kinematic wave celerity computed on the looped rating curve" by Koussis (2009) A. D. Koussis akoussis@meteo.noa.gr National Observatory of Athens, Institute for Environmental Research & Sustainable Development, Palea Penteli, Athens, 15236, Greece The estimation of transient streamflow from stage measurements is indeed important and the study of Dottori, Martina and Todini (2009) (henceforth DMT) is useful, however, DMT seem to miss certain of its <i>practical aspects</i>. The goal is <i>to infer the discharge from measurements of the stage conveniently and with accuracy adequate for practical work</i>. This comment addresses issues of the applicability of the DMT method in the field. DMT also advocate their method as a replacement of the widely used Jones Formula. The Jones Formula was modified by Thomas (Henderson, 1966) to include the temporal derivative of the depth, instead of the spatial one, to specifically allow discharge estimation from at-a-section stage observations. The outcome of the comparison is not surprising in view of this approximation. However, this discussion intends to show that, properly evaluated, the praxis-oriented Jones Formula, which did well in the tests, can perform better than DMT imply. It will be also documented that the DMT methodology relates to a known method for computing flood depth profiles. %Koussis, A. D.: Comment on "A dynamic rating curve approach to indirect discharge measurement" by %Dottori et al (2009), Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., 6, 7429–7437, doi:10.5194/hessd-6-7429-2009, %2009.\blackbox\textbfplease note, updated Anonymous Referee No 2, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., 6, C3168–C3172, www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci-discuss.net/6/C3168/2010/, 2010. % % % %Bowen, J. D., Koussis, A. D., and Zimmer, D. T.: Storm Drain Design – Diffusive %Flood Routing for PCs, J. Hydraulic Engineering, ASCE, 115(8), 1135–1150, 1989. BGS. Dokumentation des EDV-Programmsystems: WASPLA, Version 5.2, Brandt-Gerdes-Sitzmann Wasserwirtschaft GmbH, Darmstadt, 2000 (in German). Bowen, J. D., Koussis, A. D., and Zimmer, D. T.: Storm Drain Design – Diffusive Flood Routing for PCs, J. Hydraulic Eng., ASCE, 115(8), 1135–1150, 1989. Cunge, J. A.: On the subject of a flood propagation computation method (Muskingum method), J. Hydr. Res., 7(2), 205–230, 1969. Dottori, F., Martina, M. L. V., and Todini, E.: A dynamic rating curve approach to indirect discharge measurement, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 13, 847–863, doi:10.5194/hess-13-847-2009, 2009. Fenton, J. D. and Keller, R. J.: The calculation of stream flow from measurements of stage, Technical Report 01/6, Cooperative Research Centre for Catchment Hydrology, Melbourne, Australia, 84~pp., 2001. Ferrick, M.G., Blimes, J., and Long, S.E.: Modeling rapidly varied flow in tailwaters, Water Resour. Res., 20(2), 271–289, 1984. Henderson, F. M.: Flood waves in prismatic channels, J. Hydraulic Div., ASCE, 89(HY4), 1963, with Discussions 90(HY1), 1964, and Closure 90(HY4), 1964. Henderson, F. M.: Open Channel Flow, Macmillan, New York, USA, 374–394, 1966. Koussis, A.: Ein Verbessertes Näherungsverfahren zur Berechnung von Hochwasserabläufen (An Improved Approximate Flood Routing Method), Technical Report Nr. 15, Institut für Hydraulik und Hydrologie, Technische Hochschule Darmstadt, 1975. Koussis, A. D. and Chang, C.-N.: Efficient Analysis of Storm Drain Networks, Urban Stormwater Hydraulics and Hydrology, B.C. Yen, ed., 314–322, 1982. Koussis, A. D., Lagouvardos, K., Mazi, K., Kotroni, V., Sitzmann, D., Lang, J., Zaiss, H., Buzzi, A., and Malguzzi, P.: Flood forecasts for an urban basin with integrated hydro-meteorological model, J. Hydrologic Engineering, 8(1), 1–11, 2003. Koussis, A. D.: An assessment review of the hydraulics of storage flood routing 70~years after the presentation of the Muskingum method, Hydrolog. Sci. J., 54(1), 43–61, 2009. Mazi, K. and Koussis, A. D.: The 8 July 2002 storm over Athens: analysis of the Kifissos River/Canal overflows, Adv. Geosci., 7, 301–306, doi:10.5194/adgeo-7-301-2006, 2006. Natural Environment Research Council: Flood Studies Report, Vol. III Flood Routing Studies, London, England, 1975. Perkins, S. P. and Koussis, A. D.: A stream-aquifer interaction model with diffusive wave routing, J. Hydraulic Eng., 122(4), 210–219, 1996. Price, R. K.: Flood routing methods for British rivers, Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng., 55, 913–930, 1973. Wong, T. H. F. and Laurenson, E. M.: Wave speed – discharge relations in natural channels, Water Resour. Res., 19(3), 701–706, 1983. Weinmann, P. E.: Comparison of flood routing methods in natural rivers, Report No. 2/1977, Dept. Civil Eng., Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia, 1977. Weinmann, P. E. and Laurenson, E. M.: Approximate flood routing methods: A review, J. Hydraul. Div. ASCE, 105(12), 1521–1536, 1979.