Hydrology and Earth System Sciences www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net 1027-5606 1607-7938 14 8 2010 10.5194/hess-14-1567-2010 http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/14/1567/2010/ http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/14/1567/2010/hess-14-1567-2010.html http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/14/1567/2010/hess-14-1567-2010.pdf 1567 1579 2010-08-17 A method for parameterising roughness and topographic sub-grid scale effects in hydraulic modelling from LiDAR data A. Casas angelescasasp@gmail.com S. N. Lane D. Yu G. Benito Institute of Natural Resources, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, 28006 Madrid, Spain Institute Hazard, Risk and Resilience and Department of Geography, Durham University, Durham, DH1 3LE, UK Department of Geography, Loughborough University, Loughborough, LE11 3TU, UK Department of Land, Air, and Water Resources, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA High resolution airborne laser data provide new ways to explore the role of topographic complexity in hydraulic modelling parameterisation, taking into account the scale-dependency between roughness and topography. In this paper, a complex topography from LiDAR is processed using a spatially and temporally distributed method at a fine resolution. The surface topographic parameterisation considers the sub-grid LiDAR data points above and below a reference DEM, hereafter named as topographic content. A method for roughness parameterisation is developed based on the topographic content included in the topographic DEM. Five subscale parameterisation schemes are generated (topographic contents at 0, ±5, ±10, ±25 and ±50 cm) and roughness values are calculated using an equation based on the mixing layer theory (Katul et al., 2002), resulting in a co-varied relationship between roughness height and topographic content. Variations in simulated flow across spatial subscales show that the sub grid-scale behaviour of the 2-D model is not well-reflected in the topographic content of the DEM and that subscale parameterisation must be modelled through a spatially distributed roughness parameterisation. Variations in flow predictions are related to variations in the roughness parameter. Flow depth-derived results do not change systematically with variation in roughness height or topographic content but they respond to their interaction. Finally, subscale parameterisation modifies primarily the spatial structure (level of organisation) of simulated 2-D flow linearly with the additional complexity of subscale parameterisation. Abbott, M. B. and Basco, D. R.: Computational fluid dynamics, Longman Scientific and Technical with John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1989. Ackermann, F.: Airborne laser scanning – present status and future expectations, ISPRS J. Photogramm., 54, 64–67, 1999. Anderson, E. S., Thompson, J. A., Crouse, D. A., and Austin, R. E.: Horizontal resolution and data density effects on remotely sensed LIDAR-based DEM, Geoderma, 132(3–4), 406–415, doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2005.06.004, 2006. Antonarakis, A. S., Richards, K. S., and Brasington, J.: Object-based land cover classification using airborne LiDAR, Remote Sens. Environ., 112, 2988–2998, 2008. Antonarakis, A. S., Richards, K. S., Brasington, J., Bithell, M., and Muller, E.: Retrieval of vegetative fluid resistance terms for rigid stems using airborne LiDAR, J. Geophys. Res., 113, G02S07, doi:10.1029/2007JG000543, 2008. Asselman, N. E.: Laser altimetry and hydraulic roughness of vegetation – further studies using ground truth, Technical report, Delft, 2002. Bates, P. D., Marks, K. J., and Horritt, M. S.: Optimal use of high-resolution topographic data in flood inundation models, Hydrol. Process., 17, 537–557, 2003. Bates, P. D., Lane, S. N., and Ferguson, R. I.: Computational Fluid Dynamics modelling for environmental hydraulics, in: Computational Fluid Dynamics Applications in Environmental Hydraulics, edited by: Bates, P. D., Lane, S. N., and Ferguson, R. I., John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 1–15, 2005. Bradbrook, K. F., Lane, S. N., Waller, S. G., and Bates, P.: Two dimensional diffusion wave modelling of flood inundation using a simplified channel representation, JRBM, 2, 3, 1–13, 2004. Carney, S. K., Bledsoe, B. P., and Gessler, D.: Representing the bed roughness of coarse-grained streams in computational fluid dynamics, Earth Surf. Proc. Land., 31, 736–749, 2006. Casas, A., Benito, G., Thorndycraft, V. R., and Rico, M.: The topographic data source of digital terrain models as a key element in the accuracy of hydraulic flood modelling, Earth Surf. Proc. Land., 31(4), 444–456, 2006. Casas, A., Lane, S. N., Hardy, R. J., Benito, G. and Whiting, P. J.: Reconstruction of subgrid-scale topographic variability and its effect upon the spatial structure of three-dimensional river flow, Water Resour. Res., 46, W03519, doi:10.1029/2009WR007756, 2010. Cliff, A. D. and Ord, J. K.: Spatial Autocorrelation, Pion Limited, London, 1973. Clifford, N. J., Robert, A., and Richards, K. S.: Estimation of flow resistance in gravel-bedded rivers: A physical explanation of the multiplier of roughness length, Earth Surf. Proc. Land., 17, 111–126, 1992. Cobby, D. M., Mason, D. M., and Davenport, I. J.: Image processing of airborne scanning laser altimetry for improved river flood modelling, ISPRS J.Photogramm., 56(2), 121–138, 2001. Cook, A. and Merwade, V.: Effect of topographic data, geometric configuration and modeling approach on flood inundation mapping, J. Hydrol., 377, 131–142, 2009. Doneus, M. and Briese, C.: Digital terrain modelling for archaeological interpretation within forested areas using full-waveform laserscanning, in: The 7th International Symposium on Virtual Reality, Archaeology and Cultural Heritage VAST, edited by: Ioannides, M., Arnold, D., Niccolucci, F., and Mania, K., Zypern, 3612–3613, 2006. Gomes-Pereira, L. M. and Wicherson, R. J.: Suitability of laser data for deriving geographical information: a case study in the context of management of fluvial zones, ISPRS J. Photogramm., 54(2–3), 105–114, 1999. Gueudet, D.: The influence of post-spacing density of DEMs derived from LiDAR on flood modeling, Technical report, University of Texas at Austin, 2004. Haile, A. T. and Rientjes, T. H. M.: Effects of LiDAR DEM resolution in flood modelling: A model sensitivity study for the city of Tegucigalpa, Honduras, in: ISPRS WG III/3, III/4, V/3 Workshop "Laser scanning 2005", Enschede, The Netherlands, 2005. Hauer, C., Mandlburger, G., and Habersack, H.: Hydraulically related hydro-morphological units: description based on a new conceptual mesohabitat evaluation model (MEM) using LiDAR data as geometric input, River Res. Appl., 25, 29–47, 2009. Hirata, Y.: The effects of footprint size and sampling density in airborne laser scanning to extract individual trees in mountainous terrain, ISPRS, 36(8), 102–107, 2004. Hodgson, M. E. and Bresnahan, P.: Accuracy of airborne LiDAR-derived elevation: Empirical assessment and error budget, Photogramm. Eng. Rem. S., 70(3), 331–339, 2004. Horritt, M. S. and Bates, P. D.: Effects of spatial resolution on a raster based model of flood flow, J. Hydrol., 253, 239–249, 2001. Horritt, M. S. and Bates, P. D.: Evaluation of 1-D and 2-D numerical models for predicting river flood inundation, J. Hydrol., 268(1–4), 87–99, doi:10.1016/S0022-1694(02)00121-X, 2002. Horritt, M. S.: Parameterisation, validation and uncertainty analysis of CFD models of fluvial and flood hydraulics in the natural environment, in: Computational Fluid Dynamics Applications in Environmental Hydraulics, edited by: Bates, P. D., Lane, S. N., and Ferguson, R. I., John Wiley and Sons Ltd, 193–213, 2005. Horritt, M. S., Bates, P. D., and Mattinson, M. J.: Effects of mesh resolution and topographic representation in 2-D finite volume models of shallow water fluvial flow, J. Hydrol., 329, 306–314, 2006. Hunter, N. M., Bates, P. D., Horritt, M. S., and Wilson, M. D.: Simple spatially-distributed models for predicting flood inundation: a review, Geomorphology, 90(3–4), 208–225, 2007. Katul, G. G., Wiberg, P., Albertson, J., and Hornberger, G.: A mixing layer theory for flow resistance in shallow streams, Water Resour. Res., 38(11), 1250–1250, 2002. Kouwen, N. and Li, R. M.: Biomechanics of vegetative channel linings, J. Hydr. Eng. Div.-ASCE, 106(6), 713–728, 1980. Kouwen, N. and Fathi-Moghadam, M.: Friction factors for coniferous trees along rivers, J. Hydraul. Eng.-ASCE, 126(1), 732–740, 2000. Lane, S. N., Hardy, R. J., Elliott, L., and Ingham, D. B.: Numerical modeling of flow processes over gravelly surfaces using structured grids and a numerical porosity treatment, Water Resour. Res., 40, W01302, doi:10.1029/2002WR001934, 2004. Lane, S. N.: Roughness -time for a re-evaluation?, Earth Surf. Proc. Land., 30, 251–253, 2005. Lane, S. N., Hardy, R. J., Ferguson, R. I., and Parsons, D. R.: A framework for model verification and validation of CFD schemes in natural open channel flows, in: Computational Fluid Dynamics Applications in Environmental Hydraulics, edited by: Bates, P. D., Lane, S. N., and Ferguson, R. I., John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 169–192, 2005. Lane, S. N. and Ferguson, R. I.: Modelling reach-scale fluvial flows, in: Computational Fluid Dynamics Applications in Environmental Hydraulics, edited by: Bates, P. D., Lane, S. N., and Ferguson, R. I., John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 217–269, 2005. Lane, S. N., Tayefi, V., Reid, S. C., Yu, D., and Hardy, R. J.: Interactions between sediment delivery, channel change, climate change and flood risk in a temperate upland environment, Earth Surf. Proc. Land., 32(3), 429–446, 2007. Lane, S. N. and Carboneau, P. E.: High resolution remote sensing for understanding instream habitat, in: Hydroecology and Ecohydrology, edited by: Wood, P. E., Hannah, D. M. and Sadler, J. P. Wiley & Sons, Ldt, 185–204, 2007. Lane, S. N., Reid, S. C., Tayefi, V., Yu, D., and Hardy, R. J.: Reconceptualising coarse sediment delivery problems in rivers as catchment-scale and diffuse, Geomorphology, 98, 227–249, 2008. Leclerc, M.: Ecohydraulics, A new interdisciplinary frontier for CFD, in: Computational Fluid Dynamics Applications in Environmental Hydraulics, edited by: Bates, P. D., Lane, S. N., and Ferguson, R. I., John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 429–460, 2005. Liu, X.: Airborne LiDAR for DEM generation: some critical issues, Prog. Phys. Geog., 32(1), 31–49, 2008. Mandlburger, G. and Briese, C.: Using Airborne Laser Scanning for Improved Hydraulic Models, in: International Congress on Modelling and Simulation, 731–738, 2007. Mandlburger, G., Hauer, C., Höfle, B., Habersack, H., and Pfeifer, N.: Optimisation of LiDAR derived terrain models for river flow modelling, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 13, 1453–1466, doi:10.5194/hess-13-1453-2009, 2009. Marks, K. J. and Bates, P. D.: Integration of high resolution topographic data with floodplain flow models, Hydrol. Process., 14, 2109–2122, 2000. Mason, D. C., Cobby, D. M., Horritt, M. S., and Bates, P. D.: Floodplain friction parameterization in two-dimensional river flood models using vegetation heights derived from airborne scanning laser altimetry, Hydrol. Process., 17, 1711–1732, 2003. Nicholas, A. P.: Computational fluid dynamics modelling of boundary roughness in gravel-bed rivers: An investigation of the effects of random variability in bed elevation, Earth Surf. Proc. Land., 26, 345–362, 2001. Nicholas, A. P.: Roughness parameterization in CFD modelling of gravel-bed rivers, in: Computational Fluid Dynamics Applications in Environmental Hydraulics, edited by: Bates, P. D., Lane, S. N., and Ferguson, R. I., John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 329–355, 2005. Omer, C. R., Nelson, E. J., and Zundel, A. K.: Impact of varied data resolution on hydraulic modelling and floodplain delineation, J. Am. Water. Resour. As., 39(2), 467–475, 2003. Poggi, D. and Katul, G. G.: The effect of canopy roughness density on the constitutive components of the dispersive stresses, Exp. Fluids, 45, 111–121, doi:10.1007/s00348-008-0467-7, 2008. Poggi, D., Krug, C., and Katul, G. G.: Hydraulic resistance of submerged rigid vegetation derived from first-order closure models, Water Resour. Res., 45, W10442, doi:10.1029/2008WR007373, 2009. Popescu, S. C. and Zhao, K.: A voxel-based LiDAR method for estimating crown base height for deciduous and pine trees, Remote Sens. Environ., 112, 767–781, 2008. Raber, G.: The effect of LiDAR posting density on DEM accuracy and flood extent delineation, A GIS-simulation approach, Technical report, 2003. Schubert, J. E., Sanders, B. F., Smith, M. J., and Wright, N. G.: Unstructured mesh generation and landcover-based resistance for hydrodynamic modeling of urban flooding, Adv. Water Resour., 31, 1603–1621, 2008. Sithole, G. and Vosselman G.: Experimental comparison of filter algorithms for bare earth extraction from airborne laser scanning point clouds, ISPRS J. Photogramm., 59(1–2), 85–101, 2004. Straatsma, M. W. and Middelkoop, H.: Airborne laser scanning as a tool for lowland floodplain vegetation monitoring, Hydrobiologia, 565, 87–103, 2006. Straatsma, M. W. and Baptist, M. J.: Floodplain roughness parameterization using airborne laser scanning and spectral remote sensing, Remote Sens. Environ., 112, 1062–1080, 2008. Suarez, J. C., Ontiveros, C., Smith, S., and Snape, S.: Use of airborne LiDAR and aerial photography in the estimation of individual tree heights in forestry, Computers & Geosciences, (31)2, 253–262, doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2004.09.015, 2005. Tayefi, V., Lane, S. N., Hardy, R. J., and Yu, D.: A comparison of 1-D and 2-D approaches to modelling flood inundation over complex upland floodplains, Hydrol. Process., 21, 3190–3202, 2007. Terrascan user's guide: http://www.terrasolid.fi/, 2001. Wehr, A. and Lohr, U.: Airborne laser scanning – an introduction and overview, ISPRS J. Photogramm., 54, 68–82, 1999. Yu, D.: Two-dimensional diffusion wave modelling of structurally complex floodplains, Ph.D. thesis, University of Leeds, UK, 2005. Yu, D. and Lane, S. N.: Urban fluvial flood modelling using a two-dimensional diffusion-wave treatment – Part 1: Mesh resolution effects, Hydrol. Process., 20(7), 1541–1565, 2006a. Yu, D. and Lane, S. N.: Urban fluvial flood modelling using a two-dimensional diffusion-wave treatment – Part 2: Development of a sub-grid-scale treatment, Hydrol. Process., 20(7), 1567–1583, 2006b.