Journal cover Journal topic
Hydrology and Earth System Sciences An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 3.642 IF 3.642
  • IF 5-year<br/> value: 3.916 IF 5-year
  • SNIP value: 1.443 SNIP 1.443
  • IPP value: 3.250 IPP 3.250
  • SJR value: 1.852 SJR 1.852
  • h5-index value: 49 h5-index 49
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 4995-5011, 2013
© Author(s) 2013. This work is distributed
under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Research Article
10 Dec 2013
Inverse modeling of hydrologic parameters using surface flux and runoff observations in the Community Land Model
Y. Sun1,2, Z. Hou1, M. Huang1, F. Tian2, and L. Ruby Leung1
1Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, P.O. Box 999, Richland, WA 99352, USA
2Department of Hydraulic Engineering, State Key Laboratory of Hydroscience and Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China

Abstract. This study demonstrates the possibility of inverting hydrologic parameters using surface flux and runoff observations in version 4 of the Community Land Model (CLM4). Previous studies showed that surface flux and runoff calculations are sensitive to major hydrologic parameters in CLM4 over different watersheds, and illustrated the necessity and possibility of parameter calibration. Both deterministic least-square fitting and stochastic Markov-chain Monte Carlo (MCMC)-Bayesian inversion approaches are evaluated by applying them to CLM4 at selected sites with different climate and soil conditions. The unknowns to be estimated include surface and subsurface runoff generation parameters and vadose zone soil water parameters. We find that using model parameters calibrated by the sampling-based stochastic inversion approaches provides significant improvements in the model simulations compared to using default CLM4 parameter values, and that as more information comes in, the predictive intervals (ranges of posterior distributions) of the calibrated parameters become narrower. In general, parameters that are identified to be significant through sensitivity analyses and statistical tests are better calibrated than those with weak or nonlinear impacts on flux or runoff observations. Temporal resolution of observations has larger impacts on the results of inverse modeling using heat flux data than runoff data. Soil and vegetation cover have important impacts on parameter sensitivities, leading to different patterns of posterior distributions of parameters at different sites. Overall, the MCMC-Bayesian inversion approach effectively and reliably improves the simulation of CLM under different climates and environmental conditions. Bayesian model averaging of the posterior estimates with different reference acceptance probabilities can smooth the posterior distribution and provide more reliable parameter estimates, but at the expense of wider uncertainty bounds.

Citation: Sun, Y., Hou, Z., Huang, M., Tian, F., and Ruby Leung, L.: Inverse modeling of hydrologic parameters using surface flux and runoff observations in the Community Land Model, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 4995-5011, doi:10.5194/hess-17-4995-2013, 2013.
Search HESS
Final Revised Paper
Discussion Paper