Articles | Volume 21, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-879-2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-879-2017
Research article
 | 
14 Feb 2017
Research article |  | 14 Feb 2017

Using satellite-based evapotranspiration estimates to improve the structure of a simple conceptual rainfall–runoff model

Tirthankar Roy, Hoshin V. Gupta, Aleix Serrat-Capdevila, and Juan B. Valdes

Related authors

Review article: Drought as a continuum: memory effects in interlinked hydrological, ecological, and social systems
Anne F. Van Loon, Sarra Kchouk, Alessia Matanó, Faranak Tootoonchi, Camila Alvarez-Garreton, Khalid E. A. Hassaballah, Minchao Wu, Marthe L. K. Wens, Anastasiya Shyrokaya, Elena Ridolfi, Riccardo Biella, Viorica Nagavciuc, Marlies H. Barendrecht, Ana Bastos, Louise Cavalcante, Franciska T. de Vries, Margaret Garcia, Johanna Mård, Ileen N. Streefkerk, Claudia Teutschbein, Roshanak Tootoonchi, Ruben Weesie, Valentin Aich, Juan P. Boisier, Giuliano Di Baldassarre, Yiheng Du, Mauricio Galleguillos, René Garreaud, Monica Ionita, Sina Khatami, Johanna K. L. Koehler, Charles H. Luce, Shreedhar Maskey, Heidi D. Mendoza, Moses N. Mwangi, Ilias G. Pechlivanidis, Germano G. Ribeiro Neto, Tirthankar Roy, Robert Stefanski, Patricia Trambauer, Elizabeth A. Koebele, Giulia Vico, and Micha Werner
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-421,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-421, 2024
Short summary
The Great Lakes Runoff Intercomparison Project Phase 4: the Great Lakes (GRIP-GL)
Juliane Mai, Hongren Shen, Bryan A. Tolson, Étienne Gaborit, Richard Arsenault, James R. Craig, Vincent Fortin, Lauren M. Fry, Martin Gauch, Daniel Klotz, Frederik Kratzert, Nicole O'Brien, Daniel G. Princz, Sinan Rasiya Koya, Tirthankar Roy, Frank Seglenieks, Narayan K. Shrestha, André G. T. Temgoua, Vincent Vionnet, and Jonathan W. Waddell
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 3537–3572, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-3537-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-3537-2022, 2022
Short summary
CABra: a novel large-sample dataset for Brazilian catchments
André Almagro, Paulo Tarso S. Oliveira, Antônio Alves Meira Neto, Tirthankar Roy, and Peter Troch
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 3105–3135, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-3105-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-3105-2021, 2021
Short summary
Daily evaluation of 26 precipitation datasets using Stage-IV gauge-radar data for the CONUS
Hylke E. Beck, Ming Pan, Tirthankar Roy, Graham P. Weedon, Florian Pappenberger, Albert I. J. M. van Dijk, George J. Huffman, Robert F. Adler, and Eric F. Wood
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 207–224, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-207-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-207-2019, 2019
Short summary
Catchment-scale groundwater recharge and vegetation water use efficiency
Peter A. Troch, Ravindra Dwivedi, Tao Liu, Antonio Alves Meira Neto, Tirthankar Roy, Rodrigo Valdés-Pineda, Matej Durcik, Saúl Arciniega-Esparza, and José Agustín Breña-Naranjo
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2018-449,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2018-449, 2018
Revised manuscript not accepted
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Catchment hydrology | Techniques and Approaches: Modelling approaches
Multi-model approach in a variable spatial framework for streamflow simulation
Cyril Thébault, Charles Perrin, Vazken Andréassian, Guillaume Thirel, Sébastien Legrand, and Olivier Delaigue
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 1539–1566, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1539-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1539-2024, 2024
Short summary
Advancing understanding of lake–watershed hydrology: a fully coupled numerical model illustrated by Qinghai Lake
Lele Shu, Xiaodong Li, Yan Chang, Xianhong Meng, Hao Chen, Yuan Qi, Hongwei Wang, Zhaoguo Li, and Shihua Lyu
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 1477–1491, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1477-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1477-2024, 2024
Short summary
Technical note: Testing the connection between hillslope-scale runoff fluctuations and streamflow hydrographs at the outlet of large river basins
Ricardo Mantilla, Morgan Fonley, and Nicolás Velásquez
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 1373–1382, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1373-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1373-2024, 2024
Short summary
Empirical stream thermal sensitivity cluster on the landscape according to geology and climate
Lillian M. McGill, E. Ashley Steel, and Aimee H. Fullerton
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 1351–1371, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1351-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1351-2024, 2024
Short summary
Deep learning for monthly rainfall–runoff modelling: a large-sample comparison with conceptual models across Australia
Stephanie R. Clark, Julien Lerat, Jean-Michel Perraud, and Peter Fitch
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 1191–1213, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1191-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1191-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Allen, R. G., Pereira, L. S., Raes, D., and Smith, M.: Crop evapotranspiration – Guidelines for computing crop water requirements, FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, 1998.
Arboleda, A., Ghilain, N., and Gellens-Meulenberghs, F.: The LSA-SAF evapotranspiration product – first results with MSG, in Proceedings of the 2005 EUMETSAT meteorological satellite data user's conference, Dubrovnik, Croatia, 2005.
Bahremand, A.: HESS Opinions: Advocating process modeling and de-emphasizing parameter estimation, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 1433–1445, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-1433-2016, 2016.
Bastiaanssen, W. G. M., Pelgrum, H., Wang, J., Ma, Y., Moreno, J. F., Roerink, G. J., and van der Wal, T.: A remote sensing surface energy balance algorithm for land (SEBAL), J. Hydrol., 212–213, 213–229, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(98)00254-6, 1998.
Box, G. E. P. and Cox, D. R.: An Analysis of Transformations, J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B, 26, 211–252, 1964.
Download
Short summary
This study presents and compares two different approaches to using satellite-derived estimates of actual evapotranspiration (ET) to improve the performance of a conceptual rainfall–runoff model. In the first approach, the ET process within the model is constrained using the satellite ET estimates, while in the second one, the model structure is altered. Results indicate that both the approaches improve streamflow forecasting, while the second one also improves the ET simulations significantly.