<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article SYSTEM "http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/inc/hess/copernicus.dtd">
<article language="en">
	<journal>
		<journal_title>Hydrology and Earth System Sciences</journal_title>
		<journal_url>www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net</journal_url>
		<issn>1027-5606</issn>
		<eissn>1607-7938</eissn>
		<volume_number>7</volume_number>
		<issue_number>1</issue_number>
		<publication_year>2003</publication_year>
	</journal>
	<doi>10.5194/hess-7-3-2003</doi>
	<article_url>http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/7/3/2003/</article_url>
	<abstract_html>http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/7/3/2003/hess-7-3-2003.html</abstract_html>
	<fulltext_pdf>http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/7/3/2003/hess-7-3-2003.pdf</fulltext_pdf>
	<start_page>3</start_page>
	<end_page>10</end_page>
	<publication_date>0000-00-00</publication_date>
	<article_title content_type="html">Evaluating the reliability of point estimates of wetland reference evaporation</article_title>
	<authors>
		<author numeration="1" affiliations="1">
			<name>H. Gavin</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="2" affiliations="1,2">
			<name>C. T. Agnew</name>
		</author>
	</authors>
	<affiliations>
		<affiliation numeration="1" content_type="html">School of Geography, University of Manchester, Mansfield Cooper Building, Oxford Road, M13 9PL, UK</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="2" content_type="html">Email for corresponding author: clive.agnew@man.ac.uk</affiliation>
	</affiliations>
	<abstract content_type="html">The Penman-Monteith formulation of evaporation has been criticised for its 
        reliance upon point estimates so that areal estimates of wetland evaporation based upon 
        single weather stations may be misleading. Typically, wetlands comprise a complex mosaic 
        of land cover types from each of which evaporative rates may differ. The need to account 
        for wetland patches when monitoring hydrological fluxes has been noted. This paper presents 
        work carried out over a wet grassland in Southern England. The significance of fetch on 
        actual evaporation was examined using the approach adopted by Gash (1986) based upon 
        surface roughness to estimate the fraction of evaporation sensed from a specified distance 
        upwind of the monitoring station. This theoretical analysis (assuming near-neutral 
        conditions) reveals that the fraction of evaporation contributed by the surrounding area 
        increases steadily to a value of 77% at a distance of 224 m and thereafter declines 
        rapidly. Thus, point climate observations may not reflect surface conditions at greater 
        distances. This result was tested through the deployment of four weather stations on the 
        wetland. The resultant data suggested that homogeneous conditions prevailed so that the 
        central weather station provided reliable areal estimates of reference evaporation during 
        the observation period March–April 1999. This may be a result of not accounting for high 
        wind speeds and roughness found in wetlands that lead to widespread atmospheric mixing. 
        It should be noted this analysis was based upon data collected during the period 
        March-April when wind direction was constant (westerly) and the land surface was moist. 
        There could be more variation at other times of the year that would lead to greater 
        heterogeneity in actual evaporation.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style=&quot;line-height: 20px;&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Keywords: &lt;/b&gt;evaporation, Penman-Monteith, automatic weather station, fetch, wetland&lt;/p&gt;</abstract>
	<references>
	</references>
</article>

