<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article SYSTEM "http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/inc/hess/copernicus.dtd">
<article language="en">
	<journal>
		<journal_title>Hydrology and Earth System Sciences</journal_title>
		<journal_url>www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net</journal_url>
		<issn>1027-5606</issn>
		<eissn>1607-7938</eissn>
		<volume_number>8</volume_number>
		<issue_number>2</issue_number>
		<publication_year>2004</publication_year>
	</journal>
	<doi>10.5194/hess-8-220-2004</doi>
	<article_url>http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/8/220/2004/</article_url>
	<abstract_html>http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/8/220/2004/hess-8-220-2004.html</abstract_html>
	<fulltext_pdf>http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/8/220/2004/hess-8-220-2004.pdf</fulltext_pdf>
	<start_page>220</start_page>
	<end_page>234</end_page>
	<publication_date>0000-00-00</publication_date>
	<article_title content_type="html">Radar rainfall image repair techniques</article_title>
	<authors>
		<author numeration="1" affiliations="1,2">
			<name>Stephen M. Wesson</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="2" affiliations="1,2">
			<name>Geoffrey G. S. Pegram</name>
		</author>
	</authors>
	<affiliations>
		<affiliation numeration="1" content_type="html">Civil Engineering, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, 4041, South Africa</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="2" content_type="html">Email for corresponding author: wessons@ukzn.ac.za and pegram@ukzn.ac.za</affiliation>
	</affiliations>
	<abstract content_type="html">There are various quality problems associated with radar rainfall data viewed 
   in images that include ground clutter, beam blocking and anomalous propagation, to name a few. 
   To obtain the best rainfall estimate possible, techniques for removing ground clutter 
   (non-meteorological echoes that influence radar data quality) on 2-D radar rainfall image data 
   sets are presented here. These techniques concentrate on repairing the images in both a 
   computationally fast and accurate manner, and are nearest neighbour techniques of two sub-types: 
   Individual Target and Border Tracing. The contaminated data is estimated through Kriging, 
   considered the optimal technique for the spatial interpolation of Gaussian data, where the 
   &quot;screening effect&quot; that occurs with the Kriging weighting distribution around target points is 
   exploited to ensure computational efficiency. Matrix rank reduction techniques in combination 
   with Singular Value Decomposition (SVD) are also suggested for finding an efficient solution 
   to the Kriging Equations which can cope with near singular systems. Rainfall estimation at 
   ground level from radar rainfall volume scan data is of interest and importance in earth 
   bound applications such as hydrology and agriculture. As an extension of the above, Ordinary 
   Kriging is applied to three-dimensional radar rainfall data to estimate rainfall rate at 
   ground level.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p  style=&quot;line-height: 20px;&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Keywords: &lt;/b&gt;ground clutter, data infilling, Ordinary Kriging, nearest neighbours, 
   Singular Value Decomposition, border tracing, computation time, ground level rainfall 
   estimation</abstract>
	<references>
	</references>
</article>

