Baudrit, C. and Dubois, D.: Comparing methods for joint objective and subjective uncertainty propagation with an example in a risk assessment, 4
th International Symposium on Imprecise Probabilities and Their Applications, Pittsburgh, Pensilvania, 31–40, 2005.
Baudrit, C. and Dubois, D.: Practical Representations of Incomplete Probabilistic Knowledge, Comput. Stat. Data An., 51(1), 86–108, 2006.
Beven, K. J.: A manifesto for the equifinality thesis, J. Hydrol., 320, 18–36, 2006.
Beven, K. and Binley, A.: The future of distributed models: Model calibration and uncertainty prediction, Hydrol. Process., 6, 279–298, 1992.
Beven, K. J. and Freer, J.: Equifinality, data assimilation, and uncertainty estimation in mechanistic modelling of complex environmental systems using the GLUE methodology, J. Hydrol., 249, 11–29, 2001.
Cheng, D. K.: Analysis of Linear Systems, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading, 1959.
Dempster, A. P.: Upper and lower probabilities induced by a multivalued mapping, Ann. Math. Stat., 38(2), 325–339, 1967.
Dou, C., Woldt, W., Dahab, M., and Bogardi, I.: Transient ground-water flow simulation using a fuzzy set approach, Ground Water, 35(2), 205–215, 1997.
Dubois, D. and Prade, H.: Fuzzy sets and probability: Misunderstandings, bridges and gaps, in: Proceedings 2nd IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, FUZZ-IEEE'93, San Francisco, California, 28 March–4 April 1993, 1059–1068, 1993.
Dubois, D. and Prade, H.: Possibility theory and data fusion in poorly informed environments, Control Eng. Pract., 2(5), 811–823, 1994.
Dubois, D. and Prade, H.: Possibility theory: Qualitative and quantitative aspects, in: Handbook of Defeasible Reasoning and Uncertainty Management Systems, Vol. 1: Quantified Representation of Uncertainty and Imprecision, edited by: Gabbay, D. M. and Smets, P., Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 169–226, 1998.
Dubois, D., Foulloy, L., Mauris, G., and Prade, H.: Probability-possibility transformations, triangular fuzzy sets, and probabilistic inequalities, Reliab. Comput., 10, 2004, 273-297, 2004.
EspÃldora, B.: Instalación y operación de un laboratorio de hidrologÃa de nieves, Seccion Hidrologia y Riego, Departamento de Obras Civiles, Universidad de Chile, Chile, 1968.
Freissinet, C., Vauclin, M., and Erlich, M.: Comparison of first-order analysis and fuzzy set approach for the evaluation of imprecision in a pesticide groundwater pollution screening model, J. Contam. Hydrol., 37, 21–43, 1999.
Ghosh, S. and Mujumdar, P. P.: Climate change impact assessment: Uncertainty modeling with imprecise probability, J. Geophys. Res., 114, D18113, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD011648, 2009.
Hall, J. W.: Uncertainty-based sensitivity indices for imprecise probability distributions, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Safe., 91(10–11), 1443–1451, 2006.
Jacquin, A. P. and Shamseldin, A. Y.: Development of a possibilistic method for the evaluation of predictive uncertainty in rainfall-runoff modeling, Water Resour. Res., 43, W04425, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006WR005072, 2007.
Jacquin, A. P. and Shamseldin, A. Y.: Possibilistic uncertainty analysis of hydrological models, in: 8th International Conference on Hydroinformatics, Concepción, 12–16 January 2009, conf188a41, 2009.
Kamann, P. G.: Pronóstico estacional de deshielos en base a simulación, Memoria para Optar al TÃtulo de Ingeniero Civil, Universidad Técnica Federico Santa MarÃa, Chile, 1998.
Klir, G. J. and Geer, J. F.: Information-preserving probability-possibility transformations: Recent developments, in: Fuzzy Logic, edited by: Lowen, R. and Roubens, M., Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 417–428, 1993.
Kuckzera, G.: On the validity of first order prediction limits for conceptual hydrologic models, J. Hydrol., 103, 229–247, 1988.
Lei, J. H. and Schilling, W.: Preliminary uncertainty analysis-a prerequisite for assessing the predictive uncertainty of hydrologic models, Water Sci. Technol., 33(2), 79–90, 1996.
Matott, L. S., Babendreier, J. E., and Purucker, S. T.: Evaluating uncertainty in integrated environmental models: A review of concepts and tools, Water Resour. Res., 45, W06421, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008WR007301, 2009.
Misirli, F., Gupta, H. V., Sorooshian, S., and Thiemann, M.: Bayesian recursive estimation of parameter and output uncertainty for watershed models, in: Calibration of Watershed Models, edited by: Duan, Q., Gupta, H., Sorooshian, S., Rousseau, A., and Turcotte, R. V., American Geophysical Union, Washington, 113–124, 2003.
Montanari, A.: Large sample behaviors of the generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation (GLUE) in assessing the uncertainty of rainfall-runoff simulations, Water Resour. Res., 41, W08406, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004WR003826, 2005.
Montanari, A., Shoemaker, C. A., and van de Giesen, N.: Introduction to special section on Uncertainty Assessment in Surface and Subsurface Hydrology: An overview of issues and challenges, Water Resour. Res., 45, W00B00, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009WR008471, 2009.
Mujumdar, P. P. and Ghosh, S.: Modeling GCM and scenario uncertainty using a possibilistic approach: Application to the Mahanadi River, India, Water Resour. Res., 44, W06407, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007WR006137, 2008.
Nijssen, D., Schumann, A., Pahlow, M., and Klein, B.: Planning of technical flood retention measures in large river basins under consideration of imprecise probabilities of multivariate hydrological loads, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 9, 1349–1363, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-9-1349-2009, 2009.
Pappenberger, F. and Beven, K.: Ignorance is bliss: Or seven reasons not to use uncertainty analysis, Water Resour. Res., 42, W05302, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005WR004820, 2006.
Renard, B., Kavetski, D., Kuczera, G., Thyer, M. A., and Franks, S. W.: Understanding predictive uncertainty in hydrologic modeling: The challenge of identifying input and structural errors, Water Resour. Res., 46, W05521, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009WR008328, 2010.
Rivera, A., Acuña, C., Casassa, G., and Bown, F.: Use of remotely sensed and field data to estimate the contribution of Chilean glaciers to eustatic sea-level rise, Ann. Glaciol. 34, 367–372, 2002.
Romanowicz, R., Beven, K., and Tawn, J. A.: Evaluation of predictive uncertainty in nonlinear hydrological models using a Bayesian approach, in: Statistics for the Environment 2: Water Related Issues, edited by: Barnett, V. and Feridun Turkman, K., John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, 297-317, 1994.
Rojas, R., Batelaan, O., Feyen, L., and Dassargues, A.: Assessment of conceptual model uncertainty for the regional aquifer Pampa del Tamarugal –- North Chile, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 14, 171–192, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-171-2010, 2010.
Ross, T. J., Sellers, K. F., and Booker, J. M.: Considerations for using fuzzy set theory and probability theory, in: Fuzzy logic and probability applications: Building the gap, ASA-SIAM Series on Statistics and Applied Probability, edited by: Ross, T. J., Booker, J. M., and Parkinson, W. J., SIAM, Philadelphia, ASA, Alexandria, 87–104, 2002.
Shafer, G.: A Mathematical Theory of Evidence, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1976.
Seibert, J.: Estimation of Parameter Uncertainty in the HBV Model, Nord. Hydrol., 28(4/5), 247–262, 1997.
Thiemann, M., Trosset, M., Gupta, H., and Sorooshian, S.: Bayesian recursive parameter estimation for hydrologic models, Water Resour. Res., 37(10), 2521–2535, 2001.
Thorsen, M., Refsgaard, J. C., Hansen, S., Pebesma, E., Jensen, J. B., and Kleeschulte, S.: Assessment of uncertainty in simulation of nitrate leaching to aquifers at catchment scale, J. Hydrol., 242, 210–227, 2001.
Valdivia, P.: Inventario de glaciares Andes de Chile central (32°–35° Lat. S): Hoyas de los RÃos Aconcagua, Maipo, Cachapoal y Tinguiririca, in: Jornadas de HidrologÃa de Nieves y Hielos en América del Sur, PHI, UNESCO, Santiago, Chile, 3–8 December 1984, I6.1–I6.24, 1984.
Verhoest, N. E. C., De Baets, B., Mattia, F., Satalino, G., Lucau, C., and Defourny, P.: A possibilistic approach to soil moisture retrieval from ERS synthetic aperture radar backscattering under soil roughness uncertainty, Water Resour. Res, 43, W07435, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006WR005295, 2007.
Wagener, T., Wheater, H. S., and Gupta, H. V.: Identification and evaluation of watershed models, in: Calibration of Watershed Models, edited by: Duan, Q., Gupta, H. V., Sorooshian, S., Rousseau, A. N., and Turcotte, R., American Geophysical Union, Washington, 29–47, 2003.
Water Management Ltda.: Evaluación Recursos HÃdricos Salar Punta Negra, CompañÃa Minera Escondida, Chile, 2001.
Wolkenhauer, O.: Possibility Theory with Applications to data analysis, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1998.
Zadeh, L. A.: Fuzzy Sets, Inform. Control, 8(3), 338–353, 1965.
Zadeh, L. A.: Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility, Fuzzy Set. Syst., 1, 3–28, 1978.
Zadeh, L. A.: Possibility theory and soft data analysis, in: Mathematical Frontiers of the Social and Policy Sciences, edited by: Cob, B. L. and Thrall, R. M., Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado, 69–129, 1981.
Zehe, E. and Blöschl, G.: Predictability of hydrologic response at the plot and catchment scales: The role of initial conditions, Water Resour. Res., 40, W10202, https://doi.org/10.1029/2003WR002869, 2004.
Zhang, K., Li, H., and Achari, G.: Fuzzy-stochastic characterization of site uncertainty and variability in groundwater flow and contaminant transport through a heterogeneous aquifer, J. Contam. Hydrol., 106, 73–82, 2009.
Zimmermann, H.-J.: Fuzzy Set Theory and Its Applications, Fourth Edition, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, 2001.
