Journal cover Journal topic
Hydrology and Earth System Sciences An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 4.936 IF 4.936
  • IF 5-year value: 5.615 IF 5-year
    5.615
  • CiteScore value: 4.94 CiteScore
    4.94
  • SNIP value: 1.612 SNIP 1.612
  • IPP value: 4.70 IPP 4.70
  • SJR value: 2.134 SJR 2.134
  • Scimago H <br class='hide-on-tablet hide-on-mobile'>index value: 107 Scimago H
    index 107
  • h5-index value: 63 h5-index 63
Volume 14, issue 11
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 14, 2229–2242, 2010
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-2229-2010
© Author(s) 2010. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Special issue: Advances in statistical hydrology

Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 14, 2229–2242, 2010
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-2229-2010
© Author(s) 2010. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Research article 11 Nov 2010

Research article | 11 Nov 2010

Confidence intervals for the coefficient of L-variation in hydrological applications

A. Viglione A. Viglione
  • Institut für Wasserbau und Ingenieurhydrologie, Technische Universität Wien, Wien, Austria

Abstract. The coefficient of L-variation (L-CV) is commonly used in statistical hydrology, in particular in regional frequency analysis, as a measure of steepness for the frequency curve of the hydrological variable of interest. As opposed to the point estimation of the L-CV, in this work we are interested in the estimation of the interval of values (confidence interval) in which the L-CV is included at a given level of probability (confidence level). Several candidate distributions are compared in terms of their suitability to provide valid estimators of confidence intervals for the population L-CV. Monte-Carlo simulations of synthetic samples from distributions frequently used in hydrology are used as a basis for the comparison. The best estimator proves to be provided by the log-Student t distribution whose parameters are estimated without any assumption on the underlying parent distribution of the hydrological variable of interest. This estimator is shown to also outperform the non parametric bias-corrected and accelerated bootstrap method. An illustrative example of how this result can be used in hydrology is presented, namely in the comparison of methods for regional flood frequency analysis. In particular, it is shown that the confidence intervals for the L-CV can be used to assess the amount of spatial heterogeneity of flood data not explained by regionalization models.

Publications Copernicus
Download
Citation