Journal cover Journal topic
Hydrology and Earth System Sciences An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 4.256 IF 4.256
  • IF 5-year value: 4.819 IF 5-year 4.819
  • CiteScore value: 4.10 CiteScore 4.10
  • SNIP value: 1.412 SNIP 1.412
  • SJR value: 2.023 SJR 2.023
  • IPP value: 3.97 IPP 3.97
  • h5-index value: 58 h5-index 58
  • Scimago H index value: 99 Scimago H index 99
Volume 14, issue 2 | Copyright
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 14, 279-289, 2010
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-279-2010
© Author(s) 2010. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

  12 Feb 2010

12 Feb 2010

Implementing small scale processes at the soil-plant interface – the role of root architectures for calculating root water uptake profiles

C. L. Schneider1, S. Attinger1,2, J.-O. Delfs3, and A. Hildebrandt1 C. L. Schneider et al.
  • 1Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research – UFZ, Department of Computational Hydrosystems, Leipzig, Germany
  • 2Institute for Geosciences, University of Jena, Jena, Germany
  • 3Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research – UFZ, Department of Environmental Informatics, Leipzig, Germany

Abstract. In this paper, we present a stand alone root water uptake model called aRoot, which calculates the sink term for any bulk soil water flow model taking into account water flow within and around a root network. The boundary conditions for the model are the atmospheric water demand and the bulk soil water content. The variable determining the plant regulation for water uptake is the soil water potential at the soil-root interface. In the current version, we present an implementation of aRoot coupled to a 3-D Richards model. The coupled model is applied to investigate the role of root architecture on the spatial distribution of root water uptake. For this, we modeled root water uptake for an ensemble (50 realizations) of root systems generated for the same species (one month old Sorghum). The investigation was divided into two Scenarios for aRoot, one with comparatively high (A) and one with low (B) root radial resistance. We compared the results of both aRoot Scenarios with root water uptake calculated using the traditional Feddes model. The vertical rooting density profiles of the generated root systems were similar. In contrast the vertical water uptake profiles differed considerably between individuals, and more so for Scenario B than A. Also, limitation of water uptake occurred at different bulk soil moisture for different modeled individuals, in particular for Scenario A. Moreover, the aRoot model simulations show a redistribution of water uptake from more densely to less densely rooted layers with time. This behavior is in agreement with observation, but was not reproduced by the Feddes model.

Publications Copernicus
Download
Citation
Share