Articles | Volume 17, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-1-2013
© Author(s) 2013. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-1-2013
© Author(s) 2013. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Research article
| 
07 Jan 2013
Research article |
| 07 Jan 2013
Impact of climate change on sediment yield in the Mekong River basin: a case study of the Nam Ou basin, Lao PDR
B. Shrestha
Water Engineering and Management, School of Engineering and Technology, Asian Institute of Technology, P.O. Box 4 Klong Luang, Pathum Thani 12120, Thailand
M. S. Babel
Water Engineering and Management, School of Engineering and Technology, Asian Institute of Technology, P.O. Box 4 Klong Luang, Pathum Thani 12120, Thailand
S. Maskey
Department of Water Science and Engineering, UNESCO-IHE Institute for Water Education, P.O. Box 3015, 261DA Delft, The Netherlands
A. van Griensven
Department of Water Science and Engineering, UNESCO-IHE Institute for Water Education, P.O. Box 3015, 261DA Delft, The Netherlands
Department of Hydrology and Hydraulic Engineering, Vrije Universiteit Brussels, Pleinlaan 2, 1050 Brussels, Belgium
S. Uhlenbrook
Department of Water Science and Engineering, UNESCO-IHE Institute for Water Education, P.O. Box 3015, 261DA Delft, The Netherlands
Department of Water Resources, Delft University of Technology, P.O. Box 5048, 2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands
A. Green
Mekong River Commission Secretariat, Office of the Secretariat in Phnom Penh (OSP), P.O. Box 623, 576 National Road # 2, Sangkat Chak Angre Krom, Khan Menachey, Phnom Penh, Cambodia
I. Akkharath
Mekong River Commission Secretariat, Office of the Secretariat in Phnom Penh (OSP), P.O. Box 623, 576 National Road # 2, Sangkat Chak Angre Krom, Khan Menachey, Phnom Penh, Cambodia
Related subject area
Subject: Catchment hydrology | Techniques and Approaches: Modelling approaches
Seasonal prediction of end-of-dry-season watershed behavior in a highly interconnected alluvial watershed in northern California
Glaciers determine the sensitivity of hydrological processes to perturbed climate in a large mountainous basin on the Tibetan Plateau
Leveraging gauge networks and strategic discharge measurements to aid the development of continuous streamflow records
On the need for physical constraints in deep learning rainfall–runoff projections under climate change: a sensitivity analysis to warming and shifts in potential evapotranspiration
Evaluation of hydrological models on small mountainous catchments: impact of the meteorological forcings
Projecting sediment export from two highly glacierized alpine catchments under climate change: exploring non-parametric regression as an analysis tool
A framework for parameter estimation, sensitivity analysis, and uncertainty analysis for holistic hydrologic modeling using SWAT+
On understanding mountainous carbonate basins of the Mediterranean using parsimonious modeling solutions
Comparing quantile regression forest and mixture density long short-term memory models for probabilistic post-processing of satellite precipitation-driven streamflow simulations
Recent ground thermo-hydrological changes in a southern Tibetan endorheic catchment and implications for lake level changes
Towards robust seasonal streamflow forecasts in mountainous catchments: impact of calibration metric selection in hydrological modeling
Modelling flood frequency and magnitude in a glacially conditioned, heterogeneous landscape: testing the importance of land cover and land use
Direct integration of reservoirs' operations in a hydrological model for streamflow estimation: coupling a CLSTM model with MOHID-Land
Towards Interpretable LSTM-based Modelling of Hydrological Systems
Modelling the regional sensitivity of snowmelt, soil moisture, and streamflow generation to climate over the Canadian Prairies using a basin classification approach
To what extent does river routing matter in hydrological modeling?
Calibrating macroscale hydrological models in poorly gauged and heavily regulated basins
An advanced tool integrating failure and sensitivity analysis into novel modeling of the stormwater flood volume
airGRteaching: an open-source tool for teaching hydrological modeling with R
Stable water isotopes and tritium tracers tell the same tale: no evidence for underestimation of catchment transit times inferred by stable isotopes in StorAge Selection (SAS)-function models
Uncertainty in water transit time estimation with StorAge Selection functions and tracer data interpolation
Changes in Mediterranean flood processes and seasonality
On optimization of calibrations of a distributed hydrological model with spatially distributed information on snow
Technical Note: Testing the Connection Between Hillslope Scale Runoff Fluctuations and Streamflow Hydrographs at the Outlet of Large River Basins
A Network Approach for Multiscale Catchment Classification using Traits
What controls the tail behaviour of flood series: Rainfall or runoff generation?
Flow intermittence prediction using a hybrid hydrological modelling approach: influence of observed intermittence data on the training of a random forest model
Can the combining of wetlands with reservoir operation reduce the risk of future floods and droughts?
Advancing Understanding of Lake-Watershed Hydrology Through A Fully Coupled Numerical Model
Knowledge-informed deep learning for hydrological model calibration: an application to Coal Creek Watershed in Colorado
When best is the enemy of good – critical evaluation of performance criteria in hydrological models
The suitability of differentiable, physics-informed machine learning hydrologic models for ungauged regions and climate change impact assessment
Producing reliable hydrologic scenarios from raw climate model outputs without resorting to meteorological observations
Using normalised difference infrared index patterns to constrain semi-distributed rainfall–runoff models in tropical nested catchments
Deep learning for monthly rainfall-runoff modelling: a comparison with classical rainfall-runoff modelling across Australia
Revisiting the hydrological basis of the Budyko framework with the principle of hydrologically similar groups
Reconstructing five decades of sediment export from two glacierized high-alpine catchments in Tyrol, Austria, using nonparametric regression
Water and energy budgets over hydrological basins on short and long timescales
Multi-model approach in a variable spatial framework for streamflow simulation
Hydrological response to climate change and human activities in the Three-River Source Region
Incorporating experimentally derived streamflow contributions into model parameterization to improve discharge prediction
Machine-learning- and deep-learning-based streamflow prediction in a hilly catchment for future scenarios using CMIP6 GCM data
River hydraulic modeling with ICESat-2 land and water surface elevation
Hydrological modeling using the Soil and Water Assessment Tool in urban and peri-urban environments: the case of Kifisos experimental subbasin (Athens, Greece)
Empirical stream thermal sensitivities cluster on the landscape according to geology and climate
Monetizing the role of water in sustaining watershed ecosystem services using a fully integrated subsurface–surface water model
Technical note: How physically based is hydrograph separation by recursive digital filtering?
A comprehensive open-source course for teaching applied hydrological modelling in Central Asia
Impact of distributed meteorological forcing on simulated snow cover and hydrological fluxes over a mid-elevation alpine micro-scale catchment
Technical note: Extending the SWAT model to transport chemicals through tile and groundwater flow
Claire Kouba and Thomas Harter
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 691–718, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-691-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-691-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
In some watersheds, the severity of the dry season has a large impact on aquatic ecosystems. In this study, we design a way to predict, 5–6 months in advance, how severe the dry season will be in a rural watershed in northern California. This early warning can support seasonal adaptive management. To predict these two values, we assess data about snow, rain, groundwater, and river flows. We find that maximum snowpack and total wet season rainfall best predict dry season severity.
Yi Nan and Fuqiang Tian
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 669–689, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-669-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-669-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This paper utilized a tracer-aided model validated by multiple datasets in a large mountainous basin on the Tibetan Plateau to analyze hydrological sensitivity to climate change. The spatial pattern of the local hydrological sensitivities and the influence factors were analyzed in particular. The main finding of this paper is that the local hydrological sensitivity in mountainous basins is determined by the relationship between the glacier area ratio and the mean annual precipitation.
Michael J. Vlah, Matthew R. V. Ross, Spencer Rhea, and Emily S. Bernhardt
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 545–573, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-545-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-545-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Virtual stream gauging enables continuous streamflow estimation where a gauge might be difficult or impractical to install. We reconstructed flow at 27 gauges of the National Ecological Observatory Network (NEON), informing ~199 site-months of missing data in the official record and improving that accuracy of official estimates at 11 sites. This study shows that machine learning, but also routine regression methods, can be used to supplement existing gauge networks and reduce monitoring costs.
Sungwook Wi and Scott Steinschneider
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 479–503, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-479-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-479-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We investigate whether deep learning (DL) models can produce physically plausible streamflow projections under climate change. We address this question by focusing on modeled responses to increases in temperature and potential evapotranspiration and by employing three DL and three process-based hydrological models. The results suggest that physical constraints regarding model architecture and input are necessary to promote the physical realism of DL hydrological projections under climate change.
Guillaume Evin, Matthieu Le Lay, Catherine Fouchier, David Penot, Francois Colleoni, Alexandre Mas, Pierre-André Garambois, and Olivier Laurantin
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 261–281, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-261-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-261-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Hydrological modelling of mountainous catchments is challenging for many reasons, the main one being the temporal and spatial representation of precipitation forcings. This study presents an evaluation of the hydrological modelling of 55 small mountainous catchments of the northern French Alps, focusing on the influence of the type of precipitation reanalyses used as inputs. These evaluations emphasize the added value of radar measurements, in particular for the reproduction of flood events.
Lena Katharina Schmidt, Till Francke, Peter Martin Grosse, and Axel Bronstert
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 139–161, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-139-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-139-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
How suspended sediment export from glacierized high-alpine areas responds to future climate change is hardly assessable as many interacting processes are involved, and appropriate physical models are lacking. We present the first study, to our knowledge, exploring machine learning to project sediment export until 2100 in two high-alpine catchments. We find that uncertainties due to methodological limitations are small until 2070. Negative trends imply that peak sediment may have already passed.
Salam A. Abbas, Ryan T. Bailey, Jeremy T. White, Jeffrey G. Arnold, Michael J. White, Natalja Čerkasova, and Jungang Gao
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 21–48, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-21-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-21-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Research highlights.
1. Implemented groundwater module (gwflow) into SWAT+ for four watersheds with different unique hydrologic features across the United States.
2. Presented methods for sensitivity analysis, uncertainty analysis and parameter estimation for coupled models.
3. Sensitivity analysis for streamflow and groundwater head conducted using Morris method.
4. Uncertainty analysis and parameter estimation performed using an iterative ensemble smoother within the PEST framework.
Shima Azimi, Christian Massari, Giuseppe Formetta, Silvia Barbetta, Alberto Tazioli, Davide Fronzi, Sara Modanesi, Angelica Tarpanelli, and Riccardo Rigon
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 4485–4503, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-4485-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-4485-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We analyzed the water budget of nested karst catchments using simple methods and modeling. By utilizing the available data on precipitation and discharge, we were able to determine the response lag-time by adopting new techniques. Additionally, we modeled snow cover dynamics and evapotranspiration with the use of Earth observations, providing a concise overview of the water budget for the basin and its subbasins. We have made the data, models, and workflows accessible for further study.
Yuhang Zhang, Aizhong Ye, Bita Analui, Phu Nguyen, Soroosh Sorooshian, Kuolin Hsu, and Yuxuan Wang
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 4529–4550, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-4529-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-4529-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Our study shows that while the quantile regression forest (QRF) and countable mixtures of asymmetric Laplacians long short-term memory (CMAL-LSTM) models demonstrate similar proficiency in multipoint probabilistic predictions, QRF excels in smaller watersheds and CMAL-LSTM in larger ones. CMAL-LSTM performs better in single-point deterministic predictions, whereas QRF model is more efficient overall.
Léo C. P. Martin, Sebastian Westermann, Michele Magni, Fanny Brun, Joel Fiddes, Yanbin Lei, Philip Kraaijenbrink, Tamara Mathys, Moritz Langer, Simon Allen, and Walter W. Immerzeel
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 4409–4436, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-4409-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-4409-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Across the Tibetan Plateau, many large lakes have been changing level during the last decades as a response to climate change. In high-mountain environments, water fluxes from the land to the lakes are linked to the ground temperature of the land and to the energy fluxes between the ground and the atmosphere, which are modified by climate change. With a numerical model, we test how these water and energy fluxes have changed over the last decades and how they influence the lake level variations.
Diego Araya, Pablo A. Mendoza, Eduardo Muñoz-Castro, and James McPhee
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 4385–4408, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-4385-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-4385-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Dynamical systems are used by many agencies worldwide to produce seasonal streamflow forecasts, which are critical for decision-making. Such systems rely on hydrology models, which contain parameters that are typically estimated using a target performance metric (i.e., objective function). This study explores the effects of this decision across mountainous basins in Chile, illustrating tradeoffs between seasonal forecast quality and the models' capability to simulate streamflow characteristics.
Pamela E. Tetford and Joseph R. Desloges
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 3977–3998, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-3977-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-3977-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
An efficient regional flood frequency model relates drainage area to discharge, with a major assumption of similar basin conditions. In a landscape with variable glacial deposits and land use, we characterize varying hydrological function using 28 explanatory variables. We demonstrate that (1) a heterogeneous landscape requires objective model selection criteria to optimize the fit of flow data, and (2) incorporating land use as a predictor variable improves the drainage area to discharge model.
Ana Ramos Oliveira, Tiago Brito Ramos, Lígia Pinto, and Ramiro Neves
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 3875–3893, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-3875-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-3875-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This paper intends to demonstrate the adequacy of a hybrid solution to overcome the difficulties related to the incorporation of human behavior when modeling hydrological processes. Two models were implemented, one to estimate the outflow of a reservoir and the other to simulate the hydrological processes of the watershed. With both models feeding each other, results show that the proposed approach significantly improved the streamflow estimation downstream of the reservoir.
Luis Andres De la Fuente, Mohammad Reza Ehsani, Hoshin Vijai Gupta, and Laura Elizabeth Condon
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2023-252, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2023-252, 2023
Revised manuscript accepted for HESS
Short summary
Short summary
Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) is a widely used machine learning model in hydrology. However, it is difficult to extract knowledge from it. We propose HydroLSTM which represents processes like a hydrological reservoir. Models based on HydroLSTM perform similarly to LSTM while requiring fewer cell states. The learned parameters are informative about the dominant hydrology of a catchment.Our results show how parsimony and hydrological knowledge extraction can be achieved by using the new structure.
Zhihua He, Kevin Shook, Christopher Spence, John W. Pomeroy, and Colin Whitfield
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 3525–3546, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-3525-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-3525-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This study evaluated the impacts of climate change on snowmelt, soil moisture, and streamflow over the Canadian Prairies. The entire prairie region was divided into seven basin types. We found strong variations of hydrological sensitivity to precipitation and temperature changes in different land covers and basins, which suggests that different water management and adaptation methods are needed to address enhanced water stress due to expected climate change in different regions of the prairies.
Nicolás Cortés-Salazar, Nicolás Vásquez, Naoki Mizukami, Pablo A. Mendoza, and Ximena Vargas
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 3505–3524, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-3505-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-3505-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This paper shows how important river models can be for water resource applications that involve hydrological models and, in particular, parameter calibration. To this end, we conduct numerical experiments in a pilot basin using a combination of hydrologic model simulations obtained from a large sample of parameter sets and different routing methods. We find that routing can affect streamflow simulations, even at monthly time steps; the choice of parameters; and relevant streamflow metrics.
Dung Trung Vu, Thanh Duc Dang, Francesca Pianosi, and Stefano Galelli
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 3485–3504, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-3485-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-3485-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The calibration of hydrological models over extensive spatial domains is often challenged by the lack of data on river discharge and the operations of hydraulic infrastructures. Here, we use satellite data to address the lack of data that could unintentionally bias the calibration process. Our study is underpinned by a computational framework that quantifies this bias and provides a safe approach to the calibration of models in poorly gauged and heavily regulated basins.
Francesco Fatone, Bartosz Szeląg, Przemysław Kowal, Arthur McGarity, Adam Kiczko, Grzegorz Wałek, Ewa Wojciechowska, Michał Stachura, and Nicolas Caradot
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 3329–3349, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-3329-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-3329-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
A novel methodology for the development of a stormwater network performance simulator including advanced risk assessment was proposed. The applied tool enables the analysis of the influence of spatial variability in catchment and stormwater network characteristics on the relation between (SWMM) model parameters and specific flood volume, as an alternative approach to mechanistic models. The proposed method can be used at the stage of catchment model development and spatial planning management.
Olivier Delaigue, Pierre Brigode, Guillaume Thirel, and Laurent Coron
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 3293–3327, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-3293-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-3293-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Teaching hydrological modeling is an important, but difficult, matter. It requires appropriate tools and teaching material. In this article, we present the airGRteaching package, which is an open-source software tool relying on widely used hydrological models. This tool proposes an interface and numerous hydrological modeling exercises representing a wide range of hydrological applications. We show how this tool can be applied to simple but real-life cases.
Siyuan Wang, Markus Hrachowitz, Gerrit Schoups, and Christine Stumpp
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 3083–3114, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-3083-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-3083-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This study shows that previously reported underestimations of water ages are most likely not due to the use of seasonally variable tracers. Rather, these underestimations can be largely attributed to the choices of model approaches which rely on assumptions not frequently met in catchment hydrology. We therefore strongly advocate avoiding the use of this model type in combination with seasonally variable tracers and instead adopting StorAge Selection (SAS)-based or comparable model formulations.
Arianna Borriero, Rohini Kumar, Tam V. Nguyen, Jan H. Fleckenstein, and Stefanie R. Lutz
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 2989–3004, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-2989-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-2989-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We analyzed the uncertainty of the water transit time distribution (TTD) arising from model input (interpolated tracer data) and structure (StorAge Selection, SAS, functions). We found that uncertainty was mainly associated with temporal interpolation, choice of SAS function, nonspatial interpolation, and low-flow conditions. It is important to characterize the specific uncertainty sources and their combined effects on TTD, as this has relevant implications for both water quantity and quality.
Yves Tramblay, Patrick Arnaud, Guillaume Artigue, Michel Lang, Emmanuel Paquet, Luc Neppel, and Eric Sauquet
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 2973–2987, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-2973-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-2973-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Mediterranean floods are causing major damage, and recent studies have shown that, despite the increase in intense rainfall, there has been no increase in river floods. This study reveals that the seasonality of floods changed in the Mediterranean Basin during 1959–2021. There was also an increased frequency of floods linked to short episodes of intense rain, associated with a decrease in soil moisture. These changes need to be taken into consideration to adapt flood warning systems.
Dipti Tiwari, Mélanie Trudel, and Robert Leconte
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2023-143, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2023-143, 2023
Revised manuscript accepted for HESS
Short summary
Short summary
Calibrating hydrological models with multiple objective functions enhances model robustness. By integrating spatially distributed snow information into the calibration process, the overall performance of the model can be enhanced without compromising the model outputs. In this study, HYDROTEL model was calibrated in seven different experiments, incorporating the SPAEF (SPAtial Efficiency metric) alongside NSE and RMSE, with the aim of identifying the optimal calibration strategy.
Ricardo Mantilla, Morgan Fonley, and Nicolas Velasquez
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2023-187, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2023-187, 2023
Revised manuscript accepted for HESS
Short summary
Short summary
Hydrologists strive to “Be right for the right reasons” when modeling the hydrologic cycle, however, the datasets available to validate hydrological models are sparse, and in many cases, they comprise streamflow observations at the outlets of large catchments. In this work, we show that matching streamflow observations at the outlet of a large basin is not a reliable indicator that a correct description of the small-scale runoff processes.
Fabio Ciulla and Charuleka Varadharajan
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1675, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1675, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
When studying the behavior of rivers, like their tendency to flood, it is useful to group them using the characteristics of their surrounding areas like geology, climate, land use and human influence. We developed a method that, in addition to this classification, also returns the relevant characteristics of each group and associates them to particular behaviors. In this way we better understand how rivers interact with the environment and can try to improve the predictions of future behaviors.
Elena Macdonald, Bruno Merz, Björn Guse, Viet Dung Nguyen, Xiaoxiang Guan, and Sergiy Vorogushyn
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2023-186, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2023-186, 2023
Revised manuscript accepted for HESS
Short summary
Short summary
In some rivers, the occurrence of extreme flood events is more likely than in other rivers – they have heavy-tailed distributions. We find that threshold processes in the runoff generation lead to such a relatively high occurrence probability of extremes. Further, we find that beyond a certain return period, i.e. for rare events, rainfall is often the dominant control compared to runoff generation. Our results can help to improve the estimation of the occurrence probability of extreme floods.
Louise Mimeau, Annika Künne, Flora Branger, Sven Kralisch, Alexandre Devers, and Jean-Philippe Vidal
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1322, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1322, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Modelling flow intermittence is essential for predicting the future evolution of drying in river networks and better understanding the ecological and socio-economic impacts. However, modelling flow intermittence is challenging and observed data on temporary rivers is scarce. This study presents a new modelling approach for predicting flow intermittence in river networks and shows that combining different sources of observed data reduces the model uncertainty.
Yanfeng Wu, Jingxuan Sun, Boting Hu, Y. Jun Xu, Alain N. Rousseau, and Guangxin Zhang
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 2725–2745, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-2725-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-2725-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Reservoirs and wetlands are important regulators of watershed hydrology, which should be considered when projecting floods and droughts. We first coupled wetlands and reservoir operations into a semi-spatially-explicit hydrological model and then applied it in a case study involving a large river basin in northeast China. We found that, overall, the risk of future floods and droughts will increase further even under the combined influence of reservoirs and wetlands.
Lele Shu, Xiaodong Li, Yan Chang, Xianhong Meng, Hao Chen, Yuan Qi, Hongwei Wang, Zhaoguo Li, and Shihua Lyu
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2023-166, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2023-166, 2023
Revised manuscript accepted for HESS
Short summary
Short summary
We developed a new model to better understand how water moves in a lake basin. Our model improves upon previous methods by accurately capturing the complexity of water movement, both on the surface and subsurface. Our model tested using data from China's Qinghai Lake, accurately replicates complex water movements and identifies contributing factors of lake's water balance. The findings provide a robust tool for predicting hydrological processes, aiding water resource planning.
Peishi Jiang, Pin Shuai, Alexander Sun, Maruti K. Mudunuru, and Xingyuan Chen
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 2621–2644, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-2621-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-2621-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We developed a novel deep learning approach to estimate the parameters of a computationally expensive hydrological model on only a few hundred realizations. Our approach leverages the knowledge obtained by data-driven analysis to guide the design of the deep learning model used for parameter estimation. We demonstrate this approach by calibrating a state-of-the-art hydrological model against streamflow and evapotranspiration observations at a snow-dominated watershed in Colorado.
Guillaume Cinkus, Naomi Mazzilli, Hervé Jourde, Andreas Wunsch, Tanja Liesch, Nataša Ravbar, Zhao Chen, and Nico Goldscheider
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 2397–2411, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-2397-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-2397-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The Kling–Gupta Efficiency (KGE) is a performance criterion extensively used to evaluate hydrological models. We conduct a critical study on the KGE and its variant to examine counterbalancing errors. Results show that, when assessing a simulation, concurrent over- and underestimation of discharge can lead to an overall higher criterion score without an associated increase in model relevance. We suggest that one carefully choose performance criteria and use scaling factors.
Dapeng Feng, Hylke Beck, Kathryn Lawson, and Chaopeng Shen
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 2357–2373, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-2357-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-2357-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Powerful hybrid models (called δ or delta models) embrace the fundamental learning capability of AI and can also explain the physical processes. Here we test their performance when applied to regions not in the training data. δ models rivaled the accuracy of state-of-the-art AI models under the data-dense scenario and even surpassed them for the data-sparse one. They generalize well due to the physical structure included. δ models could be ideal candidates for global hydrologic assessment.
Simon Ricard, Philippe Lucas-Picher, Antoine Thiboult, and François Anctil
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 2375–2395, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-2375-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-2375-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
A simplified hydroclimatic modelling workflow is proposed to quantify the impact of climate change on water discharge without resorting to meteorological observations. Results confirm that the proposed workflow produces equivalent projections of the seasonal mean flows in comparison to a conventional hydroclimatic modelling approach. The proposed approach supports the participation of end-users in interpreting the impact of climate change on water resources.
Nutchanart Sriwongsitanon, Wasana Jandang, James Williams, Thienchart Suwawong, Ekkarin Maekan, and Hubert H. G. Savenije
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 2149–2171, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-2149-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-2149-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We developed predictive semi-distributed rainfall–runoff models for nested sub-catchments in the upper Ping basin, which yielded better or similar performance compared to calibrated lumped models. The normalised difference infrared index proves to be an effective proxy for distributed root zone moisture capacity over sub-catchments and is well correlated with the percentage of evergreen forest. In validation, soil moisture simulations appeared to be highly correlated with the soil wetness index.
Stephanie R. Clark, Julien Lerat, Jean-Michel Perraud, and Peter Fitch
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2023-124, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2023-124, 2023
Revised manuscript accepted for HESS
Short summary
Short summary
Are machine learning models able to produce reliable rainfall-runoff predictions and add enough benefits that justify the effort to implement these methods? This study covers a large set of Australian catchments (almost 500) comparing deep learning and traditional model results. The deep learning model matched or exceeded conceptual model performance for more than two-thirds of the study catchments, indicating the general viability of these models in a variety of catchments conditions.
Yuchan Chen, Xiuzhi Chen, Meimei Xue, Chuanxun Yang, Wei Zheng, Jun Cao, Wenting Yan, and Wenping Yuan
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 1929–1943, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1929-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1929-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This study addresses the quantification and estimation of the watershed-characteristic-related parameter (Pw) in the Budyko framework with the principle of hydrologically similar groups. The results show that Pw is closely related to soil moisture and fractional vegetation cover, and the relationship varies across specific hydrologic similarity groups. The overall satisfactory performance of the Pw estimation model improves the applicability of the Budyko framework for global runoff estimation.
Lena Katharina Schmidt, Till Francke, Peter Martin Grosse, Christoph Mayer, and Axel Bronstert
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 1841–1863, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1841-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1841-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We present a suitable method to reconstruct sediment export from decadal records of hydroclimatic predictors (discharge, precipitation, temperature) and shorter suspended sediment measurements. This lets us fill the knowledge gap on how sediment export from glacierized high-alpine areas has responded to climate change. We find positive trends in sediment export from the two investigated nested catchments with step-like increases around 1981 which are linked to crucial changes in glacier melt.
Samantha Petch, Bo Dong, Tristan Quaife, Robert P. King, and Keith Haines
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 1723–1744, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1723-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1723-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Gravitational measurements of water storage from GRACE (Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment) can improve understanding of the water budget. We produce flux estimates over large river catchments based on observations that close the monthly water budget and ensure consistency with GRACE on short and long timescales. We use energy data to provide additional constraints and balance the long-term energy budget. These flux estimates are important for evaluating climate models.
Cyril Thébault, Charles Perrin, Vazken Andréassian, Guillaume Thirel, Sébastien Legrand, and Olivier Delaigue
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-569, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-569, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Streamflow forecasting is useful for many applications, ranging from population safety (e.g. floods) to water resource management (e.g. agriculture or hydropower). To this end, hydrological models must be optimized. However, a model is inherently wrong. This study aims to analyse the contribution of a multi-model approach within a variable spatial framework to improve streamflow simulations. The underlying idea is to take advantage of the strength of each modelling frameworks tested.
Ting Su, Chiyuan Miao, Qingyun Duan, Jiaojiao Gou, Xiaoying Guo, and Xi Zhao
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 1477–1492, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1477-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1477-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The Three-River Source Region (TRSR) plays an extremely important role in water resources security and ecological and environmental protection in China and even all of Southeast Asia. This study used the variable infiltration capacity (VIC) land surface hydrologic model linked with the degree-day factor algorithm to simulate the runoff change in the TRSR. These results will help to guide current and future regulation and management of water resources in the TRSR.
Andreas Hartmann, Jean-Lionel Payeur-Poirier, and Luisa Hopp
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 1325–1341, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1325-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1325-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We advance our understanding of including information derived from environmental tracers into hydrological modeling. We present a simple approach that integrates streamflow observations and tracer-derived streamflow contributions for model parameter estimation. We consider multiple observed streamflow components and their variation over time to quantify the impact of their inclusion for streamflow prediction at the catchment scale.
Dharmaveer Singh, Manu Vardhan, Rakesh Sahu, Debrupa Chatterjee, Pankaj Chauhan, and Shiyin Liu
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 1047–1075, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1047-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1047-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This study examines, for the first time, the potential of various machine learning models in streamflow prediction over the Sutlej River basin (rainfall-dominated zone) in western Himalaya during the period 2041–2070 (2050s) and 2071–2100 (2080s) and its relationship to climate variability. The mean ensemble of the model results shows that the mean annual streamflow of the Sutlej River is expected to rise between the 2050s and 2080s by 0.79 to 1.43 % for SSP585 and by 0.87 to 1.10 % for SSP245.
Monica Coppo Frias, Suxia Liu, Xingguo Mo, Karina Nielsen, Heidi Ranndal, Liguang Jiang, Jun Ma, and Peter Bauer-Gottwein
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 1011–1032, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1011-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1011-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This paper uses remote sensing data from ICESat-2 to calibrate a 1D hydraulic model. With the model, we can make estimations of discharge and water surface elevation, which are important indicators in flooding risk assessment. ICESat-2 data give an added value, thanks to the 0.7 m resolution, which allows the measurement of narrow river streams. In addition, ICESat-2 provides measurements on the river dry portion geometry that can be included in the model.
Evgenia Koltsida, Nikos Mamassis, and Andreas Kallioras
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 917–931, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-917-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-917-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Daily and hourly rainfall observations were inputted to a Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) hydrological model to investigate the impacts of rainfall temporal resolution on a discharge simulation. Results indicated that groundwater flow parameters were more sensitive to daily time intervals, and channel routing parameters were more influential for hourly time intervals. This study suggests that the SWAT model appears to be a reliable tool to predict discharge in a mixed-land-use basin.
Lillian M. McGill, E. Ashley Steel, and Aimee H. Fullerton
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2022-428, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2022-428, 2023
Revised manuscript accepted for HESS
Short summary
Short summary
This study used the relationship between river water and air temperature to understand processes causing stream warming and predict how streams might respond to future climate warming. We found that the air-water relationship was diverse across sites and controlled largely by geology and snowmelt. Our findings can be used to inform strategies for river basin restoration and conservation, such as identifying climate insensitive areas of the basin that should be preserved and protected.
Tariq Aziz, Steven K. Frey, David R. Lapen, Susan Preston, Hazen A. J. Russell, Omar Khader, Andre R. Erler, and Edward A. Sudicky
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2023-25, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2023-25, 2023
Revised manuscript accepted for HESS
Short summary
Short summary
The study determines the value of water towards ecosystem services production in an agricultural watershed in Ontario, Canada. It uses a computer model and an economic valuation approach to determine how subsurface and surface water affect ecosystem services supply. The results show that subsurface water plays a critical role in maintaining ecosystem services. The study informs on the sustainable use of subsurface water and introduces a new method for managing watershed ecosystem services.
Klaus Eckhardt
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 495–499, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-495-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-495-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
An important hydrological issue is to identify components of streamflow that react to precipitation with different degrees of attenuation and delay. From the multitude of methods that have been developed for this so-called hydrograph separation, a specific, frequently used one is singled out here. It is shown to be derived from plausible physical principles. This increases confidence in its results.
Beatrice Sabine Marti, Aidar Zhumabaev, and Tobias Siegfried
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 319–330, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-319-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-319-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Numerical modelling is often used for climate impact studies in water resources management. It is, however, not yet highly accessible to many students of hydrology in Central Asia. One big hurdle for new learners is the preparation of relevant data prior to the actual modelling. We present a robust, open-source workflow and comprehensive teaching material that can be used by teachers and by students for self study.
Aniket Gupta, Alix Reverdy, Jean-Martial Cohard, Basile Hector, Marc Descloitres, Jean-Pierre Vandervaere, Catherine Coulaud, Romain Biron, Lucie Liger, Reed Maxwell, Jean-Gabriel Valay, and Didier Voisin
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 191–212, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-191-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-191-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Patchy snow cover during spring impacts mountainous ecosystems on a large range of spatio-temporal scales. A hydrological model simulated such snow patchiness at 10 m resolution. Slope and orientation controls precipitation, radiation, and wind generate differences in snowmelt, subsurface storage, streamflow, and evapotranspiration. The snow patchiness increases the duration of the snowmelt to stream and subsurface storage, which sustains the plants and streamflow later in the summer.
Hendrik Rathjens, Jens Kiesel, Michael Winchell, Jeffrey Arnold, and Robin Sur
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 159–167, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-159-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-159-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The SWAT model can simulate the transport of water-soluble chemicals through the landscape but neglects the transport through groundwater or agricultural tile drains. These transport pathways are, however, important to assess the amount of chemicals in streams. We added this capability to the model, which significantly improved the simulation. The representation of all transport pathways in the model enables watershed managers to develop robust strategies for reducing chemicals in streams.
Cited articles
Abbaspour, K. C.: SWAT-CUP2: SWAT calibration and uncertainty programs – A user manual, Department of Systems Analysis, Integrated Assessment and Modelling (SIAM), Eawag, Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, Duebendorf, Switzerland, 95 pp., 2008.
Abbaspour, K. C., Johnson, C. A., and Van Genuchten, M. T.: Estimating uncertain flow and transport parameters using a sequential uncertainty fitting procedure, Vadose Zone J., 3, 1340–1352, 2004.
Abbaspour, K. C., Yang, J., Maximov, I., Siber, R., Bogner, K., Mieleitner, J., Zobrist, J., and Srinivasan, R.: Modelling hydrology and water quality in the Pre-Alpine/Alpine Thur watershed using SWAT, J. Hydrol., 333, 413–430, 2007.
Adam, J. C. and Lettenmaier, D. P.: Adjustment of global gridded precipitation for systematic bias, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 4257–4271, 2003.
Akhtar, M., Ahmad, N., and Booij, M. J.: The impact of climate change on the water resources of Hindukush-Karakorum-Himalaya region under different glacier coverage scenarios, J. Hydrol., 355, 148–163, 2008.
Arnold, J. G., Allen, P. M., and Bernhardt, G.: A comprehensive surface-groundwater flow model, J. Hydrol., 142, 47–69, 1993.
Arnold, J. G., Williams, J. R., and Maidment, D. R.: Continuous-time water and sediment routing model for large basins, J. Hydraul. Eng., 121, 171–183, 1995.
Arnold, J. G., Srinivasan, R., Muttiah, R., and Willams, J. R.: Large area hydrological modeling and assessment part I: model development, J. Am. Water Resour. As., 34, 73–89, 1998.
Babel, M. S., Shrestha, B., and Perret, S.: Hydrological impact of biofuel production: A case study of the Khlong Phlo Watershed in Thailand, Agr. Water Manage., 101, 8–26, 2011.
Benaman, J., Christine, A. S., and Douglas, A. H.: Calibration and validation of soil and water assessment tool on an agricultural watershed in upstate New York, J. Hydrol. Eng.-ASCE, 10, 363–374, 2005.
Bogaart, P. W., Van Balen, R. T., Kasse, C., and Vandenberghe, J.: Process-based modeling of fluvial system response to rapid climate change – I: model formulation and generic applications, Quaternary Sci. Rev., 22, 2077–2095, 2003.
Boorman, D. B.: Climate, Hydrochemistry and Economics of Surface-water Systems (CHESS): adding a European dimension to the catchment modeling experience developed under LOIS, Sci. Total Environ., 314–316, 411–437, 2003.
Cai, X., Wang, D., Zhu, T., and Ringler, C.: Assessing the regional variability of GCM simulations, Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, L02706, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL036443, 2009.
Chen, J., Brissette, F. P., and Leconte, R.: Uncertainty of downscaling method in quantifying the impact of climate change on hydrology, J. Hydrol., 401, 190–202, 2011.
Diaz-Nieto, J. and Wilby, R. L.: A comparison of statistical downscaling and climate change factor methods: impacts on low flows in the river Thames, United Kingdom, Climate Change, 69, 245–268, 2005.
Di Baldassarre, G., Elshamy, M., van Griensven, A., Soliman, E., Kigobe, M., Ndomba, P., Mutemi, J., Mutua, F., Moges, S., Xuan, Y., Solomatine, D., and Uhlenbrook, S.: Future hydrology and climate in the River Nile basin: a review, Hydrolog. Sci. J., 56, 199–211, 2011.
Eastham, J., Mpelasoka, F., Mainuddin, M., Ticehurst, C., Dyce, P., Hodgson,G., Ali, R., and Kirby, M.: Mekong River Basin Water Resources Assessment: Impacts of Climate Change, CSIRO: Water for a Healthy Country National Research Flagship, CSIRO, Australia, 2008.
Elshamy, M., Di Baldassarre, G., and van Griensven, A.: Characterizing climate model uncertainty using an informal Bayesian GLUE framework: an application to the River Nile, J. Hydrol. Eng., online first: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000656, 2012.
Fowler, H. J., Blenkinsop, S., and Tebald, C.: Linking climate change modelling to impacts studies: recent advances in downscaling techniques for hydrological modeling, Int. J. Climatol., 27, 1547–1578, 2007.
Fuchs, H. J.: Data availability for studies on effects of land-cover changes on water yield, sediment and nutrients load at catchments of the Lower Mekong Basin, Working Paper 09, MRC-GTZ Cooperation Programme, 2004.
Georgakakos, K. P., Seo, D., Gupta, H., Schaake, J., and Butts, M. B.: Towards the characterization of streamflow simulation uncertainty through multimodel ensembles, J. Hydrol., 298, 222–241, 2004.
Green, W. H. and Ampt, G. A.: Studies on soil physics, 1. The flow of air and water through soils, J. Agr. Sci., 4, 11–24, 1911.
Hanratty, M. P. and Stefan, H. G.: Simulating climate change effects in a Minnesota agricultural watershed, J. Environ. Qual., 27, 1524–1532, 1998.
Hardy, R. L.: Multiquadric equations of topology and other irregular surface, J. Geophys. Res., 76, 1905–1915, 1971.
Hargreaves, G. L., Hargreaves, G. H., and Riley, J. P.: Agricultural benefits for Senegal River Basin, J. Irrig. Drain. E.-ASCE, 111, 113–124, 1985.
Hay, L. E., Wilby, R. L., and Leavesly, H. H.: Comparison of delta change and downscaled GCM scenarios for three mountainous basins in the United States, J. Am. Water Resour. As., 36, 387–397, 2000.
Hoanh, C. T., Jirayoot, K., Lacombe, G., and Srinetr, V.: Impact of climate change and development on Mekong flow regime, First assessment-2009, MRC Technical Paper No. 29, Mekong River Comission, Vientiane, Lao PDR, 2010.
Hu, Y., Maskey, S., and Uhlenbrook, S.: Downscaling daily precipitation over the Yellow River source region in China: a comparison of three statistical downscaling methods, Theor. Appl. Climatol., Online ISSN: 1434-4483, Springer Vienna, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-012-0745-4, 2012.
Huth, R., Kysely, J., and Dubrovsky, M.: Time structure of observed, GCM-simulated, downscaled, and stochastically generator daily temperature series, J. Climate, 14, 4047–4061, 2001.
IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change): Climate change: AR4 synthesis report, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2007.
Ishidaira, H., Ishikawa, Y., Funada, S., and Takeuchi, K.: Estimating the evolution of vegetation cover and its hydrological impact in the Mekong River basin in the 21st century, Hydrol. Process., 22, 1395–1405, 2008.
Jackson, W. L., Gebhardt, K., and Haveren, B. P. V.: Use of the modified universal soil loss equation for average annual sediment yield estimates on small rangeland drainage basin, in: Symposium on Drainage Basin Sediment Delivery, IASH, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA, 1986.
Johnson, C. W., Gordon, N. D., and Hanson, C. L.: North-west rangeland sediment yield analysis by the MUSLE, Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, 26, 1889–1895, 1986.
Johnston, R. and Kummu, M.: Water resources models in the Mekong basin: a review, Water Resour. Manage., 26, 429–455, 2012.
Keskinen, M.: Water resources development and impact assessment in the Mekong Basin: which way to go?. Ambio, 37, 193–198, 2008.
Kiem, A. S., Ishidaira, H., Hapuarachchi, H. P., Zhou, M. C., Hirabayahi, Y., and Takeuchi, K.: Future hydroclimatology of the Mekong River basin simulated useing the high-resolution Japan Meteorological Agency (JMA) AGCM, Hydrol. Process., 22, 1382–1394, 2008.
Kingston, D. G., Thompson, J. R., and Kite, G.: Uncertainty in climate change projections of discharge for the Mekong River Basin, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 15, 1459–1471, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-1459-2011, 2011.
Kummu, M. and Varis, O.: Sediment-related impacts due to upstream reservoir trapping, the Lower Mekong River, Geomorphology, 85, 275–293, 2007.
Kummu, M., Keskinen, M., and Varis, O.: Modern Myths of the Mekong. A critical review of water and development concepts, principles and policies. Water & Development Publications – Helsinki University of Technology, 206 pp., 2008.
Lauri, H., de Moel, H., Ward, P. J., Räsänen, T. A., Keskinen, M., and Kummu, M.: Future changes in Mekong River hydrology: impact of climate change and reservoir operation on discharge, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., 9, 6569–6614, https://doi.org/10.5194/hessd-9-6569-2012, 2012.
Li, Y., Chen, B.-M., Wang, Z.-G., and Peng, S.-L.: Effects of temperature change on water discharge, and sediment and nutrient loading in the lower Pearl River basin based on SWAT modeling, Hydrolog. Sci. J., 56, 68–83, 2011.
Lu, H.: Comparative analysis of the hydrological characteristics in Lancang Mekong River basin, International symposium of flooding in South Asia, Bangladesh, 1998.
Lu, X. X.: Spatial variability and temporal change of water discharge and sediment flux in the lower Jinsha tributary: impact of environmental changes, River Res. Appl., 21, 229–243, 2005.
Masih, I., Maskey, S., Uhlenbrook, S., and Smakhtin, V.: Impact of upstream changes in rain-fed agricultural water management on downstream flows in a semi-arid basin, Agr. Water Manage., 100, 36–44, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2011.08.013, 2011a.
Masih, I., Maskey, S., Uhlenbrook, S., and Smakhtin, V.: Assessing the impact of areal precipitation input on streamflow simulations using the SWAT model, J. Am. Water Resour. As., 47, 179–195, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2010.00502.x, 2011b.
Maurer, E. P.: Uncertainty in hydrologic impacts of climate change in the Sierra Nevada, California, under two emissions scenarios, Climatic Change, 82, 309–325, 2007.
Maurer, E. P., Adam, J. C., and Wood, A. W.: Climate model based consensus on the hydrologic impacts of climate change to the Rio Lempa basin of Central America, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 13, 183–194, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-13-183-2009, 2009.
Mekong River Commission: MRC Work Programme, Mekong River commission, Vientiane, 2003.
Mekong River Commission: Overview of the Hydrology of the Mekong Basin, Mekong River Commission, Vientiane, 2005.
Mekong River Commission: Integrated Basin Flow Management, Social Team 2006 Final Report, Water utilization program-environment program, Mekong River Commission, Vientiane, 2006.
Mekong River Commission: Existing, Under Construction and Planned/Proposed Hydropower Projects in the Lower Mekong Basin, September 2008, Map produced by the Mekong River Commission (MRC), available at: http://www.mrcmekong.org/programmes/hydropower.htm (last access: 10 September 2011), 2008.
Menzel, L. and Burger, G.: Climate change scenarios and runoff response in the Mulde catchment (Southern Elbe, Germany), J. Hydrol., 267, 53–64, 2002.
Michael, A., Schmidt, J., Enke, W., Deutschlander, T., and Maltiz, G.: Impact of expected increase in precipitation intensities on soil loss results of comapritive model simulations, Catena, 61, 155–164, 2005.
Minville, M., Brissette, F., and Leconte, R.: Uncertainty of the impact of climate change on the hydrology of a Nordic watershed, J. Hydrol., 358, 70–83, 2008.
Monteith, J. L.: Evaporation and the environment, in: The State and Movement of Water in Living Organisms, 19th Symposia of the Society for Experimental Biology, Cambridge University Press, London, United Kingdom, 205–234, 1965.
Naik, P. K. and Jay, D. A.: Distinguishing human and climate influences on the Columbia River: changes in mean flow and sediment transport, J. Hydrol., 404, 259–277, 2011.
Nash, J. E. and Sutcliffe, J. V.: River flow forecasting through conceptual models. Part I – a discussion of principles, J. Hydrology, 10, 282–290, 1970.
Neitsch, S. L., Arnold, J. G., Kiniry, J. R., and Williams, J. R.: Soil and Water Assessment Tool theoretical documentation, version 2005, Texas Water Resources Institute, College Station, Texas, USA, 2005.
Nijssen, B., O'Donnell, G., Hamlet, A., and Lettenmaier, D.: Hydrologic sensitivity of global rivers to climate change, Climate Change, 50, 143–175, 2001.
O'Neal, M. R., Nearing, M. A., Vining, R. C., Southworth, J., and Pfeifer, R. A.: Climate change impacts on soil erosion in Midwest United States with changes in crop management, Catena, 61, 165–184, 2005.
Palutikof, J. P., Winkler, J. A., Goodess, C. M., and Andresen, J. A.: The simulation of daily temperature time series from GCM Output. Part 1: comparison of model data with observations, J. Climate, 10, 2497–2513, 1997.
Phan, D. B., Wu, C. C., and Hsieh, S. C.: Impact of climate change on stream discharge and sediment yield in Northern Viet Nam, Water Res., 38, 827–836, 2011.
Phomcha, P., Wirojanagud, P., Vangpaisal, T., and Thaveevouthti, T.: Predicting sediment discharge in an agricultural watershed: a case study of the Lam Sonthi watershed, Thailand, Science Asia, 37, 43–50, 2011.
Potter, C. and Haitt, S.: Modeling river flows and sediment dynamics for the Laguna de Santa Rosa watershed in Northern California, J. Soil Water Conserv., 64, 389–393, 2009.
Priestley, C. H. B. and Taylor, R. J.: On the assessment of surface heat flux and evaporation using large-scale parameters, Mon. Weather Rev., 100, 81–92, 1972.
Prudhomme, C. and Davies, H.: Assessing uncertainties in climate change impact analyses on the river flow regimes in the UK. Part 1: baseline climate, Climate Change, 93, 177–195, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-008-9464-3, 2009.
Prudhomme, C., Jakob, D., and Svensson, C.: Uncertainty and climate change impact on the flood regime of small UK catchments, J. Hydrol., 277, 1–23, 2003.
Pruski, F. E. and Nearing, M. A.: Climate-induced changes in erosion during the 21st century for eight US locations, Water Resour. Res., 38, 34.1–34.11, 2002.
Roberts, T.: Downstream ecological implications of China's Lancang Hydropower and Mekong Navigation Project, International Rivers Network (IRN), 2001.
Rossi, C. G., Srinivasan, R., Jirayoot, K., Duc, T. Le., Souvannabouth, P., Binh, N., and Gassman, P. W.: Hydrologic evaluation of the Lower Mekong River Basin with the soil and water assessment tool model, International Agricultural Engineering Journal, 18, 1–13, 2009.
Santhi, C., Arnold, J. G., Williams, J. R., Dugas, W. A., Srinivasan, R., and Hauck, L. M.: Validation of the SWAT model on a large river basin with point and nonpoint sources, J. Am. Water Resour. As., 37, 1169–1188, 2001.
Schuol, J., Abbaspour, K. C., Srinivasan, R., and Yang, H.: Estimation of freshwater availability in the West African sub-continent using the SWAT hydrologic model, J. Hydrol., 352, 30–49, 2008.
Semenov, M. A., Brooks, R. J., Barrow, E. M., and Richardson, C. W.: Comparison of the WGEN and LARS-WG stochastic weather generators for diverse climates, Climate Res., 10, 95–107, 1998.
Setegn, S. G., Dargahi, B., Srivivasan, R., and Melesse, A. M.: Modeling of sediment yield from Anjeni-Gauged watershed, Ethiopia using SWAT model, J. Am. Water Res. As., 46, 514–526, 2010.
Shaw, E. H. and Lynn, P. P.: Areal rainfall using two surface fitting techniques, Bulletin of the International Association and Hydrological Science, XVII, 4–12, 1972.
SWCS: Conservation implications of climate change: soil erosion and runoff from cropland, Soil and Water Conservation Society, Ankeny, 2003.
Syvitski, J. P. M., Kettner, A. J., Peckham, S. D., and Kao, S. J.: Predicting the flux of sediment to the coastal zone: application to the Lanyang watershed, Northern Taiwan, J. Coastal Res., 21, 580–587, 2005.
USDA-SCS (United States Department of Agriculture – Soil Conservation Service): National engineering handbook, Section 4 Hydrology, Chapter 4–10, USDA-SCS, Washington, USA, 1972.
Uhlenbrook, S., Seibert, J., Leibundgut, C., and Rodhe, A.: Prediction uncertainty of conceptual rainfall-runoff models caused by problems to identify model parameters and structure, Hydrolog. Sci. J., 44, 279–299, 1999.
Van Liew, M. W., Veith, T. L., Bosch, D. D., and Arnold, J. G.: Suitability of SWAT for the conservation effects assessment project: a comparison on the USDA-ARS experimental watersheds, J. Hydrol. Eng., 12, 173–189, 2007.
Vrugt, J. A., Diks, C. G. H., Gupta, H. V., Bouten, W., and Verstraten, J. M.: Improved treatment of uncertainty in hydrologic modeling: combining the strengths of global optimization and data assimilation, Water Resour. Res., 41, 1–17, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004WR003059, 2005.
Wang, J. J., Lu, X. X., and Kummu, M.: Sediment load estimates and variations in the Lower Mekong River, River Res. Appl., 27, 33–46, 2011.
Walling, D. E.: The changing sediment load of the Mekong River, Ambio, 37, 150–157, 2008.
Williams, J. R.: Flood routing with variable travel time or variable storage coefficients, T. ASAE, 12, 100–103, 1969.
Williams, J. R.: Sediment-yield prediction with universal equation using runoff energy factor, Present and Prospective Technology for Predicting Sediment Yield and Sources: Proceedings of the Sediment Yield Workshop, USDA Sedimentation Lab., Oxford, Mississippi, 28–30 November 1972, ARS-S-40, 244–252, 1975.
Xu, J. X.: Sediment flux to the sea as influenced by changing human activities and precipitation: example of the Yellow River, China, Environ. Manage., 31, 328–341, 2003.
Yang, J., Reichert, P., Abbaspour, K. C., Xia, J., and Yang, H.: Comparing uncertainty analysis techniques for a SWAT application to the Chaohe Basin in China, J. Hydrol., 358, 1–23, 2008.
Zhang, X. C., Srinivasan, R., and Hao, F.: Predicting hydrologic response to climate change on the Luohe River Basin using the SWAT model, American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, 50, 901–910, 2007.
Zhang, X. C. and Nearing, M. A.: Impact of climate change on soil erosion, runoff, and wheat productivity in central Oklahoma, Catena, 61, 185–195, 2005.
Zhu, Y.-M., Lu, X. X., and Zhou, Y.: Sediment flux sensitivity to climate change: a case study in the Longchuanjiang catchment of the upper Yangtze River, China, Global Planet. Change, 60, 429–442, 2008.
