Journal cover Journal topic
Hydrology and Earth System Sciences An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 4.936 IF 4.936
  • IF 5-year value: 5.615 IF 5-year
    5.615
  • CiteScore value: 4.94 CiteScore
    4.94
  • SNIP value: 1.612 SNIP 1.612
  • IPP value: 4.70 IPP 4.70
  • SJR value: 2.134 SJR 2.134
  • Scimago H <br class='hide-on-tablet hide-on-mobile'>index value: 107 Scimago H
    index 107
  • h5-index value: 63 h5-index 63
Volume 17, issue 5
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 2001–2016, 2013
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-2001-2013
© Author(s) 2013. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 2001–2016, 2013
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-2001-2013
© Author(s) 2013. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Research article 27 May 2013

Research article | 27 May 2013

Assessment of the indirect calibration of a rainfall-runoff model for ungauged catchments in Flanders

N. De Vleeschouwer1 and V. R. N. Pauwels2 N. De Vleeschouwer and V. R. N. Pauwels
  • 1Laboratory of Hydrology and Water Management, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
  • 2Department of Civil Engineering, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia

Abstract. In this paper the potential of discharge-based indirect calibration of the probability-distributed model (PDM), a lumped rainfall-runoff (RR) model, is examined for six selected catchments in Flanders. The concept of indirect calibration indicates that one has to estimate the calibration data because the catchment is ungauged or scarcely gauged. A first case in which indirect calibration is applied is that of spatial gauging divergence: because no observed discharge records are available at the outlet of the ungauged catchment, the calibration is carried out based on a rescaled discharge time series of a very similar donor catchment. Both a calibration in the time domain and the frequency domain (also known as spectral domain) are carried out. Furthermore, the case of temporal gauging divergence is considered: limited (e.g. historical or very recent) discharge records are available at the outlet of the scarcely gauged catchment. Additionally, no time overlap exists between the forcing and discharge records. Therefore, only an indirect spectral calibration can be performed in this case. To conclude also the combination case of spatio-temporal gauging divergence is considered. In this last case only limited discharge records are available at the outlet of a donor catchment. Again the forcing and discharge records are not concomitant, which only makes feasible an indirect spectral calibration. For most catchments the modelled discharge time series is found to be acceptable in the considered cases. In the case of spatial gauging divergence, indirect temporal calibration results in a better model performance than indirect spectral calibration. Furthermore, indirect spectral calibration in the case of temporal gauging divergence leads to a better model performance than indirect spectral calibration in the case of spatial gauging divergence. Finally, the combination of spatial and temporal gauging divergence does not lead to a notably worse model performance compared to the case of spatial gauging divergence.

Publications Copernicus
Download
Citation