Articles | Volume 17, issue 8
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-3245-2013
© Author(s) 2013. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-3245-2013
© Author(s) 2013. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Research article
| 
16 Aug 2013
Research article |
| 16 Aug 2013
Analyzing the effects of geological and parameter uncertainty on prediction of groundwater head and travel time
Department of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management, Copenhagen University, Copenhagen, Denmark
T. O. Sonnenborg
Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland (GEUS), Copenhagen, Denmark
F. Jørgensen
Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland (GEUS), Copenhagen, Denmark
A.-S. Høyer
Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland (GEUS), Copenhagen, Denmark
Department of Earth Sciences, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
R. R. Møller
Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland (GEUS), Copenhagen, Denmark
K. H. Jensen
Department of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management, Copenhagen University, Copenhagen, Denmark
Related authors
X. L. He, T. O. Sonnenborg, F. Jørgensen, and K. H. Jensen
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 2943–2954, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-2943-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-2943-2014, 2014
Trine Enemark, Rasmus Bødker Madsen, Torben O. Sonnenborg, Lærke Therese Andersen, Peter B. E. Sandersen, Jacob Kidmose, Ingelise Møller, Thomas Mejer Hansen, Karsten Høgh Jensen, and Anne-Sophie Høyer
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 505–523, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-505-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-505-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
In this study, we demonstrate an approach to evaluate the interpretation uncertainty within a manually interpreted geological model in a groundwater model. Using qualitative estimates of uncertainties, several geological realizations are developed and implemented in groundwater models. We confirm existing evidence that if the conceptual model is well defined, interpretation uncertainties within the conceptual model have limited impact on groundwater model predictions.
Tanja Denager, Torben O. Sonnenborg, Majken C. Looms, Heye Bogena, and Karsten H. Jensen
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 2827–2845, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-2827-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-2827-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This study contributes to improvements in the model characterization of water and energy fluxes. The results show that multi-objective autocalibration in combination with mathematical regularization is a powerful tool to improve land surface models. Using the direct measurement of turbulent fluxes as the target variable, parameter optimization matches simulations and observations of latent heat, whereas sensible heat is clearly biased.
Ane LaBianca, Mette H. Mortensen, Peter Sandersen, Torben O. Sonnenborg, Karsten H. Jensen, and Jacob Kidmose
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 1645–1666, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1645-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1645-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The study explores the effect of Anthropocene geology and the computational grid size on the simulation of shallow urban groundwater. Many cities are facing challenges with high groundwater levels close to the surface, yet urban planning and development seldom consider its impact on the groundwater resource. This study illustrates that the urban subsurface infrastructure significantly affects the groundwater flow paths and the residence time of shallow urban groundwater.
Ida Karlsson Seidenfaden, Torben Obel Sonnenborg, Jens Christian Refsgaard, Christen Duus Børgesen, Jørgen Eivind Olesen, and Dennis Trolle
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 955–973, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-955-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-955-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
This study investigates how the spatial nitrate reduction in the subsurface may shift under changing climate and land use conditions. This change is investigated by comparing maps showing the spatial nitrate reduction in an agricultural catchment for current conditions, with maps generated for future projected climate and land use conditions. Results show that future climate flow paths may shift the catchment reduction noticeably, while implications of land use changes were less substantial.
Julian Koch, Helen Berger, Hans Jørgen Henriksen, and Torben Obel Sonnenborg
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 4603–4619, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-4603-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-4603-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
This study explores novel modelling avenues using machine learning in combination with process-based models to predict the shallow water table at high spatial resolution. Due to climate change and anthropogenic impacts, the shallow groundwater is rising in many parts of the world. In order to adapt to risks induced by groundwater flooding, new modelling tools need to emerge. In this study, we found that machine learning is capable of reaching the required accuracy and resolution.
Adrian A. S. Barfod, Troels N. Vilhelmsen, Flemming Jørgensen, Anders V. Christiansen, Anne-Sophie Høyer, Julien Straubhaar, and Ingelise Møller
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 5485–5508, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-5485-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-5485-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
The focus of this study is on the uncertainty related to using multiple-point statistics (MPS) for stochastic modeling of the upper 200 m of the subsurface. The main research goal is to showcase how MPS methods can be used on real-world hydrogeophysical data and show how the uncertainty related to changing the underlying MPS setup propagates into the finalized 3-D subsurface models.
Rena Meyer, Peter Engesgaard, Klaus Hinsby, Jan A. Piotrowski, and Torben O. Sonnenborg
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 4843–4865, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-4843-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-4843-2018, 2018
Adrian A. S. Barfod, Ingelise Møller, Anders V. Christiansen, Anne-Sophie Høyer, Júlio Hoffimann, Julien Straubhaar, and Jef Caers
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 3351–3373, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-3351-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-3351-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
Three-dimensional geological models are important to securing and managing groundwater. Such models describe the geological architecture, which is used for modeling the flow of groundwater. Common geological modeling approaches result in one model, which does not quantify the architectural uncertainty of the geology.
We present a comparison of three different state-of-the-art stochastic multiple-point statistical methods for quantifying the geological uncertainty using real-world datasets.
Anne-Sophie Høyer, Giulio Vignoli, Thomas Mejer Hansen, Le Thanh Vu, Donald A. Keefer, and Flemming Jørgensen
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 6069–6089, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-6069-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-6069-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
We present a novel approach for 3-D geostatistical simulations. It includes practical strategies for the development of realistic 3-D training images and for incorporating the diverse geological and geophysical inputs together with their uncertainty levels (due to measurement inaccuracies and scale mismatch). Inputs consist of well logs, seismics, and an existing 3-D geomodel. The simulation domain (45 million voxels) coincides with the Miocene unit over 2810 km2 across the Danish–German border.
T. O. Sonnenborg, D. Seifert, and J. C. Refsgaard
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 3891–3901, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-3891-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-3891-2015, 2015
Short summary
Short summary
The impacts of climate model uncertainty and geological model uncertainty on hydraulic head, stream flow, travel time and capture zones are evaluated. Six versions of a physically based and distributed hydrological model, each containing a unique interpretation of the geological structure of the model area, are forced by 11 climate model projections. Geology is the dominating uncertainty source for travel time and capture zones, while climate dominates for hydraulic heads and steam flow.
N. Foged, P. A. Marker, A. V. Christansen, P. Bauer-Gottwein, F. Jørgensen, A.-S. Høyer, and E. Auken
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 4349–4362, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-4349-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-4349-2014, 2014
X. L. He, T. O. Sonnenborg, F. Jørgensen, and K. H. Jensen
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 2943–2954, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-2943-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-2943-2014, 2014
I. B. Karlsson, T. O. Sonnenborg, K. H. Jensen, and J. C. Refsgaard
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 595–610, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-595-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-595-2014, 2014
P. Rasmussen, T. O. Sonnenborg, G. Goncear, and K. Hinsby
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 421–443, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-421-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-421-2013, 2013
Related subject area
Subject: Groundwater hydrology | Techniques and Approaches: Uncertainty analysis
Data-driven estimates for the geostatistical characterization of subsurface hydraulic properties
Hierarchical sensitivity analysis for a large-scale process-based hydrological model applied to an Amazonian watershed
Interpretation of multi-scale permeability data through an information theory perspective
Spatially distributed sensitivity of simulated global groundwater heads and flows to hydraulic conductivity, groundwater recharge, and surface water body parameterization
Multi-model approach to quantify groundwater-level prediction uncertainty using an ensemble of global climate models and multiple abstraction scenarios
Influence of input and parameter uncertainty on the prediction of catchment-scale groundwater travel time distributions
Numerical modeling and sensitivity analysis of seawater intrusion in a dual-permeability coastal karst aquifer with conduit networks
On the efficiency of the hybrid and the exact second-order sampling formulations of the EnKF: a reality-inspired 3-D test case for estimating biodegradation rates of chlorinated hydrocarbons at the port of Rotterdam
Testing alternative uses of electromagnetic data to reduce the prediction error of groundwater models
Groundwater flow processes and mixing in active volcanic systems: the case of Guadalajara (Mexico)
Analyses of uncertainties and scaling of groundwater level fluctuations
Interpolation of groundwater quality parameters with some values below the detection limit
An approach to identify urban groundwater recharge
Assessment of conceptual model uncertainty for the regional aquifer Pampa del Tamarugal – North Chile
Falk Heße, Sebastian Müller, and Sabine Attinger
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 357–374, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-357-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-357-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
In this study, we have presented two different advances for the field of subsurface geostatistics. First, we present data of variogram functions from a variety of different locations around the world. Second, we present a series of geostatistical analyses aimed at examining some of the statistical properties of such variogram functions and their relationship to a number of widely used variogram model functions.
Haifan Liu, Heng Dai, Jie Niu, Bill X. Hu, Dongwei Gui, Han Qiu, Ming Ye, Xingyuan Chen, Chuanhao Wu, Jin Zhang, and William Riley
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 4971–4996, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-4971-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-4971-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
It is still challenging to apply the quantitative and comprehensive global sensitivity analysis method to complex large-scale process-based hydrological models because of variant uncertainty sources and high computational cost. This work developed a new tool and demonstrate its implementation to a pilot example for comprehensive global sensitivity analysis of large-scale hydrological modelling. This method is mathematically rigorous and can be applied to other large-scale hydrological models.
Aronne Dell'Oca, Alberto Guadagnini, and Monica Riva
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 3097–3109, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-3097-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-3097-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Permeability of natural systems exhibits heterogeneous spatial variations linked with the size of the measurement support scale. As the latter becomes coarser, the system appearance is less heterogeneous. As such, sets of permeability data associated with differing support scales provide diverse amounts of information. In this contribution, we leverage information theory to quantify the information content of gas permeability datasets collected with four diverse measurement support scales.
Robert Reinecke, Laura Foglia, Steffen Mehl, Jonathan D. Herman, Alexander Wachholz, Tim Trautmann, and Petra Döll
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 4561–4582, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-4561-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-4561-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
Recently, the first global groundwater models were developed to better understand surface-water–groundwater interactions and human water use impacts. However, the reliability of model outputs is limited by a lack of data as well as model assumptions required due to the necessarily coarse spatial resolution. In this study we present the first global maps of model sensitivity according to their parameterization and build a foundation to improve datasets, model design, and model understanding.
Syed M. Touhidul Mustafa, M. Moudud Hasan, Ajoy Kumar Saha, Rahena Parvin Rannu, Els Van Uytven, Patrick Willems, and Marijke Huysmans
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 2279–2303, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-2279-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-2279-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
This study evaluates the effect of conceptual hydro(geo)logical model (CHM) structure, climate change and groundwater abstraction on future groundwater-level prediction uncertainty. If the current groundwater abstraction trend continues, groundwater level is predicted to decline quickly. Groundwater abstraction in NW Bangladesh should decrease by 60 % to ensure sustainable use. Abstraction scenarios are the dominant uncertainty source, followed by CHM uncertainty and climate model uncertainty.
Miao Jing, Falk Heße, Rohini Kumar, Olaf Kolditz, Thomas Kalbacher, and Sabine Attinger
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 171–190, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-171-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-171-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
We evaluated the uncertainty propagation from the inputs (forcings) and parameters to the predictions of groundwater travel time distributions (TTDs) using a fully distributed numerical model (mHM-OGS) and the StorAge Selection (SAS) function. Through detailed numerical and analytical investigations, we emphasize the key role of recharge estimation in the reliable predictions of TTDs and the good interpretability of the SAS function.
Zexuan Xu, Bill X. Hu, and Ming Ye
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 221–239, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-221-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-221-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
This study helps hydrologists better understand the parameters in modeling seawater intrusion in a coastal karst aquifer. Local and global sensitivity studies are conducted to evaluate a density-dependent numerical model of seawater intrusion. The sensitivity analysis indicates that karst features are critical for seawater intrusion modeling, and the evaluation of hydraulic conductivity is biased in continuum SEAWAT model. Dispervisity is no longer important in the advection-dominated aquifer.
Mohamad E. Gharamti, Johan Valstar, Gijs Janssen, Annemieke Marsman, and Ibrahim Hoteit
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 4561–4583, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-4561-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-4561-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
The paper addresses the issue of sampling errors when using the ensemble Kalman filter, in particular its hybrid and second-order formulations. The presented work is aimed at estimating concentration and biodegradation rates of subsurface contaminants at the port of Rotterdam in the Netherlands. Overall, we found that accounting for both forecast and observation sampling errors in the joint data assimilation system helps recover more accurate state and parameter estimates.
Nikolaj Kruse Christensen, Steen Christensen, and Ty Paul A. Ferre
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 1925–1946, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-1925-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-1925-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
Our primary objective in this study is to provide a virtual environment that allows users to determine the value of geophysical data and, furthermore, to investigate how best to use those data to develop groundwater models and to reduce their prediction errors. When this has been carried through for alternative data sampling, parameterization and inversion approaches, the best alternative can be chosen by comparison of prediction results between the alternatives.
A. Hernández-Antonio, J. Mahlknecht, C. Tamez-Meléndez, J. Ramos-Leal, A. Ramírez-Orozco, R. Parra, N. Ornelas-Soto, and C. J. Eastoe
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 3937–3950, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-3937-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-3937-2015, 2015
Short summary
Short summary
A conceptual model of groundwater flow processes and mixing was developed using a combination of hydrogeochemistry, isotopes and multivariate analysis. The implementation to the case of Guadalajara showed that groundwater was classified into four groups: cold groundwater, hydrothermal water, polluted groundwater and mixed groundwater. A multivariate mixing model was used to calculate the proportion of different fluids in sampled well water. The result helps authorities in decision making.
X. Y. Liang and Y.-K. Zhang
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 2971–2979, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-2971-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-2971-2015, 2015
Short summary
Short summary
The error or uncertainty in head, obtained with an analytical or numerical solution, at an early time is mainly caused by the random initial condition. The error reduces with time, later reaching a constant error. The constant error at a later time is mainly due to the effects of the uncertain source/sink. The error caused by the uncertain boundary is limited to a narrow zone. Temporal scaling of head exists in most parts of a low permeable aquifer, mainly caused by recharge fluctuation.
A. Bárdossy
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 15, 2763–2775, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-2763-2011, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-2763-2011, 2011
E. Vázquez-Suñé, J. Carrera, I. Tubau, X. Sánchez-Vila, and A. Soler
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 14, 2085–2097, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-2085-2010, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-2085-2010, 2010
R. Rojas, O. Batelaan, L. Feyen, and A. Dassargues
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 14, 171–192, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-171-2010, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-171-2010, 2010
Cited articles
Abbaspour, K. C., Schulin, R., Van Genuchtena, M. T., and Schlappi, E.: Procedures for uncertainty analyses applied to a landfill leachate plume, Ground Water, 36, 874–883, 1998.
Alectia: Boringsregistrering og synkronpejling I området "Ølgod-Skovlund + Krusbjerg og Lindbjerg", unpublished Rapport, Virum, Denmark, 5 pp., 2011.
Baalousha, H. M.: Modelling surface-groundwater interaction in the Ruataniwha basin, Hawke's Bay, New Zealand, Environ. Earth Sci., 66, 285–294, 2012.
Beven, K. J. and Binley, A.: The future of distributed models: model calibration and uncertainty prediction, Hydrol. Process., 6, 279–298, 1992.
Brauchler, R., Cheng, J. T., Dietrich, P., Everett, M., Johnson, B., Liedl, R., and Sauter, M.: An inversion strategy for hydraulic tomography: coupling travel time and amplitude inversion, J. Hydrol., 345, 184–198, 2007.
Caers, J.: Geostatistical reservoir modeling using statistical pattern recognition, J. Petrol. Sci. Eng., 29, 177–188, 2001.
Caers, J. and Zhang, T.: Multiple-point geostatistics: a quantitative vehicle for integrating geologic analogs into multiple reservoir models, in: AAPG Special Volumes Memoir 80: Integration of Outcrop and Modern Analogs in Reservoir Modeling, edited by: Grammer, G. M., Harris, P. M., and Eberli, G. P., Tulsa, OK, USA, 383–394, 2004.
Carle, S. F. And Fogg, G. E.: Transition Probability-Based Indicator Geostatistics, Mathe. Geol., 28, 453–476, 1996.
Carle, S. F.: TPROGS – Transition Probability Geostatistical Software, Version 2.1, User Manual, Hydrologic Sciences Graduate Group, University of California, Davis, California, 1999.
Carle, S. F., LaBolle, E. M., Weissmann, G. S., VanBrocklin, D., and Fogg, G. E.: Conditional simulation of hydrofacies architecture: a transition probability/Markov approach, in: Hydrogeologic Models of Sedimentary Aquifers, Concepts in Hydrogeology and Environmental Geology No. 1, edited by: Fraser, G. S. and Davis, J. M., SEPM (Society for Sedimentary Geology) Special Publication, AAPG, Tulsa, OK, USA, 147–170, 1998.
Cheng, C. and Chen, X. H.: Evaluation of methods for determination of hydraulic properties in an aquifer-aquitard system hydrologically connected to a river, Hydrogeol. J., 15, 669–678, 2007.
Comunian, A., Renard, P., Straubhaar, J., and Bayer, P.: Three-dimensional high resolution fluvio-glacial aquifer analog, Part 2: Geostatistical modelling, J. Hydrol., 405, 10–23, 2011.
Comunian, A., Renard, P., and Straubhaar, J.: 3-D multiple-point statistics simulation using 2-D training images, Comput. Geosci., 40, 49–65, 2012.
David, W. P.: User's Guide for MODPATH/MODPATH-PLOT, Version 3: a Particle Tracking Post-Processing Package for MODFLOW, the US Geological Survey Finite-Difference Ground-Water Flow Model, US Geological Survey Open File Rep. 94–464, Tulsa, OK, USA, 1994.
Delhomme, J. P.: Spatial variability and uncertainty in groundwater flow parameters: a geostatistical approach, Water Resour. Res., 15, 269–280, 1979.
Dettinger, M. D. and Wilson, J. L.: First order analysis of uncertainty in numerical models of groundwater flow, Water Resour. Res., 17, 149–161, 1981.
Doherty, J.: PEST: Model Independent Parameter Estimation, 5th Edn. of user manual, Watermark Numerical Computing, Brisbane, Australia, 2005.
Evan, R. A. and Mary, C. H.: Documentation of the hydrogeologic-unit flow (HUF) package, US Geological Survey Open File Rep. 00–342, US Geological Survey, Denver, CO, USA, 2000.
Feyen, L. and Caers, J.: Quantifying geological uncertainty for flow and transport modeling in multi-modal heterogeneous formations, Adv. Water Resour., 29, 912–929, 2006.
Feyen, L., Beven, K. J., De Smedt, F., and Freer, J.: Stochastic capture zone delineation within the generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation methodology: conditioning on head observations, Water Resour. Res., 37, 625–638, 2001.
Fleckenstein, J. H., Niswonger, R. G., and Fogg, G. E.: River-aquifer interactions, geologic heterogeneity, and low-flow management, Ground Water, 44, 837–852, 2006.
Freeze, R. A.: A stochastic-conceptual analysis of one-dimensional groundwater flow in nonuniform homogeneous media, Water Resour. Res., 11, 725–741, 1975.
Freeze, R. A., Massmann, J., Smith, L., Sperling, T., and James, B.: Hydrogeological decision analysis: 1. A framework, Ground Water, 28, 738–766, 1990.
Goovaerts, P.: Geostatistics for Natural Resources Evaluation, Oxford University Press, New York, 483 pp., 1997.
Guardiano, F. and Srivastava, R. M.: Multivariate geostatistics: beyond bivariate moments: geostatistics-troia, in: Geostatistics-Troia, Vol. 1, edited by: Soares, A., Kluwer, Dordrecht, 133–144, 1993.
Harbaugh, A. W., Banta, E. R., Hill, M. C., and McDonald, M. G.: MODFLOW-2000, the US Geological Survey Modular Ground-Water Model – User Guide to Modularization Concepts and the Ground-Water Flow Process, US Geological Survey Open-File Report 00–92, US Department of Interior, Reston, VA, USA, 121 pp., 2000.
Harrar, W. G., Sonnenborg, T. O., and Henriksen, H. J.: Capture zone, travel time, and solute transport predictions using inverse modeling and different geological models, J. Hydrol., 11, 536–548, 2003.
Hassan, A.E, Bekhit, H. M., and Chapman, J. B.: Uncertainty assessment of a stochastic groundwater flow model using GLUE analysis, J. Hydrol., 362, 89–109, 2008.
Henriksen, H. J., Troldborg, L., Nyegaard, P., Sonnenborg, T. O., Refsgaard, J. C., and Madsen, B.: Methodology for construction, calibration and validation of a national hydrological model for Denmark, J. Hydrol., 280, 52–71, 2003.
Hendricks Franssen, H. J., Stauffer, F., and Kinzelbach, W.: Joint estimation of transmissivities and recharges–application: stochastic characterization of well capture zones, J. Hydrol., 294, 87–102, 2004.
Hoeksema, R. J. and Kitanidis, P. K.: Analysis of the spatial structure of properties of selected aquifers, Water Resour. Res., 21, 563–572, 1985.
Honarkhah, M. and Caers, J.: Direct Pattern-Based Simulation of Nonstationary Geostatistical Models, Math. Geosci., 44, 651–672, 2012.
Høyer, A. S., Lykke-Andersen, H., Jørgensen, F., and Auken, E.: Combined interpretation of SkyTEM and high-resolution seismic data, Phys. Chem. Earth, 36, 1386–1397, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2011.01.001, 2011.
Høyer, A. S., Jørgensen, F., Lykke-Andersen, H., and Christiansen, A. V.: Iterative modelling of AEM data based on geological a priori information from seismic and borehole data, Near Surf. Geophys., submitted, 2013.
Johnson, N. M.: Characterization of alluvial hydrostratigraphy with indicator semivariograms, Water Resour. Res., 31, 3205–3216, 1995.
Journel, A. G.: Beyond covariance: the advent of multiple-point geostatistics, in: Geostatistics, Banff, edited by: Leuangthong, O. and Deutsch, C. V., Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2004, 225–233, 2005.
Journel, A. G. and Alabert, F.: New method for reservoir mapping, J. Petrol. Technol., 42, 212–218, 1990.
Journel, A. G. and Zhang, T.: The necessity of a multiplepoint prior model, Math. Geol., 38, 591–610, 2006.
Jørgensen, F. and Sandersen, P. B. E.: Buried and open tunnel valleys in Denmark – erosion beneath multiple ice sheets, Quaternary Sci. Rev., 25, 1339–1363, 2006.
Jørgensen, F., Møller, R. R., Høyer, A. H., and Christiansen, A. V.: Geologisk model ved Ølgod og Skovlund – eksempel p\textdegree a effektiviseret modellering i et heterogent geologisk miljø, Danmarks og Grønlands Geologiske Undersøgelse Rapport 2012/82, GEUS, Copenhagen, Denmark, 83 pp., 2012.
Klise, K. A., Weissmann, G. S., McKenna, S. A., Nichols, E. M., Frechette, J. D., Wawrzyniec, T. F., and Tidwell, V. C.: Exploring solute transport and streamline connectivity using Lidar-based outcrop images and geostatistical representations of heterogeneity, Water Resour. Res., 45, W05413, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008WR007500, 2009.
Le Coz, M., Genthon, P., and Adler, P. M.: Multiple-point statistics for modeling facies heterogeneities in a porous medium: the Komadugu-Yobe Alluvium, Lake Chad Basin, Math. Geosci., 43, 861–878, 2011.
Liu, Y.: Using the Snesim program for multiple-point statistical simulation, Comput. Geosci., 32, 1544–1563, 2006.
Liu, Y., Harding, A., Journel, A. G., and Gilbert, R.: A workflow for multiple-point geostatistical simulation, in: Geostatistics Banff 2004, Vol. 1, edited by: Leuangthong, O. and Deutsch, C. V., Springer, Dordrecht, 245–254, 2005.
Mariethoz, G., Renard, P., Cornaton, F., and Jaquet, O.: Truncated Plurigaussian simulations to characterize aquifer heterogeneity, Ground Water, 47, 13–24, 2009.
McDonald, M. G. and Harbaugh, A. W.: A Modular Three-Dimensional Finite-Difference Ground-Water Flow Model, US Geological Survey Open File Rep. 83–875, US GPO, Washington, USA, 1988.
McKay, M. D., Conover, W. J., and Beckman, R. J.: A comparison of three methods for selection values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code, Technometrics, 2, 239–245, 1979.
Mantovan, P. and Todini, E.: Hydrological forecasting uncertainty assessment: incoherence of the GLUE methodology, J. Hydrol., 330, 368–381, 2006.
Mantovan, P., Todini, E., and Martina, M. L. V.: Reply to comment by Keith Beven, Paul Smith and Jim Freer on "Hydrological forecasting uncertainty assessment: incoherence of the GLUE methodology", J. Hydrol., 228, 319–324, 2007.
Rasmussen, E. S., Dybkjær, K., and Piasecki, S.: Lithostratigraphy of the Upper Oligocene Miocene Succession of Denmark, Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland Bulletin, 22, GEUS, Copenhagen, Denmark, 92 pp., 2010.
Refsgaard, J. C., Christensen, S., Sonnenborg, D. S., Hojberg, A. L., and Troldborg, L.: Review of strategies for handling geological uncertainty in groundwater flow and transport modeling, Adv. Water Resour., 36, 36–50, 2012.
Remy, N., Boucher, A., and Wu, J.: Applied Geostatistics with SGeMS, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2009.
Renard, P.: Stochastic hydrogeology: what professionals really need?, Ground Water, 45, 531–541, 2007.
Sørensen, K. I. and Auken, E.: SkyTEM – a new high-resolution helicopter transient electromagnetic system, Explor. Geophys., 35, 191–199, 2004.
Stisen, S., Sonnenborg, T. O., Højberg, A. L., Troldborg, L., and Refsgaard, J. C.: Evaluation of climate input biases and water balance issues using a coupled surface-subsurface model, Vadose Zone J., 10, 37–53, 2011.
Strebelle, S. B.: Conditional simulation of complex geological structures using multiple-point statistics, Math. Geol., 34, 1–21, 2002.
Strebelle, S. B.: Sequential simulation for modeling geological structures from training images, in: Stochastic Modeling and Geostatistics: Principles, Methods, and Case Studies, vol. II: AAPG Computer Applications in Geology 5, edited by: Coburn, T. C., Yarus, J. M., and Chambers, R. L., AAPG, Tulsa, OK, USA, 139–149, 2006.
Tonkin, M. and Doherty, J.: A hybrid regularized inversion methodology for highly parameterized environmental models, Water Resour. Res., 41, W10412, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005WR003995, 2005.
Vrugt, J. A., Stauffer, P. H., Wohling, T., Robinson, B. A., and Vesselinov, V. V.: Inverse modeling of subsurface flow and transport properties: a review with new developments, Vadose Zone J., 7, 843–864, 2008.
Webb, E. K. and Anderson, M. P.: Simulation of preferential flow in three-dimensional, heterogeneous conductivity fields with realistic internal architecture, Water Resour. Res., 32, 533–545, 1996.
Wingle, W. L. and Poeter, E. P.: Uncertainty associated with semivariograms used for site simulation, Ground Water, 31, 725–734, 1993.
