Articles | Volume 17, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-461-2013
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-461-2013
Research article
 | 
01 Feb 2013
Research article |  | 01 Feb 2013

Local sensitivity analysis for compositional data with application to soil texture in hydrologic modelling

L. Loosvelt, H. Vernieuwe, V. R. N. Pauwels, B. De Baets, and N. E. C. Verhoest

Related authors

Identification of compound drought and heatwave events on a daily scale and across four seasons
Baoying Shan, Niko E. C. Verhoest, and Bernard De Baets
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-147,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-147, 2023
Short summary
Impact of bias nonstationarity on the performance of uni- and multivariate bias-adjusting methods: a case study on data from Uccle, Belgium
Jorn Van de Velde, Matthias Demuzere, Bernard De Baets, and Niko E. C. Verhoest
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 2319–2344, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2319-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2319-2022, 2022
Short summary
Tree hydrodynamic modelling of the soil–plant–atmosphere continuum using FETCH3
Marcela Silva, Ashley M. Matheny, Valentijn R. N. Pauwels, Dimetre Triadis, Justine E. Missik, Gil Bohrer, and Edoardo Daly
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 2619–2634, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-2619-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-2619-2022, 2022
Short summary
Unsaturated zone model complexity for the assimilation of evapotranspiration rates in groundwater modelling
Simone Gelsinari, Valentijn R. N. Pauwels, Edoardo Daly, Jos van Dam, Remko Uijlenhoet, Nicholas Fewster-Young, and Rebecca Doble
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 2261–2277, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-2261-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-2261-2021, 2021
Short summary
Assimilation of Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity (SMOS) brightness temperature into a large-scale distributed conceptual hydrological model to improve soil moisture predictions: the Murray–Darling basin in Australia as a test case
Renaud Hostache, Dominik Rains, Kaniska Mallick, Marco Chini, Ramona Pelich, Hans Lievens, Fabrizio Fenicia, Giovanni Corato, Niko E. C. Verhoest, and Patrick Matgen
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 4793–4812, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-4793-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-4793-2020, 2020
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Catchment hydrology | Techniques and Approaches: Uncertainty analysis
Technical note: Complexity–uncertainty curve (c-u-curve) – a method to analyse, classify and compare dynamical systems
Uwe Ehret and Pankaj Dey
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 2591–2605, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-2591-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-2591-2023, 2023
Short summary
Technical note: The CREDIBLE Uncertainty Estimation (CURE) toolbox: facilitating the communication of epistemic uncertainty
Trevor Page, Paul Smith, Keith Beven, Francesca Pianosi, Fanny Sarrazin, Susana Almeida, Liz Holcombe, Jim Freer, Nick Chappell, and Thorsten Wagener
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 2523–2534, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-2523-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-2523-2023, 2023
Short summary
Why do our rainfall–runoff models keep underestimating the peak flows?
András Bárdossy and Faizan Anwar
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 1987–2000, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1987-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1987-2023, 2023
Short summary
Use of expert elicitation to assign weights to climate and hydrological models in climate impact studies
Eva Sebok, Hans Jørgen Henriksen, Ernesto Pastén-Zapata, Peter Berg, Guillaume Thirel, Anthony Lemoine, Andrea Lira-Loarca, Christiana Photiadou, Rafael Pimentel, Paul Royer-Gaspard, Erik Kjellström, Jens Hesselbjerg Christensen, Jean Philippe Vidal, Philippe Lucas-Picher, Markus G. Donat, Giovanni Besio, María José Polo, Simon Stisen, Yvan Caballero, Ilias G. Pechlivanidis, Lars Troldborg, and Jens Christian Refsgaard
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 5605–5625, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5605-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5605-2022, 2022
Short summary
Pitfalls and a feasible solution for using KGE as an informal likelihood function in MCMC methods: DREAM(ZS) as an example
Yan Liu, Jaime Fernández-Ortega, Matías Mudarra, and Andreas Hartmann
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 5341–5355, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5341-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5341-2022, 2022
Short summary

Cited articles

Aitchison, J.: The statistical-analysis of compositional data, J. Roy. Stat. Soc. B, 44, 139–177, 1982.
Aitchison, J.: Principal components analysis of compositional data, Biometrika, 70, 57–65, 1983.
Aitchison, J.: The Statistical Analysis of Compositional Data, in: Monographs on Statistics and Applied Probability, p. 416, Chapman and Hall Ltd, London (UK), 1986.
Aitchison, J.: On criteria for measures of compositional difference, Math. Geol., 24, 365–379, 1992.
Aitchison, J. and Egozcue, J. J.: Compositional data analysis: Where are we and where should we be heading?, Math. Geol., 37, 829–850, 2005.
Download