Articles | Volume 18, issue 5
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-1835-2014
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-1835-2014
Research article
 | 
21 May 2014
Research article |  | 21 May 2014

Spatial controls on groundwater response dynamics in a snowmelt-dominated montane catchment

R. S. Smith, R. D. Moore, M. Weiler, and G. Jost

Related authors

Modelling the effects of climate and landcover change on the hydrologic regime of a snowmelt-dominated montane catchment
Russell S. Smith, Caren C. Dymond, David L. Spittlehouse, Rita D. Winkler, and Georg Jost
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2023-248,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2023-248, 2023
Manuscript not accepted for further review
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Catchment hydrology | Techniques and Approaches: Stochastic approaches
On the regional-scale variability in flow duration curves in Peninsular India
Pankaj Dey, Jeenu Mathai, Murugesu Sivapalan, and Pradeep P. Mujumdar
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 1493–1514, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1493-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1493-2024, 2024
Short summary
Technical Note: two-component Electrical Conductivity-based hydrograph separaTion employing an EXPonential mixing model (EXPECT) provides reliable high temporal resolution young water fraction estimates in three small Swiss catchments
Alessio Gentile, Jana von Freyberg, Davide Gisolo, Davide Canone, and Stefano Ferraris
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1797,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1797, 2023
Short summary
Towards a conceptualization of the hydrological processes behind changes of young water fraction with elevation: a focus on mountainous alpine catchments
Alessio Gentile, Davide Canone, Natalie Ceperley, Davide Gisolo, Maurizio Previati, Giulia Zuecco, Bettina Schaefli, and Stefano Ferraris
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 2301–2323, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-2301-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-2301-2023, 2023
Short summary
Flood frequency analysis using mean daily flows vs. instantaneous peak flows
Anne Bartens and Uwe Haberlandt
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2023-144,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2023-144, 2023
Revised manuscript accepted for HESS
Short summary
A mixed distribution approach for low-flow frequency analysis – Part 2: Comparative assessment of a mixed probability vs. copula-based dependence framework
Gregor Laaha
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 2019–2034, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-2019-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-2019-2023, 2023
Short summary

Cited articles

Akaike, H.: Factor-analysis and AIC, Psychometrika, 52, 317–332, 1987.
Anderson, M. G. and Burt, T. P.: The role of topography in controlling throughflow generation, Earth Surf. Proc. Land., 3, 331–344, 1978.
Anderton, S. P., White, S. M., and Alvera, B.: Micro-scale spatial variability and the timing of snow melt runoff in a high mountain catchment, J. Hydrol., 268, 158–176, 2002.
AquaPro Sensors: AquaPro Sensors is the issuing organization, Reno, NV, available at: www.aquapro-sensors.com, last access: 17 December 2012.
Balk, B. and Elder, K.: Combining binary decision tree and geostatistical methods to estimate snow distribution in a mountain watershed, Water Resour. Res., 36, 13–26, 2000.
Download

The requested paper has a corresponding corrigendum published. Please read the corrigendum first before downloading the article.