Dear Mr. Penas,

Both reviewers agree that the proposed work is propably of high scientific significance. However, also both reviewers stress that the study needs to be thoroughly revised. This includes:
- a more thorough discussion of how much data specification constrains your findings (also what one might like to find) when comparing different classification approaches;
- streamlining of the manuscript with respect to clearness and reproducibility of your argumentation.

I think this can be achieved within major revisions.

Best regards,

Erwin Zehe

Dear Mr. Penas,

I am happy to announce that both reviewers are very much pleased with the revised version of your study. They recommended minor changes that I believe you are willing to implement before the final version can go to publication.

Best regards,

Erwin Zehe

Dear Mr. Penas,

I am delighted to accept your manuscript for final publication.

Best regards,

Erwin Zehe