Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 4.256 IF 4.256
  • IF 5-year value: 4.819 IF 5-year 4.819
  • CiteScore value: 4.10 CiteScore 4.10
  • SNIP value: 1.412 SNIP 1.412
  • SJR value: 2.023 SJR 2.023
  • IPP value: 3.97 IPP 3.97
  • h5-index value: 58 h5-index 58
  • Scimago H index value: 99 Scimago H index 99
Volume 20, issue 8 | Copyright

Special issue: Effective Science Communication and Education in Hydrology...

Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 3109-3128, 2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-3109-2016
© Author(s) 2016. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Research article 02 Aug 2016

Research article | 02 Aug 2016

Willingness-to-pay for a probabilistic flood forecast: a risk-based decision-making game

Louise Arnal1,2, Maria-Helena Ramos3, Erin Coughlan de Perez4,5,6, Hannah Louise Cloke1,7, Elisabeth Stephens1, Fredrik Wetterhall2, Schalk Jan van Andel8, and Florian Pappenberger2,9 Louise Arnal et al.
  • 1Department of Geography and Environmental Science, University of Reading, Reading, UK
  • 2ECMWF, European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts, Shinfield Park, Reading, UK
  • 3IRSTEA, Catchment Hydrology Research Group, UR HBAN, Antony, France
  • 4Red Cross/Red Crescent Climate Centre, The Hague, the Netherlands
  • 5Institute for Environmental Studies, VU University Amsterdam, the Netherlands
  • 6International Research Institute for Climate and Society, Palisades, New York, USA
  • 7Department of Meteorology, University of Reading, Reading, UK
  • 8UNESCO-IHE Institute for Water Education, Delft, the Netherlands
  • 9School of Geographical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK

Abstract. Probabilistic hydro-meteorological forecasts have over the last decades been used more frequently to communicate forecast uncertainty. This uncertainty is twofold, as it constitutes both an added value and a challenge for the forecaster and the user of the forecasts. Many authors have demonstrated the added (economic) value of probabilistic over deterministic forecasts across the water sector (e.g. flood protection, hydroelectric power management and navigation). However, the richness of the information is also a source of challenges for operational uses, due partially to the difficulty in transforming the probability of occurrence of an event into a binary decision. This paper presents the results of a risk-based decision-making game on the topic of flood protection mitigation, called "How much are you prepared to pay for a forecast?". The game was played at several workshops in 2015, which were attended by operational forecasters and academics working in the field of hydro-meteorology. The aim of this game was to better understand the role of probabilistic forecasts in decision-making processes and their perceived value by decision-makers. Based on the participants' willingness-to-pay for a forecast, the results of the game show that the value (or the usefulness) of a forecast depends on several factors, including the way users perceive the quality of their forecasts and link it to the perception of their own performances as decision-makers.

Download & links
Publications Copernicus
Special issue
Download
Short summary
Forecasts are produced as probabilities of occurrence of specific events, which is both an added value and a challenge for users. This paper presents a game on flood protection, "How much are you prepared to pay for a forecast?", which investigated how users perceive the value of forecasts and are willing to pay for them when making decisions. It shows that users are mainly influenced by the perceived quality of the forecasts, their need for the information and their degree of risk tolerance.
Forecasts are produced as probabilities of occurrence of specific events, which is both an added...
Citation
Share