Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
HESS
Articles | Volume 20, issue 8
Articles | Volume 20, issue 8
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-3245-2016
© Author(s) 2016. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-3245-2016
© Author(s) 2016. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Articles | Volume 20, issue 8
Research article
 | 
10 Aug 2016
Research article |  | 10 Aug 2016

Sensitivity of future continental United States water deficit projections to general circulation models, the evapotranspiration estimation method, and the greenhouse gas emission scenario

Seungwoo Chang, Wendy D. Graham, Syewoon Hwang, and Rafael Muñoz-Carpena

Viewed

Total article views: 2,689 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
1,436 953 300 2,689 372 68 79
  • HTML: 1,436
  • PDF: 953
  • XML: 300
  • Total: 2,689
  • Supplement: 372
  • BibTeX: 68
  • EndNote: 79
Views and downloads (calculated since 15 Jan 2016)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 15 Jan 2016)

Cited

Saved (preprint)

Latest update: 18 Apr 2024
Download
Short summary
Projecting water deficit depends on how researchers combine possible future climate scenarios such as general circulation models (GCMs), evapotranspiration estimation method (ET), and greenhouse gas emission scenarios. Using global sensitivity analysis, we found the relative contribution of each of these factors to projecting future water deficit and the choice of ET estimation method are as important as the choice of GCM, and greenhouse gas emission scenario is less influential than the others.
Read more