Articles | Volume 20, issue 8
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-3325-2016
© Author(s) 2016. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Special issue:
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-3325-2016
© Author(s) 2016. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Assessment of impacts of agricultural and climate change scenarios on watershed water quantity and quality, and crop production
Graham Sustainability institute, University of Michigan, 214 S State
St., Suite 200, Ann Arbor, MI 48104, USA
Philip W. Gassman
Department of Economics, Center for Agricultural and Rural
Development, Iowa State University, 560A Heady Hall, Ames, IA 50011, USA
Justin T. Schoof
Geography and Environmental Resources, Southern Illinois University
Carbondale; Faner Hall, Carbondale, IL 62901, USA
Silvia Secchi
Geography and Environmental Resources, Southern Illinois University
Carbondale; Faner Hall, Carbondale, IL 62901, USA
Related authors
No articles found.
Sara C. Pryor, Ryan C. Sullivan, and Justin T. Schoof
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 14457–14471, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-14457-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-14457-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
The air temperature and water vapor content are increasing globally due to the increased concentration of "heat-trapping" (greenhouse) gases. But not all regions are warming at the same rate. This analysis is designed to improve understanding of the causes of recent trends and year-to-year variability in summertime heat indices over the eastern US and to present a new model that can be used to make projections of future events that may cause loss of life and/or decreased human well-being.
Shanna N. McClain, Silvia Secchi, Carl Bruch, and Jonathan W. F. Remo
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 2151–2162, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-17-2151-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-17-2151-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
This article examines the international policy and institutional frameworks for response to natural and man-made disasters occurring in the Danube basin and the Tisza sub-basin, two transnational basins. Monitoring and response to these types of incidents have historically been managed separately. We suggest that these distinctions are counterproductive, outdated, and ultimately flawed, illustrate some of the specific gaps in the Danube and the Tisza, and propose an integrated framework.
Related subject area
Subject: Catchment hydrology | Techniques and Approaches: Modelling approaches
Technical note: How physically based is hydrograph separation by recursive digital filtering?
A comprehensive open-source course for teaching applied hydrological modelling in Central Asia
Impact of distributed meteorological forcing on simulated snow cover and hydrological fluxes over a mid-elevation alpine micro-scale catchment
Technical note: Extending the SWAT model to transport chemicals through tile and groundwater flow
Long-term reconstruction of satellite-based precipitation, soil moisture, and snow water equivalent in China
Disentangling scatter in long-term concentration–discharge relationships: the role of event types
Simulating the hydrological impacts of land use conversion from annual crop to perennial forage in the Canadian Prairies using the Cold Regions Hydrological Modelling platform
How can we benefit from regime information to make more effective use of long short-term memory (LSTM) runoff models?
On the value of satellite remote sensing to reduce uncertainties of regional simulations of the Colorado River
Assessing runoff sensitivity of North American Prairie Pothole Region basins to wetland drainage using a basin classification-based virtual modelling approach
A large-sample investigation into uncertain climate change impacts on high flows across Great Britain
Effects of passive-storage conceptualization on modeling hydrological function and isotope dynamics in the flow system of a cockpit karst landscape
Technical note: Data assimilation and autoregression for using near-real-time streamflow observations in long short-term memory networks
Attribution of climate change and human activities to streamflow variations with a posterior distribution of hydrological simulations
A time-varying distributed unit hydrograph method considering soil moisture
Flood patterns in a catchment with mixed bedrock geology and a hilly landscape: identification of flashy runoff contributions during storm events
A graph neural network (GNN) approach to basin-scale river network learning: the role of physics-based connectivity and data fusion
Improving hydrologic models for predictions and process understanding using neural ODEs
Response of active catchment water storage capacity to a prolonged meteorological drought and asymptotic climate variation
Machine learning based streamflow prediction in a hilly catchment for future scenarios using CMIP6 data
HESS Opinions: Participatory Digital eARth Twin Hydrology systems (DARTHs) for everyone – a blueprint for hydrologists
Development of a national 7-day ensemble streamflow forecasting service for Australia
Future snow changes and their impact on the upstream runoff in Salween
Technical note: Do different projections matter for the Budyko framework?
Representation of seasonal land use dynamics in SWAT+ for improved assessment of blue and green water consumption
Large-sample assessment of varying spatial resolution on the streamflow estimates of the wflow_sbm hydrological model
An algorithm for deriving the topology of belowground urban stormwater networks
Assessing the influence of water sampling strategy on the performance of tracer-aided hydrological modeling in a mountainous basin on the Tibetan Plateau
Flood forecasting with machine learning models in an operational framework
Precipitation fate and transport in a Mediterranean catchment through models calibrated on plant and stream water isotope data
High-resolution satellite products improve hydrological modeling in northern Italy
Analysis of high streamflow extremes in climate change studies: how do we calibrate hydrological models?
A conceptual-model-based sediment connectivity assessment for patchy agricultural catchments
The Great Lakes Runoff Intercomparison Project Phase 4: the Great Lakes (GRIP-GL)
Spatial extrapolation of stream thermal peaks using heterogeneous time series at a national scale
Revisiting parameter sensitivities in the variable infiltration capacity model across a hydroclimatic gradient
Deep learning rainfall–runoff predictions of extreme events
Diel streamflow cycles suggest more sensitive snowmelt-driven streamflow to climate change than land surface modeling does
Teaching hydrological modelling: illustrating model structure uncertainty with a ready-to-use computational exercise
River hydraulic modelling with ICEsat-2 land and water surface elevation
Effects of spatial and temporal variability in surface water inputs on streamflow generation and cessation in the rain–snow transition zone
Quantifying multi-year hydrological memory with Catchment Forgetting Curves
On constraining a lumped hydrological model with both piezometry and streamflow: results of a large sample evaluation
Influences of land use changes on the dynamics of water quantity and quality in the German lowland catchment of the Stör
Impact of spatial distribution information of rainfall in runoff simulation using deep learning method
Towards effective drought monitoring in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region: implications from assimilating leaf area index and soil moisture into the Noah-MP land surface model for Morocco
The effects of spatial and temporal resolution of gridded meteorological forcing on watershed hydrological responses
Hydrological response of a peri-urban catchment exploiting conventional and unconventional rainfall observations: the case study of Lambro Catchment
Assessing hydrological sensitivity of grassland basins in the Canadian Prairies to climate using a basin classification-based virtual modelling approach
The value of satellite soil moisture and snow cover data for the transfer of hydrological model parameters to ungauged sites
Klaus Eckhardt
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 495–499, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-495-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-495-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
An important hydrological issue is to identify components of streamflow that react to precipitation with different degrees of attenuation and delay. From the multitude of methods that have been developed for this so-called hydrograph separation, a specific, frequently used one is singled out here. It is shown to be derived from plausible physical principles. This increases confidence in its results.
Beatrice Sabine Marti, Aidar Zhumabaev, and Tobias Siegfried
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 319–330, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-319-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-319-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Numerical modelling is often used for climate impact studies in water resources management. It is, however, not yet highly accessible to many students of hydrology in Central Asia. One big hurdle for new learners is the preparation of relevant data prior to the actual modelling. We present a robust, open-source workflow and comprehensive teaching material that can be used by teachers and by students for self study.
Aniket Gupta, Alix Reverdy, Jean-Martial Cohard, Basile Hector, Marc Descloitres, Jean-Pierre Vandervaere, Catherine Coulaud, Romain Biron, Lucie Liger, Reed Maxwell, Jean-Gabriel Valay, and Didier Voisin
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 191–212, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-191-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-191-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Patchy snow cover during spring impacts mountainous ecosystems on a large range of spatio-temporal scales. A hydrological model simulated such snow patchiness at 10 m resolution. Slope and orientation controls precipitation, radiation, and wind generate differences in snowmelt, subsurface storage, streamflow, and evapotranspiration. The snow patchiness increases the duration of the snowmelt to stream and subsurface storage, which sustains the plants and streamflow later in the summer.
Hendrik Rathjens, Jens Kiesel, Michael Winchell, Jeffrey Arnold, and Robin Sur
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 159–167, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-159-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-159-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The SWAT model can simulate the transport of water-soluble chemicals through the landscape but neglects the transport through groundwater or agricultural tile drains. These transport pathways are, however, important to assess the amount of chemicals in streams. We added this capability to the model, which significantly improved the simulation. The representation of all transport pathways in the model enables watershed managers to develop robust strategies for reducing chemicals in streams.
Wencong Yang, Hanbo Yang, Changming Li, Taihua Wang, Ziwei Liu, Qingfang Hu, and Dawen Yang
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 6427–6441, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-6427-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-6427-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We produced a daily 0.1° dataset of precipitation, soil moisture, and snow water equivalent in 1981–2017 across China via reconstructions. The dataset used global background data and local on-site data as forcing input and satellite-based data as reconstruction benchmarks. This long-term high-resolution national hydrological dataset is valuable for national investigations of hydrological processes.
Felipe A. Saavedra, Andreas Musolff, Jana von Freyberg, Ralf Merz, Stefano Basso, and Larisa Tarasova
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 6227–6245, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-6227-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-6227-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Nitrate contamination of rivers from agricultural sources is a challenge for water quality management. During runoff events, different transport paths within the catchment might be activated, generating a variety of responses in nitrate concentration in stream water. Using nitrate samples from 184 German catchments and a runoff event classification, we show that hydrologic connectivity during runoff events is a key control of nitrate transport from catchments to streams in our study domain.
Marcos R. C. Cordeiro, Kang Liang, Henry F. Wilson, Jason Vanrobaeys, David A. Lobb, Xing Fang, and John W. Pomeroy
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 5917–5931, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5917-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5917-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
This study addresses the issue of increasing interest in the hydrological impacts of converting cropland to perennial forage cover in the Canadian Prairies. By developing customized models using the Cold Regions Hydrological Modelling (CRHM) platform, this long-term (1992–2013) modelling study is expected to provide stakeholders with science-based information regarding the hydrological impacts of land use conversion from annual crop to perennial forage cover in the Canadian Prairies.
Reyhaneh Hashemi, Pierre Brigode, Pierre-André Garambois, and Pierre Javelle
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 5793–5816, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5793-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5793-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Hydrologists have long dreamed of a tool that could adequately predict runoff in catchments. Data-driven long short-term memory (LSTM) models appear very promising to the hydrology community in this respect. Here, we have sought to benefit from traditional practices in hydrology to improve the effectiveness of LSTM models. We discovered that one LSTM parameter has a hydrologic interpretation and that there is a need to increase the data and to tune two parameters, thereby improving predictions.
Mu Xiao, Giuseppe Mascaro, Zhaocheng Wang, Kristen M. Whitney, and Enrique R. Vivoni
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 5627–5646, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5627-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5627-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
As the major water resource in the southwestern United States, the Colorado River is experiencing decreases in naturalized streamflow and is predicted to face severe challenges under future climate scenarios. Here, we demonstrate the value of Earth observing satellites to improve and build confidence in the spatiotemporal simulations from regional hydrologic models for assessing the sensitivity of the Colorado River to climate change and supporting regional water managers.
Christopher Spence, Zhihua He, Kevin R. Shook, John W. Pomeroy, Colin J. Whitfield, and Jared D. Wolfe
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 5555–5575, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5555-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5555-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We learnt how streamflow from small creeks could be altered by wetland removal in the Canadian Prairies, where this practice is pervasive. Every creek basin in the region was placed into one of seven groups. We selected one of these groups and used its traits to simulate streamflow. The model worked well enough so that we could trust the results even if we removed the wetlands. Wetland removal did not change low flow amounts very much, but it doubled high flow and tripled average flow.
Rosanna A. Lane, Gemma Coxon, Jim Freer, Jan Seibert, and Thorsten Wagener
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 5535–5554, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5535-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5535-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
This study modelled the impact of climate change on river high flows across Great Britain (GB). Generally, results indicated an increase in the magnitude and frequency of high flows along the west coast of GB by 2050–2075. In contrast, average flows decreased across GB. All flow projections contained large uncertainties; the climate projections were the largest source of uncertainty overall but hydrological modelling uncertainties were considerable in some regions.
Guangxuan Li, Xi Chen, Zhicai Zhang, Lichun Wang, and Chris Soulsby
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 5515–5534, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5515-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5515-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We developed a coupled flow–tracer model to understand the effects of passive storage on modeling hydrological function and isotope dynamics in a karst flow system. Models with passive storages show improvement in matching isotope dynamics performance, and the improved performance also strongly depends on the number and location of passive storages. Our results also suggested that the solute transport is primarily controlled by advection and hydrodynamic dispersion in the steep hillslope unit.
Grey S. Nearing, Daniel Klotz, Jonathan M. Frame, Martin Gauch, Oren Gilon, Frederik Kratzert, Alden Keefe Sampson, Guy Shalev, and Sella Nevo
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 5493–5513, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5493-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5493-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
When designing flood forecasting models, it is necessary to use all available data to achieve the most accurate predictions possible. This manuscript explores two basic ways of ingesting near-real-time streamflow data into machine learning streamflow models. The point we want to make is that when working in the context of machine learning (instead of traditional hydrology models that are based on
bio-geophysics), it is not necessary to use complex statistical methods for injecting sparse data.
Xiongpeng Tang, Guobin Fu, Silong Zhang, Chao Gao, Guoqing Wang, Zhenxin Bao, Yanli Liu, Cuishan Liu, and Junliang Jin
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 5315–5339, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5315-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5315-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
In this study, we proposed a new framework that considered the uncertainties of model simulations in quantifying the contribution rate of climate change and human activities to streamflow changes. Then, the Lancang River basin was selected for the case study. The results of quantitative analysis using the new framework showed that the reason for the decrease in the streamflow at Yunjinghong station was mainly human activities.
Bin Yi, Lu Chen, Hansong Zhang, Vijay P. Singh, Ping Jiang, Yizhuo Liu, Hexiang Guo, and Hongya Qiu
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 5269–5289, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5269-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5269-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
An improved GIS-derived distributed unit hydrograph routing method considering time-varying soil moisture was proposed for flow routing. The method considered the changes of time-varying soil moisture and rainfall intensity. The response of underlying surface to the soil moisture content was considered an important factor in this study. The SUH, DUH, TDUH and proposed routing methods (TDUH-MC) were used for flood forecasts, and the simulated results were compared and discussed.
Audrey Douinot, Jean François Iffly, Cyrille Tailliez, Claude Meisch, and Laurent Pfister
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 5185–5206, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5185-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5185-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The objective of the paper is to highlight the seasonal and singular shift of the transfer time distributions of two catchments (≅10 km2).
Based on 2 years of rainfall and discharge observations, we compare variations in the properties of TTDs with the physiographic characteristics of catchment areas and the eco-hydrological cycle. The paper eventually aims to deduce several factors conducive to particularly rapid and concentrated water transfers, which leads to flash floods.
Alexander Y. Sun, Peishi Jiang, Zong-Liang Yang, Yangxinyu Xie, and Xingyuan Chen
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 5163–5184, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5163-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5163-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
High-resolution river modeling is of great interest to local governments and stakeholders for flood-hazard mitigation. This work presents a physics-guided, machine learning (ML) framework for combining the strengths of high-resolution process-based river network models with a graph-based ML model capable of modeling spatiotemporal processes. Results show that the ML model can approximate the dynamics of the process model with high fidelity, and data fusion further improves the forecasting skill.
Marvin Höge, Andreas Scheidegger, Marco Baity-Jesi, Carlo Albert, and Fabrizio Fenicia
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 5085–5102, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5085-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5085-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Neural ODEs fuse physics-based models with deep learning: neural networks substitute terms in differential equations that represent the mechanistic structure of the system. The approach combines the flexibility of machine learning with physical constraints for inter- and extrapolation. We demonstrate that neural ODE models achieve state-of-the-art predictive performance while keeping full interpretability of model states and processes in hydrologic modelling over multiple catchments.
Jing Tian, Zhengke Pan, Shenglian Guo, Jiabo Yin, Yanlai Zhou, and Jun Wang
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 4853–4874, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-4853-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-4853-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Most of the literature has focused on the runoff response to climate change, while neglecting the impacts of the potential variation in the active catchment water storage capacity (ACWSC) that plays an essential role in the transfer of climate inputs to the catchment runoff. This study aims to systematically identify the response of the ACWSC to a long-term meteorological drought and asymptotic climate change.
Dharmaveer Singh, Manu Vardhan, Rakesh Sahu, Debrupa Chatterjee, Pankaj Chauhan, and Shiyin Liu
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2022-339, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2022-339, 2022
Revised manuscript accepted for HESS
Short summary
Short summary
This study very first time examines the potential of various machine learning models in streamflow prediction over the Sutlej River Basin (rainfall dominated zone) in western Himalaya during the period 2041–2070 (2050s) and 2071–2100 (2080s) and its relationship to climate variability. The mean ensemble of model results show that the mean annual streamflow of the Sutlej River is expected to rise between 2050s and 2080s by 5.51 to 6.04 % for SSP585 and by 6.65 to 6.75 % for SSP245.
Riccardo Rigon, Giuseppe Formetta, Marialaura Bancheri, Niccolò Tubini, Concetta D'Amato, Olaf David, and Christian Massari
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 4773–4800, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-4773-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-4773-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The
Digital Earth(DE) metaphor is very useful for both end users and hydrological modelers. We analyse different categories of models, with the view of making them part of a Digital eARth Twin Hydrology system (called DARTH). We also stress the idea that DARTHs are not models in and of themselves, rather they need to be built on an appropriate information technology infrastructure. It is remarked that DARTHs have to, by construction, support the open-science movement and its ideas.
Hapu Arachchige Prasantha Hapuarachchi, Mohammed Abdul Bari, Aynul Kabir, Mohammad Mahadi Hasan, Fitsum Markos Woldemeskel, Nilantha Gamage, Patrick Daniel Sunter, Xiaoyong Sophie Zhang, David Ewen Robertson, James Clement Bennett, and Paul Martinus Feikema
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 4801–4821, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-4801-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-4801-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Methodology for developing an operational 7-day ensemble streamflow forecasting service for Australia is presented. The methodology is tested for 100 catchments to learn the characteristics of different NWP rainfall forecasts, the effect of post-processing, and the optimal ensemble size and bootstrapping parameters. Forecasts are generated using NWP rainfall products post-processed by the CHyPP model, the GR4H hydrologic model, and the ERRIS streamflow post-processor inbuilt in the SWIFT package
Chenhao Chai, Lei Wang, Deliang Chen, Jing Zhou, Hu Liu, Jingtian Zhang, Yuanwei Wang, Tao Chen, and Ruishun Liu
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 4657–4683, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-4657-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-4657-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
This work quantifies future snow changes and their impacts on hydrology in the upper Salween River (USR) under SSP126 and SSP585 using a cryosphere–hydrology model. Future warm–wet climate is not conducive to the development of snow. The rain–snow-dominated pattern of runoff will shift to a rain-dominated pattern after the 2040s under SSP585 but is unchanged under SSP126. The findings improve our understanding of cryosphere–hydrology processes and can assist water resource management in the USR.
Remko C. Nijzink and Stanislaus J. Schymanski
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 4575–4585, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-4575-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-4575-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Most catchments plot close to the empirical Budyko curve, which allows for the estimation of the long-term mean annual evaporation and runoff. The Budyko curve can be defined as a function of a wetness index or a dryness index. We found that differences can occur and that there is an uncertainty due to the different formulations.
Anna Msigwa, Celray James Chawanda, Hans C. Komakech, Albert Nkwasa, and Ann van Griensven
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 4447–4468, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-4447-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-4447-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Studies using agro-hydrological models, like the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT), to map evapotranspiration (ET) do not account for cropping seasons. A comparison between the default SWAT+ set-up (with static land use representation) and a dynamic SWAT+ model set-up (with seasonal land use representation) is made by spatial mapping of the ET. The results show that ET with seasonal representation is closer to remote sensing estimates, giving better performance than ET with static land use.
Jerom P. M. Aerts, Rolf W. Hut, Nick C. van de Giesen, Niels Drost, Willem J. van Verseveld, Albrecht H. Weerts, and Pieter Hazenberg
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 4407–4430, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-4407-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-4407-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
In recent years gridded hydrological modelling moved into the realm of hyper-resolution modelling (<10 km). In this study, we investigate the effect of varying grid-cell sizes for the wflow_sbm hydrological model. We used a large sample of basins from the CAMELS data set to test the effect that varying grid-cell sizes has on the simulation of streamflow at the basin outlet. Results show that there is no single best grid-cell size for modelling streamflow throughout the domain.
Taher Chegini and Hong-Yi Li
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 4279–4300, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-4279-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-4279-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Belowground urban stormwater networks (BUSNs) play a critical and irreplaceable role in preventing or mitigating urban floods. However, they are often not available for urban flood modeling at regional or larger scales. We develop a novel algorithm to estimate existing BUSNs using ubiquitously available aboveground data at large scales based on graph theory. The algorithm has been validated in different urban areas; thus, it is well transferable.
Yi Nan, Zhihua He, Fuqiang Tian, Zhongwang Wei, and Lide Tian
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 4147–4167, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-4147-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-4147-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Tracer-aided hydrological models are useful tool to reduce uncertainty of hydrological modeling in cold basins, but there is little guidance on the sampling strategy for isotope analysis, which is important for large mountainous basins. This study evaluated the reliance of the tracer-aided modeling performance on the availability of isotope data in the Yarlung Tsangpo river basin, and provides implications for collecting water isotope data for running tracer-aided hydrological models.
Sella Nevo, Efrat Morin, Adi Gerzi Rosenthal, Asher Metzger, Chen Barshai, Dana Weitzner, Dafi Voloshin, Frederik Kratzert, Gal Elidan, Gideon Dror, Gregory Begelman, Grey Nearing, Guy Shalev, Hila Noga, Ira Shavitt, Liora Yuklea, Moriah Royz, Niv Giladi, Nofar Peled Levi, Ofir Reich, Oren Gilon, Ronnie Maor, Shahar Timnat, Tal Shechter, Vladimir Anisimov, Yotam Gigi, Yuval Levin, Zach Moshe, Zvika Ben-Haim, Avinatan Hassidim, and Yossi Matias
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 4013–4032, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-4013-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-4013-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Early flood warnings are one of the most effective tools to save lives and goods. Machine learning (ML) models can improve flood prediction accuracy but their use in operational frameworks is limited. The paper presents a flood warning system, operational in India and Bangladesh, that uses ML models for forecasting river stage and flood inundation maps and discusses the models' performances. In 2021, more than 100 million flood alerts were sent to people near rivers over an area of 470 000 km2.
Matthias Sprenger, Pilar Llorens, Francesc Gallart, Paolo Benettin, Scott T. Allen, and Jérôme Latron
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 4093–4107, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-4093-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-4093-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Our catchment-scale transit time modeling study shows that including stable isotope data on evapotranspiration in addition to the commonly used stream water isotopes helps constrain the model parametrization and reveals that the water taken up by plants has resided longer in the catchment storage than the water leaving the catchment as stream discharge. This finding is important for our understanding of how water is stored and released, which impacts the water availability for plants and humans.
Lorenzo Alfieri, Francesco Avanzi, Fabio Delogu, Simone Gabellani, Giulia Bruno, Lorenzo Campo, Andrea Libertino, Christian Massari, Angelica Tarpanelli, Dominik Rains, Diego G. Miralles, Raphael Quast, Mariette Vreugdenhil, Huan Wu, and Luca Brocca
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 3921–3939, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-3921-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-3921-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
This work shows advances in high-resolution satellite data for hydrology. We performed hydrological simulations for the Po River basin using various satellite products, including precipitation, evaporation, soil moisture, and snow depth. Evaporation and snow depth improved a simulation based on high-quality ground observations. Interestingly, a model calibration relying on satellite data skillfully reproduces observed discharges, paving the way to satellite-driven hydrological applications.
Bruno Majone, Diego Avesani, Patrick Zulian, Aldo Fiori, and Alberto Bellin
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 3863–3883, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-3863-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-3863-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
In this work, we introduce a methodology for devising reliable future high streamflow scenarios from climate change simulations. The calibration of a hydrological model is carried out to maximize the probability that the modeled and observed high flow extremes belong to the same statistical population. Application to the Adige River catchment (southeastern Alps, Italy) showed that this procedure produces reliable quantiles of the annual maximum streamflow for use in assessment studies.
Pedro V. G. Batista, Peter Fiener, Simon Scheper, and Christine Alewell
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 3753–3770, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-3753-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-3753-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Patchy agricultural landscapes have a large number of small fields, which are separated by linear features such as roads and field borders. When eroded sediments are transported out of the agricultural fields by surface runoff, these features can influence sediment connectivity. By use of measured data and a simulation model, we demonstrate how a dense road network (and its drainage system) facilitates sediment transport from fields to water courses in a patchy Swiss agricultural catchment.
Juliane Mai, Hongren Shen, Bryan A. Tolson, Étienne Gaborit, Richard Arsenault, James R. Craig, Vincent Fortin, Lauren M. Fry, Martin Gauch, Daniel Klotz, Frederik Kratzert, Nicole O'Brien, Daniel G. Princz, Sinan Rasiya Koya, Tirthankar Roy, Frank Seglenieks, Narayan K. Shrestha, André G. T. Temgoua, Vincent Vionnet, and Jonathan W. Waddell
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 3537–3572, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-3537-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-3537-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Model intercomparison studies are carried out to test various models and compare the quality of their outputs over the same domain. In this study, 13 diverse model setups using the same input data are evaluated over the Great Lakes region. Various model outputs – such as streamflow, evaporation, soil moisture, and amount of snow on the ground – are compared using standardized methods and metrics. The basin-wise model outputs and observations are made available through an interactive website.
Aurélien Beaufort, Jacob S. Diamond, Eric Sauquet, and Florentina Moatar
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 3477–3495, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-3477-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-3477-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We developed one of the largest stream temperature databases to calculate a simple, ecologically relevant metric – the thermal peak – that captures the magnitude of summer thermal extremes. Using statistical models, we extrapolated the thermal peak to nearly every stream in France, finding the hottest thermal peaks along large rivers without forested riparian zones and groundwater inputs. Air temperature was a poor proxy for the thermal peak, highlighting the need to grow monitoring networks.
Ulises M. Sepúlveda, Pablo A. Mendoza, Naoki Mizukami, and Andrew J. Newman
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 3419–3445, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-3419-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-3419-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
This paper characterizes parameter sensitivities across more than 5500 grid cells for a commonly used macroscale hydrological model, including a suite of eight performance metrics and 43 soil, vegetation and snow parameters. The results show that the model is highly overparameterized and, more importantly, help to provide guidance on the most relevant parameters for specific target processes across diverse climatic types.
Jonathan M. Frame, Frederik Kratzert, Daniel Klotz, Martin Gauch, Guy Shalev, Oren Gilon, Logan M. Qualls, Hoshin V. Gupta, and Grey S. Nearing
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 3377–3392, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-3377-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-3377-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The most accurate rainfall–runoff predictions are currently based on deep learning. There is a concern among hydrologists that deep learning models may not be reliable in extrapolation or for predicting extreme events. This study tests that hypothesis. The deep learning models remained relatively accurate in predicting extreme events compared with traditional models, even when extreme events were not included in the training set.
Sebastian A. Krogh, Lucia Scaff, James W. Kirchner, Beatrice Gordon, Gary Sterle, and Adrian Harpold
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 3393–3417, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-3393-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-3393-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We present a new way to detect snowmelt using daily cycles in streamflow driven by solar radiation. Results show that warmer sites have earlier and more intermittent snowmelt than colder sites, and the timing of early snowmelt events is strongly correlated with the timing of streamflow volume. A space-for-time substitution shows greater sensitivity of streamflow timing to climate change in colder rather than in warmer places, which is then contrasted with land surface simulations.
Wouter J. M. Knoben and Diana Spieler
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 3299–3314, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-3299-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-3299-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
This paper introduces educational materials that can be used to teach students about model structure uncertainty in hydrological modelling. There are many different hydrological models and differences between these models impact their usefulness in different places. Such models are often used to support decision making about water resources and to perform hydrological science, and it is thus important for students to understand that model choice matters.
Monica Coppo Frias, Suxia Liu, Xingguo Mo, Karina Nielsen, Heidi Randall, Liguang Jiang, Jun Ma, and Peter Bauer-Gottwein
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-377, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-377, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
This paper uses remote sensing data from ICESat-2 to calibrate a 1D hydraulic model. With the model, we can make estimations of discharge and water surface elevation, which are important indicators in flooding risk assessment. ICESat-2 data gives an added value thanks to its 0.7 meters resolution, which allows for measuring narrow river streams. In addition, ICESat-2 provides measurements on the river dry portion geometry that can be included in the model.
Leonie Kiewiet, Ernesto Trujillo, Andrew Hedrick, Scott Havens, Katherine Hale, Mark Seyfried, Stephanie Kampf, and Sarah E. Godsey
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 2779–2796, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2779-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2779-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Climate change affects precipitation phase, which can propagate into changes in streamflow timing and magnitude. This study examines how variations in rainfall and snowmelt affect discharge. We found that annual discharge and stream cessation depended on the magnitude and timing of rainfall and snowmelt and on the snowpack melt-out date. This highlights the importance of precipitation timing and emphasizes the need for spatiotemporally distributed simulations of snowpack and rainfall dynamics.
Alban de Lavenne, Vazken Andréassian, Louise Crochemore, Göran Lindström, and Berit Arheimer
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 2715–2732, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2715-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2715-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
A watershed remembers the past to some extent, and this memory influences its behavior. This memory is defined by the ability to store past rainfall for several years. By releasing this water into the river or the atmosphere, it tends to forget. We describe how this memory fades over time in France and Sweden. A few watersheds show a multi-year memory. It increases with the influence of groundwater or dry conditions. After 3 or 4 years, they behave independently of the past.
Antoine Pelletier and Vazken Andréassian
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 2733–2758, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2733-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2733-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
A large part of the water cycle takes place underground. In many places, the soil stores water during the wet periods and can release it all year long, which is particularly visible when the river level is low. Modelling tools that are used to simulate and forecast the behaviour of the river struggle to represent this. We improved an existing model to take underground water into account using measurements of the soil water content. Results allow us make recommendations for model users.
Chaogui Lei, Paul D. Wagner, and Nicola Fohrer
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 2561–2582, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2561-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2561-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We presented an integrated approach to hydrologic modeling and partial least squares regression quantifying land use change impacts on water and nutrient balance over 3 decades. Results highlight that most variations (70 %–80 %) in water quantity and quality variables are explained by changes in land use class-specific areas and landscape metrics. Arable land influences water quantity and quality the most. The study provides insights on water resources management in rural lowland catchments.
Yang Wang and Hassan A. Karimi
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 2387–2403, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2387-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2387-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We found that rainfall data with spatial information can improve the model's performance, especially when simulating the future multi-day discharges. We did not observe that regional LSTM as a regional model achieved better results than LSTM as individual model. This conclusion applies to both one-day and multi-day simulations. However, we found that using spatially distributed rainfall data can reduce the difference between individual LSTM and regional LSTM.
Wanshu Nie, Sujay V. Kumar, Kristi R. Arsenault, Christa D. Peters-Lidard, Iliana E. Mladenova, Karim Bergaoui, Abheera Hazra, Benjamin F. Zaitchik, Sarith P. Mahanama, Rachael McDonnell, David M. Mocko, and Mahdi Navari
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 2365–2386, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2365-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2365-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The MENA (Middle East and North Africa) region faces significant food and water insecurity and hydrological hazards. Here we investigate the value of assimilating remote sensing data sets into an Earth system model to help build an effective drought monitoring system and support risk mitigation and management by countries in the region. We highlight incorporating satellite-informed vegetation conditions into the model as being one of the key processes for a successful application for the region.
Pin Shuai, Xingyuan Chen, Utkarsh Mital, Ethan T. Coon, and Dipankar Dwivedi
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 2245–2276, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2245-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2245-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Using an integrated watershed model, we compared simulated watershed hydrologic variables driven by three publicly available gridded meteorological forcings (GMFs) at various spatial and temporal resolutions. Our results demonstrated that spatially distributed variables are sensitive to the spatial resolution of the GMF. The temporal resolution of the GMF impacts the dynamics of watershed responses. The choice of GMF depends on the quantity of interest and its spatial and temporal scales.
Greta Cazzaniga, Carlo De Michele, Michele D'Amico, Cristina Deidda, Antonio Ghezzi, and Roberto Nebuloni
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 2093–2111, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2093-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2093-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Rainfall estimates are usually obtained from rain gauges, weather radars, or satellites. An alternative is the measurement of the signal loss induced by rainfall on commercial microwave links (CMLs). In this work, we assess the hydrologic response of Lambro Basin when CML-retrieved rainfall is used as model input. CML estimates agree with rain gauge data. CML-driven discharge simulations show performance comparable to that from rain gauges if a CML-based calibration of the model is undertaken.
Christopher Spence, Zhihua He, Kevin R. Shook, Balew A. Mekonnen, John W. Pomeroy, Colin J. Whitfield, and Jared D. Wolfe
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 1801–1819, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-1801-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-1801-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We determined how snow and flow in small creeks change with temperature and precipitation in the Canadian Prairie, a region where water resources are often under stress. We tried something new. Every watershed in the region was placed in one of seven groups based on their landscape traits. We selected one of these groups and used its traits to build a model of snow and streamflow. It worked well, and by the 2040s there may be 20 %–40 % less snow and 30 % less streamflow than the 1980s.
Rui Tong, Juraj Parajka, Borbála Széles, Isabella Greimeister-Pfeil, Mariette Vreugdenhil, Jürgen Komma, Peter Valent, and Günter Blöschl
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 1779–1799, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-1779-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-1779-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The role and impact of using additional data (other than runoff) for the prediction of daily hydrographs in ungauged basins are not well understood. In this study, we assessed the model performance in terms of runoff, soil moisture, and snow cover predictions with the existing regionalization approaches. Results show that the best transfer methods are the similarity and the kriging approaches. The performance of the transfer methods differs between lowland and alpine catchments.
Cited articles
Agren, M. M.: Raccoon River Water Quality Master Plan. Prepared on behalf of the M&M Divide Resource Conservation & Development, available at: http://www.iowadnr.gov/Portals/idnr/uploads/water/watershed/files/raccoonmasterwmp13.PDF (last access: 24 July 2015), 2011.
Andraski, T. W., Bundy, L. G., and Kilian, K. C.: Manure history and long-term tillage effects on soil properties and phosphorus losses in runoff, J. Environ. Qual., 32, 1782–1789, 2003.
Arnold, J. G., Srinivasan, R., Muttiah, R. S., and Williams, J. R.: Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment part I: Model development, J. Am. Water Resour. As., 34, 73–89, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.1998.tb05961.x, 1998.
Arnold, J. G., Allen, P. M., Volk, M., Williams, J. R., and Bosch, D. D.: Assessment of different representations of spatial variability on SWAT model performance, T. ASABE, 53, 1433–1443, https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.34913, 2010.
Arnold, J. G., Kiniry, J. R., Srinivasan, R., Williams, J. R., Haney, S. L., and Neitsch, S. L.: Soil and Water Assessment Tool Input/Output Documentation, Version 2012, Texas Water Resources Institute, Temple, TX, USA, TR-439, 2012.
Bressiani, D. D. A., Gassman, P. W., Fernandes, J. G., Garbossa, L. H. P., Srinivasan, R., Bonumá, N. B., and Mendiondo, E. M.: A review of Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) applications in Brazil: Challenges and Prospects, Int. J. Agric. Biol. Eng., 8, 9–35, https://doi.org/10.3965/j.ijabe.20150803.1765, 2015.
Bundy, L. G., Andraski, T. W., and Powell, J. M.: Management practice effects on phosphorus losses in runoff in corn production systems, J. Environ. Qual., 30, 1822–1828, 2001.
Cai, X., Wang, D., and Laurent, R.: Impact of Climate Change on Crop Yield: A Case Study of Rainfed Corn in Central Illinois, J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 48, 1868–1881, https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JAMC1880.1, 2009.
CARD: SWAT literature database for peer-reviewed journal articles. Center for Agricultural and Rural Development, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, available at: https://www.card.iastate.edu/swat_articles/ (last access: 11 January 2016), 2016.
Chapman, W. L. and Walsh, J. E.: Simulations of Arctic Temperature and Pressure by Global Coupled Models, J. Climate, 20, 609–632, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI4026.1, 2007.
Chien, H., Yeh, P. J.-F., and Knouft, J. H.: Modeling the potential impacts of climate change on streamflow in agricultural watersheds of the Midwestern United States, J. Hydrol., 491, 73–88, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.03.026, 2013.
Chylek, P., Li, J., Dubey, M. K., Wang, M., and Lesins, G.: Observed and model simulated 20th century Arctic temperature variability: Canadian Earth System Model CanESM2, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., 11, 22893–22907, https://doi.org/10.5194/acpd-11-22893-2011, 2011.
Davis, S. C., Parton, W. J., Grosso, S. J. D., Keough, C., Marx, E., Adler, P. R., and DeLucia, E. H.: Impact of second-generation biofuel agriculture on greenhouse-gas emissions in the corn-growing regions of the US, Front. Ecol. Environ., 10, 69–74, https://doi.org/10.1890/110003, 2012.
DMWW: Fact sheet: Nitrate Removal Facility, Des Moines Water Works, available at: http://www.dmww.com/upl/documents/water-quality/lab-reports/fact-sheets/nitrate-removal-facility.pdf (last access: 20 January 2016), 2015.
Donner, S. D. and Kucharik, C. J.: Corn-based ethanol production compromises goal of reducing nitrogen export by the Mississippi River, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 105, 4513–4518, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0708300105, 2008.
Dreborg, K. H.: Scenarios and structural uncertainty. Explorations in the field of sustainable transport, Doctoral Thesis, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, 2004.
Duffy, M.: Estimated Costs for Production, Storage and Transportation of Switchgrass, Iowa State University Extension, File A1-22, 2008.
Duffy, M: Estimated Costs of Crop Production in Iowa – 2013 FM-1712, Iowa State University Extension, 2013.
Dufresne, J.-L., Foujols, M.-A., Denvil, S., Caubel, A., Marti, O., Aumont, O., and Balkanski, Y., Balkanski, Y., Bekki, S., Bellenger, H., Benshila, R., Bony, S., Bopp, L., Braconnot, P., Brockmann, P., Cadule, P., Cheruy, F., Codron, F., Cozic, A., Cugnet, D., de Noblet, N., Duvel, J.-P., Ethé, C., Fairhead, L., Fichefet, T., Flavoni, S., Friedlingstein, P., Grandpeix, J.-Y., Guez, L., Guilyardi, E., Hauglustaine, D., Hourdin, F., Idelkadi, A., Ghattas, J., Joussaume, S., Kageyama, M., Krinner, G., Labetoulle, S., Lahellec, A., Lefebvre, M.-P., Lefevre, F., Levy, C., Li, Z. X., Lloyd, J., Lott, F., Madec, G., Mancip, M., Marchand, M., Masson, S., Meurdesoif, Y., Mignot, J., Musat, I., Parouty, S., Polcher, J., Rio, C., Schulz, M., Swingedouw, D., Szopa, S., Talandier, C., Terray, P., Viovy, N., and Vuichard, N.: Climate Change Projections Using the IPSL-CM5 Earth System Model: From CMIP3 to CMIP5, Clim. Dynam., 40, 2123–2165, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-012-1636-1, 2013.
Duku, C., Rathjens, H., Zwart, S. J., and Hein, L.: Towards ecosystem accounting: a comprehensive approach to modelling multiple hydrological ecosystem services, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 4377–4396, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-4377-2015, 2015.
ENERGY.GOV: Largest Cellulosic Ethanol Plant in the World Opens October 30. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy, Washington, D.C., available at: http://energy.gov/eere/bioenergy/articles/largest-cellulosic-ethanol-plant-world-opens-october-30, last access: 16 December 2015.
Ficklin, D. L., Luo, Y., Luedeling, E., and Zhang, M.: Climate Change Sensitivity Assessment of a Highly Agricultural Watershed Using SWAT, J. Hydrol., 374, 16–29, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.05.016, 2009.
Ficklin, D. L., Stewart, I. T., and Maurer, E. P.: Effects of projected climate change on the hydrology in the Mono Lake Basin, California, Climatic Change, 116, 111–131, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-012-0566-6, 2013.
Foley, J. A., Ramankutty, N., Brauman, K. A., Cassidy, E. S., Gerber, J. S., Johnston, M., Mueller, N. D., O'Connell, C., Ray, D. K., West, P. C., Balzer, C., Bennett, E. M., Carpenter, S. R., Hill, J., Monfreda, C., Polasky, S., Rockstrom, J., Sheehan, J., Siebert, S., Tilman, D., and Zaks, D. P. M.: Solutions for a cultivated planet, Nature, 478, 337–342, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10452, 2011.
Gassman, P. W. and Wang, Y. K.: IJABE SWAT Special Issue: Innovative modeling solutions for water resource problems, Int. J. Agric. Biol. Eng., 8, 1–8, https://doi.org/10.3965/j.ijabe.20150803.1763, 2015.
Gassman, P. W., Reyes, M., Green, C. H., and Arnold, J. G.: The Soil and Water Assessment Tool: Historical development, applications, and future directions, T. ASABE, 50, 1211–1250, https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.23634, 2007.
Gassman, P. W., Balmer, C., Siemers, M., and Srinivasan, R.: The SWAT Literature Database: Overview of database structure and key SWAT literature trends. Proceedings of the 2014 International SWAT Conference, July 28–1 August, Pernambuco, Brazil, Texas Water Resources Institute Technical Report – TR-472, available at: http://swat.tamu.edu/conferences/2014/ (last access: 19 January 2016), 2014.
Gassman, P. W., Jha, M., Wolter, C., and Schilling, K.: Evaluation of alternative cropping and nutrient management systems with Soil and Water Assessment tool for the Raccoon River Watershed Master Plan, American Journal of Environmental Sciences, 11, 227–244, https://doi.org/10.3844/ajessp.2015.227.244, 2015.
Goldstein, J. C. and Tarhule, A.: Evaluating the impacts of climate change and switchgrass production on a semiarid basin, Hydrol. Process., 29, 724–738, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10159, 2015.
Guse, B., Kail, J., Radinger, J., Schröder, M., Kiesel, J., Hering, D., Wolter, C., and Fohrer, N.: Eco-hydrologic model cascades: Simulating land use and climate change impacts on hydrology, hydraulics and habitats for fish and macroinvertebrates, Sci. Total Environ., 533, 542–556, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.05.078, 2015.
Heffernan, J. B., Soranno, P. A., Angilletta, M. J., Buckley, L. B., Gruner, D. S., Keitt, T. H., Kellner, J. R., Kominoski, J. S., Rocha, A. V., Xiao, J., Harms, T. K., Goring, S. J., Koenig, L. E., McDowell, W. H., Powell, H., Richardson, A. D., Stow, C. A., Vargas, R., and Weathers, K. C.: Macrosystems ecology: understanding ecological patterns and processes at continental scales, Front. Ecol. Environ., 12, 5–14, https://doi.org/10.1890/130017, 2014.
Hoque, Y. M., Raj, C., Hantush, M. M., Chaubey, I., and Govindaraju, R. S.: How do land-use and climate change affect watershed health? A scenario-based analysis, J. Water Qual. Expo. Health, 6, 19–33, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12403-013-0102-6, 2014.
Howells, M., Hermann, S., Welsch, M., Bazilian, M., Segerström, R., Alfstad, T., Gielen, D., Rogner, H., Fischer, G., van Velthuizen, H., Wiberg, D., Young, C., Roehr, R. A., Mueller, A., Steduto, P., and Ramma, I.: Integrated analysis of climate change, land-use, energy and water strategies, Nature Climate Change, 3, 621–626, https://doi.org/10.1038/NCLIMATE1789, 2013.
Jha, M. and Gassman, P. W.: Changes in hydrology and streamflow as predicted by modeling experiment forced with climate models, Hydrol. Process., 28, 2772–2781, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.9836, 2014.
Jha, M., Arnold, J. G., Gassman, P. W., Giorgi, F., and Gu, R. R.: Climate Change Sensitivity Assessment on Upper Mississippi River basin Streamflows Using SWAT, J. Am. Water Resour. As., 42, 997–1015, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2006.tb04510.x, 2006.
Jha, M. K., Wolter, C. F., Schilling, K. E., and Gassman, P. W.: Assessment of total maximum daily load implementation strategies for nitrate impairment of the Raccoon River, Iowa, J. Environ. Qual., 39, 1317–1327, https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2009.0392, 2010.
Ji, D., Wang, L., Feng, J., Wu, Q., Cheng, H., Zhang, Q., Yang, J., Dong, W., Dai, Y., Gong, D., Zhang, R.-H., Wang, X., Liu, J., Moore, J. C., Chen, D., and Zhou, M.: Description and basic evaluation of Beijing Normal University Earth System Model (BNU-ESM) version 1, Geosci. Model Dev., 7, 2039–2064, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-2039-2014, 2014.
Jungclaus, J. H., Lorenz, S. J., Timmreck, C., Reick, C. H., Brovkin, V., Six, K., Segschneider, J., Giorgetta, M. A., Crowley, T. J., Pongratz, J., Krivova, N. A., Vieira, L. E., Solanki, S. K., Klocke, D., Botzet, M., Esch, M., Gayler, V., Haak, H., Raddatz, T. J., Roeckner, E., Schnur, R., Widmann, H., Claussen, M., Stevens, B., and Marotzke, J.: Climate and carbon-cycle variability over the last millennium, Clim. Past, 6, 723–737, https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-6-723-2010, 2010.
Keshwani, D. R. and Cheng, J. J.: Switchgrass for bioethanol and other value-added applications: A review, Bioresource Technol., 100, 1515–1523, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2008.09.035, 2009.
Khanna, M., Dhungana, B., and Clifton-Brown, J.: Costs of producing miscanthus and switchgrass for bioenergy in Illinois, Biomass Bioenerg., 32, 482–493, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2007.11.003, 2008.
Kharin, V. V. and Zwiers, F. W.: Changes in the extremes in an ensemble of transient climate simulations with a coupled atmosphere-ocean GCM, J. Climate, 13, 3760–3788, 2000.
Kim, H. K., Parajuli, P. B., and Filip To, S. D.: Assessing impacts of bioenergy crops and climate change on hydrometeorology in the Yazoo River Basin, Mississippi, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 169, 61–73, 2013.
Kirkevåg, A., Iversen, T., Seland, Ø., Debernard, J. B., Storelvmo, T., and Kristjansson, J. E.: Aerosol-Cloud-Climate Interactions in the Climate Model CAM-Oslo, Tellus A, 60, 492–512, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0870.2008.00313.x, 2008.
Knutti, R., Furrer, R., Tebaldi, C., Cermak, J., and Meehl, G. A.: Challenges in Combining Projections from Multiple Climate Models, J. Climate, 23, 2739–2758, https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JCLI3361.1, 2010.
Krysanova, V. and White, M.: Advances in water resources assessment with SWAT – an overview, Hydrolog. Sci. J., 60, 771–783, https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2015.1029482, 2015.
Kundzewicz, Z. W., Mata, L. J., Arnell, N., Döll, P., Kabat, P., Jiménez, B., Miller, K., Oki, T., Şen, Z., and Shiklomanov, I.: Freshwater resources and their management, Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability, Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by: Parry, M. L., Canziani, O. F., Palutikof, J. P., van der Linden, P. J., and Hanson, C. E., Cambridge University Press, UK, 173–210, 2007.
Li, D., Tian, Y., Liu, C., and Hao, F.: Impact of land-cover and climate changes on runoff of the source regions of the Yellow River, J. Geogr. Sci., 14, 330-338, https://doi.org/ 10.1007/BF02837414, 2004.
Liu, G. H., Luan, Z. Q., Yan, B. X., Guo, Y. D., and Wang, Z. X.: Response of hydrological processes to land use change and climate variability in the Upper Naoli River Watershed, Northeast China, Water Resour., 42, 438–447, https://doi.org/10.1134/S0097807815040077, 2015.
Liu, W., Zhang, A., Wang, L., Fu, G., Chen, D., Liu, C., and Cai, T.: Projecting streamflow in the Tangwang River basin (China) using a rainfall generator and two hydrological models, Clim. Res., 62, 79–97, https://doi.org/10.3354/cr01261, 2015.
Martre, P., Wallach, D., Asseng, S., Ewert, F., Jones, J. W., Rötter, R. P., Boote, K. J., Ruane, A. C., Thorburn, P. J., Cammarano, D., Hatfield, J. L., Rosenzweig, C., Aggarwal, P. K., Angulo, C., Basso, B., Bertuzzi, P., Biernath, C., Brisson, N., Challinor, A. J., Doltra, J., Gayler, S., Goldberg, R., Grant, R. F., Heng, L., Hooker, J., Hunt, L. A., Ingwersen, J., Izaurralde, R. C., Kersebaum, K. C., Müller, C., Kumar, S. N., Nendel, C., O'leary, G., Olesen, J. E., Osborne, T. M., Palosuo, T., Priesack, E., Ripoche, D., Semenov, M. A., Shcherbak, I., Steduto, P., Stöckle, C. O., Stratonovitch, P., Streck, T., Supit, I., Tao, F., Travasso, M., Waha, K., White, J. W., and Wolf, J.: Multimodel ensembles of wheat growth: many models are better than one, Glob. Change Biol., 21, 911–925, https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12768, 2015.
McLaughlin, S. B. and Kszos, L. A.: Development of switchgrass (Panicum virgatum) as a bioenergy feedstock in the United States, Biomass Bioenerg., 28, 515–535, 2005.
Mehdi, B., Lehner, B., Gombault, C., Michaud, A., Beaudin, I., Sottile, M.-F., and Blondlot, A.: Simulated impacts of climate change and agricultural land use change on surface water quality with and without adaptation management strategies, Agr. Ecosyst. Environ., 213, 47–60, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2015.07.019, 2015a.
Mehdi, B., Ludwig, R., and Lehner, B.: Evaluating the impacts of climate change and crop land use change on streamflow, nitrates and phosphorus: A modeling study in Bavaria, J. Hydrol.-Regional Studies, 4, 60–90, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2015.04.009, 2015b.
Melillo, J. M., Reilly, J. M., Kicklighter, D. W., Gurgel, A. C., Cronin, T. W., Paltsev, S., Felzer, B. S., Wang, X., Sokolov, A. P., and Schlosser, C. A.: Indirect Emissions from Biofuels: How Important?, Science, 326, 1397–1399, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1180251, 2009.
Miao, R., Khanna, M., and Huang, H.: Responsiveness of Crop Yield and Acreage to Prices and Climate, Am. J. Agr. Econ., 98, 191–211, https://doi.org/10.1093/ajae/aav025, 2015.
Moore, N., Alagarswamy, G., Pijanowski, B., Thornton, P., Lofgren, B., Olson, J., Andresen, J., Yanda, P., and Qi, J.: East African food security as influenced by future climate change and land use change at local to regional scales, Climatic Change, 110, 823–844, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-011-0116-7, 2012.
Moss, R. H., Edmonds, J. A., Hibbard, K. A., Manning, M. R., Rose, S. K., van Vuuren, D. P., Carter, T. R., Emori, S., Kainuma, M., Kram, T., Meehl, G. A., Mitchell, J. F. B., Nakicenovic, N., Riahi, K., Smith, S. J., Stouffer, R. J., Thomson, A. M., Weyant, J. P., and Wilbanks, T. J.: The next generation of scenarios for climate change research and assessment, Nature, 463, 747–756, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08823, 2010.
Neitsch, S. L., Arnold, J. G., Kiniry, J. R., Srinivasan, R., and Williams, J. R.: Soil and Water Assessment Tool Theoretical Documentation, Version 2009, Texas Water Resources Institute, Temple, TX, USA, TR-406, 2011.
Neupane, R. P. and Kumar, S.: Estimating the effects of potential climate and land use changes on hydrologic processes of a large agriculture dominated watershed, J. Hydrol., 529, 418–429, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.07.050, 2015.
Öborn, I., Magnusson, U., Bengtsson, J., Vrede, K., Fahlbeck, E., Jensen, E. S., Westin, C., Jansson, T., Hedenus, F., Lindholm, S. H., Stenström, M., Jansson, B., and Rydhmer, L.: Five Scenarios for 2050 – Conditions for Agriculture and land use, Uppsala, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, ISBN: 978-91-576-9032-6, 2011.
Ostberg, S., Schaphoff, S., Lucht, W., and Gerten, D.: Three centuries of dual pressure from land use and climate change on the biosphere, Environ. Res. Lett., 10, 044011, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/4/044011, 2015.
Panagopoulos, Y., Gassman, P. W., Arritt, R. W., Herzmann, D. E., Campbell, T. D., Valcu, A., Jha, M. K., Kling, C. L., Srinivasan, R., White, M., and Arnold, J. G.: Impacts of climate change on hydrology, water quality and crop productivity in the Ohio-Tennessee River Basin, Int. J. Agric. Biol. Eng., 8, 36–53, https://doi.org/10.3965/j.ijabe.20150803.1497, 2015.
Parajuli, P. B. and Duffy, S. E.: Quantifying Hydrologic and Water Quality Responses to Bioenergy Crops in Town Creek Watershed in Mississippi, Journal of Sustainable Bioenergy Systems, 3, 202–208, https://doi.org/10.4236/jsbs.2013.33028, 2013.
Parajuli, P. B., Jayakody, P., Sassenrath, G. F., Ouyang, Y., and Pote, J. W.: Assessing the impacts of crop-rotation and tillage on crop yields and sediment yield using a modeling approach, Agr. Water Manage., 119, 32–42, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2012.12.010, 2013.
PCMDI: About the WCRP CMIP3 Multi-Model Dataset Archive at PCMDI, Program for Climate Model Diagnosis and Intercomparison (PCMDI), Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, US Department of Energy, Livermore, CA, available at: http://www-pcmdi.llnl.gov/ipcc/about_ipcc.php (last access: 11 June 2014), 2016.
Peplow, M.: Cellulosic ethanol fights for life: Pioneering biofuel producers hope that US government largesse will ease their way into a tough market, Nature, 507, 152–153, https://doi.org/10.1038/507152a, 2014.
Pierce, D. W., Barnett, T. P., Santer, B. D., and Gleckler, P. J.: Selecting Global Climate Models for Regional Climate Change Studies, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 106, 8441–8446, 2009.
RFA: Renewable Fuels Association. Fueling a High Octane Future: 2016 Ethanol Industry Outlook, Washington D.C., available at: http://www.ethanolrfa.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/Ethanol-Industry-Outlook-2016.pdf, last access: 9 February 2016.
Riahi, K., Rao, S., Krey, V., Cho, C., Chirkov, V., Fischer, G., Kindermann, G., Nakicenovic, N., and Rafaj, P.: RCP 8.5 – A scenario of comparatively high greenhouse gas emissions, Climatic Change, 109, 33–57, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-011-0149-y, 2011.
Sayasane, R., Kawasaki, A., Shrestha, S., and Takamatsu, M.: Assessment of potential impacts of climate and land use changes on stream flow: A case study of the Nam Xong Watershed in Lao PDR, Journal of Water and Climate Change, 7, 184–197, https://doi.org/10.2166/wcc.2015.050, 2015.
Schilling, K. E., Jha, M. K., Zhang, Y.-K., Gassman, P. W., and Wolter, C. F.: Impact of Land Use and Land Cover Change on the Water Balance of a Large Agricultural Watershed: Historical Effects and Future Directions, Water Resour. Res., 44, W00A09, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007WR006644, 2008.
Schlenker, W. and Roberts, M. J.: Estimating the Impact of Climate Change on Crop Yields: The Importance of Nonlinear Temperature Effects, National Bureau of Economic Research, available at: http://www.nber.org/papers/w13799 (last access: 22 June 2015), 2008.
Schumer, M. R., Vogel, K. P., Mitchell, R. B., and Perrin, R. K.: Net energy of cellulosic ethanol from switchgrass, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 105, 464–469, 2008.
Schoof, J. T.: High-resolution projections of 21st century daily precipitation for the contiguous U.S., J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 120, 3029–3042, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022376, 2015.
Schoof, J. T., Pryor, S. C., and Robeson, S. M.: Downscaling Daily Maximum and Minimum Temperatures in the Midwestern USA: A Hybrid Empirical Approach, Int. J. Climatol., 27, 439–454, https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.1412, 2007.
Schoof, J. T., Pryor, S. C., and Surprenant, J.: Development of daily precipitation projections for the United States based on probabilistic downscaling, J. Geophys. Res., 115, D13106, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD013030, 2010.
Secchi, S., Tyndall, J., Schulte, L. A., and Asbjornsen, H.: High crop prices and conservation Raising the Stakes, J. Soil Water Conserv., 63, 68A–73A, 2008.
Secchi, S., Gassman, P. W., Jha, M., Kurkalova, L., and Kling, C. L.: Potential water quality changes due to corn expansion in the Upper Mississippi River Basin, Ecol. Appl., 21, 1068–1084, 2011.
Serpa, D., Nunes, J. P., Santos, J., Sampaio, E., Jacinto, R., Veiga, S., Lima, J. C., Moreira, M., Corte-Real, J., Keizer, J. J., and Abrantes, N.: Impacts of climate and land use changes on the hydrological and erosion processes of two contrasting Mediterranean catchments, Sci. Total Environ., 538, 64–77, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.08.033, 2015.
Simpson, T. W., Sharpley, A. N., Howarth, R. W., Paerl, H. W., and Mankin, K. R.: The new gold rush: Fueling ethanol production while protecting water quality, J. Environ. Qual., 37, 318–324, https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2007.0599, 2008.
Singkran, N., Tosang, J., Waijaroen, D., Intharawichian, N., Vannarart, O., Anuntawong, P., Kunta, K., Wisetsopa, P., Tipvong, T., Janjirawuttikul, N., Masthawee, F., Anornpatanawat, S., and Kirtsaeng, S.: Influences of land use and climate changes on hydrologic system in the northeastern river basin of Thailand, Journal of Water and Climate Change, 6, 325–340, https://doi.org/10.2166/wcc.2014.127, 2015.
Stubbs, M.: Conservation Provisions in the 2014 Farm Bill (P.L. 113-79) Congressional Research Service Report R43504, Washington D.C., 2014.
Tan, M. L., Ibrahim, A. L., Yusop, Z., Duan, Z., and Ling, L.: Impacts of land-use and climate variability on hydrological components in the Johor River basin, Malaysia, Hydrolog. Sci. J., 60, 873–889, https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2014.967246, 2015.
Taylor, K. E., Stouffer, R. J., and Meehl, G. A.: An Overview of CMIP5 and the Experiment Design, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 93, 485–498, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00094.1, 2012.
Teshager, A. D., Misgna, G., Gassman, P. W., Secchi, S., and Schoof, J. T.: Modeling Agricultural Watersheds with the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT): Calibration and validation with a novel procedure for spatially explicit HRUs, Environ. Manage., 57, 894–911, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-015-0636-4, 2015.
Thomson, A. M., Calvin, K. V., Smith, S. J., Kyle, G. P., Volke, A., Patel, P., Delgado-Arias, S., Bond-Lamberty, B., Wise, M. A., Clarke, L. E., and Edmonds, J. A.: RCP4.5: a pathway for stabilization of radiative forcing by 2100, Climatic Change, 109, 77–94, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-011-0151-4, 2011.
Tilman, D., Balzer, C., Hill, J., and Befort, B. L.: Global food demand and the sustainable intensification of agriculture, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 108, 20260–20264, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1116437108, 2011.
Tomer, M. D., Moorman, T. B., James, D. E., Hadish, G., and Rossi, C. G.: Assessment of the Iowa River's south fork watershed: part 2: conservation practices, J. Soil Water Conserv., 63, 371–379, 2008.
Trybula, E. M., Cibin, R., Burks, J. L., Chaubey, I., Brouder, S. M., and Volenec, J. J.: Perennial rhizomatous grasses as bioenergy feedstock in SWAT: Parameter development and model improvement, Glob. Change Biol., 7, 1185–1202, https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12210, 2015.
Ummenhofer, C. C., Xu, H., Twine, T. E., Girvetz, E. H., McCarthy, H. R., Chhetri, N., and Nicholas, K. A.: How Climate Change Affects Extremes in Maize and Wheat Yield in Two Cropping Regions, J. Climate, 28, 4653–4687, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00326.1, 2015.
USDA-NASS: National Agricultural Statistics Service, CropScape Cropland Data Layer: Web interface, United States Department of Agriculture, 2012.
USDA-NASS: National Agricultural Statistics Service, Agricultural Statistics Board, United States Department of Agriculture, ISSN: 1936-3737, 2015.
USGS: Federal Standards and Procedures for the National Watershed Boundary Dataset (WBD), Techniques and Methods 11-A3, chap. 3 of Section A, Federal Standards Book 11, Collection and Delineation of Spatial Data. Techniques and Methods 11–A3, Fourth Ed. US Department of the Interior, US Geological Survey, Reston, VA and US Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Washington, D.C., available at: http://pubs.usgs.gov/tm/11/a3/ (last access: 23 January 2016), 2013.
Vadas, P. A., Barnett, K. H., and Undersander, D. J.: Economics and Energy of Ethanol Production from Alfalfa, Corn, and Switchgrass in the Upper Midwest, USA, BioEnergy Research, 1, 44–55, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-008-9002-1, 2008.
van Vuuren, D. P., Edmonds, J., Kainuma, M., Riahi, K., Thomson, A., Hibbard, K., Hurtt, G. C., Kram, T., Krey, V., Lamarque, J.-F., Matsui, T., Meinshausen, M., Nakicenovic, N., Smith, S. J., and Rose, S. K.: Representative concentration pathways: an overview, Climatic Change, 109, 5–31, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-011-0148-z, 2011a.
van Vuuren, D. P., Stehfest, E., Den Elzen, M. G. J., Deetman, S., Hof, A., Isaac, M., Klein Goldewijk, K., Kram, T., Mendoza Beltran, A., Oostenrijk, R., Van Vliet, J., and Van Ruijven, B.: RCP2.6: exploring the possibility to keep global mean temperature change below 2 degrees, Climatic Change, 109, 95–116, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-011-0152-3, 2011b.
Voldoire, A., Sanchez-Gomez, E., y Mélia, D. S., Decharme, B., Cassou, C., Sénési, S., Valcke, S., Beau, I., Alias, A., Chevallier, M., Déqué, M., Deshayes, J., Douville, H., Fernandez, E., Madec, G., Maisonnave, E., Moine, M.-P., Planton, S., Saint-Martin, D., Szopa, S., Tyteca, S., Alkama, R., Belamari, S., Braun, A., Coquart, L., and Chauvin, F.: The CNRM-CM5.1 Global Climate Model: Description and Basic Evaluation, Clim. Dynam., 40, 2091–2121, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-011-1259-y, 2013.
Weigel, A. P., Knutti, R., Liniger, M. A., and Appenzeller, C.: Risks of Model Weighting in Multimodel Climate Projections, J. Climate, 23, 4175–4191, https://doi.org/10.1175/2010JCLI3594.1, 2010.
White, V.: Agriculture and drinking water supplies: Removing nitrates from drinking water in Des Moines, Iowa, J. Soil Water Conserv., 51, 454–455, 1996.
Williams, J. R., Arnold, J. G., Kiniry, J. R., Gassman, P. W., and Green, C. H.: History of model development at Temple, Texas, Hydrolog. Sci. J., 53, 948–960, https://doi.org/10.1623/hysj.53.5.948, 2008.
Wilson, C. O. and Weng, Q.: Simulating the impacts of future land use and climate changes on surface water quality in the Des Plaines River watershed, Chicago Metropolitan Statistical Area, Illinois, Sci. Total Environ., 409, 4387–4405, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.07.001, 2011.
Wright, C. K. and Wimberly, M. C.: Recent land use change in the Western Corn Belt threatens grasslands and wetlands, P. Natl. Acad. Sci., 110, 4134–4139, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1215404110, 2013.
Wu, M., Demissie, Y., and Yan, E.: Simulated impact of future biofuel production on water quality and water cycle dynamics in the Upper Mississippi river basin, Biomass Bioenerg., 41, 44–56, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.01.030, 2012.
Wu, T., Yu, R., Zhang, F., Wang, Z., Dong, M., Wang, L., Jin, X., Chen, D., and Li, L.: The Beijing Climate Center Atmospheric General Circulation Model: Description and Its Performance for the Present-Day Climate, Clim. Dynam., 34, 123–47, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-008-0487-2, 2010.
Wu, Y., Liu, S., and Abdul-Aziz, O. I.: Hydrological effects of the increased CO2 and climate change in the Upper Mississippi River Basin using a modified SWAT, Climatic Change, 110, 977–1003, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-011-0087-8, 2012.
Wu, Y., Liu, S., Sohl, T. L., and Young, C. J.: Projecting the land cover change and its environmental impacts in the Cedar River Basin in the Midwestern United States, Environ. Res. Lett., 8, 024025, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/8/2/024025, 2013.
Wu, F., Zhan, J., Su, H., Yan, H., and Ma, E.: Scenario-based impact assessment of land use/cover and climate changes on watershed hydrology in Heihe River Basin of northwest China, Advances in Meteorology, 2015, 410198, https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/410198, 2015.
Yukimoto, S., Adachi, Y., Hosaka, M., Sakami, T., Yoshimura, H., Hirabara, M., Tanaka, T. A., Shindo, E., Tsujino, H., Deushi, M., Mizuta, R., Yabu, S., Obata, A., Nakano, H., Koshiro, T., Ose, T., and Kitoh, A.: A New Global Climate Model of the Meteorological Research Institute: MRI-CGCM3-Model Description and Basic Performance, J. Meteorol. Soc. Jpn., 90A, 23–64, https://doi.org/10.2151/jmsj.2012-A02, 2012.
Zhang, L., Nan, Z., Yu, W., and Ge, Y.: Modeling land-use and land-cover change and hydrological responses under consistent climate change scenarios in the Heihe River Basin, China, Water Resour. Manag., 29, 4701–4717, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-015-1085-9, 2015.
Zhang, L., Nan, Z., Yu, W., and Ge, Y.: Hydrological responses to land-use change scenarios under constant and changed climatic conditions, Environ. Manage., 57, 412–431, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-015-0620-z, 2016.
Zhou, X. V., Clark, C. D., Nair, S. S., Hawkins, S. A., and Lambert, D. M.: Environmental and economic analysis of using SWAT to simulate the effects of switchgrass production on water quality in an impaired watershed, Agr. Water Manage., 160, 1–13, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2015.06.018, 2015.
Zuo, D., Xu, Z., Yao, W., Jin, S., Xiao, P., and Ran, D.: Assessing the effects of changes in land use and climate on runoff and sediment yields from a watershed in the Loess Plateau of China, Sci. Total Environ., 544, 238–250, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.11.060, 2016.
Short summary
Current water quality problems due to intensification of corn in agricultural watersheds is expected to be exacerbated by the projected change in climate further in the 21st century. Therefore, there is an urgent need to develop alternative biofuel cropping systems and/or implement effective management practices to counteract future water quality problems that could develop from relying on extensive production of row crops in Corn Belt region watersheds.
Current water quality problems due to intensification of corn in agricultural watersheds is...
Special issue