Journal cover Journal topic
Hydrology and Earth System Sciences An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 4.936 IF 4.936
  • IF 5-year value: 5.615 IF 5-year
    5.615
  • CiteScore value: 4.94 CiteScore
    4.94
  • SNIP value: 1.612 SNIP 1.612
  • IPP value: 4.70 IPP 4.70
  • SJR value: 2.134 SJR 2.134
  • Scimago H <br class='hide-on-tablet hide-on-mobile'>index value: 107 Scimago H
    index 107
  • h5-index value: 63 h5-index 63
Volume 20, issue 2
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 803–822, 2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-803-2016
© Author(s) 2016. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 803–822, 2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-803-2016
© Author(s) 2016. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Research article 23 Feb 2016

Research article | 23 Feb 2016

The WACMOS-ET project – Part 1: Tower-scale evaluation of four remote-sensing-based evapotranspiration algorithms

D. Michel et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 3,019 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
1,731 1,182 106 3,019 68 97
  • HTML: 1,731
  • PDF: 1,182
  • XML: 106
  • Total: 3,019
  • BibTeX: 68
  • EndNote: 97
Views and downloads (calculated since 20 Oct 2015)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 20 Oct 2015)

Cited

Saved (final revised paper)

No saved metrics found.

Saved (discussion paper)

Discussed (final revised paper)

No discussed metrics found.

Discussed (discussion paper)

No discussed metrics found.
Latest update: 24 Feb 2020
Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
In this study a common reference input data set from satellite and in situ data is used to run four established evapotranspiration (ET) algorithms using sub-daily and daily input on a tower scale as a testbed for a global ET product. The PT-JPL model and GLEAM provide the best performance for satellite and in situ forcing as well as for the different temporal resolutions. PM-MOD and SEBS perform less well: the PM-MOD model generally underestimates, while SEBS generally overestimates ET.
In this study a common reference input data set from satellite and in situ data is used to run...
Citation