Journal cover Journal topic
Hydrology and Earth System Sciences An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 5.153 IF 5.153
  • IF 5-year value: 5.460 IF 5-year
    5.460
  • CiteScore value: 7.8 CiteScore
    7.8
  • SNIP value: 1.623 SNIP 1.623
  • IPP value: 4.91 IPP 4.91
  • SJR value: 2.092 SJR 2.092
  • Scimago H <br class='hide-on-tablet hide-on-mobile'>index value: 123 Scimago H
    index 123
  • h5-index value: 65 h5-index 65
Volume 21, issue 2
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 1051–1062, 2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-1051-2017
© Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Special issue: Observations and modeling of land surface water and energy...

Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 1051–1062, 2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-1051-2017
© Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Research article 20 Feb 2017

Research article | 20 Feb 2017

A case study of field-scale maize irrigation patterns in western Nebraska: implications for water managers and recommendations for hyper-resolution land surface modeling

Justin Gibson et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 1,548 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
1,037 465 46 1,548 49 62
  • HTML: 1,037
  • PDF: 465
  • XML: 46
  • Total: 1,548
  • BibTeX: 49
  • EndNote: 62
Views and downloads (calculated since 30 Aug 2016)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 30 Aug 2016)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 1,503 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1,482 with geography defined and 21 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Saved (final revised paper)

No saved metrics found.

Saved (preprint)

No saved metrics found.

Discussed (final revised paper)

No discussed metrics found.

Discussed (preprint)

No discussed metrics found.
Latest update: 06 Jul 2020
Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
The human use of water for irrigation is often ignored in models and operational forecasts. We describe four plausible and relatively simple irrigation routines that can be coupled to the next generation of models. The routines are tested against a unique irrigation dataset from western Nebraska. The most aggressive water-saving irrigation routine indicates a potential irrigation savings of 120 mm yr−1 and yield losses of less than 3 % against the crop model benchmark and historical averages.
The human use of water for irrigation is often ignored in models and operational forecasts. We...
Citation