Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 4.256 IF 4.256
  • IF 5-year value: 4.819 IF 5-year 4.819
  • CiteScore value: 4.10 CiteScore 4.10
  • SNIP value: 1.412 SNIP 1.412
  • SJR value: 2.023 SJR 2.023
  • IPP value: 3.97 IPP 3.97
  • h5-index value: 58 h5-index 58
  • Scimago H index value: 99 Scimago H index 99
Volume 21, issue 2 | Copyright

Special issue: Observations and modeling of land surface water and energy...

Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 1051-1062, 2017
© Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Research article 20 Feb 2017

Research article | 20 Feb 2017

A case study of field-scale maize irrigation patterns in western Nebraska: implications for water managers and recommendations for hyper-resolution land surface modeling

Justin Gibson et al.
Related authors
Feasibility analysis of using inverse modeling for estimating field-scale evapotranspiration in maize and soybean fields from soil water content monitoring networks
Foad Foolad, Trenton E. Franz, Tiejun Wang, Justin Gibson, Ayse Kilic, Richard G. Allen, and Andrew Suyker
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 1263-1277,,, 2017
Related subject area
Subject: Vadose Zone Hydrology | Techniques and Approaches: Modelling approaches
Predicting the soil water retention curve from the particle size distribution based on a pore space geometry containing slit-shaped spaces
Chen-Chao Chang and Dong-Hui Cheng
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 4621-4632,,, 2018
Technical note: Saturated hydraulic conductivity and textural heterogeneity of soils
Carlos García-Gutiérrez, Yakov Pachepsky, and Miguel Ángel Martín
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 3923-3932,,, 2018
Water ages in the critical zone of long-term experimental sites in northern latitudes
Matthias Sprenger, Doerthe Tetzlaff, Jim Buttle, Hjalmar Laudon, and Chris Soulsby
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 3965-3981,,, 2018
Ecohydrological particle model based on representative domains
Conrad Jackisch and Erwin Zehe
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 3639-3662,,, 2018
Impact of capillary rise and recirculation on simulated crop yields
Joop Kroes, Iwan Supit, Jos van Dam, Paul van Walsum, and Martin Mulder
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 2937-2952,,, 2018
Cited articles
Allen, R. G., Pereira, L. S., Raes, D., and Smith, M.: Crop evapotranspiration: Guidelines for computing crop requirements, Irrig. Drain. Pap. No. 56, FAO, Rome, Italy,, 1998.
Butler, J. J., Whittemore, D. O., Wilson, B. B., and Bohling, G. C.: A new approach for assessing the future of aquifers supporting irrigated agriculture, Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, 2004–2010,, 2016.
Chaney, N. W., Wood, E. F., McBratney, A. B., Hempel, J. W., Nauman, T. W., Brungard, C. W., and Odgers, N. P.: POLARIS: A 30-meter probabilistic soil series map of the contiguous United States, Geoderma, 274, 54–67,, 2016.
Dai, A.: Drought under global warming: A review, Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Clim. Chang., 2, 45–65,, 2011.
de Vrese, P., Hagemann, S., and Claussen, M.: Asian irrigation, African rain: Remote impacts of irrigation, Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, 3737–3745,, 2016.
Publications Copernicus
Special issue
Short summary
The human use of water for irrigation is often ignored in models and operational forecasts. We describe four plausible and relatively simple irrigation routines that can be coupled to the next generation of models. The routines are tested against a unique irrigation dataset from western Nebraska. The most aggressive water-saving irrigation routine indicates a potential irrigation savings of 120 mm yr−1 and yield losses of less than 3 % against the crop model benchmark and historical averages.
The human use of water for irrigation is often ignored in models and operational forecasts. We...