Articles | Volume 21, issue 3
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-1651-2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-1651-2017
Research article
 | 
21 Mar 2017
Research article |  | 21 Mar 2017

Heterogeneity measures in hydrological frequency analysis: review and new developments

Ana I. Requena, Fateh Chebana, and Taha B. M. J. Ouarda

Related authors

A bivariate return period based on copulas for hydrologic dam design: accounting for reservoir routing in risk estimation
A. I. Requena, L. Mediero, and L. Garrote
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 3023–3038, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-3023-2013,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-3023-2013, 2013

Related subject area

Subject: Catchment hydrology | Techniques and Approaches: Stochastic approaches
A mixed distribution approach for low-flow frequency analysis – Part 1: Concept, performance, and effect of seasonality
Gregor Laaha
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 689–701, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-689-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-689-2023, 2023
Short summary
Significant regime shifts in historical water yield in the Upper Brahmaputra River basin
Hao Li, Baoying Shan, Liu Liu, Lei Wang, Akash Koppa, Feng Zhong, Dongfeng Li, Xuanxuan Wang, Wenfeng Liu, Xiuping Li, and Zongxue Xu
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 6399–6412, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-6399-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-6399-2022, 2022
Short summary
A geostatistical spatially varying coefficient model for mean annual runoff that incorporates process-based simulations and short records
Thea Roksvåg, Ingelin Steinsland, and Kolbjørn Engeland
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 5391–5410, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5391-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5391-2022, 2022
Short summary
Low-flow estimation beyond the mean – expectile loss and extreme gradient boosting for spatiotemporal low-flow prediction in Austria
Johannes Laimighofer, Michael Melcher, and Gregor Laaha
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 4553–4574, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-4553-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-4553-2022, 2022
Short summary
Impact of bias nonstationarity on the performance of uni- and multivariate bias-adjusting methods: a case study on data from Uccle, Belgium
Jorn Van de Velde, Matthias Demuzere, Bernard De Baets, and Niko E. C. Verhoest
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 2319–2344, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2319-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2319-2022, 2022
Short summary

Cited articles

Akaike, H.: Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle, in: Second International Symposium on Information Theory, edited by: Petrov, B. N. and Csaki, F., Acad. Kiadó, Budapest, 267–281, 1973.
Ali, G., Tetzlaff, D., Soulsby, C., McDonnell, J. J., and Capell, R.: A comparison of similarity indices for catchment classification using a cross-regional dataset, Adv. Water Resour., 40, 11–22, 2012.
Alila, Y.: A hierarchical approach for the regionalization of precipitation annual maxima in Canada, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 104, 31645–31655, 1999.
Bocchiola, D., De Michele, C., and Rosso, R.: Review of recent advances in index flood estimation, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 7, 283–296, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-7-283-2003, 2003.
Brath, A., Castellarin, A., Franchini, M., and Galeati, G.: Estimating the index flood using indirect methods, Hydrolog. Sci. J., 46, 399–418, 2001.
Short summary
The notion of a measure to quantify the degree of heterogeneity of a region from which information is required to estimate the magnitude of events at ungauged sites is introduced. These heterogeneity measures are needed to compare regions, evaluate the impact of particular sites, and rank the performance of delineating methods. A framework to define and assess their desirable properties is proposed. Several heterogeneity measures are presented and/or developed to be assessed, giving guidelines.