Journal cover Journal topic
Hydrology and Earth System Sciences An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 4.936 IF 4.936
  • IF 5-year value: 5.615 IF 5-year
    5.615
  • CiteScore value: 4.94 CiteScore
    4.94
  • SNIP value: 1.612 SNIP 1.612
  • IPP value: 4.70 IPP 4.70
  • SJR value: 2.134 SJR 2.134
  • Scimago H <br class='hide-on-tablet hide-on-mobile'>index value: 107 Scimago H
    index 107
  • h5-index value: 63 h5-index 63
Volume 21, issue 4
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 2163–2185, 2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-2163-2017
© Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 2163–2185, 2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-2163-2017
© Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Research article 20 Apr 2017

Research article | 20 Apr 2017

Inter-comparison of daily precipitation products for large-scale hydro-climatic applications over Canada

Jefferson S. Wong et al.
Related authors  
Hydrologic-Land Surface Modelling of a Complex System under Precipitation Uncertainty: A Case Study of the Saskatchewan River Basin, Canada
Fuad Yassin, Saman Razavi, Jefferson S. Wong, Alain Pietroniro, and Howard Wheater
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2019-207,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2019-207, 2019
Publication in HESS not foreseen
Related subject area  
Subject: Hydrometeorology | Techniques and Approaches: Uncertainty analysis
Selection of multi-model ensemble of general circulation models for the simulation of precipitation and maximum and minimum temperature based on spatial assessment metrics
Kamal Ahmed, Dhanapala A. Sachindra, Shamsuddin Shahid, Mehmet C. Demirel, and Eun-Sung Chung
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 4803–4824, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-4803-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-4803-2019, 2019
Short summary
Assessment of spatial uncertainty of heavy rainfall at catchment scale using a dense gauge network
Sungmin O and Ulrich Foelsche
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 2863–2875, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-2863-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-2863-2019, 2019
Short summary
Cross-validating precipitation datasets in the Indus River basin
Jean-Philippe Baudouin, Michael Herzog, and Cameron A. Petrie
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2019-303,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2019-303, 2019
Revised manuscript accepted for HESS
Short summary
Influence of three phases of El Niño–Southern Oscillation on daily precipitation regimes in China
Aifeng Lv, Bo Qu, Shaofeng Jia, and Wenbin Zhu
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 883–896, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-883-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-883-2019, 2019
Short summary
Dual-polarized quantitative precipitation estimation as a function of range
Micheal J. Simpson and Neil I. Fox
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 3375–3389, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-3375-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-3375-2018, 2018
Short summary
Cited articles  
Adam, J. C. and Lettenmaier, D. P.: Adjustment of global gridded precipitation for systematic bias, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 108, 4257, https://doi.org/10.1029/2002jd002499, 2003.
AHCCD: Adjusted and Homogenized Canadian Climate Data, available at: http://open.canada.ca/data/en/dataset/d6813de6-b20a-46cc-8990-01862ae15c5f, last access: January 2016.
Adler, R. F., Kidd, C., Petty, G., Morissey, M., and Goodman, H. M.: Intercomparison of global precipitation products: The third Precipitation Intercomparison Project (PIP-3), B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 82, 1377–1396, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(2001)082<1377:Iogppt>2.3.Co;2, 2001.
ANUSPLIN for Canada: Australian National University Spline model for Canada, available at: http://open.canada.ca/data/en/dataset/d432cb3d-8266-4487-b894-06224a4dfd5b, last access: February 2016.
Asadullah, A., McIntyre, N., and Kigobe, M.: Evaluation of five satellite products for estimation of rainfall over Uganda, Hydrolog. Sci. J., 53, 1137–1150, https://doi.org/10.1623/hysj.53.6.1137, 2008.
Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
This study was conducted to quantify the spatial and temporal variability of the errors associated with various gridded precipitation products in Canada. Overall, WFDEI [GPCC] and CaPA performed best with respect to different performance measures, followed by ANUSPLIN and WEDEI [CRU]. Princeton and NARR demonstrated the lowest quality. Comparing the climate model-simulated products, PCIC ensembles generally performed better than NA-CORDEX ensembles in terms of reliability in four seasons.
This study was conducted to quantify the spatial and temporal variability of the errors...
Citation