Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 4.256 IF 4.256
  • IF 5-year value: 4.819 IF 5-year 4.819
  • CiteScore value: 4.10 CiteScore 4.10
  • SNIP value: 1.412 SNIP 1.412
  • SJR value: 2.023 SJR 2.023
  • IPP value: 3.97 IPP 3.97
  • h5-index value: 58 h5-index 58
  • Scimago H index value: 99 Scimago H index 99
Volume 21, issue 1 | Copyright
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 423-440, 2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-423-2017
© Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Research article 25 Jan 2017

Research article | 25 Jan 2017

Looking beyond general metrics for model comparison – lessons from an international model intercomparison study

Tanja de Boer-Euser et al.
Viewed
Total article views: 1,696 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
1,036 622 38 1,696 118 29 46
  • HTML: 1,036
  • PDF: 622
  • XML: 38
  • Total: 1,696
  • Supplement: 118
  • BibTeX: 29
  • EndNote: 46
Views and downloads (calculated since 20 Jul 2016)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 20 Jul 2016)
Cited
Saved (final revised paper)
No saved metrics found.
Saved (discussion paper)
No saved metrics found.
Discussed (final revised paper)
No discussed metrics found.
Discussed (discussion paper)
No discussed metrics found.
Latest update: 23 Sep 2018
Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
In this study, the rainfall–runoff models of eight international research groups were compared for a set of subcatchments of the Meuse basin to investigate the influence of certain model components on the modelled discharge. Although the models showed similar performances based on general metrics, clear differences could be observed for specific events. The differences during drier conditions could indeed be linked to differences in model structures.
In this study, the rainfall–runoff models of eight international research groups were compared...
Citation
Share