Journal cover Journal topic
Hydrology and Earth System Sciences An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 4.256 IF 4.256
  • IF 5-year value: 4.819 IF 5-year 4.819
  • CiteScore value: 4.10 CiteScore 4.10
  • SNIP value: 1.412 SNIP 1.412
  • SJR value: 2.023 SJR 2.023
  • IPP value: 3.97 IPP 3.97
  • h5-index value: 58 h5-index 58
  • Scimago H index value: 99 Scimago H index 99
Volume 21, issue 9
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 4693-4709, 2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-4693-2017
© Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Special issue: Sub-seasonal to seasonal hydrological forecasting

Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 4693-4709, 2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-4693-2017
© Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Research article 18 Sep 2017

Research article | 18 Sep 2017

A coupled human–natural system to assess the operational value of weather and climate services for agriculture

Yu Li1, Matteo Giuliani2, and Andrea Castelletti2,1 Yu Li et al.
  • 1Institute of Environmental Engineering, ETH Zurich, Wolfgang-Pauli-Str. 15, 8093 Zurich, Switzerland
  • 2Department of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, Piazza L. da Vinci, 32, 20133 Milan, Italy

Abstract. Recent advances in weather and climate (W&C) services are showing increasing forecast skills over seasonal and longer timescales, potentially providing valuable support in informing decisions in a variety of economic sectors. Quantifying this value, however, might not be straightforward as better forecast quality does not necessarily imply better decisions by the end users, especially when forecasts do not reach their final users, when providers are not trusted, or when forecasts are not appropriately understood. In this study, we contribute an assessment framework to evaluate the operational value of W&C services for informing agricultural practices by complementing traditional forecast quality assessments with a coupled human–natural system behavioural model which reproduces farmers' decisions. This allows a more critical assessment of the forecast value mediated by the end users' perspective, including farmers' risk attitudes and behavioural factors. The application to an agricultural area in northern Italy shows that the quality of state-of-the-art W&C services is still limited in predicting the weather and the crop yield of the incoming agricultural season, with ECMWF annual products simulated by the IFS/HOPE model resulting in the most skillful product in the study area. However, we also show that the accuracy of estimating crop yield and the probability of making optimal decisions are not necessarily linearly correlated, with the overall assessment procedure being strongly impacted by the behavioural attitudes of farmers, which can produce rank reversals in the quantification of the W&C services operational value depending on the different perceptions of risk and uncertainty.

Publications Copernicus
Special issue
Download
Short summary
The paper contributes a comparative analysis of the operational value of different forecast products for the agricultural sector. The underlying idea is that forecast accuracy per se might not be the most effective indicator of the goodness of a forecast but the behaviour of the farmers using the forecast should somehow also be taken into consideration and, correspondingly, the benefit generated by the forecast. This paper explores and validates this idea with a model-based analysis.
The paper contributes a comparative analysis of the operational value of different forecast...
Citation
Share