Articles | Volume 21, issue 11
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-5709-2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-5709-2017
Research article
 | 
17 Nov 2017
Research article |  | 17 Nov 2017

New insights into the differences between the dual node approach and the common node approach for coupling surface–subsurface flow

Rob de Rooij

Related subject area

Subject: Catchment hydrology | Techniques and Approaches: Modelling approaches
Hydrological response to climate change and human activities in the Three-River Source Region
Ting Su, Chiyuan Miao, Qingyun Duan, Jiaojiao Gou, Xiaoying Guo, and Xi Zhao
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 1477–1492, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1477-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1477-2023, 2023
Short summary
Incorporating experimentally derived streamflow contributions into model parameterization to improve discharge prediction
Andreas Hartmann, Jean-Lionel Payeur-Poirier, and Luisa Hopp
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 1325–1341, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1325-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1325-2023, 2023
Short summary
Machine-learning- and deep-learning-based streamflow prediction in a hilly catchment for future scenarios using CMIP6 GCM data
Dharmaveer Singh, Manu Vardhan, Rakesh Sahu, Debrupa Chatterjee, Pankaj Chauhan, and Shiyin Liu
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 1047–1075, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1047-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1047-2023, 2023
Short summary
River hydraulic modeling with ICESat-2 land and water surface elevation
Monica Coppo Frias, Suxia Liu, Xingguo Mo, Karina Nielsen, Heidi Ranndal, Liguang Jiang, Jun Ma, and Peter Bauer-Gottwein
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 1011–1032, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1011-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1011-2023, 2023
Short summary
Hydrological modeling using the Soil and Water Assessment Tool in urban and peri-urban environments: the case of Kifisos experimental subbasin (Athens, Greece)
Evgenia Koltsida, Nikos Mamassis, and Andreas Kallioras
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 917–931, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-917-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-917-2023, 2023
Short summary

Cited articles

An, H., and Yu, S.: Finite volume integrated surface- subsurface flow modeling on nonorthogonal grids, Water Resour. Res., 50, 2312–2328, 2014.
Blazek, J.: Computational fluid dynamics: Principles and applications, Elsevier, Oxford, UK, 2005.
Camporese, M., Paniconi, C., Putti, M., and Orlandini, S.: Surface-subsurface flow modeling with path-based runoff routing, boundary condition-based coupling, and assimilation of multisource observation data, Water Resour. Res., 46, W02512, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008WR007536, 2010.
Delfs, J. O., Park, C. H., and Kolditz, O.: A sensitivity analysis of Hortonian flow, Adv. Water Res., 32, 1386–1395, 2009.
de Rooij, R., Graham, W., and Maxwell, R.: A particle-tracking scheme for simulating pathlines in coupled surface-subsurface flows, Adv. Water Res., 52, 7–18, 2013a.
Download
Short summary
The dual node and common node approach are widely used to simulate coupled surface–subsurface flows. In this study it is shown that the dual node approach should be conceptualized as a one-sided finite difference approximation of the vertical head gradients at the land surface. This consistent dual node approach can be more accurate as well as as more numerically efficient than the common node approach.