Journal cover Journal topic
Hydrology and Earth System Sciences An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 4.936 IF 4.936
  • IF 5-year value: 5.615 IF 5-year
    5.615
  • CiteScore value: 4.94 CiteScore
    4.94
  • SNIP value: 1.612 SNIP 1.612
  • IPP value: 4.70 IPP 4.70
  • SJR value: 2.134 SJR 2.134
  • Scimago H <br class='hide-on-tablet hide-on-mobile'>index value: 107 Scimago H
    index 107
  • h5-index value: 63 h5-index 63
HESS | Articles | Volume 22, issue 4
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 2449–2470, 2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-2449-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 2449–2470, 2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-2449-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Research article 23 Apr 2018

Research article | 23 Apr 2018

Root growth, water uptake, and sap flow of winter wheat in response to different soil water conditions

Gaochao Cai et al.

Related authors

CloudRoots: Integration of advanced instrumental techniques and process modelling of sub-hourly and sub-kilometre land-atmosphere interactions
Jordi Vila-Guerau de Arellano, Patrizia Ney, Oscar Hartogensis, Hugo de Boer, Kevien van Diepen, Dzhaner Emin, Gesike de Groot, Anne Klosterhalfen, Matthias Langensiepen, Maria Matveeva, Gabriela Miranda, Arnold Moene, Uwe Rascher, Thomas Röckmann, Getachew Adnew, and Alexander Graf
Biogeosciences Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-2020-132,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-2020-132, 2020
Preprint under review for BG
Short summary
Comparison of root water uptake models in simulating CO2 and H2O fluxes and growth of wheat
Thuy Huu Nguyen, Matthias Langensiepen, Jan Vanderborght, Hubert Hüging, Cho Miltin Mboh, and Frank Ewert
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2020-180,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2020-180, 2020
Preprint under review for HESS
Short summary
Presentation and discussion of the high resolution atmosphere-land surface subsurface simulation dataset of the virtual Neckar catchment for the period 2007–2015
Bernd Schalge, Gabriele Baroni, Barbara Haese, Daniel Erdal, Gernot Geppert, Pablo Saavedra, Vincent Haefliger, Harry Vereecken, Sabine Attinger, Harald Kunstmann, Olaf A. Cirpka, Felix Ament, Stefan Kollet, Insa Neuweiler, Harrie-Jan Hendricks Franssen, and Clemens Simmer
Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2020-24,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2020-24, 2020
Preprint under review for ESSD
Short summary
Responses of soil water storage and crop water use efficiency to changing climatic conditions: a lysimeter-based space-for-time approach
Jannis Groh, Jan Vanderborght, Thomas Pütz, Hans-Jörg Vogel, Ralf Gründling, Holger Rupp, Mehdi Rahmati, Michael Sommer, Harry Vereecken, and Horst H. Gerke
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 1211–1225, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-1211-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-1211-2020, 2020
Time variability and uncertainty in the fraction of young water in a small headwater catchment
Michael Paul Stockinger, Heye Reemt Bogena, Andreas Lücke, Christine Stumpp, and Harry Vereecken
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 4333–4347, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-4333-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-4333-2019, 2019
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Vadose Zone Hydrology | Techniques and Approaches: Modelling approaches
Characterizing uncertainty in the hydraulic parameters of oil sands mine reclamation covers and its influence on water balance predictions
M. Shahabul Alam, S. Lee Barbour, and Mingbin Huang
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 735–759, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-735-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-735-2020, 2020
Short summary
Simulating preferential soil water flow and tracer transport using the Lagrangian Soil Water and Solute Transport Model
Alexander Sternagel, Ralf Loritz, Wolfgang Wilcke, and Erwin Zehe
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 4249–4267, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-4249-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-4249-2019, 2019
Short summary
Assessment of simulated soil moisture from WRF Noah, Noah-MP, and CLM land surface schemes for landslide hazard application
Lu Zhuo, Qiang Dai, Dawei Han, Ningsheng Chen, and Binru Zhao
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 4199–4218, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-4199-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-4199-2019, 2019
Short summary
Efficient estimation of effective hydraulic properties of stratal undulating surface layer using time-lapse multi-channel GPR
Xicai Pan, Stefan Jaumann, Jiabao Zhang, and Kurt Roth
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 3653–3663, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-3653-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-3653-2019, 2019
Short summary
Partitioning snowmelt and rainfall in the critical zone: effects of climate type and soil properties
John C. Hammond, Adrian A. Harpold, Sydney Weiss, and Stephanie K. Kampf
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 3553–3570, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-3553-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-3553-2019, 2019
Short summary

Cited articles

Albasha, R., Mailhol, J.-C., and Cheviron, B.: Compensatory uptake functions in empirical macroscopic root water uptake models – experimental and numerical analysis, Agr. Water Manage., 155, 22–39, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2015.03.010, 2015. 
Allen, R. G., Jensen, M. E., Wright, J. L., and Burman, R. D.: Operational estimates of reference evapotranspiration, Agron J., 81, 650–662, 1989. 
Allen, R. G., Pereira, L. S., Raes, D., and Smith, M.: Crop Evapotranspiration – Guidelines for Computing Crop Water Requirements – FAO Irrigation and Drainage paper 56, FAO, Rome, 300, 6541, 1998. 
Amenu, G. G. and Kumar, P.: A model for hydraulic redistribution incorporating coupled soil-root moisture transport, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 12, 55–74, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-12-55-2008, 2008. 
Bechmann, M., Schneider, C., Carminati, A., Vetterlein, D., Attinger, S., and Hildebrandt, A.: Effect of parameter choice in root water uptake models – the arrangement of root hydraulic properties within the root architecture affects dynamics and efficiency of root water uptake, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 4189–4206, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-4189-2014, 2014. 
Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
Different crop growths had consequences for the parameterization of root water uptake models. The root hydraulic parameters of the Couvreur model but not the water stress parameters of the Feddes–Jarvis model could be constrained by the field data measured from rhizotron facilities. The simulated differences in transpiration from the two soils and the different water treatments could be confirmed by sap flow measurements. The Couvreur model predicted the ratios of transpiration fluxes better.
Different crop growths had consequences for the parameterization of root water uptake models....
Citation