Articles | Volume 22, issue 11
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-5639-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Special issue:
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-5639-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Opinion article
| 
01 Nov 2018
Opinion article |
| 01 Nov 2018
| 01 Nov 2018
HESS Opinions: Incubating deep-learning-powered hydrologic science advances as a community
Civil and Environmental Engineering, Pennsylvania State University,
University Park, PA 16802, USA
Eric Laloy
Institute for Environment, Health and Safety,
Belgian Nuclear Research Centre, Mol, Belgium
Amin Elshorbagy
Dept. of Civil,
Geological, and Environmental Engineering, University of Saskatchewan,
Saskatoon, Canada
Adrian Albert
National Energy Research Supercomputing Center, Lawrence Berkeley
National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
Jerad Bales
Consortium of
Universities for the Advancement of Hydrologic Science, Inc. (CUAHSI),
Cambridge, MA, USA
Fi-John Chang
Department of Bioenvironmental Systems
Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, 10617, Taiwan
Sangram Ganguly
NASA Ames Research Center/BAER Institute, Moffett Field, CA 94035,
USA
Kuo-Lin Hsu
Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California,
Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697, USA
Daniel Kifer
Computer Science and Engineering,
Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA
Zheng Fang
Civil Engineering, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX
76013, USA
Kuai Fang
Civil and Environmental Engineering, Pennsylvania State University,
University Park, PA 16802, USA
Dongfeng Li
Civil Engineering, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX
76013, USA
Xiaodong Li
State Key Laboratory of Hydraulics and Mountain River
Engineering, Sichuan University, Sichuan, China
Wen-Ping Tsai
Civil and Environmental Engineering, Pennsylvania State University,
University Park, PA 16802, USA
Related authors
Yalan Song, Wouter J. M. Knoben, Martyn P. Clark, Dapeng Feng, Kathryn E. Lawson, and Chaopeng Shen
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2023-258, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2023-258, 2023
Revised manuscript under review for HESS
Short summary
Short summary
Wouldn't it be nice to have both the accuracy of neural networks (NNs) and the interpretability of process-based models (PBMs)? Differentiable modeling gives you the best of both worlds by connecting NNs with PBMs. However, there was previously a major issue that iterative solution schemes would run into memory use trouble. This paper presents an operator called adjoint, which liberates all the iterative solvers. This is the first time adjoint is applied to large-scale hydrologic modeling.
Dapeng Feng, Hylke Beck, Jens de Bruijn, Reetik Kumar Sahu, Yusuke Satoh, Yoshihide Wada, Jiangtao Liu, Ming Pan, Kathryn Lawson, and Chaopeng Shen
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2023-190, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2023-190, 2023
Revised manuscript under review for GMD
Short summary
Short summary
Accurate hydrological modeling is vital to characterizing water cycle responses to climate change. For the first time at this scale, we use differentiable physics-informed machine learning hydrologic models to simulate rainfall-runoff processes for 3753 basins around the world and compare them with purely data-driven and traditional approaches. This sets a benchmark for hydrologic estimates around the world and builds foundations for improving global hydrologic simulations.
Peter Reichert, Kai Ma, Marvin Höge, Fabrizio Fenicia, Marco Baity-Jesi, Dapeng Feng, and Chaopeng Shen
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2023-168, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2023-168, 2023
Revised manuscript under review for HESS
Short summary
Short summary
We compared the predicted change in catchment outlet discharge to precipitation and temperature change for conceptual and machine-learning hydrological models. We found that machine-learning models, despite providing excellent fit and prediction capabilities, can be unreliable regarding the prediction of the effect of temperature change for low elevation catchments. This indicates the need for caution when applying them for the prediction of the effect of climate change.
Doaa Aboelyazeed, Chonggang Xu, Forrest M. Hoffman, Jiangtao Liu, Alex W. Jones, Chris Rackauckas, Kathryn Lawson, and Chaopeng Shen
Biogeosciences, 20, 2671–2692, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-20-2671-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-20-2671-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Photosynthesis is critical for life and has been affected by the changing climate. Many parameters come into play while modeling, but traditional calibration approaches face many issues. Our framework trains coupled neural networks to provide parameters to a photosynthesis model. Using big data, we independently found parameter values that were correlated with those in the literature while giving higher correlation and reduced biases in photosynthesis rates.
Dapeng Feng, Hylke Beck, Kathryn Lawson, and Chaopeng Shen
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 2357–2373, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-2357-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-2357-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Powerful hybrid models (called δ or delta models) embrace the fundamental learning capability of AI and can also explain the physical processes. Here we test their performance when applied to regions not in the training data. δ models rivaled the accuracy of state-of-the-art AI models under the data-dense scenario and even surpassed them for the data-sparse one. They generalize well due to the physical structure included. δ models could be ideal candidates for global hydrologic assessment.
Louise J. Slater, Louise Arnal, Marie-Amélie Boucher, Annie Y.-Y. Chang, Simon Moulds, Conor Murphy, Grey Nearing, Guy Shalev, Chaopeng Shen, Linda Speight, Gabriele Villarini, Robert L. Wilby, Andrew Wood, and Massimiliano Zappa
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 1865–1889, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1865-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1865-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Hybrid forecasting systems combine data-driven methods with physics-based weather and climate models to improve the accuracy of predictions for meteorological and hydroclimatic events such as rainfall, temperature, streamflow, floods, droughts, tropical cyclones, or atmospheric rivers. We review recent developments in hybrid forecasting and outline key challenges and opportunities in the field.
Jiangtao Liu, David Hughes, Farshid Rahmani, Kathryn Lawson, and Chaopeng Shen
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 1553–1567, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1553-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1553-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Under-monitored regions like Africa need high-quality soil moisture predictions to help with food production, but it is not clear if soil moisture processes are similar enough around the world for data-driven models to maintain accuracy. We present a deep-learning-based soil moisture model that learns from both in situ data and satellite data and performs better than satellite products at the global scale. These results help us apply our model globally while better understanding its limitations.
W. J. Riley and C. Shen
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 2463–2483, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-2463-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-2463-2014, 2014
Yuhang Zhang, Aizhong Ye, Bita Analui, Phu Nguyen, Soroosh Sorooshian, Kuolin Hsu, and Yuxuan Wang
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 4529–4550, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-4529-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-4529-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Our study shows that while the quantile regression forest (QRF) and countable mixtures of asymmetric Laplacians long short-term memory (CMAL-LSTM) models demonstrate similar proficiency in multipoint probabilistic predictions, QRF excels in smaller watersheds and CMAL-LSTM in larger ones. CMAL-LSTM performs better in single-point deterministic predictions, whereas QRF model is more efficient overall.
Yalan Song, Wouter J. M. Knoben, Martyn P. Clark, Dapeng Feng, Kathryn E. Lawson, and Chaopeng Shen
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2023-258, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2023-258, 2023
Revised manuscript under review for HESS
Short summary
Short summary
Wouldn't it be nice to have both the accuracy of neural networks (NNs) and the interpretability of process-based models (PBMs)? Differentiable modeling gives you the best of both worlds by connecting NNs with PBMs. However, there was previously a major issue that iterative solution schemes would run into memory use trouble. This paper presents an operator called adjoint, which liberates all the iterative solvers. This is the first time adjoint is applied to large-scale hydrologic modeling.
Dapeng Feng, Hylke Beck, Jens de Bruijn, Reetik Kumar Sahu, Yusuke Satoh, Yoshihide Wada, Jiangtao Liu, Ming Pan, Kathryn Lawson, and Chaopeng Shen
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2023-190, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2023-190, 2023
Revised manuscript under review for GMD
Short summary
Short summary
Accurate hydrological modeling is vital to characterizing water cycle responses to climate change. For the first time at this scale, we use differentiable physics-informed machine learning hydrologic models to simulate rainfall-runoff processes for 3753 basins around the world and compare them with purely data-driven and traditional approaches. This sets a benchmark for hydrologic estimates around the world and builds foundations for improving global hydrologic simulations.
Peter Reichert, Kai Ma, Marvin Höge, Fabrizio Fenicia, Marco Baity-Jesi, Dapeng Feng, and Chaopeng Shen
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2023-168, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2023-168, 2023
Revised manuscript under review for HESS
Short summary
Short summary
We compared the predicted change in catchment outlet discharge to precipitation and temperature change for conceptual and machine-learning hydrological models. We found that machine-learning models, despite providing excellent fit and prediction capabilities, can be unreliable regarding the prediction of the effect of temperature change for low elevation catchments. This indicates the need for caution when applying them for the prediction of the effect of climate change.
Doaa Aboelyazeed, Chonggang Xu, Forrest M. Hoffman, Jiangtao Liu, Alex W. Jones, Chris Rackauckas, Kathryn Lawson, and Chaopeng Shen
Biogeosciences, 20, 2671–2692, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-20-2671-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-20-2671-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Photosynthesis is critical for life and has been affected by the changing climate. Many parameters come into play while modeling, but traditional calibration approaches face many issues. Our framework trains coupled neural networks to provide parameters to a photosynthesis model. Using big data, we independently found parameter values that were correlated with those in the literature while giving higher correlation and reduced biases in photosynthesis rates.
Dapeng Feng, Hylke Beck, Kathryn Lawson, and Chaopeng Shen
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 2357–2373, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-2357-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-2357-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Powerful hybrid models (called δ or delta models) embrace the fundamental learning capability of AI and can also explain the physical processes. Here we test their performance when applied to regions not in the training data. δ models rivaled the accuracy of state-of-the-art AI models under the data-dense scenario and even surpassed them for the data-sparse one. They generalize well due to the physical structure included. δ models could be ideal candidates for global hydrologic assessment.
Louise J. Slater, Louise Arnal, Marie-Amélie Boucher, Annie Y.-Y. Chang, Simon Moulds, Conor Murphy, Grey Nearing, Guy Shalev, Chaopeng Shen, Linda Speight, Gabriele Villarini, Robert L. Wilby, Andrew Wood, and Massimiliano Zappa
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 1865–1889, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1865-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1865-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Hybrid forecasting systems combine data-driven methods with physics-based weather and climate models to improve the accuracy of predictions for meteorological and hydroclimatic events such as rainfall, temperature, streamflow, floods, droughts, tropical cyclones, or atmospheric rivers. We review recent developments in hybrid forecasting and outline key challenges and opportunities in the field.
Mohammad Ghoreishi, Amin Elshorbagy, Saman Razavi, Günter Blöschl, Murugesu Sivapalan, and Ahmed Abdelkader
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 1201–1219, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1201-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1201-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The study proposes a quantitative model of the willingness to cooperate in the Eastern Nile River basin. Our results suggest that the 2008 food crisis may account for Sudan recovering its willingness to cooperate with Ethiopia. Long-term lack of trust among the riparian countries may have reduced basin-wide cooperation. The model can be used to explore the effects of changes in future dam operations and other management decisions on the emergence of basin cooperation.
Jiangtao Liu, David Hughes, Farshid Rahmani, Kathryn Lawson, and Chaopeng Shen
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 1553–1567, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1553-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1553-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Under-monitored regions like Africa need high-quality soil moisture predictions to help with food production, but it is not clear if soil moisture processes are similar enough around the world for data-driven models to maintain accuracy. We present a deep-learning-based soil moisture model that learns from both in situ data and satellite data and performs better than satellite products at the global scale. These results help us apply our model globally while better understanding its limitations.
Yi Liu, Jiang Li, Zheng N. Fang, Mojtaba Rashvand, and Tranell Griffin
Proc. IAHS, 382, 315–320, https://doi.org/10.5194/piahs-382-315-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/piahs-382-315-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
This paper shows the subsidence due to creep of the coastal compressible aquifer systems with the borehole extensometer compaction measurements and groundwater level observations. So this creep subsidence can become one important component of relative sea level rise in the coastal areas in the world in addition to tectonic subsidence and subsidence due to groundwater withdrawal. This research is because we need to project relative sea level rise in the Houston-Galveston region.
Ji Li, Daoxian Yuan, Jiao Liu, Yongjun Jiang, Yangbo Chen, Kuo Lin Hsu, and Soroosh Sorooshian
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 1505–1532, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-1505-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-1505-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
There are no long-term reasonable rainfall data to build a hydrological model in karst river basins to a large extent. In this paper, the PERSIANN-CCS QPEs are employed to estimate the precipitation data as an attempt in the Liujiang karst river basin, 58 270 km2, China. An improved method is proposed to revise the results of the PERSIANN-CCS QPEs. The post-processed PERSIANN-CCS QPE with a distributed hydrological model, the Liuxihe model, has a better performance in karst flood forecasting.
Phu Nguyen, Mohammed Ombadi, Soroosh Sorooshian, Kuolin Hsu, Amir AghaKouchak, Dan Braithwaite, Hamed Ashouri, and Andrea Rose Thorstensen
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 5801–5816, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-5801-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-5801-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
The goal of this article is to first provide an overview of the available PERSIANN precipitation retrieval algorithms and their differences. We evaluate the products over CONUS at different spatial and temporal scales using CPC data. Daily scale is the finest temporal scale used for the evaluation over CONUS. We provide a comparison of the available products at a quasi-global scale. We highlight the strengths and limitations of the PERSIANN products.
Yanlai Zhou, Fi-John Chang, Shenglian Guo, Huanhuan Ba, and Shaokun He
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2017-457, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2017-457, 2017
Revised manuscript not accepted
Short summary
Short summary
Developing a robust recurrent ANFIS for modeling multi-step-ahead flood forecast. Fusing the LSE into GA for optimizing the parameters of recurrent ANFIS. Improving the robustness and generalization of recurrent ANFIS. An accurate and robust multi-step-ahead inflow forecast in the Three Gorges Reservoir will provide precious decision-making time for effectively managing contingencies and emergencies and greatly alleviating flood risk as well as loss of life and property.
Amin Elshorbagy, Raja Bharath, Anchit Lakhanpal, Serena Ceola, Alberto Montanari, and Karl-Erich Lindenschmidt
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 2219–2232, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-2219-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-2219-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
Flood mapping is one of Canada's major national interests. This work presents a simple and effective method for large-scale flood hazard and risk mapping, applied in this study to Canada. Readily available data, such as remote sensing night-light data, topography, and stream network were used to create the maps.
Xiaomang Liu, Tiantian Yang, Koulin Hsu, Changming Liu, and Soroosh Sorooshian
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 169–181, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-169-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-169-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
A long-term, global, high-resolution, satellite-based precipitation estimation database (PERSIANN-CDR) was recently released. We evaluate the streamflow simulation capability of PERSIANN-CDR over two major river basins on the Tibetan Plateau. Results show that PERSIANN-CDR is a good alternative for a sparse gauge network and has the potentials for future hydrological and climate studies. The streamflow uncertainties are due to the hydrological model parameters and the length of calibration data.
H. Tang, S. Ganguly, G. Zhang, M. A. Hofton, R. F. Nelson, and R. Dubayah
Biogeosciences, 13, 239–252, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-239-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-239-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
This paper provides a unique insight into vertical distribution of leaf area index across North American ecosystems using spaceborne lidar data. This data set of leaf area index and vertical foliage profile can help set up a baseline of canopy structure needed for evaluating climate and land use induced forest changes at continental scale in the future.
Y.-T. Shih, T.-Y. Lee, J.-C. Huang, S.-J. Kao, K.-K. Liu, and F.-J. Chang
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hessd-12-449-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/hessd-12-449-2015, 2015
Revised manuscript not accepted
Short summary
Short summary
This study combines the observed riverine DIN (dissolved inorganic nitrogen) export and the controlling factors (land-use, population and discharge) to inversely estimate the effective DIN yield factors for individual land-use and per capita loading. Those estimated DIN yield factors can extrapolate all possible combinations of land-use, discharge, and population density, demonstrating the capability for scenario assessment.
R. Sultana, K.-L. Hsu, J. Li, and S. Sorooshian
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 3553–3570, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-3553-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-3553-2014, 2014
W. J. Riley and C. Shen
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 2463–2483, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-2463-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-2463-2014, 2014
F.-J. Chang and W. Sun
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hessd-10-6153-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/hessd-10-6153-2013, 2013
Revised manuscript not accepted
Related subject area
Subject: Catchment hydrology | Techniques and Approaches: Modelling approaches
Impacts of spatiotemporal resolutions of precipitation on flood event simulation based on multimodel structures – a case study over the Xiang River basin in China
A network approach for multiscale catchment classification using traits
Multi-model approach in a variable spatial framework for streamflow simulation
Advancing understanding of lake–watershed hydrology: a fully coupled numerical model illustrated by Qinghai Lake
Technical note: Testing the connection between hillslope-scale runoff fluctuations and streamflow hydrographs at the outlet of large river basins
Empirical stream thermal sensitivity cluster on the landscape according to geology and climate
Deep learning for monthly rainfall–runoff modelling: a large-sample comparison with conceptual models across Australia
On optimization of calibrations of a distributed hydrological model with spatially distributed information on snow
Toward interpretable LSTM-based modeling of hydrological systems
Flow intermittence prediction using a hybrid hydrological modelling approach: influence of observed intermittence data on the training of a random forest model
What controls the tail behaviour of flood series: rainfall or runoff generation?
Seasonal prediction of end-of-dry-season watershed behavior in a highly interconnected alluvial watershed in northern California
Glaciers determine the sensitivity of hydrological processes to perturbed climate in a large mountainous basin on the Tibetan Plateau
Leveraging gauge networks and strategic discharge measurements to aid the development of continuous streamflow records
On the need for physical constraints in deep learning rainfall–runoff projections under climate change: a sensitivity analysis to warming and shifts in potential evapotranspiration
Evaluation of hydrological models on small mountainous catchments: impact of the meteorological forcings
Impacts of climate and land-surface change on catchment evapotranspiration and runoff from 1951–2020 in Saxony, Germany
Projecting sediment export from two highly glacierized alpine catchments under climate change: exploring non-parametric regression as an analysis tool
A framework for parameter estimation, sensitivity analysis, and uncertainty analysis for holistic hydrologic modeling using SWAT+
On understanding mountainous carbonate basins of the Mediterranean using parsimonious modeling solutions
Comparing quantile regression forest and mixture density long short-term memory models for probabilistic post-processing of satellite precipitation-driven streamflow simulations
Recent ground thermo-hydrological changes in a southern Tibetan endorheic catchment and implications for lake level changes
Towards robust seasonal streamflow forecasts in mountainous catchments: impact of calibration metric selection in hydrological modeling
Modelling flood frequency and magnitude in a glacially conditioned, heterogeneous landscape: testing the importance of land cover and land use
Enhancing LSTM-based streamflow prediction with a spatially distributed approach
Direct integration of reservoirs' operations in a hydrological model for streamflow estimation: coupling a CLSTM model with MOHID-Land
Altitudinal Control of Isotopic Composition and Application in Understanding Hydrologic Processes in the mid Merced River Catchment, Sierra Nevada, California, USA
Modelling the regional sensitivity of snowmelt, soil moisture, and streamflow generation to climate over the Canadian Prairies using a basin classification approach
To what extent does river routing matter in hydrological modeling?
Calibrating macroscale hydrological models in poorly gauged and heavily regulated basins
An advanced tool integrating failure and sensitivity analysis into novel modeling of the stormwater flood volume
airGRteaching: an open-source tool for teaching hydrological modeling with R
To What Extent Do Extreme Storm Events Change Future Flood Hazards?
Stable water isotopes and tritium tracers tell the same tale: no evidence for underestimation of catchment transit times inferred by stable isotopes in StorAge Selection (SAS)-function models
Uncertainty in water transit time estimation with StorAge Selection functions and tracer data interpolation
Changes in Mediterranean flood processes and seasonality
Can the combining of wetlands with reservoir operation reduce the risk of future floods and droughts?
Knowledge-informed deep learning for hydrological model calibration: an application to Coal Creek Watershed in Colorado
When best is the enemy of good – critical evaluation of performance criteria in hydrological models
The suitability of differentiable, physics-informed machine learning hydrologic models for ungauged regions and climate change impact assessment
Producing reliable hydrologic scenarios from raw climate model outputs without resorting to meteorological observations
Afforestation impacts on terrestrial hydrology insignificant compared to climate change in Great Britain
Using normalised difference infrared index patterns to constrain semi-distributed rainfall–runoff models in tropical nested catchments
Revisiting the hydrological basis of the Budyko framework with the principle of hydrologically similar groups
Reconstructing five decades of sediment export from two glacierized high-alpine catchments in Tyrol, Austria, using nonparametric regression
Water and energy budgets over hydrological basins on short and long timescales
Hydrological response to climate change and human activities in the Three-River Source Region
Incorporating experimentally derived streamflow contributions into model parameterization to improve discharge prediction
Machine-learning- and deep-learning-based streamflow prediction in a hilly catchment for future scenarios using CMIP6 GCM data
River hydraulic modeling with ICESat-2 land and water surface elevation
Qian Zhu, Xiaodong Qin, Dongyang Zhou, Tiantian Yang, and Xinyi Song
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 1665–1686, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1665-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1665-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Input data, model and calibration strategy can affect the accuracy of flood event simulation and prediction. Satellite-based precipitation with different spatiotemporal resolutions is an important input source. Data-driven models are sometimes proven to be more accurate than hydrological models. Event-based calibration and conventional strategy are two options adopted for flood simulation. This study targets the three concerns for accurate flood event simulation and prediction.
Fabio Ciulla and Charuleka Varadharajan
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 1617–1651, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1617-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1617-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We present a new method based on network science for unsupervised classification of large datasets and apply it to classify 9067 US catchments and 274 biophysical traits at multiple scales. We find that our trait-based approach produces catchment classes with distinct streamflow behavior and that spatial patterns emerge amongst pristine and human-impacted catchments. This method can be widely used beyond hydrology to identify patterns, reduce trait redundancy, and select representative sites.
Cyril Thébault, Charles Perrin, Vazken Andréassian, Guillaume Thirel, Sébastien Legrand, and Olivier Delaigue
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 1539–1566, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1539-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1539-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Streamflow forecasting is useful for many applications, ranging from population safety (e.g. floods) to water resource management (e.g. agriculture or hydropower). To this end, hydrological models must be optimized. However, a model is inherently wrong. This study aims to analyse the contribution of a multi-model approach within a variable spatial framework to improve streamflow simulations. The underlying idea is to take advantage of the strength of each modelling framework tested.
Lele Shu, Xiaodong Li, Yan Chang, Xianhong Meng, Hao Chen, Yuan Qi, Hongwei Wang, Zhaoguo Li, and Shihua Lyu
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 1477–1491, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1477-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1477-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We developed a new model to better understand how water moves in a lake basin. Our model improves upon previous methods by accurately capturing the complexity of water movement, both on the surface and subsurface. Our model, tested using data from China's Qinghai Lake, accurately replicates complex water movements and identifies contributing factors of the lake's water balance. The findings provide a robust tool for predicting hydrological processes, aiding water resource planning.
Ricardo Mantilla, Morgan Fonley, and Nicolás Velásquez
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 1373–1382, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1373-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1373-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Hydrologists strive to “Be right for the right reasons” when modeling the hydrologic cycle; however, the datasets available to validate hydrological models are sparse, and in many cases, they comprise streamflow observations at the outlets of large catchments. In this work, we show that matching streamflow observations at the outlet of a large basin is not a reliable indicator of a correct description of the small-scale runoff processes.
Lillian M. McGill, E. Ashley Steel, and Aimee H. Fullerton
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 1351–1371, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1351-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1351-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This study examines the relationship between air and river temperatures in Washington's Snoqualmie and Wenatchee basins. We used classification and regression approaches to show that the sensitivity of river temperature to air temperature is variable across basins and controlled largely by geology and snowmelt. Findings can be used to inform strategies for river basin restoration and conservation, such as identifying climate-insensitive areas of the basin that should be preserved and protected.
Stephanie R. Clark, Julien Lerat, Jean-Michel Perraud, and Peter Fitch
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 1191–1213, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1191-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1191-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
To determine if deep learning models are in general a viable alternative to traditional hydrologic modelling techniques in Australian catchments, a comparison of river–runoff predictions is made between traditional conceptual models and deep learning models in almost 500 catchments spread over the continent. It is found that the deep learning models match or outperform the traditional models in over two-thirds of the river catchments, indicating feasibility in a wide variety of conditions.
Dipti Tiwari, Mélanie Trudel, and Robert Leconte
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 1127–1146, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1127-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1127-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Calibrating hydrological models with multi-objective functions enhances model robustness. By using spatially distributed snow information in the calibration, the model performance can be enhanced without compromising the outputs. In this study the HYDROTEL model was calibrated in seven different experiments, incorporating the SPAEF (spatial efficiency) metric alongside Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) and root-mean-square error (RMSE), with the aim of identifying the optimal calibration strategy.
Luis Andres De la Fuente, Mohammad Reza Ehsani, Hoshin Vijai Gupta, and Laura Elizabeth Condon
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 945–971, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-945-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-945-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Long short-term memory (LSTM) is a widely used machine-learning model in hydrology, but it is difficult to extract knowledge from it. We propose HydroLSTM, which represents processes like a hydrological reservoir. Models based on HydroLSTM perform similarly to LSTM while requiring fewer cell states. The learned parameters are informative about the dominant hydrology of a catchment. Our results show how parsimony and hydrological knowledge extraction can be achieved by using the new structure.
Louise Mimeau, Annika Künne, Flora Branger, Sven Kralisch, Alexandre Devers, and Jean-Philippe Vidal
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 851–871, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-851-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-851-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Modelling flow intermittence is essential for predicting the future evolution of drying in river networks and better understanding the ecological and socio-economic impacts. However, modelling flow intermittence is challenging, and observed data on temporary rivers are scarce. This study presents a new modelling approach for predicting flow intermittence in river networks and shows that combining different sources of observed data reduces the model uncertainty.
Elena Macdonald, Bruno Merz, Björn Guse, Viet Dung Nguyen, Xiaoxiang Guan, and Sergiy Vorogushyn
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 833–850, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-833-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-833-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
In some rivers, the occurrence of extreme flood events is more likely than in other rivers – they have heavy-tailed distributions. We find that threshold processes in the runoff generation lead to such a relatively high occurrence probability of extremes. Further, we find that beyond a certain return period, i.e. for rare events, rainfall is often the dominant control compared to runoff generation. Our results can help to improve the estimation of the occurrence probability of extreme floods.
Claire Kouba and Thomas Harter
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 691–718, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-691-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-691-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
In some watersheds, the severity of the dry season has a large impact on aquatic ecosystems. In this study, we design a way to predict, 5–6 months in advance, how severe the dry season will be in a rural watershed in northern California. This early warning can support seasonal adaptive management. To predict these two values, we assess data about snow, rain, groundwater, and river flows. We find that maximum snowpack and total wet season rainfall best predict dry season severity.
Yi Nan and Fuqiang Tian
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 669–689, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-669-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-669-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This paper utilized a tracer-aided model validated by multiple datasets in a large mountainous basin on the Tibetan Plateau to analyze hydrological sensitivity to climate change. The spatial pattern of the local hydrological sensitivities and the influence factors were analyzed in particular. The main finding of this paper is that the local hydrological sensitivity in mountainous basins is determined by the relationship between the glacier area ratio and the mean annual precipitation.
Michael J. Vlah, Matthew R. V. Ross, Spencer Rhea, and Emily S. Bernhardt
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 545–573, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-545-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-545-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Virtual stream gauging enables continuous streamflow estimation where a gauge might be difficult or impractical to install. We reconstructed flow at 27 gauges of the National Ecological Observatory Network (NEON), informing ~199 site-months of missing data in the official record and improving that accuracy of official estimates at 11 sites. This study shows that machine learning, but also routine regression methods, can be used to supplement existing gauge networks and reduce monitoring costs.
Sungwook Wi and Scott Steinschneider
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 479–503, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-479-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-479-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We investigate whether deep learning (DL) models can produce physically plausible streamflow projections under climate change. We address this question by focusing on modeled responses to increases in temperature and potential evapotranspiration and by employing three DL and three process-based hydrological models. The results suggest that physical constraints regarding model architecture and input are necessary to promote the physical realism of DL hydrological projections under climate change.
Guillaume Evin, Matthieu Le Lay, Catherine Fouchier, David Penot, Francois Colleoni, Alexandre Mas, Pierre-André Garambois, and Olivier Laurantin
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 261–281, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-261-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-261-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Hydrological modelling of mountainous catchments is challenging for many reasons, the main one being the temporal and spatial representation of precipitation forcings. This study presents an evaluation of the hydrological modelling of 55 small mountainous catchments of the northern French Alps, focusing on the influence of the type of precipitation reanalyses used as inputs. These evaluations emphasize the added value of radar measurements, in particular for the reproduction of flood events.
Maik Renner and Corina Hauffe
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2024-6, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2024-6, 2024
Revised manuscript accepted for HESS
Short summary
Short summary
Climate and land-surface conditions influence the availability of fresh water resources. Their impact is quantified with data of 71 catchments in Saxony/Germany, for which distinct signatures in the joint water and energy budgets are found: (i) past forest dieback caused a decrease and subsequent recovery of evapotranspiration in the affected regions, and (ii) the recent shift towards higher aridity imposed a large decline in runoff, that has not been seen in the observation records before.
Lena Katharina Schmidt, Till Francke, Peter Martin Grosse, and Axel Bronstert
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 139–161, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-139-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-139-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
How suspended sediment export from glacierized high-alpine areas responds to future climate change is hardly assessable as many interacting processes are involved, and appropriate physical models are lacking. We present the first study, to our knowledge, exploring machine learning to project sediment export until 2100 in two high-alpine catchments. We find that uncertainties due to methodological limitations are small until 2070. Negative trends imply that peak sediment may have already passed.
Salam A. Abbas, Ryan T. Bailey, Jeremy T. White, Jeffrey G. Arnold, Michael J. White, Natalja Čerkasova, and Jungang Gao
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 21–48, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-21-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-21-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Research highlights.
1. Implemented groundwater module (gwflow) into SWAT+ for four watersheds with different unique hydrologic features across the United States.
2. Presented methods for sensitivity analysis, uncertainty analysis and parameter estimation for coupled models.
3. Sensitivity analysis for streamflow and groundwater head conducted using Morris method.
4. Uncertainty analysis and parameter estimation performed using an iterative ensemble smoother within the PEST framework.
Shima Azimi, Christian Massari, Giuseppe Formetta, Silvia Barbetta, Alberto Tazioli, Davide Fronzi, Sara Modanesi, Angelica Tarpanelli, and Riccardo Rigon
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 4485–4503, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-4485-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-4485-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We analyzed the water budget of nested karst catchments using simple methods and modeling. By utilizing the available data on precipitation and discharge, we were able to determine the response lag-time by adopting new techniques. Additionally, we modeled snow cover dynamics and evapotranspiration with the use of Earth observations, providing a concise overview of the water budget for the basin and its subbasins. We have made the data, models, and workflows accessible for further study.
Yuhang Zhang, Aizhong Ye, Bita Analui, Phu Nguyen, Soroosh Sorooshian, Kuolin Hsu, and Yuxuan Wang
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 4529–4550, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-4529-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-4529-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Our study shows that while the quantile regression forest (QRF) and countable mixtures of asymmetric Laplacians long short-term memory (CMAL-LSTM) models demonstrate similar proficiency in multipoint probabilistic predictions, QRF excels in smaller watersheds and CMAL-LSTM in larger ones. CMAL-LSTM performs better in single-point deterministic predictions, whereas QRF model is more efficient overall.
Léo C. P. Martin, Sebastian Westermann, Michele Magni, Fanny Brun, Joel Fiddes, Yanbin Lei, Philip Kraaijenbrink, Tamara Mathys, Moritz Langer, Simon Allen, and Walter W. Immerzeel
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 4409–4436, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-4409-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-4409-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Across the Tibetan Plateau, many large lakes have been changing level during the last decades as a response to climate change. In high-mountain environments, water fluxes from the land to the lakes are linked to the ground temperature of the land and to the energy fluxes between the ground and the atmosphere, which are modified by climate change. With a numerical model, we test how these water and energy fluxes have changed over the last decades and how they influence the lake level variations.
Diego Araya, Pablo A. Mendoza, Eduardo Muñoz-Castro, and James McPhee
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 4385–4408, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-4385-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-4385-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Dynamical systems are used by many agencies worldwide to produce seasonal streamflow forecasts, which are critical for decision-making. Such systems rely on hydrology models, which contain parameters that are typically estimated using a target performance metric (i.e., objective function). This study explores the effects of this decision across mountainous basins in Chile, illustrating tradeoffs between seasonal forecast quality and the models' capability to simulate streamflow characteristics.
Pamela E. Tetford and Joseph R. Desloges
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 3977–3998, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-3977-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-3977-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
An efficient regional flood frequency model relates drainage area to discharge, with a major assumption of similar basin conditions. In a landscape with variable glacial deposits and land use, we characterize varying hydrological function using 28 explanatory variables. We demonstrate that (1) a heterogeneous landscape requires objective model selection criteria to optimize the fit of flow data, and (2) incorporating land use as a predictor variable improves the drainage area to discharge model.
Qiutong Yu, Bryan A. Tolson, Hongren Shen, Ming Han, Juliane Mai, and Jimmy Lin
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2023-237, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2023-237, 2023
Revised manuscript accepted for HESS
Short summary
Short summary
It is challenging to incorporate the spatial distribution information of input variables when implementing LSTM models for streamflow prediction. This paper presents a novel hybrid modeling approach to predict streamflow while accounting for spatial variability. We evaluated the performance against lumped LSTM predictions in 224 basins across the Great Lakes region in North America. This approach shows promise in predicting streamflow at large ungauged basin.
Ana Ramos Oliveira, Tiago Brito Ramos, Lígia Pinto, and Ramiro Neves
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 3875–3893, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-3875-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-3875-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This paper intends to demonstrate the adequacy of a hybrid solution to overcome the difficulties related to the incorporation of human behavior when modeling hydrological processes. Two models were implemented, one to estimate the outflow of a reservoir and the other to simulate the hydrological processes of the watershed. With both models feeding each other, results show that the proposed approach significantly improved the streamflow estimation downstream of the reservoir.
Fengjing Liu, Martha H. Conklin, and Glenn D. Shaw
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2023-230, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2023-230, 2023
Revised manuscript accepted for HESS
Short summary
Short summary
Mountain snowpack has been declining and more precipitation falls as rain than snow. Using stable isotopes, we found flows and flow duration in Yosemite Creek are most sensitive to climate warming due to strong evaporation of waterfalls, potentially lengthening the dry-up period of water falls in summer and negatively affecting tourism. Groundwater recharge in Yosemite Valley is primarily from the upper snow-rain transition (2,000–2,500m) and very vulnerable to shift in the snow-rain ratio.
Zhihua He, Kevin Shook, Christopher Spence, John W. Pomeroy, and Colin Whitfield
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 3525–3546, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-3525-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-3525-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This study evaluated the impacts of climate change on snowmelt, soil moisture, and streamflow over the Canadian Prairies. The entire prairie region was divided into seven basin types. We found strong variations of hydrological sensitivity to precipitation and temperature changes in different land covers and basins, which suggests that different water management and adaptation methods are needed to address enhanced water stress due to expected climate change in different regions of the prairies.
Nicolás Cortés-Salazar, Nicolás Vásquez, Naoki Mizukami, Pablo A. Mendoza, and Ximena Vargas
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 3505–3524, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-3505-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-3505-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This paper shows how important river models can be for water resource applications that involve hydrological models and, in particular, parameter calibration. To this end, we conduct numerical experiments in a pilot basin using a combination of hydrologic model simulations obtained from a large sample of parameter sets and different routing methods. We find that routing can affect streamflow simulations, even at monthly time steps; the choice of parameters; and relevant streamflow metrics.
Dung Trung Vu, Thanh Duc Dang, Francesca Pianosi, and Stefano Galelli
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 3485–3504, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-3485-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-3485-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The calibration of hydrological models over extensive spatial domains is often challenged by the lack of data on river discharge and the operations of hydraulic infrastructures. Here, we use satellite data to address the lack of data that could unintentionally bias the calibration process. Our study is underpinned by a computational framework that quantifies this bias and provides a safe approach to the calibration of models in poorly gauged and heavily regulated basins.
Francesco Fatone, Bartosz Szeląg, Przemysław Kowal, Arthur McGarity, Adam Kiczko, Grzegorz Wałek, Ewa Wojciechowska, Michał Stachura, and Nicolas Caradot
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 3329–3349, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-3329-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-3329-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
A novel methodology for the development of a stormwater network performance simulator including advanced risk assessment was proposed. The applied tool enables the analysis of the influence of spatial variability in catchment and stormwater network characteristics on the relation between (SWMM) model parameters and specific flood volume, as an alternative approach to mechanistic models. The proposed method can be used at the stage of catchment model development and spatial planning management.
Olivier Delaigue, Pierre Brigode, Guillaume Thirel, and Laurent Coron
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 3293–3327, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-3293-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-3293-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Teaching hydrological modeling is an important, but difficult, matter. It requires appropriate tools and teaching material. In this article, we present the airGRteaching package, which is an open-source software tool relying on widely used hydrological models. This tool proposes an interface and numerous hydrological modeling exercises representing a wide range of hydrological applications. We show how this tool can be applied to simple but real-life cases.
Mariam Khanam, Giulia Sofia, and Emmanouil N. Anagnostou
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1969, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1969, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Due to climate change, flooding is expected to become more frequent globally in the coming decades. Locally, storm-induced channel geometry changes can drastically affect flood hazards, yet rivers are mostly treated as static elements in flood studies. This study tried to gain an understanding of the effects of major storm events on future flood hazards, promoting a framework for incorporating channel conveyance adjustments into flood hazard assessment.
Siyuan Wang, Markus Hrachowitz, Gerrit Schoups, and Christine Stumpp
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 3083–3114, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-3083-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-3083-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This study shows that previously reported underestimations of water ages are most likely not due to the use of seasonally variable tracers. Rather, these underestimations can be largely attributed to the choices of model approaches which rely on assumptions not frequently met in catchment hydrology. We therefore strongly advocate avoiding the use of this model type in combination with seasonally variable tracers and instead adopting StorAge Selection (SAS)-based or comparable model formulations.
Arianna Borriero, Rohini Kumar, Tam V. Nguyen, Jan H. Fleckenstein, and Stefanie R. Lutz
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 2989–3004, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-2989-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-2989-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We analyzed the uncertainty of the water transit time distribution (TTD) arising from model input (interpolated tracer data) and structure (StorAge Selection, SAS, functions). We found that uncertainty was mainly associated with temporal interpolation, choice of SAS function, nonspatial interpolation, and low-flow conditions. It is important to characterize the specific uncertainty sources and their combined effects on TTD, as this has relevant implications for both water quantity and quality.
Yves Tramblay, Patrick Arnaud, Guillaume Artigue, Michel Lang, Emmanuel Paquet, Luc Neppel, and Eric Sauquet
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 2973–2987, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-2973-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-2973-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Mediterranean floods are causing major damage, and recent studies have shown that, despite the increase in intense rainfall, there has been no increase in river floods. This study reveals that the seasonality of floods changed in the Mediterranean Basin during 1959–2021. There was also an increased frequency of floods linked to short episodes of intense rain, associated with a decrease in soil moisture. These changes need to be taken into consideration to adapt flood warning systems.
Yanfeng Wu, Jingxuan Sun, Boting Hu, Y. Jun Xu, Alain N. Rousseau, and Guangxin Zhang
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 2725–2745, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-2725-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-2725-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Reservoirs and wetlands are important regulators of watershed hydrology, which should be considered when projecting floods and droughts. We first coupled wetlands and reservoir operations into a semi-spatially-explicit hydrological model and then applied it in a case study involving a large river basin in northeast China. We found that, overall, the risk of future floods and droughts will increase further even under the combined influence of reservoirs and wetlands.
Peishi Jiang, Pin Shuai, Alexander Sun, Maruti K. Mudunuru, and Xingyuan Chen
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 2621–2644, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-2621-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-2621-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We developed a novel deep learning approach to estimate the parameters of a computationally expensive hydrological model on only a few hundred realizations. Our approach leverages the knowledge obtained by data-driven analysis to guide the design of the deep learning model used for parameter estimation. We demonstrate this approach by calibrating a state-of-the-art hydrological model against streamflow and evapotranspiration observations at a snow-dominated watershed in Colorado.
Guillaume Cinkus, Naomi Mazzilli, Hervé Jourde, Andreas Wunsch, Tanja Liesch, Nataša Ravbar, Zhao Chen, and Nico Goldscheider
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 2397–2411, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-2397-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-2397-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The Kling–Gupta Efficiency (KGE) is a performance criterion extensively used to evaluate hydrological models. We conduct a critical study on the KGE and its variant to examine counterbalancing errors. Results show that, when assessing a simulation, concurrent over- and underestimation of discharge can lead to an overall higher criterion score without an associated increase in model relevance. We suggest that one carefully choose performance criteria and use scaling factors.
Dapeng Feng, Hylke Beck, Kathryn Lawson, and Chaopeng Shen
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 2357–2373, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-2357-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-2357-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Powerful hybrid models (called δ or delta models) embrace the fundamental learning capability of AI and can also explain the physical processes. Here we test their performance when applied to regions not in the training data. δ models rivaled the accuracy of state-of-the-art AI models under the data-dense scenario and even surpassed them for the data-sparse one. They generalize well due to the physical structure included. δ models could be ideal candidates for global hydrologic assessment.
Simon Ricard, Philippe Lucas-Picher, Antoine Thiboult, and François Anctil
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 2375–2395, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-2375-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-2375-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
A simplified hydroclimatic modelling workflow is proposed to quantify the impact of climate change on water discharge without resorting to meteorological observations. Results confirm that the proposed workflow produces equivalent projections of the seasonal mean flows in comparison to a conventional hydroclimatic modelling approach. The proposed approach supports the participation of end-users in interpreting the impact of climate change on water resources.
Marcus Edmund Henry Buechel, Louise Slater, and Simon Dadson
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2023-138, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2023-138, 2023
Revised manuscript accepted for HESS
Short summary
Short summary
Afforestation has been proposed internationally, but the hydrological implications of such large increases in spatial extent of woodland are not fully understood. In this study we use a land surface model to simulate hydrology across Great Britain with realistic afforestation scenarios and potential climate changes. Countrywide afforestation minimally influences hydrology when compared to climate change, and reduces low streamflow whilst not lowering the highest flows.
Nutchanart Sriwongsitanon, Wasana Jandang, James Williams, Thienchart Suwawong, Ekkarin Maekan, and Hubert H. G. Savenije
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 2149–2171, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-2149-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-2149-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We developed predictive semi-distributed rainfall–runoff models for nested sub-catchments in the upper Ping basin, which yielded better or similar performance compared to calibrated lumped models. The normalised difference infrared index proves to be an effective proxy for distributed root zone moisture capacity over sub-catchments and is well correlated with the percentage of evergreen forest. In validation, soil moisture simulations appeared to be highly correlated with the soil wetness index.
Yuchan Chen, Xiuzhi Chen, Meimei Xue, Chuanxun Yang, Wei Zheng, Jun Cao, Wenting Yan, and Wenping Yuan
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 1929–1943, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1929-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1929-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This study addresses the quantification and estimation of the watershed-characteristic-related parameter (Pw) in the Budyko framework with the principle of hydrologically similar groups. The results show that Pw is closely related to soil moisture and fractional vegetation cover, and the relationship varies across specific hydrologic similarity groups. The overall satisfactory performance of the Pw estimation model improves the applicability of the Budyko framework for global runoff estimation.
Lena Katharina Schmidt, Till Francke, Peter Martin Grosse, Christoph Mayer, and Axel Bronstert
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 1841–1863, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1841-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1841-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We present a suitable method to reconstruct sediment export from decadal records of hydroclimatic predictors (discharge, precipitation, temperature) and shorter suspended sediment measurements. This lets us fill the knowledge gap on how sediment export from glacierized high-alpine areas has responded to climate change. We find positive trends in sediment export from the two investigated nested catchments with step-like increases around 1981 which are linked to crucial changes in glacier melt.
Samantha Petch, Bo Dong, Tristan Quaife, Robert P. King, and Keith Haines
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 1723–1744, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1723-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1723-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Gravitational measurements of water storage from GRACE (Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment) can improve understanding of the water budget. We produce flux estimates over large river catchments based on observations that close the monthly water budget and ensure consistency with GRACE on short and long timescales. We use energy data to provide additional constraints and balance the long-term energy budget. These flux estimates are important for evaluating climate models.
Ting Su, Chiyuan Miao, Qingyun Duan, Jiaojiao Gou, Xiaoying Guo, and Xi Zhao
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 1477–1492, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1477-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1477-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The Three-River Source Region (TRSR) plays an extremely important role in water resources security and ecological and environmental protection in China and even all of Southeast Asia. This study used the variable infiltration capacity (VIC) land surface hydrologic model linked with the degree-day factor algorithm to simulate the runoff change in the TRSR. These results will help to guide current and future regulation and management of water resources in the TRSR.
Andreas Hartmann, Jean-Lionel Payeur-Poirier, and Luisa Hopp
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 1325–1341, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1325-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1325-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We advance our understanding of including information derived from environmental tracers into hydrological modeling. We present a simple approach that integrates streamflow observations and tracer-derived streamflow contributions for model parameter estimation. We consider multiple observed streamflow components and their variation over time to quantify the impact of their inclusion for streamflow prediction at the catchment scale.
Dharmaveer Singh, Manu Vardhan, Rakesh Sahu, Debrupa Chatterjee, Pankaj Chauhan, and Shiyin Liu
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 1047–1075, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1047-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1047-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This study examines, for the first time, the potential of various machine learning models in streamflow prediction over the Sutlej River basin (rainfall-dominated zone) in western Himalaya during the period 2041–2070 (2050s) and 2071–2100 (2080s) and its relationship to climate variability. The mean ensemble of the model results shows that the mean annual streamflow of the Sutlej River is expected to rise between the 2050s and 2080s by 0.79 to 1.43 % for SSP585 and by 0.87 to 1.10 % for SSP245.
Monica Coppo Frias, Suxia Liu, Xingguo Mo, Karina Nielsen, Heidi Ranndal, Liguang Jiang, Jun Ma, and Peter Bauer-Gottwein
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 1011–1032, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1011-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1011-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This paper uses remote sensing data from ICESat-2 to calibrate a 1D hydraulic model. With the model, we can make estimations of discharge and water surface elevation, which are important indicators in flooding risk assessment. ICESat-2 data give an added value, thanks to the 0.7 m resolution, which allows the measurement of narrow river streams. In addition, ICESat-2 provides measurements on the river dry portion geometry that can be included in the model.
Cited articles
Abramowitz, G., Gupta, H., Pitman, A., Wang, Y., Leuning, R., Cleugh, H.,
Hsu, K., Abramowitz, G., Gupta, H., Pitman, A., Wang, Y., Leuning, R.,
Cleugh, H., and Hsu, K.: Neural Error Regression Diagnosis (NERD): A Tool for
Model Bias Identification and Prognostic Data Assimilation, J.
Hydrometeorol., 7, 160–177, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM479.1, 2006.
Abramowitz, G., Pitman, A., Gupta, H., Kowalczyk, E., Wang, Y., Abramowitz,
G., Pitman, A., Gupta, H., Kowalczyk, E., and Wang, Y.: Systematic Bias in
Land Surface Models, J. Hydrometeorol., 8, 989–1001, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM628.1, 2007.
Ajami, H., Khan, U., Tuteja, N. K., and Sharma, A.: Development of a
computationally efficient semi-distributed hydrologic modeling application
for soil moisture, lateral flow and runoff simulation, Environ. Model.
Softw., 85, 319–331, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENVSOFT.2016.09.002, 2016.
Albert, A., Strano, E., Kaur, J., and Gonzalez, M.: Modeling urbanization
patterns with generative adversarial networks, arXiv:1801.02710,
available at: http://arxiv.org/abs/1801.02710, last access: 24 March 2018.
Allamano, P., Croci, A., and Laio, F.: Toward the camera rain gauge, Water
Resour. Res., 51, 1744–1757, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014WR016298, 2015.
Angermueller, C., Pärnamaa, T., Parts, L., and Stegle, O.: Deep learning
for computational biology, Mol. Syst. Biol., 12, 878,
https://doi.org/10.15252/MSB.20156651, 2016.
Archfield, S. A., Clark, M., Arheimer, B., Hay, L. E., McMillan, H., Kiang,
J. E., Seibert, J., Hakala, K., Bock, A., Wagener, T., Farmer, W. H.,
Andréassian, V., Attinger, S., Viglione, A., Knight, R., Markstrom, S.,
and Over, T.: Accelerating advances in continental domain hydrologic
modeling, Water Resour. Res., 51, 10078–10091, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR017498,
2015.
Arpit, D., Jastrzębski, S., Ballas, N., Krueger, D., Bengio, E., Kanwal,
M. S., Maharaj, T., Fischer, A., Courville, A., Bengio, Y., and
Lacoste-Julien, S.: A Closer Look at Memorization in Deep Networks, in
Proceedings of the 34 th International Conference on Machine Learning,
Sydney, Australia, PMLR 70, available at:
https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.05394, last access: 19 November 2017.
Aspen: Internet of Water: Sharing and Integrating Water Data for
Sustainability, A Rep. from Aspen Inst. Dialogue Ser. Water Data,
available at:
https://www.aspeninstitute.org/publications/internet-of-water/ (last access: 27
August 2018), 2017.
Aspray, W.: Women and underrepresented minorities in computing: a historical and social study, Springer, Basel, Switzerland, 2016.
Assem, H., Ghariba, S., Makrai, G., Johnston, P., Gill, L., and Pilla, F.:
Urban Water Flow and Water Level Prediction Based on Deep Learning, in ECML
PKDD 2017: Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases,
317–329, Springer, Cham., 2017.
Baldi, P., Sadowski, P., and Whiteson, D.: Enhanced Higgs Boson to
Banino, A., Barry, C., Uria, B., Blundell, C., Lillicrap, T., Mirowski, P.,
Pritzel, A., Chadwick, M. J., Degris, T., Modayil, J., Wayne, G., Soyer, H.,
Viola, F., Zhang, B., Goroshin, R., Rabinowitz, N., Pascanu, R., Beattie, C.,
Petersen, S., Sadik, A., Gaffney, S., King, H., Kavukcuoglu, K., Hassabis,
D., Hadsell, R., and Kumaran, D.: Vector-based navigation using grid-like
representations in artificial agents, Nature, 557, 429–433, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0102-6, 2018.
Baughman, A. K., Chuang, W., Dixon, K. R., Benz, Z., and Basilico, J.: DeepQA
Jeopardy! Gamification: A Machine-Learning Perspective, IEEE Trans. Comput.
Intell. AI Games, 6, 55–66, https://doi.org/10.1109/TCIAIG.2013.2285651, 2014.
Beven, K.: Changing ideas in hydrology – The case of physically-based
models, J. Hydrol., 105, 157–172, https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(89)90101-7,
1989.
Beven, K.: Topmodel?: A Critique, Hydrol. Process., 11,
1069–1085, 1997.
Blöschl, G.: Hydrologic synthesis: Across processes, places, and scales,
Water Resour. Res., 42, W03S02, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005WR004319, 2006.
Chaney, N. W., Herman, J. D., Ek, M. B., and Wood, E. F.: Deriving Global
Parameter Estimates for the Noah Land Surface Model using FLUXNET and Machine
Learning, J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 121, 13218–13235, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD024821, 2016.
Chang, L.-C., Shen, H.-Y., and Chang, F.-J.: Regional flood inundation nowcast
using hybrid SOM and dynamic neural networks, J. Hydrol., 519, 476–489,
https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JHYDROL.2014.07.036, 2014.
Chen, I.-T., Chang, L.-C., and Chang, F.-J.: Exploring the spatio-temporal
interrelation between groundwater and surface water by using the
self-organizing maps, J. Hydrol., 556, 131–142,
https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JHYDROL.2017.10.015, 2018.
CIF: Results, Int. Time Ser. Forecast. Compet. – Comput. Intell. Forecast., available at:
http://irafm.osu.cz/cif/main.php?c=Static&page=results (last access: 24
March 2018), 2016.
Clark, M. P., Nijssen, B., Lundquist, J. D., Kavetski, D., Rupp, D. E.,
Woods, R. A., Freer, J. E., Gutmann, E. D., Wood, A. W., Brekke, L. D.,
Arnold, J. R., Gochis, D. J., and Rasmussen, R. M.: A unified approach for
process-based hydrologic modeling: 1. Modeling concept, Water Resour. Res.,
51, 2498–2514, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR017198, 2015.
CoCoRaHS: Community Collaborative Rain, Hail and Snow Network (CoCoRaHS),
“Volunteers Work. together to Meas. Precip. across nations”,
available at: https://www.cocorahs.org/, last access: 23 August 2018.
Columbus, L.: Roundup Of Machine Learning Forecasts And Market Estimates,
2018, Forbes Contrib., available at:
https://www.forbes.com/sites/louiscolumbus/2018/02/18/roundup-of-machine-learning-forecasts-and-market-estimates-2018/#7d3c5bd62225,
last access: 30 July 2018.
CrowdHydrology: CrowdHydrology, available at:
http://crowdhydrology.geology.buffalo.edu/, last access: 23 August 2018.
CUAHSI: Consortium of Universities Allied for Water Research, Inc (CUASI)
Cyberseminars, available at: https://www.cuahsi.org/education/cyberseminars/, last access: 8 October 2018a.
CUAHSI: Data Driven Education, available at:
https://www.cuahsi.org/education/data-driven-education/, last access: 26
September 2018b.
CUAHSI: HydroClient, available at: http://data.cuahsi.org/, last access: 19 August 2018c.
Delle Monache, L., Nipen, T., Liu, Y., Roux, G., and Stull, R.: Kalman Filter
and Analog Schemes to Postprocess Numerical Weather Predictions, Mon. Weather
Rev., 139, 3554–3570, https://doi.org/10.1175/2011MWR3653.1, 2011.
Delle Monache, L., Eckel, F. A., Rife, D. L., Nagarajan, B., and Searight, K.:
Probabilistic Weather Prediction with an Analog Ensemble, Mon. Weather Rev.,
141, 3498–3516, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-12-00281.1, 2013.
Dignan, L.: Google Research becomes Google AI to reflect AI-first ambitions,
zdnet.com, available at:
https://www.zdnet.com/article/google-research-becomes-google-ai-to-reflect-ai-first-ambitions/, last access: 20 August 2018.
Drucker, H., Burges, C. J. C., Kaufman, L., Smola, A., and Vapnik, V.: Support
vector regression machines, Proc. 9th Int. Conf. Neural Inf. Process. Syst.,
155–161, available at:
https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2999003 (last access: 5 January 2018), 1996.
Endo, A., Burnett, K., Orencio, P., Kumazawa, T., Wada, C., Ishii, A.,
Tsurita, I., and Taniguchi, M.: Methods of the Water-Energy-Food Nexus, Water,
7, 5806–5830, https://doi.org/10.3390/w7105806, 2015.
Entekhabi, D.: The Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) mission, Proc. IEEE,
98, 704–716, https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2010.2043918, 2010.
Evans, H., Gervet, E., Kuchembuck, R., and Hu, M.: Will You Embrace AI Fast Enough?
ATKearney Operations & Performance Transformation report, available at:
https://www.atkearney.com/operations-performance-transformation/article?/a/will-you-embrace-ai-fast-enough, last access 10 August 2018.
Faghmous, J. H. and Kumar, V.: A Big Data Guide to Understanding Climate
Change: The Case for Theory-Guided Data Science, Big Data, 2, 155–163,
https://doi.org/10.1089/big.2014.0026, 2014.
Fang, K. and Shen, C.: Full-flow-regime storage-streamflow correlation
patterns provide insights into hydrologic functioning over the continental
US, Water Resour. Res., 53, 8064–8083, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016WR020283, 2017.
Fang, K., Shen, C., Kifer, D., and Yang, X.: Prolongation of SMAP to
Spatio-temporally Seamless Coverage of Continental US Using a Deep Learning
Neural Network, Geophys. Res. Lett., 44, 11030–11039, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL075619, 2017.
Gatys, L. A., Ecker, A. S., and Bethge, M.: Image Style Transfer Using
Convolutional Neural Networks, 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and
Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2414–2423, 2016.
Gentine, P., Pritchard, M., Rasp, S., Reinaudi, G., and Yacalis, G.: Could
Machine Learning Break the Convection Parameterization Deadlock?, Geophys.
Res. Lett., 45, 5742–5751, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL078202, 2018.
Gershgorn, D.: The data that transformed AI research-and possibly the world,
Quartz, available at:
https://qz.com/1034972/the-data-that-changed-the-direction-of-ai-research-and-possibly-the-world/,
last access: 8 October 2018, 2017.
Gleeson, T., Moosdorf, N., Hartmann, J., and van Beek, L. P. H.: A glimpse
beneath earth's surface: GLobal HYdrogeology MaPS (GLHYMPS) of permeability
and porosity, Geophys. Res. Lett., 41, 3891–3898,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL059856, 2014.
Goh, G. B., Hodas, N. O., and Vishnu, A.: Deep learning for computational
chemistry, J. Comput. Chem., 38, 1291–1307, https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.24764, 2017.
Goodfellow, I., Pouget-Abadie, J., Mirza, M., Xu, B., Warde-Farley, D.,
Ozair, S., Courville, A., and Bengio, Y.: Generative Adversarial Networks, in
Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Neural Information
Processing Systems (NIPS'14), available at:
http://arxiv.org/abs/1406.2661 (last access: 25 February 2017), 2014.
Goodfellow, I., Shlens, J., and Szegedy, C.: Explaining and Harnessing
Adversarial Examples, International Conference on Learning
Representations, available at: http://arxiv.org/abs/1412.6572 (last access: 25 February 2017), 2015.
Goodman, B. and Flaxman, S.: European Union regulations on algorithmic
decision-making and a “right to explanation”,
arXiv:1606.08813, available at: http://arxiv.org/abs/1606.08813 (last access: 7 February 2018), 2016.
Govindaraju, R. S.: Artificial Neural Networks in Hydrology. II: Hydrologic
Applications, J. Hydrol. Eng., 5, 124–137,
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2000)5:2(124), 2000.
Graves, A., Mohamed, A., and Hinton, G.: Speech recognition with deep recurrent neural networks,
in: 2013 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, 6645–6649, IEEE, Vancouver, Canada, 2013.
GRDC: River Discharge Data, Glob. Runoff Data Cent., available at:
http://www.bafg.de/GRDC/EN/02_srvcs/21_tmsrs/riverdischarge_node.html, last access: 28 July 2017.
Greff, K., Srivastava, R. K., Koutník, J., Steunebrink, B. R., and
Schmidhuber, J.: LSTM: A Search Space Odyssey,
available at:
http://arxiv.org/abs/1503.04069 (last access: 18 July 2016), 2015.
Guo, Y., Liu, Y., Oerlemans, A., Lao, S., Wu, S., and Lew, M. S.: Deep
learning for visual understanding: A review, Neurocomputing, 187, 27–48,
https://doi.org/10.1016/J.NEUCOM.2015.09.116, 2016.
Hall, D. K., Riggs, G. A., and Salomonson., V. V.: MODIS/Terra Snow Cover
5-Min L2 Swath 500 m, Version 5, Boulder, Colorado USA, 2006.
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., and Sun, J.: Deep Residual Learning for Image
Recognition, 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern
Recognition (CVPR), 770–778, 2016.
Helber, P., Bischke, B., Dengel, A., and Borth, D.: EuroSAT: A Novel Dataset
and Deep Learning Benchmark for Land Use and Land Cover Classification,
available at: http://arxiv.org/abs/1709.00029 (last access: 2
September 2018), 2017.
Hendricks, L. A., Akata, Z., Rohrbach, M., Donahue, J., Schiele, B., and Darrell, T.:
Generating Visual Explanations, in: Computer Vision – ECCV 2016, 3–19, available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46493-0_1,
Springer, Cham, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2016.
Hiroi, K. and Kawaguchi, N.: FloodEye: Real-time flash flood prediction
system for urban complex water flow, 2016 IEEE SENSORS, 1–3,
2016.
Hirschberg, J. and Manning, C. D.: Advances in natural language processing,
Science, 349, 261–266, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa8685, 2015.
Ho, T. K.: Random decision forests, in Proceedings of 3rd International
Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition, IEEE
Comput. Soc. Press., 1, 278–282, 1995.
Hochreiter, S.: The Vanishing Gradient Problem During Learning Recurrent
Neural Nets and Problem Solutions, Int. J. Uncertainty, Fuzziness
Knowledge-Based Syst., 6, 107–116, https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218488598000094, 1998.
Hochreiter, S. and Schmidhuber, J.: Long Short-Term Memory, Neural Comput.,
9, 1735–1780, https://doi.org/10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735, 1997.
Horsburgh, J. S., Morsy, M. M., Castronova, A. M., Goodall, J. L., Gan, T.,
Yi, H., Stealey, M. J., and Tarboton, D. G.: HydroShare: Sharing Diverse
Environmental Data Types and Models as Social Objects with Application to the
Hydrology Domain, J. Am. Water Resour. As., 52, 873–889,
https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12363, 2016.
Hrachowitz, M., Savenije, H. H. G., Blöschl, G., McDonnell, J. J.,
Sivapalan, M., Pomeroy, J. W., Arheimer, B., Blume, T., Clark, M. P., Ehret,
U., Fenicia, F., Freer, J. E., Gelfan, A., Gupta, H. V., Hughes, D. A., Hut,
R. W., Montanari, A., Pande, S., Tetzlaff, D., Troch, P. A., Uhlenbrook, S.,
Wagener, T., Winsemius, H. C., Woods, R. A., Zehe, E., and Cudennec, C.: A
decade of Predictions in Ungauged Basins (PUB) – a review, Hydrol. Sci. J.,
58, 1198–1255, https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2013.803183, 2013.
Hsu, K., Gupta, H. V., and Sorooshian, S.: Artificial Neural Network Modeling
of the Rainfall-Runoff Process, Water Resour. Res., 31, 2517–2530,
https://doi.org/10.1029/95WR01955, 1995.
Hsu, K., Gao, X., Sorooshian, S., Gupta, H. V., Hsu, K., Gao, X., Sorooshian,
S., and Gupta, H. V.: Precipitation Estimation from Remotely Sensed
Information Using Artificial Neural Networks, J. Appl. Meteorol., 36,
1176–1190, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1997)036<1176:PEFRSI>2.0.CO;2, 1997.
Hsu, K., Gupta, H. V., Gao, X., Sorooshian, S., and Imam, B.: Self-organizing
linear output map (SOLO): An artificial neural network suitable for
hydrologic modeling and analysis, Water Resour. Res., 38, 38-1–38-17,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2001WR000795, 2002.
Huang, W., He, D., Yang, X., Zhou, Z., Kifer, D., and Giles, C. L.: Detecting
Arbitrary Oriented Text in the Wild with a Visual Attention Model, in
Proceedings of the 2016 ACM on Multimedia Conference – MM '16, 551–555,
ACM Press, New York, USA, 2016.
Indermuhle, E., Frinken, V., and Bunke, H.: Mode Detection in Online
Handwritten Documents Using BLSTM Neural Networks, 2012 International
Conference on Frontiers in Handwriting Recognition, 302–307, IEEE,
2012.
Izadinia, H., Russell, B. C., Farhadi, A., Hoffman, M. D., and Hertzmann, A.:
Deep Classifiers from Image Tags in the Wild, Proceedings of the 2015
Workshop on Community-Organized Multimodal Mining: Opportunities for Novel
Solutions, 13–18, ACM, 2015.
Jackson, T., O'Neill, P., Njoku, E., Chan, S., Bindlish, R., Colliander, A.,
Chen, F., Burgin, M., Dunbar, S., Piepmeier, J., Cosh, M., Caldwell, T.,
Walker, J., Wu, X., Berg, A., Rowlandson, T., Pacheco, A., McNairn, H.,
Thibeault, M., Martínez-Fernández, J., González-Zamora, Á.,
Seyfried10, M., Bosch, D., Starks, P., Goodrich, D., Prueger, J., Su, Z., van
der Velde, R., Asanuma, J., Palecki, M., Small, E., Zreda, M., Calvet, J.,
Crow, W., Kerr, Y., Yueh, S., and Entekhabi, D.: Soil Moisture Active Passive
(SMAP) Project Calibration and Validation for the L2/3_SM_P Version 3 Data Products, SMAP Proj. JPL D-93720,
available at:
https://nsidc.org/data/smap/technical-references
(last access: 27 July 2017), 2016.
Josephson, J. R. and Josephson, S. G.: Abductive inference?: computation,
philosophy, technology, Cambridge University Press, 1994.
Junk, C., Delle Monache, L., Alessandrini, S., Cervone, G., and von Bremen,
L.: Predictor-weighting strategies for probabilistic wind power forecasting
with an analog ensemble, Meteorol. Z., 24, 361–379,
https://doi.org/10.1127/metz/2015/0659, 2015.
Karpathy, A., Johnson, J., and Fei-Fei, L.: Visualizing and Understanding
Recurrent Networks, ICLR 2016 Workshop, available at:
http://arxiv.org/abs/1506.02078 (last access: 7 November 2016), 2015.
Karpatne, A., Atluri, G., Faghmous, J. H., Steinbach, M., Banerjee, A.,
Ganguly, A., Shekhar, S., Samatova, N., and Kumar, V.: Theory-Guided Data
Science: A New Paradigm for Scientific Discovery from Data, IEEE Trans.
Knowl. Data Eng., 29, 2318–2331, https://doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2017.2720168, 2017.
Kawaguchi, K., Kaelbling, L. P., and Bengio, Y.: Generalization in Deep
Learning, arXiv:1710.05468, available at:
http://arxiv.org/abs/1710.05468 (last access: 12 March 2018), 2017.
Kingma, D. P. and Ba, J.: Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization, in 3rd
International Conference for Learning Representations, San Diego, CA,
available at: http://arxiv.org/abs/1412.6980 (last access: 30 March
2018), 2014.
Kingma, D. P. and Welling, M.: Auto-Encoding Variational Bayes, in
Proceedings of the 2014 International Conference on Learning Representations
(ICLR), available at: http://arxiv.org/abs/1312.6114 (last access: 24
March 2018), 2013.
Knyazikhin, Y., Glassy, J., Privette, J. L., Tian, Y., Lotsch, A., Zhang, Y.,
Wang, Y., Morisette, J. T., P.Votava, Myneni, R. B., Nemani, R. R., and
Running, S. W.: MODIS Leaf Area Index (LAI) and Fraction of
Photosynthetically Active Radiation Absorbed by Vegetation (FPAR) Product
(MOD15) Algorithm Theoretical Basis Document,
https://modis.gsfc.nasa.gov/data/atbd/atbd_mod15.pdf (last
access: 8 October 2018), 1999.
Koza, J. R.: Genetic Programming: on the Programming of Computers by Means of
Natural Selection, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, 1992.
Kratzert, F., Klotz, D., Brenner, C., Schulz, K., and Herrnegger, M.:
Rainfall-Runoff modelling using Long-Short-Term-Memory (LSTM) networks,
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2018-247, in
review, 2018.
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., and Hinton, G. E.: ImageNet Classification
with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks, Advances in Neural Information
Processing Systems 25, 1097–1105, available at:
https://papers.nips.cc/paper/4824-imagenet-classification-with-deep-convolutional-neural-
(last access: 30 March 2018), 2012.
Krueger, D., Ballas, N., Jastrzebski, S., Arpit, D., Kanwal, M. S., Maharaj,
T., Bengio, E., Erraqabi, A., Fischer, A., Lacoste-Julien, S., and Courville,
A.: Deep nets don't learn via memorization, ICLR 2017, available at:
https://openreview.net/pdf?id=rJv6ZgHYg, 2017.
Kumar, D. and Menkovski, V.: Understanding Anatomy Classification Through
Visualization, 30th NIPS Machine learning for Health Workshop, available at:
https://arxiv.org/abs/1611.06284 (last access: 24 November 2017), 2016.
Laloy, E., Hérault, R., Lee, J., Jacques, D., and Linde, N.: Inversion
using a new low-dimensional representation of complex binary geological media
based on a deep neural network, Adv. Water Resour., 110, 387–405,
https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ADVWATRES.2017.09.029, 2017.
Laloy, E., Hérault, R., Jacques, D., and Linde, N.: Training-Image Based
Geostatistical Inversion Using a Spatial Generative Adversarial Neural
Network, Water Resour. Res., 54, 381–406, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017WR022148, 2018.
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., and Hinton, G.: Deep learning, Nature, 521, 436–444,
https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14539, 2015.
Lehman, K. J.: Courting the Uncommitted: A Mixed-Methods Study of Undecided
Students in Introductory Computer Science Courses, UCLA Electron, Theses
Diss., available at: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/94k326xs (last
access: 31 July 2018), 2017.
Leviathan, Y. and Matias, Y.: Google Duplex: An AI System for Accomplishing
Real-World Tasks Over the Phone, Google AI Blog, available at:
https://ai.googleblog.com/2018/05/duplex-ai-system-for-natural-conversation.html,
last access: 20 August 2018.
Liu, Y., Racah, E., Prabhat, Correa, J., Khosrowshahi, A., Lavers, D.,
Kunkel, K., Wehner, M., and Collins, W.: Application of Deep Convolutional
Neural Networks for Detecting Extreme Weather in Climate Datasets, ACM SIGKDD
2016 Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining, available at:
http://arxiv.org/abs/1605.01156, last access: 21 October 2016.
Mahendran, A. and Vedaldi, A.: Understanding deep image representations by
inverting them, 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern
Recognition (CVPR), 5188–5196, 2015.
Maier, H. R., Jain, A., Dandy, G. C., and Sudheer, K. P.: Methods used for
the development of neural networks for the prediction of water resource
variables in river systems: Current status and future directions, Environ.
Model. Softw., 25, 891–909, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENVSOFT.2010.02.003, 2010.
Marshall, L.: Creativity, Uncertainty, and Automated Model Building,
Groundwater, 55, 693–697, https://doi.org/10.1111/gwat.12552, 2017.
Matsuoka, D., Nakano, M., Sugiyama, D., and Uchida, S.: Detecting Precursors of Tropical Cyclone
using Deep Neural Networks, The 7th International Workshop on Climate
Informatics, CI, 2017.
McCabe, M. F., Rodell, M., Alsdorf, D. E., Miralles, D. G., Uijlenhoet, R.,
Wagner, W., Lucieer, A., Houborg, R., Verhoest, N. E. C., Franz, T. E., Shi,
J., Gao, H., and Wood, E. F.: The future of Earth observation in hydrology,
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 3879–3914,
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-3879-2017, 2017.
Mecklenburg, S., Kerr, Y., Font, J., and Hahne, A.: The Soil Moisture and
Ocean Salinity Mission – An Overview, IGARSS 2008, IEEE International
Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, IV-938–IV-941, 2008.
Merwade, V. and Ruddell, B. L.: Moving university hydrology education forward
with community-based geoinformatics, data and modeling resources, Hydrol.
Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 2393–2404, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-2393-2012,
2012.
Montanari, A., Young, G., Savenije, H. H. G., Hughes, D., Wagener, T., Ren,
L. L., Koutsoyiannis, D., Cudennec, C., Toth, E., Grimaldi, S., Blöschl,
G., Sivapalan, M., Beven, K., Gupta, H., Hipsey, M., Schaefli, B., Arheimer,
B., Boegh, E., Schymanski, S. J., Baldassarre, G. Di, Yu, B., Hubert, P.,
Huang, Y., Schumann, A., Post, D. A., Srinivasan, V., Harman, C., Thompson,
S., Rogger, M., Viglione, A., McMillan, H., Characklis, G., Pang, Z., and
Belyaev, V.: “Panta Rhei – Everything Flows”: Change in hydrology and
society – The IAHS Scientific Decade 2013–2022, Hydrol. Sci. J., 58,
https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2013.809088, 2013.
Moradkhani, H., Hsu, K., Gupta, H. V., and Sorooshian, S.: Improved
streamflow forecasting using self-organizing radial basis function artificial
neural networks, J. Hydrol., 295, 246–262,
https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JHYDROL.2004.03.027, 2004.
Mosser, L., Dubrule, O., and Blunt, M. J.: Reconstruction of
three-dimensional porous media using generative adversarial neural networks,
Phys. Rev. E, 96, 43309, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.96.043309, 2017.
Mount, N. J., Maier, H. R., Toth, E., Elshorbagy, A., Solomatine, D., Chang,
F.-J., and Abrahart, R. J.: Data-driven modelling approaches for
socio-hydrology: opportunities and challenges within the Panta Rhei Science
Plan, Hydrol. Sci. J., 61, 1–17,
https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2016.1159683, 2016.
Mu, Q., Zhao, M., and Running, S. W.: Improvements to a MODIS global
terrestrial evapotranspiration algorithm, Remote Sens. Environ., 115,
1781–1800, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2011.02.019, 2011.
Nearing, G. S., Mocko, D. M., Peters-Lidard, C. D., Kumar, S. V., and Xia, Y.: Benchmarking
NLDAS-2 Soil Moisture and Evapotranspiration to Separate Uncertainty
Contributions, J. Hydrometeorol., 17, 745–759, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-15-0063.1,
2016.
Ororbia, A. G., Giles, C. L., and Kifer, D.: Unifying Adversarial Training
Algorithms with Flexible Deep Data Gradient Regularization, Neural
Computation, MIT Press, available at: http://arxiv.org/abs/1601.07213
(last access: 24 February 2017), 2016.
Pavelsky, T. M., Durand, M. T., Andreadis, K. M., Beighley, R. E., Paiva, R.
C. D., Allen, G. H., and Miller, Z. F.: Assessing the potential global extent
of SWOT river discharge observations, J. Hydrol., 519, 1516–1525,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.08.044, 2014.
Ranzato, M., Poultney, C., Chopra, S., and LeCun, Y.: Efficient learning of
sparse representations with an energy-based model, Proc. 19th Int. Conf.
Neural Inf. Process. Syst., 1137–1144, available at:
https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2976599 (last access: 30 March
2018), 2006.
Russakovsky, O., Deng, J., Su, H., Krause, J., Satheesh, S., Ma, S., Huang,
Z., Karpathy, A., Khosla, A., Bernstein, M., Berg, A. C., and Fei-Fei, L.:
ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge, arXiv:1409.0575,
available at: http://arxiv.org/abs/1409.0575 (last access: 24 March 2018),
2014.
Sadler, J. M., Goodall, J. L., Morsy, M. M., and Spencer, K.: Modeling urban
coastal flood severity from crowd-sourced flood reports using Poisson
regression and Random Forest, J. Hydrol., 559, 43–55,
https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JHYDROL.2018.01.044, 2018.
Samek, W., Binder, A., Montavon, G., Lapuschkin, S., and Muller, K.-R.:
Evaluating the Visualization of What a Deep Neural Network Has Learned, IEEE
Trans. Neural Networks Learn. Syst., 28, 2660–2673,
https://doi.org/10.1109/TNNLS.2016.2599820, 2017.
Sax, L. J., Lehman, K. J., Jacobs, J. A., Kanny, M. A., Lim, G.,
Monje-Paulson, L., and Zimmerman, H. B.: Anatomy of an Enduring Gender Gap:
The Evolution of Women's Participation in Computer Science, J. Higher Educ.,
88, 258–293, https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2016.1257306, 2017.
Schaap, M. G., Leij, F. J., and van Genuchten, M. T.: Rosetta: a Computer Program for Estimating Soil
Hydraulic Parameters With Hierarchical Pedotransfer Functions, J. Hydrol., 251, 163–176, doi:10.1016/S0022-1694(01)00466-8, 2001.
Schmidhuber, J.: Deep learning in neural networks: An overview, Neural
Networks, 61, 85–117, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neunet.2014.09.003, 2015.
Schwalm, C. R., Anderegg, W. R. L., Michalak, A. M., Fisher, J. B., Biondi,
F., Koch, G., Litvak, M., Ogle, K., Shaw, J. D., Wolf, A., Huntzinger, D. N.,
Schaefer, K., Cook, R., Wei, Y., Fang, Y., Hayes, D., Huang, M., Jain, A.,
and Tian, H.: Global patterns of drought recovery, Nature, 548, 202–205,
https://doi.org/10.1038/nature23021, 2017.
Settles, B.: Active Learning, in: Synthesis lectures on artificial
intelligence and machine learning, edited by: Brachman, R. J., Cohen, W.
W.,
and Dietterich, T. G., Norgan & Claypool, Williston, VT, USA, 2012.
Shen, C.: A trans-disciplinary review of deep learning research and its
relevance for water resources scientists, Water Resour. Res., https://doi.org/10.1029/2018WR022643, 2018.
Simonite, T.: AI is the future – but where are the women, Wired,
available at:
https://www.wired.com/story/artificial-intelligence-researchers-gender-imbalance/, last access: 1 September
2018.
Simonyan, K. and Zisserman, A.: Very Deep Convolutional Networks for
Large-Scale Image Recognition, ICLR 2015, available at:
http://arxiv.org/abs/1409.1556 (last access: 25 August 2018), 2014.
Snelson, E. and Ghahramani, Z.: Sparse Gaussian Processes using
Pseudo-inputs, Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., 18, 1257–1264, 2006.
Srinivasan, M.: Hydrology from space: NASA's satellites supporting water
resources applications, Water Forum III Droughts Other Extrem. Weather Events, available at:
http://www.jsg.utexas.edu/ciess/files/Srinivasanetal_TWF_Oct14_Final.pdf (last access: 12 July 2016),
2013.
Srivastava, N., Hinton, G., Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., and Salakhutdinov,
R.: Dropout: A Simple Way to Prevent Neural Networks from Overfitting, J.
Mach. Learn. Res., 15, 1929–1958, 2014.
Stallkamp, J., Schlipsing, M., Salmen, J., and Igel, C.: The German Traffic
Sign Recognition Benchmark: A multi-class classification competition, The
2011 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, 1453–1460,
2011.
Stocker, T. F., Qin, D., Plattner, G.-K., Alexander, L. V., Allen, S. K.,
Bindoff, N. L., Bréon, F.-M., Church, J. A., Cubasch, U., Emori, S.,
Forster, P., Friedlingstein, P., Gillett, N., Gregory, J. M., Hartmann, D.
L., Jansen, E., Kirtman, B., Knutti, R., Kumar, K. K., Lemke, P., Marotzke,
J., Masson-Delmotte, V., Meehl, G. A., Mokhov, I. I., Piao, S., Ramaswamy,
V., Randall, D., Rhein, M., Rojas, M., Sabine, C., Shindell, D., Talley, L.
D., Vaughan, D. G., and Xie, S.-P.: Technical summary, Climate Change 2013,
in:
The Physical Science Basis, edited by: Stocker, T. F.,
Qin, D., Plattner, G.-K., Tignor, M., Allen, S. K., Boschung, J., Nauels, A., Xia, Y.,
Bex, V., and Midgley, P. M., Contrib. Work. Gr. I to Fifth Assess. Rep. Intergov. Panel Clim.
Chang., available at:
http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar5/wg1/WG1AR5_TS_FINAL.pdf
(last
access: 8 October 2018), 2013.
Stollenga, M. F., Byeon, W., Liwicki, M., and Schmidhuber, J.: Parallel
multi-dimensional LSTM, with application to fast biomedical volumetric image
segmentation, Proc. 28th Int. Conf. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., 2,
2998–3006, 2015.
Szegedy, C., Zaremba, W., Sutskever, I., Bruna, J., Erhan, D., Goodfellow, I., and Fergus, R.: Intriguing properties of neural networks,
available at:
http://arxiv.org/abs/1312.6199 (last access: 8 June 2016), 2013.
Szegedy, C., Wei Liu, Yangqing Jia, Sermanet, P., Reed, S., Anguelov, D.,
Erhan, D., Vanhoucke, V., and Rabinovich, A.: Going deeper with convolutions,
2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR),
1–9, , 2015.
Tao, Y., Gao, X., Hsu, K., Sorooshian, S., and Ihler, A.: A Deep Neural
Network Modeling Framework to Reduce Bias in Satellite Precipitation
Products, J. Hydrometeorol., 17, 931–945, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-15-0075.1, 2016.
Tao, Y., Gao, X., Ihler, A., Sorooshian, S., Hsu, K., Tao, Y., Gao, X.,
Ihler, A., Sorooshian, S., and Hsu, K.: Precipitation Identification with
Bispectral Satellite Information Using Deep Learning Approaches, J.
Hydrometeorol., 18, 1271–1283, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-16-0176.1, 2017.
Tao, Y., Hsu, K., Ihler, A., Gao, X., Sorooshian, S., Tao, Y., Hsu, K.,
Ihler, A., Gao, X., and Sorooshian, S.: A Two-Stage Deep Neural Network
Framework for Precipitation Estimation from Bispectral Satellite Information,
J. Hydrometeorol., 19, 393–408, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-17-0077.1, 2018.
Thompson, J. A., Pena-Yewtukhiw, E. M., and Grove, J. H.: Soil–landscape
modeling across a physiographic region: Topographic patterns and model
transportability, Geoderma, 133, 57–70,
https://doi.org/10.1016/J.GEODERMA.2006.03.037, 2006.
Tibshirani, R. and Tibshirani, R.: Regression Shrinkage and Selection Via the
Lasso, J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B, 58, 267–288, 1994.
Troch, P. A., Carrillo, G., Sivapalan, M., Wagener, T., and Sawicz, K.:
Climate-vegetation-soil interactions and long-term hydrologic partitioning:
signatures of catchment co-evolution, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17,
2209–2217, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-2209-2013, 2013.
Vandal, T., Kodra, E., Ganguly, S., Michaelis, A., Nemani, R., and Ganguly,
A. R.: DeepSD: Generating High Resolution Climate Change Projections through
Single Image Super-Resolution, 23rd ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge
Discovery and Data Mining., available at:
http://arxiv.org/abs/1703.03126, last access: 2 December 2017.
Vondrick, C., Pirsiavash, H., and Torralba, A.: Anticipating Visual
Representations from Unlabeled Video, CVPR 2016, available at:
http://arxiv.org/abs/1504.08023 (last access: 20 August 2018), 2016.
Voosen, P.: The AI detectives, Science, 80, 357,
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.357.6346.22, 2017.
Wagener, T., Sivapalan, M., Troch, P. A., McGlynn, B. L., Harman, C. J.,
Gupta, H. V., Kumar, P., Rao, P. S. C., Basu, N. B., and Wilson, J. S.: The
future of hydrology: An evolving science for a changing world, Water Resour.
Res., 46, 1–10, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009WR008906, 2010.
Wagener, T., Kelleher, C., Weiler, M., McGlynn, B., Gooseff, M., Marshall,
L., Meixner, T., McGuire, K., Gregg, S., Sharma, P., and Zappe, S.: It takes
a community to raise a hydrologist: the Modular Curriculum for Hydrologic
Advancement (MOCHA), Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 3405–3418,
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-3405-2012, 2012.
Wahr, J.: Time-variable gravity from GRACE: First results, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 31, L11501, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL019779, 2004.
Wahr, J., Swenson, S., and Velicogna, I.: Accuracy of GRACE mass estimates,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L06401, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL025305, 2006.
Wang, H., Skau, E., Krim, H., and Cervone, G.: Fusing Heterogeneous Data: A
Case for Remote Sensing and Social Media, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 1–13, https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2018.2846199, 2018.
WaterML2: WaterML2, A global standard for hydrological time series, available
at: http://www.waterml2.org/, last access: 23 August 2018.
Xiong, W., Droppo, J., Huang, X., Seide, F., Seltzer, M., Stolcke, A., Yu, D., and Zweig, G.: Achieving Human Parity in Conversational Speech Recognition,
Microsoft Res. Tech. Rep. MSR-TR-2016-71. arXiv1610.05256, available at: http://arxiv.org/abs/1610.05256 (last access: 24 March 2018), 2016.
Yosinski, J., Clune, J., Nguyen, A., Fuchs, T., and Lipson, H.: Understanding
Neural Networks Through Deep Visualization, in Deep Learning Workshop, 31 st
International Conference on Machine Learning, Lille, France, available at:
http://arxiv.org/abs/1506.06579 (last access: 19 November 2017), 2015.
Yu, K.-H., Zhang, C., Berry, G. J., Altman, R. B., Ré, C., Rubin, D. L., and Snyder, M.: Predicting non-small cell lung cancer prognosis by fully
automated microscopic pathology image features, Nat. Commun., 7, 12474,
https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms12474, 2016.
Zen, H. and Sak, H.: Unidirectional long short-term memory recurrent neural
network with recurrent output layer for low-latency speech synthesis, 2015
IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing
(ICASSP), 4470–4474, 2015.
Zhang, D., Lindholm, G., and Ratnaweera, H.: Use long short-term memory to
enhance Internet of Things for combined sewer overflow monitoring, J.
Hydrol., 556, 409–418, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JHYDROL.2017.11.018, 2018.
Zhu, X. X., Tuia, D., Mou, L., Xia, G.-S., Zhang, L., Xu, F., and Fraundorfer, F.:
Deep Learning in Remote Sensing: A Comprehensive Review and List of Resources, IEEE Geosci.
Remote Sens. Mag., 5, 8–36, https://doi.org/10.1109/MGRS.2017.2762307, 2017.
Short summary
Recently, deep learning (DL) has emerged as a revolutionary tool for transforming industries and scientific disciplines. We argue that DL can offer a complementary avenue toward advancing hydrology. New methods are being developed to interpret the knowledge learned by deep networks. We argue that open competitions, integrating DL and process-based models, more data sharing, data collection from citizen scientists, and improved education will be needed to incubate advances in hydrology.
Recently, deep learning (DL) has emerged as a revolutionary tool for transforming industries and...
Special issue