The manuscript addresses a relevant topic and especially for this Special Issue the model improvement with satellite data is very valuable. Yet, as also stated by the reviewers, the manuscript needs further improvement. Please address all improvements addressed in your response to the reviewers and pay specific attention to hte following:

1. Improve the English

2. Clearly address the novelty of the research and make sure you link this to other international research and model developments on this topic. The fact that your model has been improved with the specific properties and has been applied for the basin for the first time does not say that it is scientifically novel. Pay more attention to the discussion of the differences, advantages and similarities of your model from the models referenced in the Introduction.

3. Address the model and parameter uncertainty, see the comments of reviewer 2 and pay specific attention to the model calibration and please increase the number of flood events considered. Look for a way to present the relevant statistics efficiently.

4. Make sure the presentation and discussion of results is in the right order.

5. Consider presenting results of the model performance for one of the upstream sub-basins where the influence of Karst highly dominates the runoff processes.

The shape of the basins as presented in Figure 2 and 3 deviate significantly from the shape as presented in Figure 1. Please consider re-scaling