Articles | Volume 23, issue 5
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-2225-2019
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-2225-2019
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Research article
| 
07 May 2019
Research article |
| 07 May 2019
| 07 May 2019
Process-based flood frequency analysis in an agricultural watershed exhibiting nonstationary flood seasonality
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of
Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA
Daniel B. Wright
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of
Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA
Zhihua Zhu
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Department of Water
Resources and Environment, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510275, China
Cassia Smith
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Carnegie Mellon
University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA
Kathleen D. Holman
Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation, Denver, CO 80225, USA
Related authors
No articles found.
Yuan Liu and Daniel B. Wright
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 5241–5267, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5241-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5241-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We present a new approach to estimate extreme rainfall probability and severity using the atmospheric water balance, where precipitation is the sum of water vapor components moving in and out of a storm. We apply our method to the Mississippi Basin and its five major subbasins. Our approach achieves a good fit to reference precipitation, indicating that the rainfall probability estimation can benefit from additional information from physical processes that control rainfall.
Andrew J. Newman, Amanda G. Stone, Manabendra Saharia, Kathleen D. Holman, Nans Addor, and Martyn P. Clark
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 5603–5621, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5603-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5603-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
This study assesses methods that estimate flood return periods to identify when we would obtain a large flood return estimate change if the method or input data were changed (sensitivities). We include an examination of multiple flood-generating models, which is a novel addition to the flood estimation literature. We highlight the need to select appropriate flood models for the study watershed. These results will help operational water agencies develop more robust risk assessments.
Zhengzheng Zhou, James A. Smith, Mary Lynn Baeck, Daniel B. Wright, Brianne K. Smith, and Shuguang Liu
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 4701–4717, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-4701-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-4701-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The role of rainfall space–time structure in flood response is an important research issue in urban hydrology. This study contributes to this understanding in small urban watersheds. Combining stochastically based rainfall scenarios with a hydrological model, the results show the complexities of flood response for various return periods, implying the common assumptions of spatially uniform rainfall in urban flood frequency are problematic, even for relatively small basin scales.
Related subject area
Subject: Catchment hydrology | Techniques and Approaches: Modelling approaches
Machine-learning- and deep-learning-based streamflow prediction in a hilly catchment for future scenarios using CMIP6 GCM data
River hydraulic modeling with ICESat-2 land and water surface elevation
Hydrological modeling using the Soil and Water Assessment Tool in urban and peri-urban environments: the case of Kifisos experimental subbasin (Athens, Greece)
Technical note: How physically based is hydrograph separation by recursive digital filtering?
A comprehensive open-source course for teaching applied hydrological modelling in Central Asia
Impact of distributed meteorological forcing on simulated snow cover and hydrological fluxes over a mid-elevation alpine micro-scale catchment
Technical note: Extending the SWAT model to transport chemicals through tile and groundwater flow
Long-term reconstruction of satellite-based precipitation, soil moisture, and snow water equivalent in China
Disentangling scatter in long-term concentration–discharge relationships: the role of event types
Simulating the hydrological impacts of land use conversion from annual crop to perennial forage in the Canadian Prairies using the Cold Regions Hydrological Modelling platform
How can we benefit from regime information to make more effective use of long short-term memory (LSTM) runoff models?
On the value of satellite remote sensing to reduce uncertainties of regional simulations of the Colorado River
Assessing runoff sensitivity of North American Prairie Pothole Region basins to wetland drainage using a basin classification-based virtual modelling approach
A large-sample investigation into uncertain climate change impacts on high flows across Great Britain
Effects of passive-storage conceptualization on modeling hydrological function and isotope dynamics in the flow system of a cockpit karst landscape
Technical note: Data assimilation and autoregression for using near-real-time streamflow observations in long short-term memory networks
Attribution of climate change and human activities to streamflow variations with a posterior distribution of hydrological simulations
A time-varying distributed unit hydrograph method considering soil moisture
Hydrological response to climate change and human activities in the Three-River Source Region
Flood patterns in a catchment with mixed bedrock geology and a hilly landscape: identification of flashy runoff contributions during storm events
A graph neural network (GNN) approach to basin-scale river network learning: the role of physics-based connectivity and data fusion
Improving hydrologic models for predictions and process understanding using neural ODEs
Response of active catchment water storage capacity to a prolonged meteorological drought and asymptotic climate variation
HESS Opinions: Participatory Digital eARth Twin Hydrology systems (DARTHs) for everyone – a blueprint for hydrologists
Development of a national 7-day ensemble streamflow forecasting service for Australia
Future snow changes and their impact on the upstream runoff in Salween
Technical note: Do different projections matter for the Budyko framework?
Representation of seasonal land use dynamics in SWAT+ for improved assessment of blue and green water consumption
Large-sample assessment of varying spatial resolution on the streamflow estimates of the wflow_sbm hydrological model
An algorithm for deriving the topology of belowground urban stormwater networks
Assessing the influence of water sampling strategy on the performance of tracer-aided hydrological modeling in a mountainous basin on the Tibetan Plateau
Flood forecasting with machine learning models in an operational framework
Precipitation fate and transport in a Mediterranean catchment through models calibrated on plant and stream water isotope data
High-resolution satellite products improve hydrological modeling in northern Italy
Analysis of high streamflow extremes in climate change studies: how do we calibrate hydrological models?
A conceptual-model-based sediment connectivity assessment for patchy agricultural catchments
The Great Lakes Runoff Intercomparison Project Phase 4: the Great Lakes (GRIP-GL)
Spatial extrapolation of stream thermal peaks using heterogeneous time series at a national scale
Revisiting parameter sensitivities in the variable infiltration capacity model across a hydroclimatic gradient
Deep learning rainfall–runoff predictions of extreme events
Diel streamflow cycles suggest more sensitive snowmelt-driven streamflow to climate change than land surface modeling does
Teaching hydrological modelling: illustrating model structure uncertainty with a ready-to-use computational exercise
Effects of spatial and temporal variability in surface water inputs on streamflow generation and cessation in the rain–snow transition zone
Quantifying multi-year hydrological memory with Catchment Forgetting Curves
On constraining a lumped hydrological model with both piezometry and streamflow: results of a large sample evaluation
Influences of land use changes on the dynamics of water quantity and quality in the German lowland catchment of the Stör
Impact of spatial distribution information of rainfall in runoff simulation using deep learning method
Towards effective drought monitoring in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region: implications from assimilating leaf area index and soil moisture into the Noah-MP land surface model for Morocco
The effects of spatial and temporal resolution of gridded meteorological forcing on watershed hydrological responses
Hydrological response of a peri-urban catchment exploiting conventional and unconventional rainfall observations: the case study of Lambro Catchment
Dharmaveer Singh, Manu Vardhan, Rakesh Sahu, Debrupa Chatterjee, Pankaj Chauhan, and Shiyin Liu
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 1047–1075, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1047-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1047-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This study examines, for the first time, the potential of various machine learning models in streamflow prediction over the Sutlej River basin (rainfall-dominated zone) in western Himalaya during the period 2041–2070 (2050s) and 2071–2100 (2080s) and its relationship to climate variability. The mean ensemble of the model results shows that the mean annual streamflow of the Sutlej River is expected to rise between the 2050s and 2080s by 0.79 to 1.43 % for SSP585 and by 0.87 to 1.10 % for SSP245.
Monica Coppo Frias, Suxia Liu, Xingguo Mo, Karina Nielsen, Heidi Ranndal, Liguang Jiang, Jun Ma, and Peter Bauer-Gottwein
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 1011–1032, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1011-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1011-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This paper uses remote sensing data from ICESat-2 to calibrate a 1D hydraulic model. With the model, we can make estimations of discharge and water surface elevation, which are important indicators in flooding risk assessment. ICESat-2 data give an added value, thanks to the 0.7 m resolution, which allows the measurement of narrow river streams. In addition, ICESat-2 provides measurements on the river dry portion geometry that can be included in the model.
Evgenia Koltsida, Nikos Mamassis, and Andreas Kallioras
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 917–931, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-917-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-917-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Daily and hourly rainfall observations were inputted to a Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) hydrological model to investigate the impacts of rainfall temporal resolution on a discharge simulation. Results indicated that groundwater flow parameters were more sensitive to daily time intervals, and channel routing parameters were more influential for hourly time intervals. This study suggests that the SWAT model appears to be a reliable tool to predict discharge in a mixed-land-use basin.
Klaus Eckhardt
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 495–499, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-495-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-495-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
An important hydrological issue is to identify components of streamflow that react to precipitation with different degrees of attenuation and delay. From the multitude of methods that have been developed for this so-called hydrograph separation, a specific, frequently used one is singled out here. It is shown to be derived from plausible physical principles. This increases confidence in its results.
Beatrice Sabine Marti, Aidar Zhumabaev, and Tobias Siegfried
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 319–330, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-319-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-319-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Numerical modelling is often used for climate impact studies in water resources management. It is, however, not yet highly accessible to many students of hydrology in Central Asia. One big hurdle for new learners is the preparation of relevant data prior to the actual modelling. We present a robust, open-source workflow and comprehensive teaching material that can be used by teachers and by students for self study.
Aniket Gupta, Alix Reverdy, Jean-Martial Cohard, Basile Hector, Marc Descloitres, Jean-Pierre Vandervaere, Catherine Coulaud, Romain Biron, Lucie Liger, Reed Maxwell, Jean-Gabriel Valay, and Didier Voisin
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 191–212, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-191-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-191-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Patchy snow cover during spring impacts mountainous ecosystems on a large range of spatio-temporal scales. A hydrological model simulated such snow patchiness at 10 m resolution. Slope and orientation controls precipitation, radiation, and wind generate differences in snowmelt, subsurface storage, streamflow, and evapotranspiration. The snow patchiness increases the duration of the snowmelt to stream and subsurface storage, which sustains the plants and streamflow later in the summer.
Hendrik Rathjens, Jens Kiesel, Michael Winchell, Jeffrey Arnold, and Robin Sur
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 159–167, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-159-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-159-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The SWAT model can simulate the transport of water-soluble chemicals through the landscape but neglects the transport through groundwater or agricultural tile drains. These transport pathways are, however, important to assess the amount of chemicals in streams. We added this capability to the model, which significantly improved the simulation. The representation of all transport pathways in the model enables watershed managers to develop robust strategies for reducing chemicals in streams.
Wencong Yang, Hanbo Yang, Changming Li, Taihua Wang, Ziwei Liu, Qingfang Hu, and Dawen Yang
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 6427–6441, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-6427-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-6427-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We produced a daily 0.1° dataset of precipitation, soil moisture, and snow water equivalent in 1981–2017 across China via reconstructions. The dataset used global background data and local on-site data as forcing input and satellite-based data as reconstruction benchmarks. This long-term high-resolution national hydrological dataset is valuable for national investigations of hydrological processes.
Felipe A. Saavedra, Andreas Musolff, Jana von Freyberg, Ralf Merz, Stefano Basso, and Larisa Tarasova
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 6227–6245, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-6227-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-6227-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Nitrate contamination of rivers from agricultural sources is a challenge for water quality management. During runoff events, different transport paths within the catchment might be activated, generating a variety of responses in nitrate concentration in stream water. Using nitrate samples from 184 German catchments and a runoff event classification, we show that hydrologic connectivity during runoff events is a key control of nitrate transport from catchments to streams in our study domain.
Marcos R. C. Cordeiro, Kang Liang, Henry F. Wilson, Jason Vanrobaeys, David A. Lobb, Xing Fang, and John W. Pomeroy
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 5917–5931, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5917-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5917-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
This study addresses the issue of increasing interest in the hydrological impacts of converting cropland to perennial forage cover in the Canadian Prairies. By developing customized models using the Cold Regions Hydrological Modelling (CRHM) platform, this long-term (1992–2013) modelling study is expected to provide stakeholders with science-based information regarding the hydrological impacts of land use conversion from annual crop to perennial forage cover in the Canadian Prairies.
Reyhaneh Hashemi, Pierre Brigode, Pierre-André Garambois, and Pierre Javelle
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 5793–5816, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5793-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5793-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Hydrologists have long dreamed of a tool that could adequately predict runoff in catchments. Data-driven long short-term memory (LSTM) models appear very promising to the hydrology community in this respect. Here, we have sought to benefit from traditional practices in hydrology to improve the effectiveness of LSTM models. We discovered that one LSTM parameter has a hydrologic interpretation and that there is a need to increase the data and to tune two parameters, thereby improving predictions.
Mu Xiao, Giuseppe Mascaro, Zhaocheng Wang, Kristen M. Whitney, and Enrique R. Vivoni
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 5627–5646, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5627-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5627-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
As the major water resource in the southwestern United States, the Colorado River is experiencing decreases in naturalized streamflow and is predicted to face severe challenges under future climate scenarios. Here, we demonstrate the value of Earth observing satellites to improve and build confidence in the spatiotemporal simulations from regional hydrologic models for assessing the sensitivity of the Colorado River to climate change and supporting regional water managers.
Christopher Spence, Zhihua He, Kevin R. Shook, John W. Pomeroy, Colin J. Whitfield, and Jared D. Wolfe
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 5555–5575, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5555-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5555-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We learnt how streamflow from small creeks could be altered by wetland removal in the Canadian Prairies, where this practice is pervasive. Every creek basin in the region was placed into one of seven groups. We selected one of these groups and used its traits to simulate streamflow. The model worked well enough so that we could trust the results even if we removed the wetlands. Wetland removal did not change low flow amounts very much, but it doubled high flow and tripled average flow.
Rosanna A. Lane, Gemma Coxon, Jim Freer, Jan Seibert, and Thorsten Wagener
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 5535–5554, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5535-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5535-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
This study modelled the impact of climate change on river high flows across Great Britain (GB). Generally, results indicated an increase in the magnitude and frequency of high flows along the west coast of GB by 2050–2075. In contrast, average flows decreased across GB. All flow projections contained large uncertainties; the climate projections were the largest source of uncertainty overall but hydrological modelling uncertainties were considerable in some regions.
Guangxuan Li, Xi Chen, Zhicai Zhang, Lichun Wang, and Chris Soulsby
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 5515–5534, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5515-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5515-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We developed a coupled flow–tracer model to understand the effects of passive storage on modeling hydrological function and isotope dynamics in a karst flow system. Models with passive storages show improvement in matching isotope dynamics performance, and the improved performance also strongly depends on the number and location of passive storages. Our results also suggested that the solute transport is primarily controlled by advection and hydrodynamic dispersion in the steep hillslope unit.
Grey S. Nearing, Daniel Klotz, Jonathan M. Frame, Martin Gauch, Oren Gilon, Frederik Kratzert, Alden Keefe Sampson, Guy Shalev, and Sella Nevo
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 5493–5513, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5493-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5493-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
When designing flood forecasting models, it is necessary to use all available data to achieve the most accurate predictions possible. This manuscript explores two basic ways of ingesting near-real-time streamflow data into machine learning streamflow models. The point we want to make is that when working in the context of machine learning (instead of traditional hydrology models that are based on
bio-geophysics), it is not necessary to use complex statistical methods for injecting sparse data.
Xiongpeng Tang, Guobin Fu, Silong Zhang, Chao Gao, Guoqing Wang, Zhenxin Bao, Yanli Liu, Cuishan Liu, and Junliang Jin
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 5315–5339, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5315-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5315-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
In this study, we proposed a new framework that considered the uncertainties of model simulations in quantifying the contribution rate of climate change and human activities to streamflow changes. Then, the Lancang River basin was selected for the case study. The results of quantitative analysis using the new framework showed that the reason for the decrease in the streamflow at Yunjinghong station was mainly human activities.
Bin Yi, Lu Chen, Hansong Zhang, Vijay P. Singh, Ping Jiang, Yizhuo Liu, Hexiang Guo, and Hongya Qiu
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 5269–5289, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5269-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5269-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
An improved GIS-derived distributed unit hydrograph routing method considering time-varying soil moisture was proposed for flow routing. The method considered the changes of time-varying soil moisture and rainfall intensity. The response of underlying surface to the soil moisture content was considered an important factor in this study. The SUH, DUH, TDUH and proposed routing methods (TDUH-MC) were used for flood forecasts, and the simulated results were compared and discussed.
Ting Su, Chiyuan Miao, Qingyun Duan, Jiaojiao Gou, Xiaoying Guo, and Xi Zhao
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2022-355, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2022-355, 2022
Revised manuscript accepted for HESS
Short summary
Short summary
Three-River Source Region (TRSR) plays an extremely important role in water resources security and ecological and environmental protection in China and even all of Southeast Asia. This study used the variable infiltration capacity (VIC) land surface hydrologic model linked with the degree-day factor algorithm to simulate the runoff change in the TRSR. These results will help to guide current and future regulation and management of water resources in the TRSR.
Audrey Douinot, Jean François Iffly, Cyrille Tailliez, Claude Meisch, and Laurent Pfister
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 5185–5206, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5185-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5185-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The objective of the paper is to highlight the seasonal and singular shift of the transfer time distributions of two catchments (≅10 km2).
Based on 2 years of rainfall and discharge observations, we compare variations in the properties of TTDs with the physiographic characteristics of catchment areas and the eco-hydrological cycle. The paper eventually aims to deduce several factors conducive to particularly rapid and concentrated water transfers, which leads to flash floods.
Alexander Y. Sun, Peishi Jiang, Zong-Liang Yang, Yangxinyu Xie, and Xingyuan Chen
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 5163–5184, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5163-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5163-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
High-resolution river modeling is of great interest to local governments and stakeholders for flood-hazard mitigation. This work presents a physics-guided, machine learning (ML) framework for combining the strengths of high-resolution process-based river network models with a graph-based ML model capable of modeling spatiotemporal processes. Results show that the ML model can approximate the dynamics of the process model with high fidelity, and data fusion further improves the forecasting skill.
Marvin Höge, Andreas Scheidegger, Marco Baity-Jesi, Carlo Albert, and Fabrizio Fenicia
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 5085–5102, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5085-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5085-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Neural ODEs fuse physics-based models with deep learning: neural networks substitute terms in differential equations that represent the mechanistic structure of the system. The approach combines the flexibility of machine learning with physical constraints for inter- and extrapolation. We demonstrate that neural ODE models achieve state-of-the-art predictive performance while keeping full interpretability of model states and processes in hydrologic modelling over multiple catchments.
Jing Tian, Zhengke Pan, Shenglian Guo, Jiabo Yin, Yanlai Zhou, and Jun Wang
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 4853–4874, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-4853-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-4853-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Most of the literature has focused on the runoff response to climate change, while neglecting the impacts of the potential variation in the active catchment water storage capacity (ACWSC) that plays an essential role in the transfer of climate inputs to the catchment runoff. This study aims to systematically identify the response of the ACWSC to a long-term meteorological drought and asymptotic climate change.
Riccardo Rigon, Giuseppe Formetta, Marialaura Bancheri, Niccolò Tubini, Concetta D'Amato, Olaf David, and Christian Massari
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 4773–4800, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-4773-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-4773-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The
Digital Earth(DE) metaphor is very useful for both end users and hydrological modelers. We analyse different categories of models, with the view of making them part of a Digital eARth Twin Hydrology system (called DARTH). We also stress the idea that DARTHs are not models in and of themselves, rather they need to be built on an appropriate information technology infrastructure. It is remarked that DARTHs have to, by construction, support the open-science movement and its ideas.
Hapu Arachchige Prasantha Hapuarachchi, Mohammed Abdul Bari, Aynul Kabir, Mohammad Mahadi Hasan, Fitsum Markos Woldemeskel, Nilantha Gamage, Patrick Daniel Sunter, Xiaoyong Sophie Zhang, David Ewen Robertson, James Clement Bennett, and Paul Martinus Feikema
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 4801–4821, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-4801-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-4801-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Methodology for developing an operational 7-day ensemble streamflow forecasting service for Australia is presented. The methodology is tested for 100 catchments to learn the characteristics of different NWP rainfall forecasts, the effect of post-processing, and the optimal ensemble size and bootstrapping parameters. Forecasts are generated using NWP rainfall products post-processed by the CHyPP model, the GR4H hydrologic model, and the ERRIS streamflow post-processor inbuilt in the SWIFT package
Chenhao Chai, Lei Wang, Deliang Chen, Jing Zhou, Hu Liu, Jingtian Zhang, Yuanwei Wang, Tao Chen, and Ruishun Liu
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 4657–4683, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-4657-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-4657-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
This work quantifies future snow changes and their impacts on hydrology in the upper Salween River (USR) under SSP126 and SSP585 using a cryosphere–hydrology model. Future warm–wet climate is not conducive to the development of snow. The rain–snow-dominated pattern of runoff will shift to a rain-dominated pattern after the 2040s under SSP585 but is unchanged under SSP126. The findings improve our understanding of cryosphere–hydrology processes and can assist water resource management in the USR.
Remko C. Nijzink and Stanislaus J. Schymanski
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 4575–4585, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-4575-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-4575-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Most catchments plot close to the empirical Budyko curve, which allows for the estimation of the long-term mean annual evaporation and runoff. The Budyko curve can be defined as a function of a wetness index or a dryness index. We found that differences can occur and that there is an uncertainty due to the different formulations.
Anna Msigwa, Celray James Chawanda, Hans C. Komakech, Albert Nkwasa, and Ann van Griensven
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 4447–4468, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-4447-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-4447-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Studies using agro-hydrological models, like the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT), to map evapotranspiration (ET) do not account for cropping seasons. A comparison between the default SWAT+ set-up (with static land use representation) and a dynamic SWAT+ model set-up (with seasonal land use representation) is made by spatial mapping of the ET. The results show that ET with seasonal representation is closer to remote sensing estimates, giving better performance than ET with static land use.
Jerom P. M. Aerts, Rolf W. Hut, Nick C. van de Giesen, Niels Drost, Willem J. van Verseveld, Albrecht H. Weerts, and Pieter Hazenberg
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 4407–4430, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-4407-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-4407-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
In recent years gridded hydrological modelling moved into the realm of hyper-resolution modelling (<10 km). In this study, we investigate the effect of varying grid-cell sizes for the wflow_sbm hydrological model. We used a large sample of basins from the CAMELS data set to test the effect that varying grid-cell sizes has on the simulation of streamflow at the basin outlet. Results show that there is no single best grid-cell size for modelling streamflow throughout the domain.
Taher Chegini and Hong-Yi Li
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 4279–4300, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-4279-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-4279-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Belowground urban stormwater networks (BUSNs) play a critical and irreplaceable role in preventing or mitigating urban floods. However, they are often not available for urban flood modeling at regional or larger scales. We develop a novel algorithm to estimate existing BUSNs using ubiquitously available aboveground data at large scales based on graph theory. The algorithm has been validated in different urban areas; thus, it is well transferable.
Yi Nan, Zhihua He, Fuqiang Tian, Zhongwang Wei, and Lide Tian
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 4147–4167, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-4147-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-4147-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Tracer-aided hydrological models are useful tool to reduce uncertainty of hydrological modeling in cold basins, but there is little guidance on the sampling strategy for isotope analysis, which is important for large mountainous basins. This study evaluated the reliance of the tracer-aided modeling performance on the availability of isotope data in the Yarlung Tsangpo river basin, and provides implications for collecting water isotope data for running tracer-aided hydrological models.
Sella Nevo, Efrat Morin, Adi Gerzi Rosenthal, Asher Metzger, Chen Barshai, Dana Weitzner, Dafi Voloshin, Frederik Kratzert, Gal Elidan, Gideon Dror, Gregory Begelman, Grey Nearing, Guy Shalev, Hila Noga, Ira Shavitt, Liora Yuklea, Moriah Royz, Niv Giladi, Nofar Peled Levi, Ofir Reich, Oren Gilon, Ronnie Maor, Shahar Timnat, Tal Shechter, Vladimir Anisimov, Yotam Gigi, Yuval Levin, Zach Moshe, Zvika Ben-Haim, Avinatan Hassidim, and Yossi Matias
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 4013–4032, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-4013-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-4013-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Early flood warnings are one of the most effective tools to save lives and goods. Machine learning (ML) models can improve flood prediction accuracy but their use in operational frameworks is limited. The paper presents a flood warning system, operational in India and Bangladesh, that uses ML models for forecasting river stage and flood inundation maps and discusses the models' performances. In 2021, more than 100 million flood alerts were sent to people near rivers over an area of 470 000 km2.
Matthias Sprenger, Pilar Llorens, Francesc Gallart, Paolo Benettin, Scott T. Allen, and Jérôme Latron
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 4093–4107, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-4093-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-4093-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Our catchment-scale transit time modeling study shows that including stable isotope data on evapotranspiration in addition to the commonly used stream water isotopes helps constrain the model parametrization and reveals that the water taken up by plants has resided longer in the catchment storage than the water leaving the catchment as stream discharge. This finding is important for our understanding of how water is stored and released, which impacts the water availability for plants and humans.
Lorenzo Alfieri, Francesco Avanzi, Fabio Delogu, Simone Gabellani, Giulia Bruno, Lorenzo Campo, Andrea Libertino, Christian Massari, Angelica Tarpanelli, Dominik Rains, Diego G. Miralles, Raphael Quast, Mariette Vreugdenhil, Huan Wu, and Luca Brocca
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 3921–3939, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-3921-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-3921-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
This work shows advances in high-resolution satellite data for hydrology. We performed hydrological simulations for the Po River basin using various satellite products, including precipitation, evaporation, soil moisture, and snow depth. Evaporation and snow depth improved a simulation based on high-quality ground observations. Interestingly, a model calibration relying on satellite data skillfully reproduces observed discharges, paving the way to satellite-driven hydrological applications.
Bruno Majone, Diego Avesani, Patrick Zulian, Aldo Fiori, and Alberto Bellin
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 3863–3883, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-3863-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-3863-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
In this work, we introduce a methodology for devising reliable future high streamflow scenarios from climate change simulations. The calibration of a hydrological model is carried out to maximize the probability that the modeled and observed high flow extremes belong to the same statistical population. Application to the Adige River catchment (southeastern Alps, Italy) showed that this procedure produces reliable quantiles of the annual maximum streamflow for use in assessment studies.
Pedro V. G. Batista, Peter Fiener, Simon Scheper, and Christine Alewell
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 3753–3770, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-3753-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-3753-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Patchy agricultural landscapes have a large number of small fields, which are separated by linear features such as roads and field borders. When eroded sediments are transported out of the agricultural fields by surface runoff, these features can influence sediment connectivity. By use of measured data and a simulation model, we demonstrate how a dense road network (and its drainage system) facilitates sediment transport from fields to water courses in a patchy Swiss agricultural catchment.
Juliane Mai, Hongren Shen, Bryan A. Tolson, Étienne Gaborit, Richard Arsenault, James R. Craig, Vincent Fortin, Lauren M. Fry, Martin Gauch, Daniel Klotz, Frederik Kratzert, Nicole O'Brien, Daniel G. Princz, Sinan Rasiya Koya, Tirthankar Roy, Frank Seglenieks, Narayan K. Shrestha, André G. T. Temgoua, Vincent Vionnet, and Jonathan W. Waddell
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 3537–3572, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-3537-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-3537-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Model intercomparison studies are carried out to test various models and compare the quality of their outputs over the same domain. In this study, 13 diverse model setups using the same input data are evaluated over the Great Lakes region. Various model outputs – such as streamflow, evaporation, soil moisture, and amount of snow on the ground – are compared using standardized methods and metrics. The basin-wise model outputs and observations are made available through an interactive website.
Aurélien Beaufort, Jacob S. Diamond, Eric Sauquet, and Florentina Moatar
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 3477–3495, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-3477-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-3477-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We developed one of the largest stream temperature databases to calculate a simple, ecologically relevant metric – the thermal peak – that captures the magnitude of summer thermal extremes. Using statistical models, we extrapolated the thermal peak to nearly every stream in France, finding the hottest thermal peaks along large rivers without forested riparian zones and groundwater inputs. Air temperature was a poor proxy for the thermal peak, highlighting the need to grow monitoring networks.
Ulises M. Sepúlveda, Pablo A. Mendoza, Naoki Mizukami, and Andrew J. Newman
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 3419–3445, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-3419-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-3419-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
This paper characterizes parameter sensitivities across more than 5500 grid cells for a commonly used macroscale hydrological model, including a suite of eight performance metrics and 43 soil, vegetation and snow parameters. The results show that the model is highly overparameterized and, more importantly, help to provide guidance on the most relevant parameters for specific target processes across diverse climatic types.
Jonathan M. Frame, Frederik Kratzert, Daniel Klotz, Martin Gauch, Guy Shalev, Oren Gilon, Logan M. Qualls, Hoshin V. Gupta, and Grey S. Nearing
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 3377–3392, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-3377-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-3377-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The most accurate rainfall–runoff predictions are currently based on deep learning. There is a concern among hydrologists that deep learning models may not be reliable in extrapolation or for predicting extreme events. This study tests that hypothesis. The deep learning models remained relatively accurate in predicting extreme events compared with traditional models, even when extreme events were not included in the training set.
Sebastian A. Krogh, Lucia Scaff, James W. Kirchner, Beatrice Gordon, Gary Sterle, and Adrian Harpold
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 3393–3417, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-3393-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-3393-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We present a new way to detect snowmelt using daily cycles in streamflow driven by solar radiation. Results show that warmer sites have earlier and more intermittent snowmelt than colder sites, and the timing of early snowmelt events is strongly correlated with the timing of streamflow volume. A space-for-time substitution shows greater sensitivity of streamflow timing to climate change in colder rather than in warmer places, which is then contrasted with land surface simulations.
Wouter J. M. Knoben and Diana Spieler
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 3299–3314, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-3299-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-3299-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
This paper introduces educational materials that can be used to teach students about model structure uncertainty in hydrological modelling. There are many different hydrological models and differences between these models impact their usefulness in different places. Such models are often used to support decision making about water resources and to perform hydrological science, and it is thus important for students to understand that model choice matters.
Leonie Kiewiet, Ernesto Trujillo, Andrew Hedrick, Scott Havens, Katherine Hale, Mark Seyfried, Stephanie Kampf, and Sarah E. Godsey
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 2779–2796, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2779-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2779-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Climate change affects precipitation phase, which can propagate into changes in streamflow timing and magnitude. This study examines how variations in rainfall and snowmelt affect discharge. We found that annual discharge and stream cessation depended on the magnitude and timing of rainfall and snowmelt and on the snowpack melt-out date. This highlights the importance of precipitation timing and emphasizes the need for spatiotemporally distributed simulations of snowpack and rainfall dynamics.
Alban de Lavenne, Vazken Andréassian, Louise Crochemore, Göran Lindström, and Berit Arheimer
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 2715–2732, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2715-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2715-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
A watershed remembers the past to some extent, and this memory influences its behavior. This memory is defined by the ability to store past rainfall for several years. By releasing this water into the river or the atmosphere, it tends to forget. We describe how this memory fades over time in France and Sweden. A few watersheds show a multi-year memory. It increases with the influence of groundwater or dry conditions. After 3 or 4 years, they behave independently of the past.
Antoine Pelletier and Vazken Andréassian
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 2733–2758, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2733-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2733-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
A large part of the water cycle takes place underground. In many places, the soil stores water during the wet periods and can release it all year long, which is particularly visible when the river level is low. Modelling tools that are used to simulate and forecast the behaviour of the river struggle to represent this. We improved an existing model to take underground water into account using measurements of the soil water content. Results allow us make recommendations for model users.
Chaogui Lei, Paul D. Wagner, and Nicola Fohrer
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 2561–2582, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2561-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2561-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We presented an integrated approach to hydrologic modeling and partial least squares regression quantifying land use change impacts on water and nutrient balance over 3 decades. Results highlight that most variations (70 %–80 %) in water quantity and quality variables are explained by changes in land use class-specific areas and landscape metrics. Arable land influences water quantity and quality the most. The study provides insights on water resources management in rural lowland catchments.
Yang Wang and Hassan A. Karimi
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 2387–2403, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2387-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2387-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We found that rainfall data with spatial information can improve the model's performance, especially when simulating the future multi-day discharges. We did not observe that regional LSTM as a regional model achieved better results than LSTM as individual model. This conclusion applies to both one-day and multi-day simulations. However, we found that using spatially distributed rainfall data can reduce the difference between individual LSTM and regional LSTM.
Wanshu Nie, Sujay V. Kumar, Kristi R. Arsenault, Christa D. Peters-Lidard, Iliana E. Mladenova, Karim Bergaoui, Abheera Hazra, Benjamin F. Zaitchik, Sarith P. Mahanama, Rachael McDonnell, David M. Mocko, and Mahdi Navari
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 2365–2386, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2365-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2365-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The MENA (Middle East and North Africa) region faces significant food and water insecurity and hydrological hazards. Here we investigate the value of assimilating remote sensing data sets into an Earth system model to help build an effective drought monitoring system and support risk mitigation and management by countries in the region. We highlight incorporating satellite-informed vegetation conditions into the model as being one of the key processes for a successful application for the region.
Pin Shuai, Xingyuan Chen, Utkarsh Mital, Ethan T. Coon, and Dipankar Dwivedi
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 2245–2276, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2245-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2245-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Using an integrated watershed model, we compared simulated watershed hydrologic variables driven by three publicly available gridded meteorological forcings (GMFs) at various spatial and temporal resolutions. Our results demonstrated that spatially distributed variables are sensitive to the spatial resolution of the GMF. The temporal resolution of the GMF impacts the dynamics of watershed responses. The choice of GMF depends on the quantity of interest and its spatial and temporal scales.
Greta Cazzaniga, Carlo De Michele, Michele D'Amico, Cristina Deidda, Antonio Ghezzi, and Roberto Nebuloni
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 2093–2111, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2093-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2093-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Rainfall estimates are usually obtained from rain gauges, weather radars, or satellites. An alternative is the measurement of the signal loss induced by rainfall on commercial microwave links (CMLs). In this work, we assess the hydrologic response of Lambro Basin when CML-retrieved rainfall is used as model input. CML estimates agree with rain gauge data. CML-driven discharge simulations show performance comparable to that from rain gauges if a CML-based calibration of the model is undertaken.
Cited articles
Alexander, G. N.: Using the probability of storm transposition for estimating
the frequency of rare floods, J. Hydrol., 1, 46–57, 1963.
Ayalew, T., Krajewski, W., and Mantilla, R.: Exploring the Effect of
Reservoir Storage on Peak Discharge Frequency, J. Hydrol. Eng., 18,
1697–1708, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000721, 2013.
Ayalew, T. B. and Krajewski, W. F.: Effect of River Network Geometry on Flood
Frequency: A Tale of Two Watersheds in Iowa, J. Hydrol. Eng., 22, 06017004,
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001544, 2017.
Ball, J., Babister, M., Nathan, R., Weeks, W., Weinmann, E., and Retallick,
M.: Australian Rainfall and Runoff: A Guide to Flood Estimation, edited by:
Testoni, I., Commonwealth of Australia (Geoscience Australia), 2016.
Bartles, M., Brunner, G., Fleming, M., Faber, B., and Slaughter, J.: HEC-SSP
Statistical Software Package Version 2.1, Computer Program Documentation, US
Army Corps of Engineers, Institute for Water Resources Hydrologic Engineering
Center (HEC), 609 Second Street Davis, CA 95616-4687, 2016.
Berghuijs, W. R., Woods, R. A., Hutton, C. J., and Sivapalan, M.: Dominant
flood generating mechanisms across the United States: Flood Mechanisms Across
the U.S., Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, 4382–4390, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL068070,
2016.
Bergström, S.: The HBV Model: Its Structure and Applications, Swedish
Meteorological and Hydrological Institute (SMHI), Hydrology, Norrköping,
1992.
Bergström, S.: The HBV model (Chapter 13), in: Computer Models of
Watershed Hydrology, edited by: Singh, V. P., 443–476, Water Resources
Publications, Highlands Ranch, Colorado, USA, 1995.
Beven, K.: Prophecy, reality and uncertainty in distributed hydrological
modelling, Adv. Water Resour., 16, 41–51, https://doi.org/10.1016/0309-1708(93)90028-E,
1993.
Beven, K. and Binley, A.: The future of distributed models: Model calibration
and uncertainty prediction, Hydrol. Process., 6, 279–298,
https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.3360060305, 1992.
Beven, K. and Binley, A.: GLUE: 20 years on: GLUE: 20 YEARS ON, Hydrol.
Process., 28, 5897–5918, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10082, 2014.
Blazkova, S. and Beven, K.: Flood frequency prediction for data limited
catchments in the Czech Republic using a stochastic rainfall model and
TOPMODEL, J. Hydrol., 195, 256–278, 1997.
Blazkova, S. and Beven, K.: Flood frequency estimation by continuous
simulation for a catchment treated as ungauged (with uncertainty), Water
Resour. Res., 38, 14-1–14-14, https://doi.org/10.1029/2001WR000500, 2002.
Blazkova, S. and Beven, K.: A limits of acceptability approach to model
evaluation and uncertainty estimation in flood frequency estimation by
continuous simulation: Skalka catchment, Czech Republic, Water Resour. Res.,
45, W00B16, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007WR006726, 2009.
Calver, A., Lamb, R., and Morris, S. E.: River flood frequency estimation
using continuous runoff modelling, Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng.-Water Marit. Energy,
136, 225–234, 1999.
Calver, A., Stewart, E., and Goodsell, G.: Comparative analysis of
statistical and catchment modelling approaches to river flood frequency
estimation: River flood frequency estimation, J. Flood Risk Manag., 2,
24–31, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-318X.2009.01018.x, 2009.
Cameron, D., Beven, K., and Tawn, J.: An evaluation of three stochastic
rainfall models, J. Hydrol., 228, 130–149,
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(00)00143-8, 2000.
Camici, S., Tarpanelli, A., Brocca, L., Melone, F., and Moramarco, T.: Design
soil moisture estimation by comparing continuous and storm-based
rainfall-runoff modeling: DESIGN SOIL MOISTURE ESTIMATION, Water Resour.
Res., 47, W05527, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010WR009298, 2011.
Ceola, S., Laio, F., and Montanari, A.: Satellite nighttime lights reveal
increasing human exposure to floods worldwide, Geophys. Res. Lett., 41,
7184–7190, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL061859, 2014.
Chen, H., Xu, C.-Y., and Guo, S.: Comparison and evaluation of multiple GCMs,
statistical downscaling and hydrological models in the study of climate
change impacts on runoff, J. Hydrol., 434–435, 36–45,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.02.040, 2012.
Chen, M., Shi, W., Xie, P., Silva, V. B. S., Kousky, V. E., Wayne Higgins,
R., and Janowiak, J. E.: Assessing objective techniques for gauge-based
analyses of global daily precipitation, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D04110,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009132, 2008.
Cheng, L., AghaKouchak, A., Gilleland, E., and Katz, R. W.: Non-stationary
extreme value analysis in a changing climate, Climatic Change, 127, 353–369,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-014-1254-5, 2014.
Clark, M. P., Nijssen, B., Lundquist, J. D., Kavetski, D., Rupp, D. E.,
Woods, R. A., Freer, J. E., Gutmann, E. D., Wood, A. W., Brekke, L. D.,
Arnold, J. R., Gochis, D. J., and Rasmussen, R. M.: A unified approach for
process-based hydrologic modeling: 1. Modeling concept: A unified approach
for process-based hydrologic modeling, Water Resour. Res., 51, 2498–2514,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR017198, 2015a.
Clark, M. P., Nijssen, B., Lundquist, J. D., Kavetski, D., Rupp, D. E.,
Woods, R. A., Freer, J. E., Gutmann, E. D., Wood, A. W., Gochis, D. J.,
Rasmussen, R. M., Tarboton, D. G., Mahat, V., Flerchinger, G. N., and Marks,
D. G.: A unified approach for process-based hydrologic modeling: 2. Model
implementation and case studies: A unified approach for process-based
hydrologic modeling, Water Resour. Res., 51, 2515–2542,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR017200, 2015b.
Crum, T. D. and Alberty, R. L.: The WSR-88D and the WSR-88D operational
support facility, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 74, 1669–1687, 1993.
Cudworth, A. G.: Flood hydrology manual, US Dept. of the Interior, Bureau of
Reclamation, Denver Office, 1989.
Cunha, L. K., Krajewski, W. F., Mantilla, R., and Cunha, L.: A framework for
flood risk assessment under nonstationary conditions or in the absence of
historical data, J. Flood Risk Manag., 4, 3–22,
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-318X.2010.01085.x, 2011.
Cunnane, C.: Unbiased plotting positions-a review, J. Hydrol., 37, 205–222,
1978.
Dawdy, D. R., Griffis, V. W., and Gupta, V. K.: Regional Flood-Frequency
Analysis: How We Got Here and Where We Are Going, J. Hydrol. Eng., 17,
953–959, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000584, 2012.
Douglas, E. M., Vogel, R. M., and Kroll, C. N.: Trends in floods and low
flows in the United States: impact of spatial correlation, J. Hydrol., 240,
90–105, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(00)00336-X, 2000.
Eagleson, P. S.: Dynamics of flood frequency, Water Resour. Res., 8,
878–898, https://doi.org/10.1029/WR008i004p00878, 1972.
El Adlouni, S., Ouarda, T. B. M. J., Zhang, X., Roy, R., and Bobée, B.:
Generalized maximum likelihood estimators for the nonstationary generalized
extreme value model, Water Resour. Res., 43, W03410,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2005WR004545, 2007.
Enfield, D. B., Mestas-Nuñez, A. M., and Trimble, P. J.: The Atlantic
Multidecadal Oscillation and its relation to rainfall and river flows in the
continental U.S., Geophys. Res. Lett., 28, 2077–2080,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2000GL012745, 2001.
England, J. F., Julien, P. Y., and Velleux, M. L.: Physically-based extreme
flood frequency with stochastic storm transposition and paleoflood data on
large watersheds, J. Hydrol., 510, 228–245,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.12.021, 2014.
Fontaine, T. A. and Potter, K. W.: Estimating probabilities of extreme
rainfalls, J. Hydraul. Eng., 115, 1562–1575, 1989.
Foufoula-Georgiou, E.: A probabilistic storm transposition approach for
estimating exceedance probabilities of extreme precipitation depths, Water
Resour. Res., 25, 799–815, 1989.
Franchini, M., Helmlinger, K. R., Foufoula-Georgiou, E., and Todini, E.:
Stochastic storm transposition coupled with rainfall – runoff modeling for
estimation of exceedance probabilities of design floods, J. Hydrol., 175,
511–532, 1996.
Franchini, M., Galeati, G., and Lolli, M.: Analytical derivation of the flood
frequency curve through partial duration series analysis and a probabilistic
representation of the runoff coefficient, J. Hydrol., 303, 1–15,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.07.008, 2005.
Franks, S. W. and Kuczera, G.: Flood frequency analysis: Evidence and
implications of secular climate variability, New South Wales, Water Resour.
Res., 38, 20-1–20-7, https://doi.org/10.1029/2001WR000232, 2002.
Furrer, E. M. and Katz, R. W.: Improving the simulation of extreme
precipitation events by stochastic weather generators, Water Resour. Res.,
44, W12439, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008WR007316, 2008.
Gilleland, E. and Katz, R. W.: extRemes 2.0: An Extreme Value Analysis
Package in R, J. Stat. Softw., 72, 1–39, https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v072.i08, 2016.
Gilroy, K. L. and McCuen, R. H.: A nonstationary flood frequency analysis
method to adjust for future climate change and urbanization, J. Hydrol.,
414–415, 40–48, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.10.009, 2012.
Gupta, H. V., Kling, H., Yilmaz, K. K., and Martinez, G. F.: Decomposition of
the mean squared error and NSE performance criteria: Implications for
improving hydrological modelling, J. Hydrol., 377, 80–91,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.08.003, 2009.
Gupta, V. K.: Transposition of Storms for Estimating Flood Probability
Distributions, Colo. State Univ. Hydrol. Pap., 59, 35, 1972.
Haberlandt, U., Ebner von Eschenbach, A.-D., and Buchwald, I.: A space-time
hybrid hourly rainfall model for derived flood frequency analysis, Hydrol.
Earth Syst. Sci., 12, 1353–1367, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-12-1353-2008, 2008.
Harlin, J. and Kung, C.-S.: Parameter uncertainty and simulation of design
floods in Sweden, J. Hydrol., 137, 209–230, 1992.
Hirsch, R. M. and Ryberg, K. R.: Has the magnitude of floods across the USA
changed with global CO2 levels?, Hydrolog. Sci. J., 57, 1–9,
https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2011.621895, 2012.
Hyndman, D. W.: Impacts of Projected Changes in Climate on Hydrology, in:
Global Environmental Change, edited by: Freedman, B., 211–220, Springer,
Dordrecht, the Netherlands, 2014.
IFC: Hydrologic Assessment of the Turkey River Watershed (DRAFT), Iowa Flood
Center, 100 C. Maxwell Stanley Hydraulics Laboratory Iowa City, Iowa 52242,
2014.
Interagency Advisory Committee on Water Data (IACWD): Guidelines for
Determining Flood Flow Frequency, Bulletin 17B, Reston, VA, 1982.
Jain, S. and Lall, U.: Magnitude and timing of annual maximum floods: Trends
and large-scale climatic associations for the Blacksmith Fork River, Utah,
Water Resour. Res., 36, 3641–3651, https://doi.org/10.1029/2000WR900183, 2000.
Kjeldsen, T. R.: The revitalised FSR/FEH rainfall-runoff method, NERC/Centre
for Ecology & Hydrology, Wallingford, UK, 2007.
Klemeš, V.: Operational testing of hydrological simulation models,
Hydrolog. Sci. J., 31, 13–24, https://doi.org/10.1080/02626668609491024, 1986.
Klemeš, V.: Tall tales about tails of hydrological distributions. I, J.
Hydrol. Eng., 5, 227–231, 2000a.
Klemeš, V.: Tall tales about tails of hydrological distributions. II, J.
Hydrol. Eng., 5, 232–239, 2000b.
Konrad, C. P. and Booth, D. B.: Hydrologic Trends Associated with Urban
Development for Selected Streams in the Puget Sound Basin, Western
Washington, Water-Resources Investigations Report, Series number: 2002-4040,
https://doi.org/10.3133/wri024040, 2002.
Lamb, R.: Calibration of a conceptual rainfall-runoff model for flood
frequency estimation by continuous simulation, Water Resour. Res., 35,
3103–3114, 1999.
Lamb, R., Faulkner, D., Wass, P., and Cameron, D.: Have applications of
continuous rainfall-runoff simulation realized the vision for process-based
flood frequency analysis?: Process-based Flood Frequency: Have Applications
Realized the Vision?, Hydrol. Process., 30, 2463–2481,
https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10882, 2016.
Li, J., Thyer, M., Lambert, M., Kuczera, G., and Metcalfe, A.: An efficient
causative event-based approach for deriving the annual flood frequency
distribution, J. Hydrol., 510, 412–423, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.12.035,
2014.
Lin, Y. and Mitchell, K. E.: 1.2 the NCEP stage II/IV hourly precipitation
analyses: Development and applications, in: 19th Conf. Hydrology, American
Meteorological Society, San Diego, CA, USA, 2005.
Lindström, G., Johansson, B., Persson, M., Gardelin, M., and
Bergström, S.: Development and test of the distributed HBV-96
hydrological model, J. Hydrol., 201, 272–288, 1997.
Linsley, R. K.: Flood Estimates: How Good Are They?, Water Resour. Res., 22,
159S–164S, https://doi.org/10.1029/WR022i09Sp0159S, 1986.
Luke, A., Vrugt Jasper, A., AghaKouchak, A., Matthew, R., and Sanders, B. F.:
Predicting nonstationary flood frequencies: Evidence supports an updated
stationarity thesis in the United States, Water Resour. Res., 53, 5469–5494,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2016WR019676, 2017.
Machado, M. J., Botero, B. A., López, J., Francés, F.,
Díez-Herrero, A., and Benito, G.: Flood frequency analysis of historical
flood data under stationary and non-stationary modelling, Hydrol. Earth Syst.
Sci., 19, 2561–2576, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-2561-2015, 2015.
Mann, H. B.: Nonparametric tests against trend, Econometrica, 13, 245–259,
1945.
Milly, P. C. D., Betancourt, J., Falkenmark, M., Hirsch, R. M., Kundzewicz,
Z. W., Lettenmaier, D. P., and Stouffer, R. J.: Stationarity Is Dead: Whither
Water Management?, Science, 319, 573–574, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1151915, 2008.
Nathan, R., Jordan, P., Scorah, M., Lang, S., Kuczera, G., Schaefer, M., and
Weinmann, E.: Estimating the exceedance probability of extreme rainfalls up
to the probable maximum precipitation, J. Hydrol., 543, 706–720,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.10.044, 2016.
Niemeyer, R. J., Link, T. E., Heinse, R., and Seyfried, M. S.: Climate
moderates potential shifts in streamflow from changes in pinyon-juniper
woodland cover across the western U.S., Hydrol. Process., 31, 3489–3503,
https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.11264, 2017.
Ntelekos, A. A., Oppenheimer, M., Smith, J. A., and Miller, A. J.:
Urbanization, climate change and flood policy in the United States, Climatic
Change, 103, 597–616, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-009-9789-6, 2010.
Osuch, M., Romanowicz, R. J., and Booij, M. J.: The influence of parametric
uncertainty on the relationships between HBV model parameters and climatic
characteristics, Hydrolog. Sci. J., 60, 1299–1316,
https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2014.967694, 2015.
Ouarda, T. B. M. J., Cunderlik, J. M., St-Hilaire, A., Barbet, M., Bruneau,
P., and Bobée, B.: Data-based comparison of seasonality-based regional
flood frequency methods, J. Hydrol., 330, 329–339,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.03.023, 2006.
Park, D. and Markus, M.: Analysis of a changing hydrologic flood regime using
the Variable Infiltration Capacity model, J. Hydrol., 515, 267–280,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.05.004, 2014.
Peleg, N., Blumensaat, F., Molnar, P., Fatichi, S., and Burlando, P.:
Partitioning the impacts of spatial and climatological rainfall variability
in urban drainage modeling, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 1559–1572,
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-1559-2017, 2017.
Potter, K. W.: Evidence for nonstationarity as a physical explanation of the
Hurst Phenomenon, Water Resour. Res., 12, 1047–1052,
https://doi.org/10.1029/WR012i005p01047, 1976.
Press, W. H. (Ed.): FORTRAN numerical recipes, 2nd Edn., Cambridge University
Press, Cambridge, New York, 1996.
Prosdocimi, I., Kjeldsen, T. R., and Miller, J. D.: Detection and attribution
of urbanization effect on flood extremes using nonstationary flood-frequency
models, Water Resour. Res., 51, 4244–4262, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR017065, 2015.
Rashid, M. M., Beecham, S., and Chowdhury, R. K.: Simulation of extreme
rainfall and projection of future changes using the GLIMCLIM model, Theor.
Appl. Climatol., 130, 453–466, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-016-1892-9, 2017.
Rogger, M., Kohl, B., Pirkl, H., Viglione, A., Komma, J., Kirnbauer, R.,
Merz, R., and Blöschl, G.: Runoff models and flood frequency statistics
for design flood estimation in Austria – Do they tell a consistent story?,
J. Hydrol., 456–457, 30–43, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.05.068, 2012.
Schilling, K. E. and Libra, R. D.: INCREASED BASEFLOW IN IOWA OVER THE SECOND
HALF OF THE 20TH CENTURY, J. Am. Water Resour. As., 39, 851–860,
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2003.tb04410.x, 2003.
Schilling, K. E., Gassman, P. W., Kling, C. L., Campbell, T., Jha, M. K.,
Wolter, C. F., and Arnold, J. G.: The potential for agricultural land use
change to reduce flood risk in a large watershed, Hydrol. Process., 28,
3314–3325, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.9865, 2014.
Seibert, J.: Multi-criteria calibration of a conceptual runoff model using a
genetic algorithm, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 4, 215–224,
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-4-215-2000, 2000.
Seibert, J.: Reliability of model predictions outside calibration conditions,
Hydrol. Res., 34, 477–492, 2003.
Seibert, J. and Vis, M. J. P.: Teaching hydrological modeling with a
user-friendly catchment-runoff-model software package, Hydrol. Earth Syst.
Sci., 16, 3315–3325, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-3315-2012, 2012.
Sen, P. K.: Estimates of the Regression Coefficient Based on Kendall's Tau,
J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 63, 1379, https://doi.org/10.2307/2285891, 1968.
Serago, J. M. and Vogel, R. M.: Parsimonious nonstationary flood frequency
analysis, Adv. Water Resour., 112, 1–16,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2017.11.026, 2018.
Sivapalan, M. and Samuel, J. M.: Transcending limitations of stationarity and
the return period: process-based approach to flood estimation and risk
assessment, Hydrol. Process., 23, 1671–1675, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7292, 2009.
Smith, J. A., Villarini, G., and Baeck, M. L.: Mixture Distributions and the
Hydroclimatology of Extreme Rainfall and Flooding in the Eastern United
States, J. Hydrometeorol., 12, 294–309, https://doi.org/10.1175/2010JHM1242.1, 2011.
Smith, J. A., Baeck, M. L., Villarini, G., Wright, D. B., and Krajewski, W.:
Extreme Flood Response: The June 2008 Flooding in Iowa, J. Hydrometeorol.,
14, 1810–1825, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-12-0191.1, 2013.
Stedinger, J. R. and Griffis, V. W.: Getting from here to where? Flood
frequency analysis and climate, J. Am. Water Resour. As., 47, 506–513, 2011.
Svensson, C. and Jones, D. A.: Review of methods for deriving areal reduction
factors: Review of ARF methods, J. Flood Risk Manag., 3, 232–245,
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-318X.2010.01075.x, 2010.
Viglione, A. and Blöschl, G.: On the role of storm duration in the
mapping of rainfall to flood return periods, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 13,
205–216, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-13-205-2009, 2009.
Viglione, A., Merz, R., and Blöschl, G.: On the role of the runoff
coefficient in the mapping of rainfall to flood return periods, Hydrol. Earth
Syst. Sci., 13, 577–593, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-13-577-2009, 2009.
Viglione, A., Chirico, G. B., Woods, R., and Blöschl, G.: Generalised
synthesis of space–time variability in flood response: An analytical
framework, J. Hydrol., 394, 198–212, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.05.047,
2010a.
Viglione, A., Chirico, G. B., Komma, J., Woods, R., Borga, M., and
Blöschl, G.: Quantifying space-time dynamics of flood event types, J.
Hydrol., 394, 213–229, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.05.041, 2010b.
Villarini, G., Serinaldi, F., Smith, J. A., and Krajewski, W. F.: On the
stationarity of annual flood peaks in the continental United States during
the 20th century, Water Resour. Res., 45, W08417, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008WR007645,
2009.
Villarini, G., Smith, J. A., Baeck, M. L., and Krajewski, W. F.: Examining
Flood Frequency Distributions in the Midwest U.S.1, J. Am. Water Resour.
As., 47, 447–463, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2011.00540.x, 2011.
Vis, M., Knight, R., Pool, S., Wolfe, W., and Seibert, J.: Model Calibration
Criteria for Estimating Ecological Flow Characteristics, Water, 7,
2358–2381, https://doi.org/10.3390/w7052358, 2015.
Wilson, L. L. and Foufoula-Georgiou, E.: Regional rainfall frequency analysis
via stochastic storm transposition, J. Hydraul. Eng., 116, 859–880, 1990.
Wright, D. B., Smith, J. A., Villarini, G., and Baeck, M. L.: Estimating the
frequency of extreme rainfall using weather radar and stochastic storm
transposition, J. Hydrol., 488, 150–165, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.03.003,
2013.
Wright, D. B., Smith, J. A., and Baeck, M. L.: Critical examination of area
reduction factors, J. Hydrol. Eng., 19, 769–776, 2014a.
Wright, D. B., Smith, J. A., and Baeck, M. L.: Flood frequency analysis using
radar rainfall fields and stochastic storm transposition, Water Resour. Res.,
50, 1592–1615, https://doi.org/10.1002/2013WR014224, 2014b.
Wright, D. B., Mantilla, R., and Peters-Lidard, C. D.: A remote sensing-based
tool for assessing rainfall-driven hazards, Environ. Modell. Softw., 90,
34–54, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.12.006, 2017.
Zhu, Z., Wright, D. B., and Yu, G.: The Impact of Rainfall Space-Time
Structure in Flood Frequency Analysis, Water Resour. Res., 54, 8983–8998,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2018WR023550, 2018.
Short summary
The relationship between flood severity and probability is a key component of flood risk management, and depends on factors including rainfall, soil wetness, and watershed properties. In this study, we combine radar rainfall data and flood simulations to better understand how these factors
shapeflood frequency. We apply our method to an agricultural watershed in the Midwestern US where the flood properties are changing. Conventional methods will fail to account for these changes.
The relationship between flood severity and probability is a key component of flood risk...
