Articles | Volume 23, issue 11
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-4783-2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-4783-2019
Research article
 | 
25 Nov 2019
Research article |  | 25 Nov 2019

A virtual hydrological framework for evaluation of stochastic rainfall models

Bree Bennett, Mark Thyer, Michael Leonard, Martin Lambert, and Bryson Bates

Related authors

Flexible forecast value metric suitable for a wide range of decisions: application using probabilistic subseasonal streamflow forecasts
Richard Laugesen, Mark Thyer, David McInerney, and Dmitri Kavetski
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 873–893, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-873-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-873-2023, 2023
Short summary
Seamless streamflow forecasting at daily to monthly scales: MuTHRE lets you have your cake and eat it too
David McInerney, Mark Thyer, Dmitri Kavetski, Richard Laugesen, Fitsum Woldemeskel, Narendra Tuteja, and George Kuczera
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 5669–5683, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5669-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5669-2022, 2022
Short summary
Estimating the probability of compound floods in estuarine regions
Wenyan Wu, Seth Westra, and Michael Leonard
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 2821–2841, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-2821-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-2821-2021, 2021
Short summary
Historical and future changes in global flood magnitude – evidence from a model–observation investigation
Hong Xuan Do, Fang Zhao, Seth Westra, Michael Leonard, Lukas Gudmundsson, Julien Eric Stanislas Boulange, Jinfeng Chang, Philippe Ciais, Dieter Gerten, Simon N. Gosling, Hannes Müller Schmied, Tobias Stacke, Camelia-Eliza Telteu, and Yoshihide Wada
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 1543–1564, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-1543-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-1543-2020, 2020
Short summary
Spatially dependent flood probabilities to support the design of civil infrastructure systems
Phuong Dong Le, Michael Leonard, and Seth Westra
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 4851–4867, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-4851-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-4851-2019, 2019
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Catchment hydrology | Techniques and Approaches: Modelling approaches
Technical note: How physically based is hydrograph separation by recursive digital filtering?
Klaus Eckhardt
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 495–499, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-495-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-495-2023, 2023
Short summary
A comprehensive open-source course for teaching applied hydrological modelling in Central Asia
Beatrice Sabine Marti, Aidar Zhumabaev, and Tobias Siegfried
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 319–330, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-319-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-319-2023, 2023
Short summary
Impact of distributed meteorological forcing on simulated snow cover and hydrological fluxes over a mid-elevation alpine micro-scale catchment
Aniket Gupta, Alix Reverdy, Jean-Martial Cohard, Basile Hector, Marc Descloitres, Jean-Pierre Vandervaere, Catherine Coulaud, Romain Biron, Lucie Liger, Reed Maxwell, Jean-Gabriel Valay, and Didier Voisin
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 191–212, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-191-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-191-2023, 2023
Short summary
Technical note: Extending the SWAT model to transport chemicals through tile and groundwater flow
Hendrik Rathjens, Jens Kiesel, Michael Winchell, Jeffrey Arnold, and Robin Sur
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 159–167, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-159-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-159-2023, 2023
Short summary
Long-term reconstruction of satellite-based precipitation, soil moisture, and snow water equivalent in China
Wencong Yang, Hanbo Yang, Changming Li, Taihua Wang, Ziwei Liu, Qingfang Hu, and Dawen Yang
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 6427–6441, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-6427-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-6427-2022, 2022
Short summary

Cited articles

Andreassian, V., Perrin, C., Michel, C., Usart-Sanchez, I., and Lavabre, J.: Impact of imperfect rainfall knowledge on the efficiency and the parameters of watershed models, J. Hydrol., 250, 206–223, 2001. 
Ang, A. and Tang, W.: Probability Concepts in Engineering: Emphasis on Applications to Civil and Environmental Engineering (2nd Edition), John Wiley & Sons Inc, Hoboken, New Jersey, USA, ISBN 10 0-471-72064-X, 2007. 
Ball, J. E.: The influence of storm temporal patterns on catchment response, J. Hydrol., 158, 285–303, 1994. 
Baxevani, A. and Lennartsson, J.: A spatiotemporal precipitation generator based on a censored latent Gaussian field, Water Resour. Res., 51, 4338–4358, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014WR016455, 2015. 
Bennett, B., Thyer, M., Leonard, M., Lambert, M., and Bates, B.: A comprehensive and systematic evaluation framework for a parsimonious daily rainfall field model, J. Hydrol., 556, 1123–1138, 2018. 
Download
Short summary
A new stochastic rainfall model evaluation framework is introduced, with three key features: (1) streamflow-based, to directly evaluate modelled streamflow performance, (2) virtual, to avoid confounding errors in hydrological models or data, and (3) targeted, to isolate errors according to specific sites/months. The framework identified the importance of rainfall in the wetting-up months for providing reliable predictions of streamflow over the entire year despite their low flow volumes.