Articles | Volume 23, issue 12
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-5033-2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-5033-2019
Research article
 | 
13 Dec 2019
Research article |  | 13 Dec 2019

Ability of a soil–vegetation–atmosphere transfer model and a two-source energy balance model to predict evapotranspiration for several crops and climate conditions

Guillaume Bigeard, Benoit Coudert, Jonas Chirouze, Salah Er-Raki, Gilles Boulet, Eric Ceschia, and Lionel Jarlan

Download

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
ED: Reconsider after major revisions (further review by editor and referees) (21 Jun 2019) by Nunzio Romano
AR by B. Coudert on behalf of the Authors (10 Jul 2019)  Author's response    Manuscript
ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (13 Jul 2019) by Nunzio Romano
RR by Anonymous Referee #2 (06 Aug 2019)
RR by Anonymous Referee #1 (19 Aug 2019)
ED: Publish subject to minor revisions (review by editor) (26 Aug 2019) by Nunzio Romano
AR by B. Coudert on behalf of the Authors (09 Sep 2019)  Author's response    Manuscript
ED: Publish as is (22 Sep 2019) by Nunzio Romano
Download
Short summary
The purpose of our work is to estimate landscape evapotranspiration (ET) fluxes over agricultural areas by relying on two surface modeling approaches with increasing complexity and input data needs. Both approaches, compared sequentially and over the entire crop cycle, showed quite similar performance except under developed vegetation and stressed conditions. This study helps lay the groundwork for exploring the complementarities between instantaneous and continuous ET mapping with TIR data.