Dear Authors,

We have received two constructive reviews for this manuscript. Both reviewers were quite supportive and provided helpful suggestions for improving the manuscript. The suggestions focus on some key issues such as making the methodology more explicit and reproducible, the choice of indicators, and clarifying the real-world applicability of the method.
I find that your proposed changes are sensible and would like to invite you to submit a revised manuscript which will be sent back to the two reviewers for re-review.

Sincerely,
Louise Slater

Dear Authors,

We have received one re-review from Reviewer 1, and the second reviewer declined to re-review, but was mostly positive about the manuscript in their earlier review. Reviewer 1 finds that most of their comments have been well addressed and suggests a minor technical correction.

In their earlier review, Reviewer 2 made a number of suggestions, including clarification of the methodology. I find the proposed changes in the revised manuscript address these comments well; the terminology is more consistent and the model approach is easier to understand than before.

Therefore, on the basis of these two reviews and my own reading of the revised manuscript, I am happy to recommend publication of this interesting work.

Sincerely,
Louise Slater