Articles | Volume 24, issue 6
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-2921-2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-2921-2020
Research article
 | Highlight paper
 | 
03 Jun 2020
Research article | Highlight paper |  | 03 Jun 2020

Comparing Palmer Drought Severity Index drought assessments using the traditional offline approach with direct climate model outputs

Yuting Yang, Shulei Zhang, Michael L. Roderick, Tim R. McVicar, Dawen Yang, Wenbin Liu, and Xiaoyan Li

Viewed

Total article views: 7,323 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
5,970 1,281 72 7,323 374 76 93
  • HTML: 5,970
  • PDF: 1,281
  • XML: 72
  • Total: 7,323
  • Supplement: 374
  • BibTeX: 76
  • EndNote: 93
Views and downloads (calculated since 03 Feb 2020)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 03 Feb 2020)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 7,323 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 6,525 with geography defined and 798 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 18 Mar 2024
Download
Short summary
Many previous studies using offline drought indices report that future warming will increase worldwide drought. However, this contradicts observations/projections of vegetation greening and increased runoff. We resolved this paradox by re-calculating the same drought indices using direct climate model outputs and find no increase in future drought as the climate warms. We also find that accounting for the impact of CO2 on plant transpiration avoids the previous overestimation of drought.